Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Permit Number - D06-0054
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/19/2007 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 10/22/2007 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Patricia Gehlen DATE: December 5, 2007 CDRC/Zoning Manager SUBJECT: Safeway Fuel Station, 8702 E. Broadway Blvd. Development Plan D06-0054 (Second Review) T14S, R15E, Section 15 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Development Plan. The Development Plan (DP) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Development Plan: 1. Please include a detailed response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DP. 2. Major Streets & Routes right of way intersection widening is required per Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan right-of-way per D.S. 2-02.2.1.19. 3. Please provide property description per D.S. 2-02.2.1.3. 4. Label existing and future sight visibility triangles per D.S. 2-02.2.1.10. 5. Please show dimensioned right-of-way, including any applicable Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan right-of-way per D.S. 2-02.2.1.19. Drainage Statement: 1. The DS has been accepted by engineering. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1193 or Paul.Machado@ci.tucsonaz.govs Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 791-5550 x1193 office (520) 879-8010 fax C:/8702 E. Broadway Blvd. CDRC2 |
| 10/31/2007 | FRODRIG2 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | October 30, 2007 To: Jeff Winter, Esencia Architecture & Urban Design Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Project Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ____________________________________ From: Tom Porter (520-740-6579), representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environmental Quality Subject: Safeway Store 0234, 8702 E. Broadway (Fuel Station) Development Plan – 2nd Submittal D06-0054 The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. Sheet C-2: The public manhole northeast of property should be MH#8239-01 not #8245-01. Sheet C-2: Revise the site plan to show the existing building connection sewer (BCS), the pipe that will be removed, pipe that will remain in place and the new building connection and cleanouts. 2nd request. This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the development plan. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the third(3rd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $39.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me at the telephone number shown under my signature on the first page of this letter |
| 11/02/2007 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | 1) Fences or walls constructed in a single continuous line shall extend into a street landscape border no more than the actual width of the fence or wall. Where a fence or wall incorporates offsets or similar design features, a screen may extend a maximum of three (3) feet into the street landscape border. Revise the plan as necessary to comply with the requirement in the landscape border segment between the two driveways on Broadway Boulevard. LUC 3.7.3 |
| 11/05/2007 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approved | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D06-0054 SAFEWAY 234 FUEL STATION/REVISED DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: November 5, 2007 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. NOTE: Submit a 24 x 36 Reverse Reading Double Matte Photo Mylar of approved Development Plan to City Planning. Signed and dated Mylar will be forwarded to Pima County Addressing prior to assignment of addresses. 2.) All addresses will need to be displayed per Pima County Address Standards at the time of final inspection. jg |
| 11/09/2007 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Terry Stevens Lead Planner PROJECT: D06-0054 Safeway 234 Fuel Station Development Plan TRANSMITTAL: 11/09/07 DUE DATE: 01/25/07 COMMENTS: 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is 01/24/08. 2. DS 2-05.2.1.D A small, project-location map shall be drawn on the first sheet of the development plan, preferably in the upper right corner. The map should cover approximately one (1) square mile, be drawn at a minimum scale of 3" = 1 mile, and provide the following information. 1. section corners will be labeled. 3. DS 2-05.2.4.F Provide the ½ future right of way line for Broadway. The MS&R width for Broadway at the intersection is 75' because of the intersection widening. Indicated on the plan is 75' to "future curb". The future right of way is 75' south of the center line of Broadway The future curb location is 63' south of the center line of Broadway. Revise. 4. DS 2-05.2.4.P The detail for the handicap parking space (8-DP-4) is not as indicated on the development plan. Revise. On the detail for the handicap parking space (8-DP-4), clearly indicate the maximum slope of the parking space and access aisle. Per ANSI 117.1-2003 Sec. 502.5 the maximum allowed slope is 1:48. In detail 12-DP-4 note #1 indicates an incorrect height from grade to the bottom of the handicap parking sign. The correct height is indicated as 7' as per detail 6-DP-4. Revise or remove note. 5. Zoning acknowledges your letter and response in regards to the lot split and subsequent lot combinations. A search of Pima County records indicates that parcel 133-31-1600 was combined with parcel 133-31-159F. There does not appear to have been any split of parcel 133-31-159F. If this is the case the property lines on the development plan are not correct as the east property line of parcel 133-31-159F is located on the east side of the "existing drive"(PAAL). Revise property lines on the development plan. Note: If a lot split is going to be done, it must be first processed through Development Services prior to recording legal desriptions. The length of the north property line indicated as 50' does not appear to be correct. Revise. In addition to revisions of the property lines, revise gross lot area and floor area ratio calculations. Lot area expansion calculations are not required as full code compliance is required for this project. Remove from plans. Floor area ratio calculations as indicated on the submitted plan are incorrect. Provide the allowed FAR, which is 0.90, and the proposed FAR. See LUC Sec. 3.2.11. FYI: The gas island canopy does not count towards the FAR. 6. Note #10 in the fuel station pump requirements indicate 12 dispensers being provided. The plan indicates 16 being provided. Clarify. 7. In the project data portion of DP-T note #1-a should list the existing zoning as C1 and the proposed zoning as C2. 8. Along the north side of the kiosk a 5' pedestrian refuge is required. As indicated only 4' has been provided. Revise. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 837-4961 TLS C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D06-0054-2dp.doc |
| 11/15/2007 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D06-0054 Safeway 234 Fuel Station () Tentative Plat ( X ) Development Plan ( X ) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Pantano East GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: Broadway Blvd. COMMENTS DUE BY: 11/19/07 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies with Plan Policies ( X ) See Additional Comments Below () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: ( X ) Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat ( X ) Development Plan ( ) Landscape Plan () Other 1. Please add rezoning conditions to development plan notes. REVIEWER: drcorral 791-4505 DATE: 11/09/07 |
| 11/27/2007 | ANDY VERA | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Denied | 1. DP-5, Trash Enclosure and Metal Trash Gate Detail. Must show within detail and annotate the embedded sleeve positoned appropriately for securing gates with the cane bolt in the open position. Currently demonstrates securing in the closed position only. Not adequate. Please provide corrections on resubmittal. If you have any questions you may contact Andy Vera at (520) 791-5543 ext 1212 or e-mail: Andy.Vera@tucsonaz.gov |
| 12/07/2007 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES December 7, 2007 Jeff Winter, R.A., A.I.A Esencia Architecture & Urban Design 1702 East McNair Drive, Suite 200 Tempe, Arizona 85283 Subject: D06-0054 Safewau 234 Fuel Station Development Plan Dear Jeff: Your submittal of October 19, 2007 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 7 Copies Revised Development Plan (Wastewater, Landscape, ESD, Zoning, Engineering, DUPD, DSD) 5 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Landscape, Zoning, Engineering, DUPD, DSD) 2 Copies Approved Lot Reconfiguration Documents (Zoning, DSD) PRIOR TO RESUBMITTAL OF THIS PLAN, A WRITTEN EXTENSION MUST BE SUBMITTED TO AND GRANTED BY THE CDRC OFFICE. Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: (480) 755-0956 dp-resubmittal |