Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D06-0054
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/08/2007 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | DATE: January 8, 2007 TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services FROM: Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov CC: SUBJECT: D06-0054 Safeway 234 Fuel Station: Development Plan Staff has no comments. |
| 01/08/2007 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Add the CDRC case number and any related case numbers to the landscape plans. DS 2-07.2.1.B 2) A minimum distance of two (2) feet must be maintained between a PAAL and any wall, screen, or other obstruction. DS 3-05.2.2.B.3 Revise the plans to provide the required seperation. 3) Fences or walls constructed in a single continuous line shall extend into a street landscape border no more than the actual width of the fence or wall. Where a fence or wall incorporates offsets or similar design features, a screen may extend a maximum of three (3) feet into the street landscape border. Revise the plan to relocate the wall shown at the air/water dispenser location. 4) The air/water dispenser may not be located in the street landscape border. The land use and associated fixtures and accessories are to be located behind the street landscape border. LUC Table 3.7.2-I 5) Landscape borders proposed in right-of-way or MS&R areas must be approved by the City Engineer or designee and comply with the City Engineer's requirements on construction, irrigation, location, and plant type. Provide verification, in writing, of any approvals obtained. Contact Gary Wittwer, DOT Landscape Architect for specific requirements. 6) Verify that the scale of the landscape drawing is correct. It appears to match the 1"=20' scale of the site plan. 7) Revise the landscape plan to provide screening east of the driveway along Broadway Boulevard. LUC 3.7.3 8) The NPPO application is not approved. At least thirty (30) percent of each genus and species of other Viable Protected Native Plant shall be preserved-in-place or salvaged and transplanted on-site. LUC 3.8.6.2.A.3 9) Grading, hydrology, and landscape structural plans are to be integrated to make maximum use of site storm water runoff for supplemental on-site irrigation purposes. The landscape plan shall indicate use of all runoff, from individual catch basins around single trees to basins accepting flow from an entire vehicular use area or roof area. Show water harvesting areas on the landscape plans. LUC 3.7.4.3.B 10) It appears that a rezoning is anticipated. The Landscape Section reserves the right to offer additional comments after completion of the rezoning review. 11) Ensure that the plans are submitted in the format prescribed in DS 2-05, Exhibit I. The plans are to be folded to an 8 1/2 X 11" format in order to be accommodated in our files. RESUBMITTAL OF ALL PLANS IS REQUIRED. |
| 01/09/2007 | FRODRIG2 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | Transportation Information for Rezoning, Subdivision, and Development Requests Delivered to: Date Delivered: Development Services - City of Tucson 1/5/2007 Case Number Project Name Average number of daily trips (ADT) forecasted as a result of the proposed development This information is provided for jurisdictional development services departments to assess the impact of the proposed development on surrounding traffic patterns and roads. If the forecasted daily traffic exceeds 500 average daily trips, a more detailed analysis is also provided. D06-0054 2,023 Safeway 234 Fuel Station Pima Association of Governments Sandra C. Holland, Data Services 177 N. Church Ave., Suite 405, Tucson, Arizona 85701-1127 (520) 792-1093 FAX (520) 620-6981 |
| 01/09/2007 | JCLARK3 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Denied | * No known landfill within 1000 feet of this development. * Refuse enclosure does not show sidewall protection required per the Development Standards. * The Development Standards require that there be 10 feet clear area between the rear wall protection and the front gates. * No provisions shown or discussed for recycling. |
