Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D05-0040
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/09/2006 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES January 9, 2006 Kim Acorn Acorn Associates Architecture, LTD. 4400 East Broadway Blvd., Suite 505 Tucson, Arizona 85711 Subject: D05-0040 TRS Home Furnishings Development Plan Dear Jeff: Your submittal of November 01, 2005 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter for each agency explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLUELINES MUST BE FOLDED 8 Copies Revised Development Plan (Environmental Services, Community Planning, Landscape, Zoning, Engineering, Traffic, Wastewater, DSD) 5 Copies Revised Landscape Plans (Zoning, Community Planning, Landscape, Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Revised NPPO plans(Landscape, DSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Reports (Engineering, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608, ext. 1179. Sincerely, Patricia Y. Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 881-0995 |
| 11/01/2005 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | The Development Plan is approved November 01, 2005. |
| 11/01/2005 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 11/07/2005 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | NO COMMENT D05-0040 ACORN ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTURE, LTD TRS HOME FURNISHINGS ********************************************************************* Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Notice: This email transmission and any attachments are intended for use by the person(s)/entity(ies) named above and may contain confidential/privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by e-mail, and delete or destroy all copies plus attachments. Neither the State nor the Arizona Department of Transportation and/or its employees shall be liable for violations of law, or damages resulting from your dissemination or use of this email transmission if you are not the intended recipient. ********************************************************************* |
| 11/08/2005 | JCLARK3 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | * No known landfill with in 1000 feet of this development. * Enclosure does not have side wall protection. * No provisions shown for recycling. |
| 11/09/2005 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approved | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D05-0040 TRS HOME FURNISHINGS /DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: November 8, 2005 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. NOTE: 1: Submit a 24 x 36 Reverse Reading Double Matte Photo Mylar of approved Development Plan to City Planning. Signed and dated Mylar will be forwarded to Pima County Addressing prior to assignment of addresses. 2: All addresses will need to be displayed per Pima County Address Standards at the time of final inspection. jg |
| 11/09/2005 | PMCLAUG1 | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Per LUC 3.7.2.4.A, on streets designated as Major Streets and Routes (MS&R), such as Valencia Road, the required minimum 10-foot street landscape border is measured from the MS&R future right-of-way line as determined by LUC 2.8.3.4. The landscape border may not be located within the MS&R right-of-way as shown on the plan. Revise the landscape plan to be based on the full 150-foot right-of-way (75-foot half right-of-way) for Valencia Road, rather than the existing 45-foot half right-of-way shown. 2. Landscaping requirements apply to expansion of existing development as follows: On sites where the gross floor area of the existing building(s) is more than ten thousand (10,000) square feet, expansion in square footage of land area, floor area, lot coverage, or vehicular use area as follows: If the expansion is less than 25%, the requirements of this Division apply only to the proposed expansion. Existing development on the site is subject to the zoning regulations in effect at the time the existing development received zoning approval per LUC 3.7.1.2.B If the expansion is 25% or greater or if expansions as of February 15, 1991 cumulatively result in a 25% or greater expansion in land area, floor area, lot coverage, or vehicular use area, the requirements of this Division apply to the entire site per LUC 3.7.1.2.B. Provide a calculation of percent expansion of building floor area and vehicle use area on the development plan and submit a copy of the last approved landscape plan and site plan for the existing development on the site (to the west of the proposed project site). Further comments may be necessary once copies of the approved plans are provided and an expansion calculation is given. 3. Add the existing and future sight-visibility triangles (SVTs) to the landscape plan. LUC 3.7.2.8 & DS 2-06 4. All lettering and dimensions must be a minimum of 12 point (0.12") in size for microfilming purposes. Revise all text on sheets L-1 and L-2 to meet this minimum archiving standard. DS2-03.2.1.C 5. Add the development plan case number (D05-040) to the lower right hand corner of all sheets of the Development Plan, Landscape Plan and NPPO Plan. DS 2-03.2.2.B.1 6. Dimension all landscape areas on the landscape plan drawing. DS 2-07.2.2.A.2 7. Landscape plan shall include irrigation specification design and layout per DS 2-06.5.4.A & DS 2-06.5.4.B including source of irrigation, sleeves for driveways and sidewalks, locations of valves, low-flow bubblers or drip irrigation. 8. Delineate the limits of grading on the landscape and NPPO plans, and indicate areas where the protective fencing (described in Plant Protection Note #1 on sheet L-1) is to be located. 9. Note the depths of retention/detention basins, and percentage or ratio of side slopes on the landscape plan. Provide sections for basins on the development plan submittal. DS 2-07.2.2.B Basin design is to be in accordance with DS 10-01 Refer to p. 78 for design criteria regarding basin slopes/depths. DS 10-01. 10. Indicate the methods by which water harvesting or storm water runoff is used to benefit planting areas on the site. LUC 3.7.4.3.B 11. In the location map on both the development plan and landscape plan, revise the section number in the lower left-hand corner of section 12 to read "12" rather than "23". RESUBMITTAL OF ALL PLANS IS REQUIRED |
