Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D10-0024
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/29/2010 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 07/29/2010 | RONALD BROWN | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | Not a COT owned or operated property |
| 07/30/2010 | MARTIN BROWN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Denied | Please provide information regarding location of proposed and existing fire hydrants. |
| 08/02/2010 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 08/06/2010 | ELIZABETH LEIBOLD | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: August 6, 2010 TO: RICK Engineering, Bruce Paton, P.E. REVIEWER: Elizabeth Leibold, PE SUBJECT: Nordies Rack Development Package Engineering Review ADDRESS: 4302 N Oracle Rd, Home Depot Retail Center lot 9 LOCATION: T13S R13E Sec24 REZONING CASE: C9-82-48 FLOODPLAIN STATUS: X-unshaded zone, 1636K CASE NUMBER: D10-0024, T10BU01213 SUMMARY: A development package was submitted in lieu of an otherwise required development plan for the proposed Nordies Rack Home Depot Retail Center Lot 9 improvements. Engineering Division of Planning & Development Services Department has received and reviewed the Development Package including plan sheets, Drainage Statement (RICK Engineering Co, Bruce Paton, P.E. 7/23/10), and SWPPP (RICK Engineering Co, Bruce Paton, P.E. 7/23/10). All comments reflect Development Plan, Grading Plan, and SWPPP review. Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the Development Package until the following comments are addressed. MASTER COVER SHEETS/ GENERAL NOTES: 1) DS Sec.2-01.3.3: Relevant case numbers (D10-0024, T10BU01213) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 2) DS Sec.2-01.3.7: Address the following Development Package general note comments: a) DS Sec.2-01.3: As a general comment, please update all locations of Development Services Department with "Planning & Development services Department". b) DS Sec.11-01.16: After grading note 28, add additional grading note that states that: There will be a required letter stating the drainage facilities were constructed to meet City of Tucson drainage requirements and were constructed per the approved plans and drainage report(s). c) DS Sec.2-01.3.8.E: Add general note that clarifies whether the elevation datum on the grading plan is the same as the drainage report. BASE LAYER SHEET / SITE PLAN COMMENTS: 3) DS Sec.2-01.3.8.A: Assure lot boundary bearing and distances are correctly labeled for the perimeter of the lot 9 per plat, and label as Recorded, and if there is additional data label as Measured or Calculated. 4) DS Sec.2-01.3.8.B & D: All easements shall be drawn on the plan, including those indicated on plat for this lot. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement shall occur prior to approval of plan unless written permission from easement holder(s) is provided. 5) Detail G on sheet 9 needs clarification that the interior minimum dimension between side bollards is 10-ft, and 10-ft between rear bollards and front door frames. SIGNING & STRIPING SHEET COMMENT: 6) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.G: Provide traffic control diagram sheet within grading plan sheets that clarifies construction access and staging areas. Show temporary signage and traffic controls. DRAINAGE REPORT COMMENTS: 7) DS Sec.10-03.3.1.A.5, DS Sec.10-01.2.2: Address the following geotechnical-related drainage comments: a) DS Sec.10-02.14.6: Submit geotechnical report. Assure 30-ft boring evaluation for collapsible soils is included in drainage report discussion for building setbacks from basins. b) On drainage Figure 1 exhibit, dimension minimum building setbacks from basins to building per geotechnical recommendations. 8) DS Sec.10-02.14.2.5: Provide gal/min rate of pump for truck well at north side of building 12. Discuss in drainage report that the truck wells shall not hold stormwater for more than 4-hrs. 9) DS Sec10.02.13.4, Tucson Code 11-58, 26.10.C: Relocate inlet for basin 11 or adjust location of on-site sanitary waste disposal system to avoid contamination into basin; redesign detail P on sheet 10 and update sheets 7, 15, 18, to direct basin 11 inflow so that stormwater runoff is not flowing through the trash enclosure. LANDSCAPE PLAN COMMENTS: 10) DS Sec.3-01.5.1.A.1: Regarding landscape sheets address the following comment: a) Add a landscape note to the landscape plans sheets 15/16 that states that any existing trees or planted trees within the existing/remaining and proposed SVT's shall be checked and trimmed to assure that they are clear of leaves and branches to a height of at least six feet above grade. The location of trees within existing and future sight visibility triangles may be restricted or modified as determined by the City of Tucson Inspectors in order to preserve visibility. GRADING, PAVING, UTILITIES PLAN / DETAIL SHEET COMMENTS: 