| 01/09/2007 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 01/09/2007 | FRODRIG2 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | Transportation Information for Rezoning, Subdivision and Development Review Requests File Number Description Date Reviewed E Pima Association of Governments Sandra C. Holland, Data Services 177 N. Church Avenue, Suite 405 Tucson, AZ 85701 Phone: (520) 792-1093 Fax: (520) 620-6981 www.pagnet.org D06-0054 Safeway 234 Fuel Station 1/5/2007 This analysis is designed to allow jurisdictional planning departments to further assess the traffic impacts of planned residential and commerical developments that PAG expects will generate more than 500 average daily trips. Nearby roadway data include planned improvements, existing and future volumes and capacities, and bus and bike accessibility. 1. Nearest Existing or Planned Major Street 2. Is a street improvement planned as part of PAG's 5-Year Transportation Improvement Program? See http://www.pagnet.org/tip/ for more information on the TIP planning process. Planned Action: STREET IDENTIFICATION 3. Existing (2005) Daily Traffic Volume (reported in ADT) See http://www.pagnet.org/TPD/DataTrends/ for more information. 4. Existing (2005) Daily Capacity (reported in ADT) 5. Existing (2005) Number of Lanes 8. Future (2030) Number of Lanes TRANSIT AND BIKEWAYS CONSIDERATIONS 10. Present Bus Service (Route, Frequency, Distance) 11. Existing or Planned Bikeway Remarks: Street Number 1 Street Number 2, if applicable. Year Year Planned Action: VOLUME/CAPACITY/TRAFFIC GENERATION CONSIDERATIONS 6. Future (2030) Daily Volume (reported in ADT) (Assuming planned transportation improvement projects are completed.) 7. Future (2030) Daily Capacity (reported in ADT) Broadway (Camino Seco - Harrison) No 0 27,108 44,320 4 44,320 28,208 4 2,023 Rt 8, every 10 min, 0 mi away; Rt 82, 3 AM and 3 PM trips, 0 mi away Bus/bike lane Camino Seco (Broadway - Old Spanish Trail) No 0 20,986 44,320 4 22,412 44,320 4 Rt 8, every 10 min, 0 mi away; Rt 82, 3 AM and 3 PM trips, 0 mi away Bike route with striped shoulder 9. Average daily traffic (ADT) forecasted as a result of the proposed development |
| 01/11/2007 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 01/22/2007 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D06-0054 SAFEWAY 234 FUEL STATION/DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: 1/22/07 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Delete direction from all street names (Location Map and site plan). Label Section, Township, Range on Location Map. Spell out Boulevard for Broadway and Street for Cooper on sheets A-O and A-1. Correct 8702 E. Broadway Road to Boulevard in all locations. es |
| 01/24/2007 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approved | No comments |
| 01/26/2007 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Terry Stevens Lead Planner PROJECT: D06-0054 Safeway 234 Fuel Station Development Plan TRANSMITTAL: 01/26/07 DUE DATE: 01/25/07 COMMENTS: 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is 01/24/08. 2. This project is currently under a rezoning application. Further comments will be forth coming based on the rezoning conditions. Incorporate into this plan any changes required by the rezoning conditions at the time of the next submittal. 3. Please review Development Standards 2-05 for format and content for a Development Plan submittal. 4. DS 2-05.2.1.C All lettering and dimensions shall be the equivalent of twelve (0.12") point or greater in size. The purpose of this requirement is to assure that all lettering is legible when reviewed and will maintain that legibility when reproduced and photographically reduced (microfilmed) for record-keeping purposes. Sheet A-01 does not meet this requirement. Remove all references to a site plan. Provide a title block (preferably in the lower right corner) clearly indicating this is a Development Plan. See later comment on content of the title block. Renumber all sheets in order to provide chronological order for this set of plans. Revise all detail call outs to reflect the change in page numbers. 5. DS 2-05.2.1.D A small, project-location map shall be drawn on the first sheet of the development plan, preferably in the upper right corner. The map should cover approximately one (1) square mile, be drawn at a minimum scale of 3" = 1 mile, and provide the following information. 1. Show the subject property within the one (1) square mile area. 2. Identify conditions within the square mile area, such as major streets and watercourses. 3. Section, township, and range; section corners; north arrow; and the scale will be labeled. 6. DS 2-05.2.1.G The following title block information is to be provided, preferably in the lower right corner of the sheet. 1. The proposed name of the project or, if there is no name, the proposed tenant's name or the property address. 2. A brief legal description. 7. DS 2-05.2.1.H The north arrow, contour interval, and scale should be placed together on each sheet, preferably in the upper right corner of the plat. 8. DS 2-05.2.2 List the applicable rezoning file number and conditions of approval. Also place the Rezoning case #C9-__-__ and the Development Plan # D06-0054 file numbers in the lower right corner of the plan or in that vicinity. 9. DS 2-05.2.2.3 List as the proposed use "General Merchandise Sales "31" subject to: 3.5.9.2.A-------Gasoline Sales--Retail". 