Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: CORE REVIEW
Permit Number - D08-0004
Review Name: CORE REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/24/2008 | FRODRIG2 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 02/07/2008 | CDRC1 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Approv-Cond | February 6, 2008 To: MICHAEL SCHOOLER GROMATZKY DUPREE & ASSOCIATES, SOUTHWEST, LLC Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ___________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6579), representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environment Quality Subject: TPC @ GATEWAY CENTER Dev. Plan - 1st Submittal D08-004 The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. All Sheets: Show the jurisdiction’s case number, D08-004, in or near the title block of each sheet. This case number should be shown larger and bolder than any associated cross-reference numbers. Sheet 1: If there is no new sewer proposed for this project then eliminate General Notes #5 and #9. Add the following General Note: THE ON-SITE SEWERS ARE EXISTING AND PRIVATE. NO NEW SEWERS ARE PROPOSED. Sheet 1: Revise General Note #14 to read as follows: THIS PROJECT WILL HAVE ______ EXISTING AND______ PROPOSED WASTEWATER FIXTURE UNIT EQUIVALENTS PER TABLE 13.20.045(E)(1) IN PIMA COUNTY CODE 13.20.045(E). And fill in the blanks with the appropriate values. Sheet 2: Show the public and private sewer lines using different line-types, so that they can readily be distinguished from each other. Also, show and describe examples of these different line types in the legend on Sheet 1. Sheet 2: Call out the existing public sewer in Rosewood with pipe size and construction plan#. Also show the sewer flow arrows for all sewer line on plan both public and private. Sheet 2: Indicate the IMS# for all public manholes shown on plan and include the rim and invert elevations. Sheet 2: Indicate the size of pipe for the private BCS shown for the existing building on site and include the slope and length of pipe. Subject to the above, the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality and Wastewater Management Department hereby approve the above referenced submittal of the development plan. The required revision(s) may be shown on the Mylars. Please note the following: Approval of the above referenced submittal does not authorize the construction of public or private sewer collection lines, or water distribution lines. Prior to the construction of such features, a Construction Authorization (Approval To Construct) may need to be obtained from the Pima County Environmental Quality. Also, air quality activity permits must be secured by the developer or prime contractor from the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality before constructing, operating or engaging in an activity which may cause or contribute to air pollution. If you have any questions regarding the above-mentioned comments, please contact me. |
| 02/08/2008 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Submit an updated landscape plan. Any change in design or land use requires a new review and approval process for the landscape plan. DS 2-07.2.0 No revised landscape plans were received. Provide a plan that incorporates the entire site. 2) Incorporate the improvements required for the River Park along the east side of the building on the landscape and development plans. Ord. 38760, Ex. 1. 3) The Development Plan includes 2 sheets labeled as 1 of 2. Please correct. 4) The landscape plans will be reviewed for conformance with the Gateway PAD and other applicable COT codes and standards. |
| 02/08/2008 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 02/15/2008 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR1193722 February 15, 2008 Triumph Builders Southwest, LLC Attn: Jim Callister 3450 S Broadmont Dr. #11 Tucson, AZ 85713 Dear Jim Callister : SUBJECT: TPC @ Gateway Center D08-0004 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted February 13, 2008 It appears that there are no conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, offsite and electrical load plans. Include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Ms. Mary Boice New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (DB-101) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-917-8732 Please call the area Designer Nancy DiMaria at (520) 918-8267, should you have any questions. Sincerely, Henrietta Noriega Office Specialist Design/Build hn Enclosures cc: City of Tucson, (Email only) N. DiMaria, Tucson Electric Power |
| 02/15/2008 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approv-Cond | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D08-0004 TPC @ GATEWAY CENTER /DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: February 15, 2008 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITION: 1.) CORRECT T15S, R14E TO T14S, R15E IN TITLE BLOCK AND LOCATION MAP ON MYLAR. NOTE: 1.) Submit a 24 x 36 Reverse Reading Double Matte Photo Mylar of approved Development Plan to City Planning. Signed and dated Mylar will be forwarded to Pima County Addressing prior to assignment of addresses. 2.) All addresses will need to be displayed per Pima County Address Standards at the time of final inspection. jg |