11) DS Sec.2-01.3.8.M: Address the following grading related comments: a) Label / clarify barrier between truck well retaining wall and PAAL at north side of building 12. b) Assure setbacks for buildings from basins match minimum setback geotechnical recommendations. c) Provide a local vertical benchmark on site, or at minimum on the Home Depot site, with elevation and provide datum. STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN COMMENTS: 12) Tucson Code Chap.26 Art.2: The Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) does not meet the minimum requirements of the AzPDES Construction General Permit (CGP). Revise the SWPPP according to the following comments: a) Address the following general SWPPP comments: i) For inspection purposes, please fill out the enclosed City of Tucson's "AZPDES - Posting Requirements" green sheet, and post it or the NOI at construction entrance of the site at beginning of construction activities and maintain this posted document throughout project construction. ii) Show, label, and provide leader line for the receiving waters either on location map on cover sheet, on vicinity map on exhibit, or on other planview. iii) Tucson Code Sec.26 Article 2: Provide registrant seals for SWPP report and exhibit(s) per COT Stormwater Ordinance. b) Address the following comments for the SWPPP Report: i) All Operators shall be identified and have separate certification statements. For the Owner/Operator Certification Statements, provide name and signature for the Operators with each certification statement. ii) The Operator Certification Statement should have a statement with name & signature that they act as Operator and that they have operational control over the construction plans and specifications, including the ability to make modifications to those plans and specifications (e.g., owner or developer of project), or that they have day-to-day operational control of those project activities that are necessary to ensure compliance with a stormwater pollution prevention plan for the site or other grading permit conditions. iii) At minimum, one Operator, either the project manager or owner as listed on the bottom of the second page of the NOI shall sign one of the Operator certifications. Please note that the remaining signatures from the Operators must be on the SWPPP on the site copy of the SWPPP (exhibit or report) at or before commencement of construction. (Part IV.C.1) iv) Provide list of contractors and subcontractors to be filled out at commencement of grading construction activity and to be updated on site and kept with the SWPP. Indicate in the SWPPP the name(s) of the party(ies) with day-to-day operational control of those activities necessary to ensure compliance with the SWPPP or other permit conditions. Provide a table for recording the names and responsibilities for each party responsible for activities necessary to ensure compliance with the SWPPP or other permit conditions. (Part IV.B.1.d) v) Provide sequential list of grading construction activities for this project. The sequence of major activities should state whether establishment of erosion and stormwater controls are to occur prior to clearing and rough grading of this site. vi) Identify and provide a list of potential pollutant sources from this project. vii) Provide copy of completely filled-out NOI that has been sent to ADEQ. See the weblink: http://www.azdeq.gov/environ/water/permits/download/constnoi.pdf viii) Provide a copy of the form for the NOT. See the weblink: http://www.azdeq.gov/environ/water/permits/download/constnot.pdf c) Address the following comments for the SWPPP exhibit sheets: i) Depict /clarify all specific interim erosion/stormwater control measures and locations of all stabilization practices on planview, including control measures needed along downstream disturbance limits, specific interim erosion control devices at basin outlets, and other controls as necessary for this project. ii) Label Rillito river on location map on SWPPP exhibit. iii) Regarding general notes on the SWPPP cover sheet: (1) Add or clarify note on SWPP plan cover sheet that the Operator shall report to ADEQ any noncompliance (including spills) which may endanger human health or the environment. The Operator shall orally notify the office listed below within 24 hours: (a) Arizona Department of Environmental Quality 1110 W. Washington, 5th floor (5515B-1) Phoenix, AZ 85007 Office: 602-771-4466; Fax 602-771-4505 13) For resubmittal package, provide 2 copies of revised SWPPP exhibit, report, copy of NOI, NOT, with general permit. SOILS/GEOTECHNICAL REPORT COMMENT: 14) DS Sec.2-01.4.2.A, DS Sec.10-02.14.6: In grading notes a Western Tech geotechnical report is referenced; please submit with resubmittal, assuring 30-ft boring evaluation for collapsible soils is included. Please provide a revised Development Package plan sheets, revised Drainage Report, Geotechnical Report, revised SWPPP and a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments. If you have questions, call me at 837-4934. Elizabeth Leibold, P.E., CPM, CFM Civil Engineer Engineering Division Planning & Development Services Department |