10. DS 2-05.2.2.10 Add a note stating that "This project is designed to meet the overlay zone criteria: Sec.2.8.3 Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Setback Zone." 11. DS 2-05.2.2.11 List the gross lot area of the site by square footage and acreage. The gross lot area indicated appears to be for the entire site. List as the gross area only the area of the project to be developed. 12. DS 2-05.2.3.B If applicable, all easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement is to occur prior to issuance of permits. 13. DS 2-05.2.4.A There appears to be a lot reconfiguration being done at the east side of the property. Provide documentation that the lot reconfiguration has been approved by the City of Tucson. FYI: The 26' wide remainder of the property to the east will be considered a non-buildable lot and will not be approved in the proposed lot reconfiguration. The remainder portion of the lot could be combined with the main portion of the shopping center property. This property is operating in conjunction with the shopping center but could be sold as a separate stand alone property therefore a lot combination covenant will be required. A copy of the lot combination covenant can be obtained from the City of Tucson DSD web site. Provide the recordation information (docket and page) on the development plan. Provide a copy of the cross access agreement with the shopping center. Provide distance and bearings for all lot lines. 14. DS 2-05.2.4.F Provide the ½ future right of way line for Broadway. The MS&R width for Broadway at the intersection is 75' because of the intersection widening. 15. Ds 2-05.2.4.K Pedestrian circulation is required from each street on which the project is adjacent to. See DS 2-08.3.1 and DS 2-08.4.1.A. A pedestrian path (sidewalk) is required from Broadway to the building and connecting to the rest of the shopping center. A suggestion would be to provide a sidewalk from the southeast corner of the kiosk directly east connecting to the existing sidewalk in the shopping center with a cross walk and handicap ramps. This suggestion would meet the requirement for both the connection to Broadway and the rest of the shopping center. A sidewalk is required between the building (kiosk) and the handicap parking spaces at the west side of the building. See DS 2-08.4.1.C. Revise the handicap ramps and detail 8 of A-11. A handicap ramp will then be required at the handicap access aisle. A sidewalk is required along the north side of the handicap parking space. Striped cross walks are allowed only to cross a PAAL not be parallel to a vehicular use area. See DS 2-08.4.1 Sidewalks within a project must be physically separated from any vehicular travel lane by means of curbing, grade separation, barriers, railings, or other means, except at crosswalks. A handicap ramp will be required to be located at the west end of this sidewalk connecting to the cross walk. Clearly indicate the location, with dimensions, of the required 5' wide pedestrian refuge area per DS 3-05.2.2.B.1 A minimum setback distance of five (5) feet for a pedestrian refuge area must be maintained between any enclosed structure and a PAAL. Clearly indicate the width of all required sidewalks and cross walks as per DS 2-08.5.1.A All sidewalks will be a minimum four (4) feet wide and will be installed to avoid any obstruction which decreases the minimum width to less than four (4) feet. 16. DS 2-05.2.4.N On the drawing, show the locations and footprints of all structures. Label the heights and dimensions. 17. DS 2-05.2.4.P The parking calculations provided for the number of required parking spaces is incorrect. Per LUC Sec. 3.3.4 under the Retail Trade Use Group, General Merchandise Sales---Gasoline Sales -Retail, The number of required parking is one per employee with a minimum of two required. Revise the required calculations. On detail 6 of A-11 for the handicap parking sign indicate the minimum distance from grade to the bottom of the Reserved Parking sign. Minimum distance as per City of Tucson standards is seven (7) feet. 18. DS 2-05.2.4.Q Per the LUC Sec. 3.3.4 referenced in the above comment bicycle parking is not required. Revise bicycle parking calculations to indicate none being required. If bicycle parking is being provided it must meet the requirements of DS 2-09 for location, clearances, type of rack, etc. Provide appropriate details. 19. DS 2-05.2.4.R Provide the locations of all sight visibility triangles including existing and future. See engineering comments. 20. DS 2-05..2.4.U Indicate graphically, where possible, and by notes, in all other instances, compliance with conditions of rezoning. Provide as a separate document how each of the rezoning conditions have been meet. 21. DS 2-05.2.4.V Indicate location and type of postal service to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements, such as pedestrian accessibility, utilities, and landscaping. 22. If applicable, indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal and billboards) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. 23. Depending on changes to the plans and responses to the above comments, additional comments may be forth coming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 791-5550 ext. 2000. TLS C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D06-0054dp.doc |