| 02/21/2008 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: TPC @ Gateway Center D08-0004 Development Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: February 21, 2008 DUE DATE: February 22, 2008 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1) Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is January 23, 2009. 2) D.S. 2-05.2.1.D.2 Label the Pantano Wash on the location map. 3) D.S. 2-05.2.1.F Provide a reduced-scale map of the PAD 3 District on the first sheet, indicating the location of this project within the PAD. 4) D.S. 2-05.2.2.B.2 List the D08-0004 development plan number in the lower right corner of the plan. 5) D.S. 2-05.2.4.B Label all existing zoning for the adjacent parcels, including across the adjacent right-of-way, on the plan. 6) D.S. 2-05.2.4.K For your information if wheel stops are used at the areas where the sidewalk is flush with asphalt, the truncated domes area only required at the accessible access aisle. 7) D.S. 2-05.2.4.O The loading space calculation lists the required loading space size as 12X25, per LUC Section 3.4.5.5 the required loading space size is 12X35. 8) D.S. 2-05.2.4.P On the provided accessible parking detail show the maximum allowed surface slopes, see, ICC/ANSI A117.1-2003 Sec. 502.5. Also the dimension for the location of the wheel stop is not shown correctly, see D.S. 3-05.0 Figure 5. 9) D.S. 2-05.2.4.P Based on the provided last approved development plan there are 220 vehicle parking spaces located at Lot 5, Block 3. Per this plan there are only 183 vehicle parking space on Lot 5, Block 3. Please explain the difference. 10) D.S. 2-05.2.4.P Provide a typical detail for a standard parking space. 11) D.S. 2-05.2.4.P For clarity please remove all items that are to be demolished, striping, curbing, etc. from the plan. 12) D.S. 2-05.2.4.W If applicable provide the location, type, size and height of existing and proposed freestanding signage and billboards. 13) Ensure that all changes to the development plan are reflected on the landscape plans. 14) Additional comments may be forth coming depending on how each comment has been addressed. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956. C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D08-0004dp.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan and additional requested documents. |
| 02/22/2008 | ANDY VERA | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Denied | 1. This development will be required to provide enclosures for the storage of both refuse and recycle dumpsters. Either two single enclosures or one double wide enclosure. 2. Current enclosure placement appears to require vehicle to back-up an excess of 40 ft. If so, a modification request of DS 6-01.4.1.C., will be required. Clarify. 3. Sheet 2, enlcosure detail - Position gate post to the face of CMU wall so does not encroach within clear area. Include dimensions for all bollards to identify proper spacing. Front side bollard must be minimum 2 ft to center of CMU face and rear side bollard 4 ft to center from front side bollard. Rear bollards 4 ft to center. Please provide corrections on resubmittal. If you have any questions you may contact Andy Vera at (520) 791-5543 ext 1212 or e-mail: Andy.Vera@tucsonaz.gov |
| 02/25/2008 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 02/26/2008 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Patricia Gehlen DATE: February 26, 2008 CDRC/Zoning Manager SUBJECT: TPC @ Gateway Center, 7333 E. Rosewood St. Development Plan D08-0004 (First Review) T14S, R15E, Section 08 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Development Plan and Drainage Report. The Development Plan (DP) and Drainage Statement (DR) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Development Plan: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DP. 2. Demonstrate how the new concrete dock will be drained, i.e.: sump pump ect. Drainage Statement: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DS. 2. A Drainage Statement is a brief description of drainage conditions applicable for a site which are not affected by 100 year flows of 100 cfs, of more……per S.M.D.D.F.M., chap. II, 2.1.2. The DS must be submitted along with the site plan and accepted with the approval of the grading plan. 3. The content and format of the Drainage Statement should follow S.M.D.D.F.M., chap. II, 2.2. 4. Show the project address or administration address on the cover sheet of the DS. 5. If applicable, add the basin(s) maintenance responsibility note and checklist per S.M.D.D.F.M. 2.3.1.6 C 1 and 2 to the DS. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-4932 or Paul.Machado@ci.tucsonaz.govs Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 837-4932 office (520) 879-8010 fax C:/7333 E. Rosewood St. CDRC.doc |
| 02/28/2008 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN | Denied | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D08-0004 TPC at Gateway Center 02/26/07 () Tentative Plat ( X ) Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment ( X ) Development Plan for Iceoplex Addition CROSS REFERENCE: NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Gateway Center PAD GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: COMMENTS DUE BY: February 22, 2008 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies with Plan Policies ( X ) See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: (X) Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan ( ) Other REVIEWER: JBeall 791-4505 DATE: 2/20/07 Comments, It should be noted that the Gateway Center PAD calls for maximizing recreational opportunities, especially along the Pantano River park through a trail and other linkages. Central to the Gateway PAD open space is the Pantano Wash itself, with a linear trail system proposed along the west bank between Broadway and Speedway, and a small urban park located along the wash north of the loop road (which is adjacent to the south side of the project property). This system of