| 11/18/2005 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | SUBJECT: TRS HOME FURNISHINGS D05-0040 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted November 1, 2005. It appears that there are no conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, offsite and electrical load plans. Include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Liza Castillo Right of Way Agent Land Management Tucson Electric Power Co. (520) 917-8745 lcastillo@tep.com |
| 11/29/2005 | FRODRIG2 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | 82 estimated daily trips in 24 hr period. |
| 12/01/2005 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | December 1, 2005 To: Kim Acorn, Acorn Associates Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Project Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ____________________________________ From: Michael Harrington (520-740-6579), representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environmental Quality Subject: TRS Home Furnishings Development Plan - 1st Submittal D05-0040 The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. This project will be tributary to the Roger Road Wastewater Treatment Plant via the Santa Cruz Interceptor. Obtain a letter from the PCWMD's Development Services Section, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for the project is available in the downstream public sewerage system and provide a copy of that letter to this office. The form to request such a letter may be found at: http://www.pima.gov/wwm/forms/docs/CapResponseRequest.pdf. The development plan for this project cannot be approved until a copy of this letter has been received by this office. Based on the proposed building location being outside of the Emory Park sewer improvement area, this project will qualify for the Non-Participating sewer connection fee rate. All Sheets: Add the development plan case number, D05-0040, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross-reference numbers. No wastewater review fees will be charged for sheets where this is the only required revision. Sheet DP1: Revise the General Notes by; Moving Utilities notes numbers 4.3, 4.4 & 4.5, from sheet DP3, and adding them to the General Notes on sheet DP1. Sheet DP3: Delete Utilities notes numbers 4.3, 4.4 & 4.5 from this page. Sheet DP3: Revise the Utility Plan so that; The existing public sewer located in Fontana Avenue is labeled with the construction plan number G-332. Sheet DP3: Revise the Utility Plan so that; All public sewers mains and manholes located within 100’ of the subject property are shown on the plan and identified by plan number. Sheet DP 3: Revise the site plan so that; The sewer main used for the private sewer point of connection, located in Fontana Avenue R.O.W., shows its upstream cleanout and downstream manholes labeled with the PCWMD IMS numbers. These are the identifying numbers used on the PCWMD Mapping and Records basemaps and the PCWMD MapGuide and PCDOT MapGuide websites. Provide the invert at the point of connection to the public sewer. Sheet DP3: Revise the Utility Plan so that it shows; The length and slope of each pipe reach of the proposed private sewer. And label the proposed NEW SANITARY SEWER as PRIVATE. Sheet DP3: Revise the Utility Plan so that; The sewer connection to the PROPOSED BUILDING is identified as an HCS or BCS. Subject to the above, the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality and Wastewater Management Department hereby approve the above referenced submittal of the . The required revision(s) may be shown on the Mylars. Please note the following: Approval of the above referenced submittal does not authorize the construction of public or private sewer collection lines, or water distribution lines. Prior to the construction of such features, a Construction Authorization (Approval To Construct) may need to be obtained from the Pima County Environmental Quality. Also, air quality activity permits must be secured by the developer or prime contractor from the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality before constructing, operating or engaging in an activity which may cause or contribute to air pollution. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me at the telephone number shown under my signature on the first page of this letter CC: Project File |
| 12/02/2005 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approved | No comment |
