Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D08-0029
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/20/2008 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 06/04/2008 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | Revise the landscape and development plans to correspond with regard to the location of proposed paths, benches, water harvesting locations and drainage features. Differences were noted primarily in the area south of building 8. The paths shown on the landscape plan are to be considered in the grading and drainage design. |
| 06/10/2008 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Terry Stevens Lead Planner PROJECT: D08-0029 Villas at Tanque Verde Development Plan TRANSMITTAL: 06/10/2008 DUE DATE: 06/18/08 COMMENTS: 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is 05/20/09. 2. DS 2-05.2.2.B.2 This project has been assigned the case number D08-0029. List the case number in the lower right corner next to the title block of all plan sheets including the Landscape and NPPO sheets. 3. The Scenic Corridor Overlay has not been completed at this time. The development plan cannot be approved until the SCZ overlay has been completed and approved. The SCZ case number indicated in the lower right corner and in permitting notes #5 is incorrect. The correct case number is T08SA00191. Revise. Please add the following notes to the development plan. a) This development is subject to the review and approval of the special application for the Scenic Corridor Overlay. The Special application case number is T08SA00191.The special application has been reviewed and approved, approval date _________, without conditions. b) No grading beyond that is necessary for siting of buildings, drives, private yards, and structural improvements. All viable vegetation with a caliper of 4 inches or greater and all saguaro cacti will be preserved or relocated on the site per the Native Plant and Preservation Ordinance. c) Drainageways are to be maintained in their natural state. d) All new utilities for development on private property or public right-of-way along River Road will be underground. Trenching is permitted for the placement of utilities lines, if area is revegetated in accordance with Land Use Code Sec. 3.7.5.2.D e) Building or structure surfaces, which are visible from River Road will have colors, which are, predominate within the surrounding landscape. Colors are as follows: (list approved colors from T06SA00090 case). f) Fencing and freestanding walls facing River Road will meet material restrictions in Land Use Code Sec. 3.7.3, Screening Requirements. g) All disturbed areas on the site that are visible from River Road and are not covered by permanent improvements shall be revegetated with native plants, plants from the Drought Tolerant Plant List, or a combination of both. h) Exposed cut and fill slopes shall be no greater than 1-foot rise or fall over a 3-foot length. 4. This comment will remain as a reminder to the reviewer until docket and page are provided. There appears to be a proposed utility easement from the road through the center of the project. Identify the easement, provide width, recordation information, etc. The recordation information has not been provided. 5. The DDO package submittal and the notes on the plans are missing for building #2. I believe a DDO was applied for and granted for building #2 provide documentation. General note #23 is incorrect. The required perimeter yard setbacks are four times the height of the structure to all adjacent SR zoning. The street perimeter yard setback is based on the requirements of the SCZ Overlay, three times the overall height of the structure from the property line. Revise note. 6. DS 2-05.2.4.K Per DS 2-08.4.1.F Sidewalks may not be located between any motor vehicle parking spaces and the PAAL providing access to that space. The required parking spaces located within the garages will have the sidewalk located between them and the PAAL. A DSMR can be applied for and will be supported by zoning for the location of the sidewalk. If the DSMR is applied for and approved, provide on the plans the DSMR case number, what the DSMR is for, date of approval and any conditions of approval. List the DSMR case number in the lower right corner of all sheets. Special exception condition #9 requires one passive recreational facility. Clearly indicate the accessible pedestrian circulation path to the facility as well as the facility on the development plan. Clearly indicate the location of the required man gate for the fence at the sidewalk near the entrance to this project. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 837-4961 TLS C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D08-0029dp.doc 10 JUNE 2008 S08-0029/VILLAS AT TANQUE VERDE REVIEWED BY RON BROWN ACCESSIBLE REVIEW 2006 IBC/ICC 117.1 DENIED: SEE COMMENTS BELOW A. PROVIDE OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION ON COVER SHEET AS PER 2006 IBC, CHAPTER 3. B. DENOTE GOVERNING ACCESSIBILITY CODE; 2006 IBC/ICC 117.1 FOR PRIVATE PROPERTY, DENOTE RIGHT OF WAY ACCESSIBILITY STANDARDS; COT DOT STANDARDS FOR CURB RAMPS AT DRIVE WAY ENTRANCE FROM STREETS. C. THE CURB RAMPS AT MAIN DRIVE ENTRANCE FROM TANQUE VERDE ROAD ARE TO MEET R.O.W. DOT RAMP STANDARDS DS 207. PROVIDE LARGE SCALE DETAILS INCLUDING DETECTABLE WARNINGS. D. PROVIDE AND IDENTIFY ACCESSIBLE ROUTE THROUGHOUT SITE FROM ALL STRUCTURES TO PUBLIC R.O.W., PARKING FACILITIES, COMMON RECREATIONAL AREAS AND TO NEAREST PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION POINT AS PER 2066 IBC, SECTION 1104 AND ICC 117.1, SECTION 402. 1. PROVIDE SPOT GRADES THROUGHOUT ACCESSIBLE ROUTE TO SHOW SLOPE COMPLIANCE WITH ICC 117.1, SECTION 403.3 2. LOCATE NEAREST PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION DROP OFF POINT E. PROVIDE ONE MARKED CROSSING NEXT TO THE MOST WESTERLY PARKING SPACE CLOSEST TO THE MOST WESTERLY TRASH ENCLOSURE. PROVIDE ALL REQUIRED RAMPS, DETECTABLE WARNINGS AND MARKED CROSSINGS AS PER 2066 IBC/ICC 117.1, SECTION 406, 406.12 AND 705.5. F. DELETE ALL THE DETECTABLE WARNINGS (TRUNCATED DOMES) SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS EXCEPT THE ONES AT THE MAIN DRIVE ENTRANCE. G. PROVIDE 2 ADDITIONAL ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES, ONE IN FRONT OF BUILDING 7 AND ONE IN FRONT OF BUILDING 3. PROVIDE ALL ACCESS AISLES, RAMPS, AND SIGNAGE AS PER ICC 117.1, SECTION 502. H. IDENTIFY ONE OF THE ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES AS "VAN ACCESSIBLE" AS PER ICC 117.1, SECTION 502. I. PROVIDE ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGN, 7' ABOVE GRADE TO BOTTOM OF SIGN WITH "VAN ACCESSIBLE" SIGN INCLUDED. J. PROVIDE LARGE SCALE DETAIL OF ALL TYPES OF INTERIOR CURB AND SIDE WALK RAMPS SHOWING SIZES, DIMENSIONS, ALL SLOPES, DETECTABLE WARNINGS AS REQUIRED AND COMPLYING WITH 2006 IBC, SECTION 1010 AND ICC 117.1, SECTIONS 405 AND 406. K. THERE ARE TWO LOADING ZONES SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS. ARE THESE PASSENGER OR MATERIAL LOADING ZONES? PLEASE DENOTE WHICH. IF THEY ARE PASSENGER LOADING ZONES, THEY DO NOT MEET ACCESSIBLE LOADING ZONES AS PER ICC 117.1, SECTION 503. PROVIDE ONE 8X20 PARKING SPACE PLUS A 5X20 ACCESS AISLE, FOR A TOTAL WIDTH OF 13'. L. ANY FUTURE RECREATIONAL FACILITIES ADDED NEAR THE DETENTION BASIN SHALL NOT BE AT THE BOTTOM OF THE BASIN UNLESS PROPER ACCESSIBILITY RAMPS ARE ADDED FOR COMPLETE ACCESSIBILITY TO ALL RECREATIONAL ITEMS. END OF REVIEW |
| 06/11/2008 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | June 10, 2008 To: Rudolf Ing Dowl Engineers Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ___________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6579), representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environment Quality Subject: Villas at Tanque Verde Dev. Plan - 1st Submittal D08-029 The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. This project will be tributary to the Ina Road Wastewater Treatment Facility via the North Rillito Interceptor. Capacity will be available when G-70-030 is augmented per G-2008-032. Sheet 1: Add a Permitting Note that states: THE REQUIRED OFF-SITE PUBLIC SEWER LINE AND THE REQUIRED AUGMENTATION OF EXISTING PUBLIC SEWER LINE G-70-030 SHALL BE DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PIMA COUNTY REGIONAL WASTEWATER RECLAMATION DEPARTMENT’S SEWER DESIGN STANDARDS. The off-site public sewer and the augmentation will qualify this project for connection fee discounts and over sizing credits. We will send to your office via e-mail, a .pdf file containing a Sewer Service Agreement for the proposed number of wastewater fixture unit equivalents. Three originals will need to be printed out from this file for notarized signatures by the Owner of Record. The three signed originals of the Agreement must be returned to this office in order to satisfy the necessary requirements needed to approve the Mylars of the . The required off-site public sewer easement must be recorded before this development plan may be approved. This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the development plan. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the second (2nd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $100.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above-mentioned comments, please contact me. |
