Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D07-0041
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/04/2007 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 10/08/2007 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 10/11/2007 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Approved | Office of the Pima County Assessor 115 N. Church Ave. Tucson, Arizona 85701 BILL STAPLES ASSESSOR TO: CDRC Office Subdivision Review City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559) FROM: Gary Ault, Mapping Supervisor Pima County Assessor’s Office Mapping Department DATE: OCTOBER 10,2007 RE: Assessor’s Review and Comments Regarding DEVELOPMENT PLAN: D07-0041 TANQUE VERDE VALLEY CASITAS T141502 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * X Plat meets Assessor’s Office requirements. _______ Plat does not meet Assessor’s Office requirements. ROSANNA WERNER |
| 10/11/2007 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | October 10, 2007 To: John Holley The WLB Group Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ___________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6579), representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environment Quality Subject: Tanque Verde Valley Casitas Dev. Plan - 1st Submittal D07-041 The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. This project will be tributary to the Ina Road Wastewater Treatment Facility via the North Rillito Interceptor. Obtain a letter from the PCWMD's Development Services Section, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for the project is available in the downstream public sewerage system and provide a copy of that letter to this office. The required form to request such a letter may be found at: http://www.pima.gov/wwm/forms/docs/CapResponseRequest.pdf. The development plan for this project cannot be approved until a copy of this letter has been received by this office. All Sheets: Show the jurisdiction’s case number, D07-0041, in or near the title block of each sheet. This case number should be shown larger and bolder than any associated cross-reference numbers. Sheet 1: Revise General Note #15 to read as follows: THE ON-SITE SANITARY SEWERS WILL BE PRIVATE AND WILL BE CONSTRUCTED, OPERATED AND MAINTAINED ON A PRIVATE BASIS, AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH AN APPROVED OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN, IF REQUIRED. THE LOCATION AND METHOD OF CONNECTION TO AN EXISTING PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER IS SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT. Sheet 1: Revise General Note #18 to read as follows: THIS PROJECT WILL HAVE ______ EXISTING AND______ PROPOSED WASTEWATER FIXTURE UNIT EQUIVALENTS PER TABLE 13.20.045(E)(1) IN PIMA COUNTY CODE 13.20.045(E). And fill in the blanks with the appropriate values. Sheet 1: Add a Permitting Note that states: A PROJECT CONSTRUCTION PERMIT MUST BE SECURED FROM PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT BEFORE BEGINNING ANY WORK ON THIS PROJECT. Sheet 1: Add the following Permitting Notes: THE LANDSCAPING WITHIN ALL PUBLIC SEWER EASEMENTS SHOWN HEREON SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLANTING GUIDELINES OF PC/COT STANDARD DETAIL WWM A-4. NO PERMITS FOR PERMANENT STRUCTURES (I.E., MASONRY WALLS, FENCES, ETC.) ON OR THROUGH THE PUBLIC SEWER EASEMENT WILL BE ISSUED WITHOUT SEPARATE WRITTEN CONSENT OF PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT. Sheet 2 and 3: Show the BCS going to each building. Mark it as private BCS and show the length/slope and pipe size. Also show cleanouts w/rim and invert elevations. Sheet 3: It is unclear where private sewer line running north onto the adjoining property directly north of the project is going. If this is Bonanza St. it needs to marked on the plan. This should also be marked on Sheet 4. Sheet 3 and 4: New OS MH#7 should be marked as public and the off-site sewer and manholes downstream from there should also be marked as public. Sheet 4: Show the public and private sewer lines using different line-types, so that they can readily be distinguished from each other. Also, show and describe examples of these different line types in the legend on Sheet 1 and do the same for existing verses proposed. Sheet 4: The section of sewer line downstream of New OS MH#3 does not appear to be within an easement please clarify on the plan or create an easement with recordation information for this section. Sheet 4: The off-site sewer line should be centered in the sewer easement. Are the sewer easements dedicated for public sewer? If so they should be called out as public sewer easements. This office will require a revised set of blue lines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the development plan. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the second (2nd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $200.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above-mentioned comments, please contact me. |