| 12/05/2005 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: D05-0040 TRS Home Furnishings Development Plan TRANSMITTAL DATE: December 1, 2005 DUE DATE: December 1, 2005 COMMENTS: 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is October 31, 2006. This plan has been reviewed based on the proposed development and compliance with current LUC and Development Standards requirements. 2. It appears, based on review of the legal description and the drawing that a lot reconfiguration lots splits have occurred on lots 92 and 95. Please provide approval documents by the City of Tucson granting approval of lot reconfiguration and lot splits. As of this review without having further information, it will be assumed that the City of Tucson has not reviewed or approved the lot splits and reconfiguration. At this time it is requested that all information, drawings, legal descriptions, and the proper lot split/reconfiguration application is made and applicable fees are paid in order to process the lot split/reconfiguration application. Further comments may be forthcoming on this issue based on the applicant's response to this comment. The legal description in the title block may have to be revised based on the new legal description of the lots. Also please delineate and dimension the new lot lines for all four lots. DS 2-05.2.1.G.2 Based on the drawing a tentative plat and final plat may be required for the subdivision of land as depicted. A total of six lots appear to have been created. Until the revised drawing is submitted for review this will be the assumption. A recorded lot combo covenant will also be required. Please call me for more info. 3. List on the plans the conditions of rezoning. If a subsequent change of development plan was submitted for review and additional conditions were added please include the new conditions. On May 22, 1990, a letter from COT Planning Department was sent to Acorn and Associates explaining the receipt of a letter and a conceptual plan reflecting the change of development plan. Per a conversation with Craig Gross regarding this matter, we are requesting that a copy of the letter and conceptual plan submitted to the Planning Department in 1990, be made available to the Zoning Reviewer with the next development plan submittal package. The review of the conceptual plan is to ensure that that the proposed development is in compliance with change of development plan of 1990. DS 2-05.2.2.B.2 and .7 4. This plan is subject to the compliance with the criteria of Major Streets and Routes LUC section 2.8.3 and the Airport Environs Zone LUC section 2.8.5. Add a note stating that this development plan has been designed to meet the criteria of AEZ overlay. Although a note stating that the development plan has been designed to meet the requirements of LUC section 2.8.5 the plan does not depict compliance. The rezoning conditions of 1985 do not require dedication of right-of-way for Valencia Road. This development will be impacted by the future widening and the site should be designed to meet future site conditions with respect the location of the right of way line. If the applicant does not wish to design the site at this time to meet code in the future, the applicant must submit a second set of drawings depicting how the Land Use Code criteria for this development will be met, (parking, vehicular use areas, sidewalks and landscaping, floor area ratio etc). See LUC section 2.8.3.5.F. In addition to the future site and landscape plans a recorded MS&R covenant will be required. This site is subject compliance with criteria of the Airport Environs Zone. The site is within the AHD, NCD-65 and the CUZ-2 sections of the AEZ overlay. The following information must be included on the plan. List the elevation of the end of the NW runway, 11L and also list the elevation of the site after grading and the overall elevation of the structure. Please ensure that the overall height of the building will comply with the allowed within the AHD on this site. The allowed maximum height based on the AEZ overlay maps is 132 feet. Review the COT zoning maps and the AEZ maps and add the applicable AHD (height limitation) information to the drawing. The building must be constructed to meet the NCD-65 noise levels. Add a note that states that the building will be constructed to meet this requirement. DS 2-05.2.2.B.10 5. The note listing the gross area of the site may have to be revised based on the response comments to the lot split issue. DS 2-05.2.2.B.11 6. Based on any lot splits that may have occurred or are proposed the site boundary information for each new lot must be annotated on the plan. Due to the possible number of splits and the size of the property a tentative/development plat and final plat may be required. DS 2-05.2.3.A Proposed land splits or existing lot lines shall be drawn on the development plan with dimensions and the identification number and approximate square footage of each lot. (Please, be aware that, if land division occurs and the number of lots falls within the definition of subdivision, a subdivision plat is required.) DS 2-05.2.4.A 7. If applicable, draw, label and dimension all existing or proposed easements. DS 2-05.2.3.B and DS 2-05.2.4.G All proposed easements must be recorded and recordation information must be listed on the plan. The easements must be recorded prior to final approval of the development plan. Also provide copies of existing documents granting cross access, pedestrian and cross parking. The agreements must be listed as a keynote on the plan along with the recordation information. Structures will not be constructed over existing or proposed utility easements. Please clarify if the existing water/electric easement is to be relocated or abandoned. The development plan cannot be approved until the easement issue is addressed. 