| 06/20/2008 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D06-0011 Villas at Tanque Verde 06/20/08 () Tentative Plat (XXXX) Development Plan (XXXX) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: C15-02-03 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: General Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: Tanque Verde COMMENTS DUE BY: 6/18/08 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions (XXXX) RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies NOTE: If proposed colors and elevations are consistent with SCZ conditions, staff has no objections. () See Additional Comments Attached () Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Other – REVIEWER: drcorral 791-4505 DATE: 6/16/08 |
| 07/01/2008 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Patricia Gehlen DATE: June 27, 2008 CDRC/Zoning Manager SUBJECT: Villas at Tanque Verde, 8668 Tanque Verde Rd. Development Plan D08-0029 (First Review) T13S, R15E, Section 33 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Development Plan and Drainage Report. The Development Plan (DP) and Drainage Report (DR) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Development Plan: 1. A detailed response letter to the comments must accompany the corrected copies of the DP. 2. Include a letter explaining any differences between the "old" DP (D06-0011) and the "new" DP (D08-0029) with the next submittal. 3. The following comments were not addressed under the old development number D06-0011. A review fee of $75.00 per hour will charged to the DP and DR unless a viable reason is given why the comments were not addressed. 4. If a CLOMR or LOMR is not being pursued, than the construction must abide by the FEMA regulations for projects in the floodplain. Per previous comment. 5. Show the limits of the 100-year floodplain and water surface elevation per D.S. 2-02.2.1.15. Per previous comment. 6. Change the Development plan number to D08-0029 on all sheets per D.S. 2-02.2.1.29. 7. A flood plain use permit will be required for this project, both for construction of the infrastructure and for construction of the buildings. Apply for the FUP in conjunction with the grading plan application and submittal. The FUP for the building will be issued separately. 8. Add a note to the DP stating that buildings 6 and 7 will require a flood plain ues permit and an elevation certificate issued by DSD Engineering Division. Drainage Report: 1. A detailed response letter to the comments must accompany the corrected copies of the DR. 2. Include a letter explaining any differences between the "old" DP (D06-0011) and the "new" DP (D08-0029) with the next submittal. 3. A Drainage report is required for any site greater than one acre in size or for any site subject to detention requirements…..per S.M.D.D.F.M., chap. II, 2.1.2. 4. The content and format of the Drainage Report should follow S.M.D.D.F.M., chap. II, 2.2. 5. Show the project address or administration address on the cover sheet of the DR. 6. If applicable, add the basin(s) maintenance responsibility note and checklist per S.M.D.D.F.M. 2.3.1.6 C 1 and 2 to the DR. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-4932 or Paul.Machado@tucsonaz.gov Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 837-4932 office (520) 879-8010 fax C:/8668 E. Tanque Verde Rd. DP |
| 07/03/2008 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES July 3, 2008 Rudolf A. Ing, P.E. DOWL Engineers 166 West Alameda Tucson, Arizona 85701 Subject: D08-0029 (formally D06-0011) Villas at Tanque Verde Development Plan Dear Rudy: Your submittal of May 21, 2008 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 5 Copies Revised Development Plan (Landscape, Zoning, Wastewater, Engineering, DSD) 4 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Landscape, Zoning, Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Report (Engineering, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 624-0384 dp-resubmittal |
| 07/03/2008 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ***REVISED*** July 9, 2008 Rudolf A. Ing, P.E. DOWL Engineers 166 West Alameda Tucson, Arizona 85701 Subject: D08-0029 (formally D06-0011) Villas at Tanque Verde Development Plan Dear Rudy: Your submittal of May 21, 2008 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 6 Copies Revised Development Plan (Landscape, Zoning, Wastewater, Engineering, ESD, DSD) 4 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Landscape, Zoning, Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Report (Engineering, DSD) Please see ESD comments under DS08-24 for comments. Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 624-0384 |