| 10/15/2007 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | ADOT has NO COMMENT D07-0041 THE WLB GROUP INC. TANQUE VERDE VALLEY CASITAS -------------------------------------------------------- Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Notice: This email transmission and any attachments are intended for use by the person(s)/entity(ies) named above and may contain confidential/privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by email, and delete or destroy all copies plus attachments. |
| 10/22/2007 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D07-0041 TANQUE VERDE VALLEY CASITAS/DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: 10/22/07 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Correct Bonanza Road to Bonanza Avenue on Sheets 1 and 2. Correct Speedway Blvd. to Speedway Boulevard on sheets 1 and 2. Delete adjacent property owners names on sheets 1, 2 & 3. Correct duplicate Building 5 to 6 on Sheet 3. es |
| 10/23/2007 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Submit a native plant preservation plan for the off-site sewer line on sheet 4 of the Development Plan. LUC 3.8.4.2 2) Basin slopes are required to have slopes no steeper than 4:1 where depths are three feet or greater. Slopes for basins less than three feet are to be no steeper than 3:1 for unprotected slopes and 2: 1 for protected. Retaining walls, proposed in lieu of slopes, should not exceed thirty-five percent of the basin perimeter. Revise the plans as necessary to comply with the Technical Requirements and Guidelines of the Stormwater Detention/Retention manual (p. 74-84). Revise the landscape plan to include slope ratios for retention and detention basins. DS 10-01.4 3) Revise the landscape plan to show the MS&R right-of-way line. On streets designated as Major Streets and Routes (MS&R), the street landscape border is measured from the MS&R right-of-way line as determined by Sec. 2.8.3.4. 4) Revise the landscape and development plans to show the same size landscape borders along the streets; provide dimensions. The proposed sidewalk, as shown on the landscape plan, covers the western landscape border almost entirely. Fifty (50) percent or more of the area of the street landscape border must be covered with shrubs or vegetative ground cover. LUC 3.7.2.4.A.5, DS 2-07.2.2. 5) Portions of landscape borders proposed in right-of-way or MS&R right-of-way areas must be approved by the City Engineer or designee and comply with the City Engineer's requirements on construction, irrigation, location, and plant type. Provide verification, in writing, of any approvals obtained. Contact Gary Wittwer, DOT Landscape Architect for specific requirements. 6) Vegetation or structures higher than thirty (30) inches must be located outside of the sight visibility triangles (SVT's). Show the future SVT's on the landscape plans and revise as necessary to resolve conflicts. 7) Canopy trees must be evenly distributed throughout the vehicular use area. Every parking space shall be located within forty (40) feet of the trunk of a canopy tree (as measured from the center of the tree trunk). Revise the landscape plan as necessary to demonstrate compliance with this requirement, near the north and east sides of Building 5. LUC 3.7.2.3.A 8) Revise the development plan, landscape plan, and the native plant preservation plans to match relative to the improvements proposed along the street frontage and the width of the landscape borders. DS 2-07.2.2 RESUBMITTAL OF ALL PLANS IS REQUIRED |
| 10/25/2007 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D07-0041 Tanque Verde Valley Casitas 10/25/07 (X) Tentative Plat () Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Pantano East Area Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: NO COMMENTS DUE BY: November 1, 2007 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: (X) Not an RCP (X) Proposal Complies with Annexation ® () RCP Proposal Complies with Plan Policies () See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: () Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: msp 791-4505 DATE: October 22, 2007 |