8. All PAALs must be dimensioned. Please dimension the PAAL area between the parking area with six parking spaces and the northeast side of the building. In addition to dimensioning the PAAL draw, label, and dimension a five-foot pedestrian refuge area, which includes a four-foot wide concrete sidewalk along the northeast sides of the building. The required sidewalk must connect to the sidewalk along the eastside of the building. All sidewalks must be constructed of concrete and must be physically separated from the vehicular use areas. The section of the continuous circulation extending from the sidewalk along the right of way and between the two parking spaces must be concrete and physically separated. Physical separation can be accomplished by a constructing a raised sidewalk and providing an access ramp to transition from the sidewalk to the crosswalk. The minimum width of the sidewalk must be four feet clear. Please revise the sidewalk as required. DS 2-05.2.4.D.3 and DS 2-05.2.4.K Please ensure that all sidewalks are dimensioned to ensure compliance with the minimum width or clearance of four feet. 9. Show all right-of-way dedications on or abutting the site and label. If the development plan has been prepared in conjunction with a subdivision plat or is required as a condition of approval of a review process, such as a rezoning, street dedications in accordance with the Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan may be required by these processes. Dedication of right of way for Valencia Road may be required. If the dedication right of way is a requirement by the Department of Transportation the site drawing will have to be redesigned in order to ensure that the development is designed to meet code based on the new right of way line. Please contact Elizabeth Eberbach, Engineering Reviewer for DSD for more information on the Valencia Road right of way dedication requirements. DS 2-05.2.4.E 10. If street dedication is not required or proposed and the project site is adjacent to a Major Street or Route, draw the Major Street right-of-way lines for those streets. (Add the MS&R future sidewalk, right-of-way lines, etc.) DS 2-05.2.4.F 11. Please add a building setback dimension from the Valencia Road back of the future curb location to the building. DS 2-05.2.4.I 12. It appears that two separate buildings are proposed. Please label on the building footprint the square footage for each building. DS 2-05.2.4.M Label the building dimensions for both buildings. DS 2-05.2.4.N 13. Per table 3.4.5.3 a building with a gross floor area of 10,000 to 30,000 square feet, two loading zones are required for this development. The plan depicts one loading on the north side of the building. Please add the second loading space. Label and dimension the loading spaces. Also revise the loading space calculation as required. DS 2-05.2.4.Q 14. Please revise the note for the vehicle-parking ratio. The correct parking ratio is one space per 200 square feet of the gross floor area. The note lists the ratio as 1/2000. Revise as required. Also revise the note that lists the "Required Parking Based On Financial Service Use". This note implies that a financial service is proposed. Please revise the note as required unless the financial service is proposed in which case the parking calculation must be revised to a ratio of one space per 175 square feet of gross floor area. If note 2 under the parking calculation is to reflect the use and the table for the loading zones add the correct use group name Retail Trade Use Group and Loading Zone Table 3.4.5.3. DS 2-05.2.4.P 15. Bicycle parking is required for this development at a ratio of eight percent of the number of vehicle parking spaces provided. This development is to be provided with 87 vehicle parking spaces. The number of bicycle parking spaces required is seven. Of the seven spaces fifty percent must be class one and fifty percent must be class two facilities. The location and a typical detail drawing have been provided for both the classes one and two facilities. What has not been depicted on the drawing is the location of the class one facility and the dimensions of the actual facility locations have not been provided. Please review development standards section 2-09 for facility dimensions such as post separations, aisle widths etc. The bicycle parking calculations must be revised to correctly list the number of required and number of bicycle spaces provided. The detail drawings should include the type of surfacing proposed, type of facility, and the number of bicycle the facility supports. Also the type of lighting must be listed. DS 2-05.2.4.Q 16. Existing and future sight visibility triangles must be drawn, labeled and dimensioned at all driveway entrances. DS 2-05.2.4.R 17. Indicate graphically, where possible, and by notes, in all other instances, compliance with conditions of rezoning. DS 2-05.2.4.U 18. Indicate location and type of postal service to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements, such as pedestrian accessibility, utilities, and landscaping. If the postal service is to be provided inside the building, please add a note stating so. If the postal service is to be provided in a central location via multiple postal boxes or pedestal please draw and label the location and type of service. DS 2-05.2.4.V 19. Indicate the locations and types of proposed freestanding, signs including existing billboards to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and those minimal location requirements can be met. The type and size of freestanding sign must be labeled. DS 2-05.2.4.W 20. See the landscape reviewer comments related to landscape borders, screening, and NPPO requirements. DS 2-05.2.4.X 21. All text height must be a minimum of .12. The drawing text notes, dimensions, annotations etc are less than .12. Please revise the height as required. 22. Please review all land use code data and revise all incorrect notes. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. DGR C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D050040dp.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan and additional requested documents. |