open space is to be enjoyed by employees and residents. Also it should be noted that on October 7, 1996, the Mayor and Council approved the request to reduce the Riverpark easement width from 20 feet to 6 feet along the area of this site that abuts the Riverpark, subject to certain conditions. These conditions included provision of security lighting, cameras, and landscaped areas with pedestrian safety in mind on the east side of the building adjacent to the Riverpark; and for a mural to be completed on the east facing side of the building. Also it appears that no crossing has been provided for the existing drainage channel that abuts the southern edge of the project site and impedes the 20’ Linear Park Path. The applicant needs to meet with City of Tucson Parks and Recreation Department to discuss how the Linear Park Path is to be incorporated into the overall design of the project so as to ensure that this a continuous pedestrian/recreation linkage from Broadway to Speedway, that is safe. Please provide cross section of linear park path and pedestrian path linkages on development plan along with a Keynote that delineates the pedestrian path linkage. |
| 02/28/2008 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Denied | PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT COMMENTS City of Tucson CDRC – Community Design Review Committee CASE NUMBER: D08-0004 CASE NAME: TPC@ Gateway Center: Core Review Submittal #: 1 COMMENTS DUE: 2/22/08 COMMENTS SENT: 2/27/08 Items being reviewed: ( ) Tentative or Final Plat () Development Plan ( ) Landscape Plan ( ) Other - Related: annexation - rezoning - C9-96-SP3a CDRC – D98-029 Adopted land use plan(s) – Gateway Center PAD-3 Parks and Recreation Department Staff has reviewed this proposal and offers the following comments: () APPROVED – No Resubmittal Required. () No comment () Proposal complies with annexation or rezoning conditions () RCP Proposal; complies with land use plan () Proposal satisfies trails, recreational amenities, and/or parks and open space requirements () No additional comments - complies with comments submitted on: () NOT APPROVED – Resubmit the following. See attached comments. ( ) Tentative Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan ( ) Other REVIEWER: Joanne Hershenhorn DATE: 2/27/08 S:\PARKS_AND_RECREATION_DEPT\REVIEW_COMMENTS\CDRC_Cases\2008_ReviewsD08_0004_TPC_Gateway_Ctr.doc TPC @ Gateway Center D08-0004 Please submit a Landscape Plan. Please label the Pantano Wash on the Development Plan and the Landscape Plan, and provide the recording information for the wash. In order to establish an “existing conditions” baseline, please provide the following: On October 7, 1996, in conjunction with the development of the Iceoplex Addition, the Mayor and Council approved a request to reduce the width of the Pantano Wash river park easement from 20 to 6 feet, subject to five conditions (Ordinance No. 8760 an Exhibit 1 to same Ordinance). Please provide this information on the Development Plan. On the Development Plan, include an existing section of the eastern edge of the site adjacent to the Pantano Wash. Show the Pantano Wash, soil-cement bank stabilization, handrail, paved walkway, and eastern edge of building. Label the original 20-foot linear park easement, and the current 6-foot reduced easement. Show the current paving relative to the easement. Please clarify that keynote #31 has since been modified (i.e., reduced to 6 feet). Keynote #32, which calls out an 8-foot access easement, appears to be inconsistent with the 6-foot easement. Please clarify – is the remaining river park easement 6 feet or 8 feet? When the area south of Rosewood Street is developed and the river park to the south built, it will be desirable to complete the river park segment adjacent to this site, consistent with the river sections park upstream and downstream. The intent is to form a continuous pedestrian/recreation linkage along the Pantano Wash between Speedway and Broadway. This would include removing the building addition (i.e., that area labeled as “excluded area” on this development plan). Staff recognizes this may not happen, but we remain optimistic it will. In the interim, staff suggests the following: Provide an enhanced pathway along the east side of the building, linking around the southeast side of the building to the sidewalk system along Rosewood Street. This enhanced pathway would include a mural on the side of the building adjacent to the river park, as well as security lighting and monitoring cameras; or, alternatively, Block off access to the path on the east side of the building, and create a new enhanced pathway around the northwest side of the building, linking to the sidewalk system on Rosewood Street. Please provide cross-sections of the pathway on the development plan and landscape plan. Please call Joanne Hershenhorn at 791-4505 if you want to discuss the above. |
| 02/29/2008 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES February 29, 2008 Jim Callister Triumph Builders Southwest, LLC 3450 S. Broadmont Dr. #11 Tucson, Arizona 85785713 Subject: D08-0004 TPC @ Gateway Center Development Plan Dear Jim: Your submittal of January 24, 2008 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 8 Copies Revised Development Plan (Wastewater, Landscape, Zoning, ESD, Engineering, Parks and Recreation, DUPD, DSD) 6 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Landscape, Zoning, Engineering, Parks and Recreation, DUPD, DSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Statement (Engineering, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 622-0688 dp-resubmittal |