| 10/25/2007 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Terry Stevens Lead Planner PROJECT: D07-0041 Tanque Verde Casistas Development Plan TRANSMITTAL: 10/25/07 DUE DATE: 11/01/07 COMMENTS: 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is 10/31/08. 2. DS 2-05.2.1.K Provide the annexation case # C9-84-32 on each sheet in the lower right hand corner next to the title block. 3. DS 2-05.2.2.B.2 This project has been assigned the case number D07-0041. List the case number in the lower right corner next to the title block of all plan sheets including the Landscape and NPPO sheets. 4. DS 2-05.2.2.B.3 In general note #3 list the proposed use as "Family Dwelling" with development designator "L". 5. DS 2-05.2.2.B.11 The gross area of the site, as indicated in note #1, should be indicated as the total area after the dedication of right of way to the City of Tucson. Indicate the property lines with distance and bearings as they will be after the right of way dedication. 6. DS 2-05.2.4.D.3 Per DS 3-05.2.2.B.4 a minimum distance of one (1) foot must be maintained between any structure and a PAAL. As indicated on the development plan the carports do not meet this requirement. Clearly indicate by dimensions how the proposed carport covers meet this requirement. Clearly identify the carport covers by keynote or in the legend. The PAAL located at the crosswalk near the southwest corner of the pool area does not appear to meet the minimum width for a PAAL (24'). Provide a dimension for this area. Provide a dimensioned detail of the proposed backup spur, clearly indicating the required 3' radius, 3' clear area, and 24' width. The indicated handicap ramps at the back of the back up spur may not work because of the required minimum width of a sidewalk being 4'. See later comment. 7. DS 2-05.2.4.I General note #24 which indicates setbacks is not correct. The north and west property lines abut SR zoned property which requires a minimum setback of 25' not the height of the building. The east property line is adjacent to R3 zoned property which requires a setback of 10' or ¾ the height of the structure which ever is greater. See LUC Sec. 3.2.6.4. Revise note. Provide dimensions from the buildings to the property lines indicating compliance with required setbacks. The carport cover indicated near the south east corner of building #10 does not meet the required minimum setback of 25' from the west property line. A setback waiver can be obtained from the adjoining property owner indicating that they have no objection to the location of the carport as indicated on the plan. Provide documentation or revise location of the carport. 8. DS 2-05.2.4.K See DS 2-08 and ANSI 117.1-2003 for pedestrian circulation and handicap accessible information. DS 2-08.3.1 The on site pedestrian circulation path is required to connect to the pedestrian circulation path located in any adjacent street. Provide connection to the property line along Speedway as a minimum and to the sidewalk located in the right of way if required by engineering. The sidewalk located along the south property line adjacent to Speedway appears to be located in the required landscape buffer. (clearly indicate the required landscape buffer) This may not be allowed, see landscape comments. DS 2-08.5.1 The minimum width of a sidewalk is four (4) feet. Revise plan, note #11, details 2, 3 and 4 of page5. DS 2-08.4.1.B A sidewalk will be provided adjacent and parallel to any PAAL on the side where buildings are located. Missing in several locations: east side of building #10, west side of building #11, west side of building #7, east side of building #8 DS 2-08.4.1.C A sidewalk will be provided adjacent to any parking space accessed by a PAAL where the space is located on the same side of the PAAL as any building and no other parking spaces or PAALs intervene. Missing in several locations: south side of building #10, south side of building #12, west side of building #4 Provide a detail of the handicap ramps clearly indicating width, slope, landings, truncated domes. Access ramps at crosswalks connecting to sidewalks must be provided. In addition Truncated Dome (early warning systems) must be added to all access ramps where transitioning from the pedestrian area to the vehicular use area or at HC access aisles transitioning to the sidewalk area. The indicated striped pavement between the parking spaces located on the north side of building #5 is considered part of the pedestrian circulation path and must be physically separated from the vehicular use area. (must be a sidewalk with ramp) It could remain a striped area only if a handicap parking space is located on one side of the striped area with a minimum width of 5', it then becomes an access aisle. 9. DS 2-05.2.4.N On the drawings label the height and dimensions of all structures. 