| 01/26/2007 | PGEHLEN1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 01/29/2007 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Passed | |
| 01/30/2007 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR#175480 January 10, 2007 Dear Mr. Winter : SUBJECT: Safeway 234 Fuel Station D06-0054 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted December 26, 2006 It appears that there are no conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, offsite and electrical load plans. Include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Ms. Mary Boice New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (DB-101) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-917-8732 Please call the area Designer Nancy DiMaria at (520) 918-8267, should you have any questions. Sincerely, Henrietta Noriega Office Specialist Design/Build hn Enclosures cc: P. Gehlen, City of Tucson (Email) N. DiMaria, TEP |
| 01/30/2007 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Passed | |
| 02/14/2007 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Patricia Gehlen DATE: February 14, 2007 CDRC/Zoning Manager SUBJECT: Safeway Fuel Station, 8702 E. Broadway Blvd. Development Plan D06-0054 (First Review) T14S, R15E, Section 15 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Development Plan and Drainage Report. The Development Plan (DP) and Drainage Report (DR) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Development Plan: 1. Please include a detailed response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DP. 2. As per the Federal ADA requirements, all wheel chair ramps shall have the truncated domes instead of the standard grooves that are shown on COT SD 207. Aside from the Truncated Domes, all wheel chair ramps shall be constructed in accordance with COT SD 207. 3. Limit access to property no closer than 200' of intersection centerline for arterial street. 4. Major Streets & Routes right of way mid block width is 120' for Broadway Blvd. (Dedication may be required - check Maps & Records @ 201 N. Stone, 3rd Floor, for existing right of way). 5. Major Streets & Routes right of way intersection widening is required per Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan right-of-way per D.S. 2-02.2.1.19. 6. 30' min. separation between driveways per Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan right-of-way per D.S. 2-02.2.1.19. 7. Curb returns with min. 18' radii are required along Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan right-of-way per D.S. 2-02.2.1.19. 8. Limit all grading and construction no closer than 2' from the property line. 9. Please provide property description per D.S. 2-02.2.1.3. 10. Label existing and future sight visibility triangles per D.S. 2-02.2.1.10. 11. Please label all vehicular, bicycle, pedestrian, and handicapped circulation clearly identified per D.S. 2-02.2.1.12. 12. Fully-dimensioned loading space(s) and maneuvering area(s) per D.S. 2-02.2.1.14. 13. Please show dimensioned right-of-way, including any applicable Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan right-of-way per D.S. 2-02.2.1.19. 14. Any improvements in the public right-of-way is prohibited without the written consent of the City of Tucson Transportation Department. 15. Add the basin(s) maintenance responsibility note per S.M.D.D.F.M. 2.3.1.6 C 1 and 2 to the DP. Water harvesting area cannot be located in the public right-of-way. 16. Dimension from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways, and utility lines per D.S. 2-02.2.1.21. 17. Please provide existing topographic contours at intervals not exceeding two (2) feet and/or spot elevations as pertinent and Bench Mark based on City of Tucson Datum, including City Field Book and page number per D.S. 2-02.2.1.23. 18. Show Development plan number (D06-0054) on all sheets per D.S. 2-02.2.1.29. 19. Show refuse container location, size, and access thereto fully dimensioned per D.S. 2-02.2.1.32 and D.S. 6-01.0. 20. Placement of fill in excess of 2' above existing grade at any location in the outer 100' of the developing site is not allowed and/or shall meet the requirements per D.S. 11-01. Please address. 21. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information. 22. Please show a typical cross section of the P.A.A.L. or call out the percentage of slopes. Call out the GB at the D/W, if applicable. 23. Please show the proposed roof drainage patterns, 100% of the 10-year flow must be conveyed under the sidewalks including any other site drainage as well. Please provide supporting calculations to demonstrate compliance with D.S. 3-01.4.4. If the location(s) of the roof scuppers have not yet been decided, a general note indicating sidewalk scuppers will be used when the roof scuppers locations have been designed and located will suffice. 24. List the consulting engineer and the owner/developer on the plans with the pertinent information. 25. Add note: "Depress all landscaped areas 6" maximum for water harvesting". Drainage Statement: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DS. 2. A Drainage Statement is a brief description of drainage conditions applicable for a site which are not affected by 100 year flows of 100 cfs, of more……per S.M.D.D.F.M., chap. II, 2.1.2. The DS must be submitted along with the site plan and accepted with the approval of the grading plan. 3. The content and format of the Drainage Statement should follow S.M.D.D.F.M., chap. II, 2.2. 4. Show the project address or administration address on the cover sheet of the DS. 5. If applicable, add the basin(s) maintenance responsibility note and checklist per S.M.D.D.F.M. 2.3.1.6 C 1 and 2 to the DS. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1193 or Paul.Machado@ci.tucsonaz.govs Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 791-5550 x1193 office (520) 879-8010 fax C:/8702 E. Broadway Blvd. CDRC |
| 02/16/2007 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D06-0054 Safeway 234 Fuel Station 02/14/07 () Tentative Plat ( X ) Development Plan ( X ) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: Broadway Blvd. COMMENTS DUE BY: 01/25/07 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies with Plan Policies ( X ) See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: ( X ) Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat ( X ) Development Plan ( X ) Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: RJH 791-4505 DATE: 02/14/07 D06-0054 Safeway 234 Fuel Station DUPD staff reviews for compliance with rezoning and annexation conditions. This site has not been rezoned. Staff anticipated the processing of a rezoning request to use as a basis for a preliminary review. Given that a rezoning request has not been submitted, review comments can not be provided. When a rezoning has been processed and conditions established, DUPD comments will be provided for future submittals. Staff anticipates that these conditions will require modifications to the proposed site plan. |
| 02/21/2007 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES February 21, 2007 Jeff Winter, R.A., A.I.A Esencia Architecture & Urban Design 1702 East McNair Drive, Suite 200 Tempe, Arizona 85283 Subject: D06-0054 Safewau 234 Fuel Station Development Plan Dear Jeff: Your submittal of December 26, 2006 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 8 Copies Revised Development Plan (Wastewater, Landscape, ESD, Addressing, Zoning, Engineering, DUPD, DSD) 5 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Landscape, Zoning, Engineering, DUPD, DSD) 2 Copies Revised NPPO Plan (Landscape, DSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Report (Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Approved Lot Reconfiguration Documents (Zoning, DSD) 2 Copies Lot Combination Covenant (Zoning, DSD) 2 Copies Cross Access Agreements (Zoning, DSD) PRIOR TO RESUBMITTAL OF THIS PLAN, THE CDRC MANAGER MUST REVIEW THE REZONING CONDITIONS TO DETERMINE IF ADDITIONAL REVIEW AGENCIES MUST BE ADDED TO THE DISTRIBUTION FOR REVIEW OF THE REZONING CONDITIONS. Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608 extension 1179. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: (480) 755-0956 dp-resubmittal |
| 12/26/2006 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 12/27/2006 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | December 20, 2006 To: Jeff Winter, Esencia Architecture & Urban Design Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Project Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ____________________________________ From: Michael J.Harrington (520-740-6579), representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environmental Quality Subject: Safeway Store 0234, 8702 E. Broadway (Fuel Station) Development Plan - 1st Submittal D06-0054 The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. This project will be tributary to the Ina Road Water Pollution Controll Facility via the Tanque Verde Interceptor. The