Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Permit Number - D05-0040
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/22/2006 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 02/28/2006 | JCLARK3 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/01/2006 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Submit the MS&R Covenant as required in LUC 2.8.3.5.F. The following link includes a covenant approved by the City for these situations: http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/Major_Streets_Covenant.pdf When the covenant is approved and recorded the MS&R Covenant recording information is to be added to the development plan. DS 2-05.2.4.E 2. Revise the landscape plan to relocate Desert spoon from the SVT east of the driveway. This plant typically interferes with visibility. LUC 3.7.2.8 & DS 2-06 3. Basin design is to be in accordance with DS 10-01 Refer to p. 78 for design criteria regarding basin slopes/depths. DS 10-01. LUC 3.7.4.3.A Basin slopes are required to have slopes no steeper than 4:1 where depths exceed three feet, 3:1 for unprotected slopes and 2: 1 for protected slopes for depths less than three feet. DS 10-01.4 A DSMR will be required to modify the standard and allow approval of the current design. DS 1-01.4.0 4. Indicate the methods by which water harvesting or storm water runoff is used to benefit planting areas on the site. LUC 3.7.4.3.B In addition to creating depressions in the landscape areas, the plans are required to show how the site makes maximum use of site storm water runoff for supplemental on-site irrigation purposes. Provide openings and other elements that facilitate the required water harvesting on the grading plan and indicate these items on the landscape plan. 5) Identify the type of dust control proposed for the retention basin. DS 10-01. 6) The chain link security fence (Detail 11 on sheet DP4) could not be located on the plans. The use of chain-link fencing is limited along along a street frontage along a Gateway Route (Valencia Road). Show the location of the proposed fence on the landscape and development plans. DS 2-05.2.4.X RESUBMITTAL OF ALL PLANS IS REQUIRED |
| 03/06/2006 | FRODRIG2 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Approv-Cond | March 6, 2006 TO: Kim Acorn Acorn Associates Architecture Ltd. THRU: Patricia Gehlen City of Tucson, Development Services Department FROM: Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Pima County Development Services Department Development Review Division (Wastewater) SUBJECT: TRS Home Furnishings Development Plan – 2nd Submittal (AMENDED) D05-040 The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. SHEET DP1. Please move utility notes 4.4-4.6 from Sheet DP3 to the general notes on this sheet. SHEET DP3. Delete utility notes 4.1, 4.4, 4.5 and 4.6. Subject to the above required revisions, the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality and Wastewater Management Department hereby approve the above referenced submittal of the development plan. Please note the following: Approval of the above referenced submittal does not authorize the construction of public or private sewer collection lines, or water distribution lines. Prior to the construction of such features, a Construction Authorization (Approval To Construct) may need to be obtained from the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality. Also, air quality activity permits must be secured by the developer or prime contractor from the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality before constructing, operating or engaging in an activity which may cause or contribute to air pollution. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me. Sincerely, Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Telephone: (520) 740-6947 Copy: Project |
| 03/06/2006 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D05-0040 TRS Home Furnishings 03/03/06 () Tentative Plat (XXXX) Development Plan (XXXX) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: C9-84-09 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: 12th Avenue/Valencia GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: Valencia COMMENTS DUE BY: 03/08/06 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies () See Additional Comments Attached (XXXX) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: 12/05/05 () Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: D. Estolano 791-4505 DATE: 2/27/06 |
| 03/08/2006 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Patricia Gehlen DATE: March 8, 2006 CDRC/Zoning Manager SUBJECT: TRS Home Furnishing, 225 E Valencia Rd. Development Plan D05-0040 (First Review) T15S, R13E, Section 12 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Development Plan and Drainage Report. The Development Plan (DP) and Drainage Report (DR) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Development Plan: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DP. 2. Label existing and future sight visibility triangles per D.S. 2-02.2.1.10. It seems there may be a conflict between the future SVT and the proposed parking, therefore the future SVT must be shown. Per pervious 3. Show refuse container location, size, and access thereto fully dimensioned per D.S. 2-02.2.1.32 and D.S. 6-01.0. Obtain permission from John Clark at 791-5543 x1136 for approval of refuse enclosure location. Drainage Report: 1. This DR has been accepted for DP Plat purposes only. Additional comments may be necessary at the grading plan stage. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1193 or Paul.Machado@ci.tucsonaz.govs Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 791-5550 x1193 office (520) 879-8010 fax C:/225 E VALENCIA RD CDRC 2 |
| 03/21/2006 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | Traffic Engineering REJECTS this DP submittal: 1. Detail 15 on sheet 4 incorrectly depicts the location of the future SVT. Figure 6 of the MSRP indicates that the curb line for a 150' ultimate ROW will be 12' in from the ROW line. It is along this line that the SVT will lie. D. Dale Kelch, PE Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov |
| 04/01/2006 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: D05-0040 TRS Home Furnishings Development Plan TRANSMITTAL DATE: April 1, 2006 DUE DATE: March 8, 2006 COMMENTS: I apologize for the delay in providing the comments for the second submittal of this development plan. If you would like to call me about any of the remaining comments please feel free to do so. 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is October 31, 2006. This plan has been reviewed based on the proposed development and compliance with current LUC and Development Standards requirements. 2. I acknowledge that the owner is filing the lot combo covenant for recordation. Someone from your office dropped off a document for an MS&R covenant. I believe that in addition to the MS&R covenant the lot combo covenant is to be submitted. Please let me know if you were able to download a copy of the file from our web site. If not I can email you a copy of the Lot Combo Covenant. Has the MS&R covenant been recorded? If so please provide a copy of the recorded document or the recordation receipt. Thank you. (Previous comment left as reference for the reviewer) It appears based on review of the legal description and the drawing that a lot reconfiguration lots splits have occurred on lots 92 and 95. Please provide approval documents by the City of Tucson granting approval of lot reconfiguration and lot splits. As of this review without having further information, it will be assumed that the City of Tucson has not reviewed or approved the lot splits and reconfiguration. At this time it is requested that all information, drawings, legal descriptions, and the proper lot split/reconfiguration application is made and applicable fees are paid in order to process the lot split/reconfiguration application. Further comments may be forthcoming on this issue based on the applicant's response to this comment. The legal description in the title block may have to be revised based on the new legal description of the lots. Also please delineate and dimension the new lot lines for all four lots. DS 2-05.2.1.G.2 Based on the drawing a tentative plat and final plat may be required for the subdivision of land as depicted. A total of six lots appear to have been created. Until the revised drawing is submitted for review this will be the assumption. A recorded lot combo covenant will also be required. Please call me for more info. 3. It was not clear from the response to the previous comment regarding the PAAL and refuge area along the east and north sides of the proposed building. The location in question is the area with the doors and bicycle lockers. The response was that, non-public trucks would use this area. If the public is not allowed to access this area a sidewalk is not required but a striped five-foot wide pedestrian refuge is still required per D.S. 2-08.3.1. Please revise the plan as required. (Previous Comment left as reference for the reviewer) All PAALs must be dimensioned. Please dimension the PAAL area between the parking area with six parking spaces and the northeast side of the building. In addition to dimensioning the PAAL draw, label, and dimension a five-foot pedestrian refuge area, which includes a four-foot wide concrete sidewalk along the northeast sides of the building. The required sidewalk must connect to the sidewalk along the eastside of the building. All sidewalks must be constructed of concrete and must be physically separated from the vehicular use areas. The section of the continuous circulation extending from the sidewalk along the right of way and between the two parking spaces must be concrete and physically separated. Physical separation can be accomplished by a constructing a raised sidewalk and providing an access ramp to transition from the sidewalk to the crosswalk. The minimum width of the sidewalk must be four feet clear. Please revise the sidewalk as required. DS 2-05.2.4.D.3 and DS 2-05.2.4.K Please ensure that all sidewalks are dimensioned to ensure compliance with the minimum width or clearance of four feet. 4. I acknowledge that a second loading zone has been added to comply with requirement. It does not appear that the location of the loading is accessible. Please demonstrate access into and out of the loading zone. (Previous Comment left as reference for the reviewer) Per table 3.4.5.3 a building with a gross floor area of 10,000 to 30,000 square feet, two loading zones are required for this development. The plan depicts one loading on the north side of the building. Please add the second loading space. Label and dimension the loading spaces. Also revise the loading space calculation as required. DS 2-05.2.4.Q If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. DGR C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D050040dp2.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan and additional requested documents. |
| 04/03/2006 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES April 3, 2006 Kim Acorn Acorn Associates Architecture, LTD. 4400 East Broadway Blvd., Suite 505 Tucson, Arizona 85711 Subject: D05-0040 TRS Home Furnishings Development Plan Dear Kim: Your submittal of February 22, 2006 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter for each agency explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLUELINES MUST BE FOLDED 5 Copies Revised Development Plan (Landscape, Zoning, Engineering, Traffic, DSD) 4 Copies Revised Landscape Plans (Zoning, Landscape, Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Revised NPPO plans(Landscape, DSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Reports (Engineering, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608, ext. 1179. Sincerely, Patricia Y. Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 881-0995 |