| 08/09/2010 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | This e-mail constitutes approval of the Development Plan Package submitted July 29, 2010, for the Oracle Wetmore Corner Retail Center, Lot 9, located at the southeast corner of the Oracle Road/Wetmore Road intersection. Maria Deal Southern Regional Traffic Engineering ADOT 1221 S. 2nd Ave. Tucson, AZ 85713 ________________________________ Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Notice: This email transmission and any attachments are intended for use by the person(s)/entity(ies) named above and may contain confidential/privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by email, and delete or destroy all copies plus attachments. . |
| 08/09/2010 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | COT NON-DSD | TUCSON POLICE DEPARTMENT | Approved | >>> Rebecca Noel 08/09/2010 10:23 AM >>> I have no issues with this request. CSO Becky Noel #37968 Tucson Police Dept 837-7428 |
| 08/11/2010 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | August 10, 2010 To: THOMAS SAYLER-BROWN SBBL ARCHITECTURE & PLANNING Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ____________________________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6719), Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department Subject: CORNER RETAIL, LOT 9 Dev. Plan – 1st Submittal D10-0024 The Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department (PCRWRD) has reviewed the proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project. The following comments are offered for your use: Obtain a letter from the PCRWRD’s Development Liaison Unit, written within the past year, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for the project is available in the downstream public sewerage system and provide a copy of that letter to this office. The required form to request such a letter may be found at: http://www.pima.gov/wwm/developer.htm#permits The development plan for this project cannot be approved until a copy of this letter has been received by this office. The development plan submitted is significantly deficient. Refer to Pima County Development Services “Development Plan Review, Checklist Requirements” section J. WASTEWATER, for submittal requirements. The checklist is available at; http://www.pimaxpress.com/SubDivision/Documents/DevPlanReq.pdf This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the development plan. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the second(2nd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $50.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. This comment letter has been reviewed and accepted for substantial conformance to Pima County Code Title 13 by: ___________________________ Chad Amateau, P.E., Civil Engineer PCRWRD, Planning Services Section, Development Liaison Unit cc: Chad Amateau, PE Kristin Borer, PE, DLU Manager DLU Project folder |
| 08/11/2010 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D10-0024 Oracle Wetmore Retail Center () Tentative Plat (X) Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other - Elevations CROSS REFERENCE: Annexation (Ordinance 5651) NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: North Stone Neighborhood Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: Yes, (Gateway) COMMENTS DUE BY: August 26, 2010 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an FLD, No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies (X) Resubmittal Required - See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: (*) Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat (X) Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: msp 791-5505 DATE: 8/04/10 Planning and Development Services Community Planning Section D10-0024 Oracle Wetmore Retail Center August 4, 2010 Staff offers the following comments: 1. Please revise development plan, sheet 10, wall detail (Typical Wall Opening Cross-Section "O"), to be in compliance with Special Exception SE-03-06, Condition #30. |
| 08/18/2010 | FRODRIG2 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | Due Date Case Number Project Address August 26, 2010 D10-0024 ORACLE WETMORE RETAIL CENTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN Comments: The proposed Development Plan for the Oracle Wetmore Retail Center, Case No. D10-0024, Located from 4306 N. through 4370 N. Oracle Road, meets the minimum requirements for the Environmental Services, Solid Waste Disposal Standard 6-01.0 and is here Approved, subject to the following details to be incorporated on the approved Development Plan. All containers shown on the Development Plan must be labeled for the intended us being Solid Waste or Recycle materials The gates for the container enclosures must be shown, installed and mounted attached to the end on the CMU screen wall as show on Solid Waste Standards. The detail of the container enclosures must clearly show that the minimum inside dimension between the bollards shall be a 10’- 0”. As shown on the Solid Waste Standards. Environmental Services Department Development Plan Review Reviewer: Tony Teran Office Phone (520) 837-3706 E-mail: Tony.Teran @tucsonaz.gov |