existing private sewer BCS will be removed when the existing building is demolished. No new sewer connection is proposed. All Sheets: Add the development plan case number, D06-0054, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross reference numbers. Add any appropriate cross-reference numbers. No wastewater review fees will be charged for sheets where these are the only required revisions. Subject to the above, the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality and Wastewater Management Department hereby approve the above referenced submittal of the development plan. Please note the following: Approval of the above referenced submittal does not authorize the construction of public or private sewer collection lines, or water distribution lines. Also, air quality activity permits must be secured by the developer or prime contractor from the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality before constructing, operating or engaging in an activity which may cause or contribute to air pollution. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me at the telephone number shown under my signature on the first page of this letter CC: Project File |
| 12/27/2006 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | January 5, 2007 To: Jeff Winter, Esencia Architecture & Urban Design Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Project Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ____________________________________ From: Michael J.Harrington (520-740-6579), representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environmental Quality Subject: Safeway Store 0234, 8702 E. Broadway (Fuel Station) Development Plan - 1st Submittal (REVISED REVIEW LETTER) D06-0054 The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. This project will be tributary to the Ina Road Water Pollution Control Facility via the Tanque Verde Interceptor. A portion of the existing private sewer will be removed and a new connection (BCS) will be connected to the existing pipe to service a new fueling station facility. Per written guidance provided by the PCWMD Development Services Section, sufficient conveyance and treatment capacity exists in the downstream public sewerage system for this small project, and a formal capacity response letter from the PCWMD will not be required. This project will qualify for the Standard connection fee rate. All Sheets: Add the development plan case number, D06-0054, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross reference numbers. Add any appropriate cross-reference numbers. No wastewater review fees will be charged for sheets where these are the only required revisions. Add a General Note that states: THIS PROJECT WILL HAVE ______ EXISTING AND______ PROPOSED WASTEWATER FIXTURE UNIT EQUIVALENTS PER TABLE 13.20.045(E)(1) IN PIMA COUNTY CODE 13.20.045(E). And fill in the blanks with the appropriate values. Add a General Note that states: ANY WASTEWATER DISCHARGED INTO THE PUBLIC SANITARY SEWERAGE SYSTEM SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE INDUSTRIAL WASTE ORDINANCE (PIMA COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 1991-140, AS AMENDED). Add a General Note that states: THE ON-SITE SANITARY SEWERS WILL BE PRIVATE AND WILL BE CONSTRUCTED, OPERATED AND MAINTAINED ON A PRIVATE BASIS, AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH AN APPROVED OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN, IF REQUIRED. THE LOCATION AND METHOD OF CONNECTION TO AN EXISTING PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER IS SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT. Add a Permitting or General Note that states: A PROJECT CONSTRUCTION PERMIT MUST BE SECURED FROM PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT BEFORE BEGINNING ANY WORK ON THIS PROJECT. Sheet DP1.1: Revise the site plan so that it shows all public sewer elements (sewer mains and manholes and cleanouts), that are located on this project or are less than 100’ from this project, identified with the wastewater improvement plan and manhole IMS numbers. The improvement plan and IMS numbers may be found at the PCWMD Maps and Records Section office (5th floor), or on PCWMD and PCDOT MapGuide internet websites. Revise the site plan to show the existing building connection sewer (BCS), the pipe that will be removed, pipe that will remain in place and the new building connection and cleanouts. This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the development plan. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the second (2nd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $100.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me at the telephone number shown under my signature on the first page of this letter CC: Project File |