10. DS 2-05.2.4.P Provide location and detail of the required van accessible parking space. See IBC Sec. 1106.5 For every six or fraction there of one van accessible parking space is required. The standard parking space in detail 6 of 5 is missing dimensions. The handicap parking sign has the incorrect verbiage. A copy of the correct sign can be obtained here at DSD. Per City of Tucson standards the minimum distance from grade to the bottom of the main sign for the handicap parking is seven (7) feet. Revise detail. The cross walk located southwest of the pool area cannot cross behind the parking spaces. Revise. 11. DS 2-05.2.4.Q Per DS 2-09.5.1.A the minimum distance between the outer posts of class 2 bicycle parking racks is 30". Revise detail 11 on 5 of 7. DS 2-09.6.2 Clearly indicate the surface material for the class one and class two bicycle parking spaces. DS 2-09.5.2 Clearly indicate the required 5' wide access aisle for both types of bicycle parking spaces. 12. DS 2-05.2.4.R The future sight visibility triangle indicated at the entrance from Speedway does not appear to be located in the correct location. It should start at the face of curb,.not as indicated. See engineering comments. 13. The indicated drainage way located in the 30' ingress/egress easement along the east side of the property may not be allowed. See engineering comments. 14. DS 2-05.2.4.W If applicable, provide location, type size and height of existing and proposed signage including billboards. If no signage is existing or proposed please state so. 15. Provide the allowed and proposed lot coverage calculations. Note: calculations must be based on the lot size after dedication of the right of way. 16. Provide allowed and proposed density calculations. Note: calculations must be based on the lot size after dedication of the right of way. 17. Depending on responses to the above comments and changes to the site plan, further comments may be forth coming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 837-4961 TLS C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D07-0041dp.doc |
| 10/26/2007 | FRODRIG2 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | CASE: D07-0041, TANQUE VERDE VALLEY CASITAS: DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENT: NO OBJECTIONS OR ADVERSE COMMENTS Vehicle Trip Generation: Daily: 645 PM Peak: 60 Please call if you have questions, Aichong Sun Pima Association of Governments 177 N. Church Ave, #405 Tucson, AZ 85701 Tel: (520) 792-1093, Fax: (520) 620-6981 Web: www.PAGnet.org and www.RTAmobility.com |
| 10/31/2007 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Denied | >>> Jim Stoyanoff 10/31/2007 10:05 AM >>> Please submit a legal description and sketch for Easement Note 11 which refers to future MS&R dedication along Speedway. Please provide a letter from the property owner north of this development (parcel 133-03-2980) consenting to the installation of rip-rap (keynote 34) within the 30' ingress/egress & utility easement. Jim Stoyanoff Real Estate Division 201 North Stone Avenue Tucson, AZ 85701 Phone 837-6719 |
| 11/02/2007 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR#189556 November 1, 2007 WLB Group Attn: John Holley 4444 E. Broadway Blvd. Tucson, AZ 85711 Dear Mr. Holley: SUBJECT: Tanque Verde Valley Casitas D07-0041 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted October 23, 2007 It appears that there are conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development. TEP will bill the customer to relocate or convert the existing overhead lines to underground. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, offsite and electrical load plans. Include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Ms. Mary Boice New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (DB-101) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-917-8732 Please call the area Designer Nancy DiMaria at (520) 918-8267, should you have any questions. Sincerely, Henrietta Noriega Office Specialist Design/Build hn Enclosures cc: City of Tucson, (Email only) N. DiMaria, Tucson Electric Power |
| 11/02/2007 | PGEHLEN1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 11/02/2007 | ROBERT YOUNG | PIMA COUNTY | PIMA CTY - DEV REVIEW | Passed | |
| 11/05/2007 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approv-Cond | Call out the Cross-Access Easement on eastern property line. Easement should be a minimum of 24' wide to provide two-way access to lots north of this proposed development. Ensure that the Cross-Access Easement is not hindered by the 3:1 cross slopes. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-4259 x76730 or Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov |
| 11/08/2007 | ANDY VERA | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Denied | 1. In ground dumpster will be required to be screen per DS 6-01.2.2.A. Refer to 6-01.4.0. A. Ensure refuse/recycle enclosure area has a 10 ft x 10 ft inside clear service area between wall protection and the front gates. DS 6-01.4.1.B and 6-01.4.2.C.2 B. Enclosure gates must be equipped with appropriate anchors for for securing them in the open and closed positions. DS 6-01.4.2.C.4. Provide detail, deminsions, and appropriate annotation within detail of refuse/recycle enclosures. 2. Recommend adding two additional refuse/recycle enclosures to allow greater accessibility for users and afford community to recycle. Add one enclosure to the southwest corner of building 1 and another at the northwest corner of building 9. Allows equal access from the north, central and south sections of development. Please correct for resubmittal. Feel free to contact Andy Vera at (520) 791-5543 x 1212 if you have any questions. |
| 11/16/2007 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | DATE: November 15, 2007 TO: DSD_CDRC@ tucsonaz.gov FROM: Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov SUBJECT: D07-0041 Tanque Verde Casitas: Development Plan(10-04-07) Staff has no comments. |
| 11/19/2007 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | November 19, 2007 To: Patricia Gehlen CDRC/Zoning Manager FROM: Loren Makus, EIT Engineering Division SUBJECT: Tanque Verde Valley Casitas Development Plan D07-0041 (First Review) T14S, R15E, Section 2 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Revised Development Plan, Revised Drainage Report The development plan has been reviewed by the Engineering Division and we do not recommend approval at this time. The following comments must be addressed: 1. Easement note 3 indicates that the easement described has been released. Please remove this from the plan to prevent confusion. 2. In note 40 indicate which culvert detail is referenced. 3. Clearly indicate where the vertical curb ends and extruded curb begins. 4. Show the contour interval near the scale bar and north arrow on each sheet. Provide sufficient labels on intermediate contours to establish clearly the existing conditions on the site. 5. This proposed development appears to be in violation of the differential grading requirements of the grading Development Standard. Revise the proposed grades to limit the fill in the outer 100 feet of the project site to less than 2 feet (excepting the filling of minor depressions and holes.) 6. Construction Keynote 29 refers to detail 5 on sheet 5. Provide the referenced detail. 7. Provide a notarized letter from the owners of all properties that are a party to the access easment shown on the plan. The letter must indicate that the owners are aware of the proposed uses of the easement and that they have no objections. The letter should also describe the proposed development within the easement. 8. Four foot sidewalks are required for on-site pedestrian circulation. Revise all sidewalks to be at least 4 feet in width. (DS 2-08.5.1.A.) 9. The basin is shown with retaining wall around the perimeter. Revise the basin design to meet the design criteria in the retention/detention manual. The manual indicates that the basin should have no more than 35 per cent of the perimeter formed by retaining walls. Drainage Report : 10. Revise the retention volume calcultations. The calculations must use the 5-year runoff coefficients along with the 5-year rainfall depth. Provide the calculations showing how the runoff coefficients were computed. 11. Provide schematic details for all drainage structures in the drainage report. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 520.837.4927 or loren.makus@tucsonaz.gov. Loren Makus, EIT Senior Engineering Associate |
| 11/20/2007 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES November 20, 2007 John Holley The WLB Group Inc. 4444 East Broadway Blvd. Tucson, Arizona 85711 Subject: D07-0041 Tanque Verde Valley Casitas Development Plan Dear John: Your submittal of October 4, 2007 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 9 Copies Revised Development Plan (Wastewater, Addressing, Landscape, Zoning, Real Estate, Traffic, ESD, Engineering, DSD) 4 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Landscape, Zoning, Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Revised NPPO Plan (Landscape, DSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Report (Engineering, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 881-7492 dp-resubmittal |