| 08/18/2010 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Please provide a marked crossing from the S.W. corner of proposed building 12 to the existing building 4. 2. Details of the ramps at the marked crossing from building 11 to building 12 are referenced as detail 4/9. This detail does not exist, please clarify. 3. At detail 2/4: a. This is not a representative detail for the curb ramp as designed for the West side of the marked crossing from building 10 to building 9. Please provide detail of actual designed ramp shown on sheet 3 and comply with ICC (ANSI 117.1), Section 406 and 406.12 for detectable warnings. b. Delete all references to ADOT 705.5 and COT detail 207. These do not apply for this project. Use 2006 IBC, Chapter 11 and ICC (ANSI 117.1), Section 406. 4. At detail nos. L/9 and K/9: a. Delete all reference to ADAAG section 2.29.5 and COT SD 207. These are not applicable for this project. Use 2006 IBC, Chapter 11 and ICC (ANSI 117.1), Section 406. b. Please finish the dimensioning of the proposed "Van Accessible" parking space and note accordingly. END OF REVIEW |
| 08/18/2010 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 08/18/2010 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Oracle Wetmore Retail Center Development Package (1st Review) D10-0024 TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 18, 2010 DUE DATE: August 19, 2010 DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development package. If, at the end of that time, the development package has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is July 28, 2011. 2. This development package was reviewed for compliance with the City of Tucson Development Standards (D.S.) and Land Use Code (LUC) for full code compliance. 3. D.S. 2-01.3.2.D Provide the administrative street address adjacent to the title block. 4. D.S. 2-01.3.3 Provide the Development Package Number D10-0024 adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 5. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.a It does not appear that the vehicle parking calculation is correct. Based on the number of vehicle parking spaces provided, 575 for Home Depot & 1,169 for Shopping Center, The total number of vehicle parking spaces provided should be 1,744 not 1,758 as shown on the plan, please clarify. 6. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.d It does not appear that the bicycle parking calculation is correct. Based on 88 (42 Class 1 & 46 Class 2) "DISTRIBUTED THROUGHOUT SHOPPING CENTER" and a total provided of 108 there should be 20 bicycle parking spaces (12 Class 1 and 8 Class 2) shown on this revised plan. Zoning was only able to located 8 Class 1 on the revised plan, please clarify. 7. If applicable ensure all changes are made to the grading and landscape plans. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com Sshield1 on DS1/planning/New Development Package/ D10-0024 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan & Floor, Sign, Lighting and Elevation Rendering plans CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Oracle Wetmore Retail Center Development Package (1st Review) T10BU01213 TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 18, 2010 DUE DATE: August 19, 2010 GRADING PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning cannot approve the grading plan until the development package has been approved. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 08/19/2010 | JOHN WILLIAMS | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES August 19, 2010 Thomas Sayler-Brown SBBL Architecture + Planning 1001 N. Alvernon Way Tucson, Arizona 85711 Subject: D10-0024 Oracle Wetmore Retail Center Development Package Dear Thomas: Your submittal of July 29, 2010 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and 8 sets of the DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 8 Copies Revised Development Package (Fire, Engineering, Wastewater, Community Planning, Env Svcs, Zoning HC, Zoning, PDSD) 2 Copies Floor, Sign, Lighting & Elevation Plans (Zoning, PDSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Report (Engineering, PDSD) 2 Copies Revised Geotechnical Report (Engineering, PDSD) 2 Copies Revised SWPPP (Engineering, PDSD) 1 Check Made out to "Pima Country Treasurer" for $50.00 (Wastewater) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4917. Sincerely, John Williams Planning Technician All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd/ Via fax: (520) 620-0535 |