| 12/05/2005 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D05-0040 TRS Home Furnishings 12/05/05 () Tentative Plat (XXXX) Development Plan (XXXX) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: C9-84-09 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: 12th Avenue/Valencia GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: Valencia COMMENTS DUE BY: 12/1/05 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies () See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: (XXXX) Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat (XXXX) Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: D. Estolano 791-4505 DATE: 11/29/05 Urban Planning and Design Comments TRS Home Furnishings – D-05-0040 November 29, 2005 The site is subject to rezoning condition as outlined in rezoning case C9-84-09. Please add/revise the following items to the development plan: Please list the rezoning conditions on the development plan. 2. Per rezoning condition 1.e. “no vehicular access to Fontana Avenue,” please revise the development plan deleting the 24-foot access easement off of Fontanta. If this access easement is intended to be solely used as a utility easement, please add a note to the General Notes section stating that access off of Fontanta is restricted to utility vehicles only. |
| 12/09/2005 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | DATE: December 09, 2005 TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services FROM: Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov SUBJECT: D05-0040 TRS Home Furnishings: Development Plan Staff has no comments. |
| 12/15/2005 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | Traffic Engineering REJECTS this DP: 1. Show and label as to size (ie 20x110) both existing and future SVTs (DS 2-05.2.4.R) If the existing and future SVTs are coincident, label it as both existing and future. Include the near side SVT from the existing access to the west of this project. D. Dale Kelch, PE Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov |
| 12/30/2005 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Patricia Gehlen DATE: January 9, 2006 CDRC/Zoning Manager SUBJECT: TRS Home Furnishing, 225 E Valencia Rd. Development Plan D05-0040 (First Review) T15S, R13E, Section 12 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Development Plan and Drainage Report. The Development Plan (DP) and Drainage Report (DR) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Development Plan: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DP. 2. As per the Federal ADA requirements, all wheel chair ramps shall have the truncated domes instead of the standard grooves that are shown on COT SD 207. Aside from the Truncated Domes, all wheel chair ramps shall be constructed in accordance with COT SD 207. 3. Label existing and future sight visibility triangles per D.S. 2-02.2.1.10. 4. Show all points of egress and ingress including locations and width of driveways and parking area access lanes (P.A.A.L.) per D.S. 2-02.2.1.11. 5. Please label all vehicular, bicycle, pedestrian, and handicapped circulation clearly identified per D.S. 2-02.2.1.12. 6. Fully-dimensioned loading space(s) and maneuvering area(s) per D.S. 2-02.2.1.14. 7. Show the limits of the 100-year floodplain and water surface elevation per D.S. 2-02.2.1.15. 8. Please provide Drainage patterns and finished grades per D.S. 2-02.2.1.16. 9. Please list estimated cut & fill quantities per D.S. 2-02.2.1.17. 10. Please show dimensioned right-of-way, including any applicable Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan right-of-way per D.S. 2-02.2.1.19. 11. Add the basin(s) maintenance responsibility note per S.M.D.D.F.M. 2.3.1.6 C 1 and 2 to the DP. 12. Location and orientation of existing major physical features, such as railroad tracks and drainageways per D.S. 2-02.2.1.22. 13. Show Development plan number on all sheets per D.S. 2-02.2.1.29. 14. Show refuse container location, size, and access thereto fully dimensioned per D.S. 2-02.2.1.32 and D.S. 6-01.0. 15. Placement of fill in excess of 2' above existing grade at any location in the outer 100' of the developing site is not allowed and/or shall meet the requirements per D.S. 11-01. Please address. 16. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information. 17. Please show a typical cross section of the P.A.A.L. or call out the percentage of slopes. Call out the GB at the D/W, if applicable. 18. Please show the proposed roof drainage patterns, 100% of the 10-year flow must be conveyed under the sidewalks including any other site drainage as well. Please provide supporting calculations to demonstrate compliance with D.S. 3-01.4.4. If the location(s) of the roof scuppers have not yet been decided, a general note indicating sidewalk scuppers will be used when the roof scuppers locations have been designed and located will suffice. 19. List the consulting engineer and the owner/developer on the plans with the pertinent information. 20. Add note: "Depress all landscaped areas 6" maximum for water harvesting". 21. "A grading permit and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP's) will be required for this project. Submit 4 sets of grading and SWPPP's with text, upon completion and submittal of a grading permit application. A grading permit may not be issued prior to site plan approval. Subsequent comments may be necessary, depending upon the nature and extent of revisions that occur to the plans". Drainage Report: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DR. 2. This review was performed for DP Plat purposes only. Additional comments may be necessary at the grading plan stage. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1193 or Paul.Machado@ci.tucsonaz.govs Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 791-5550 x1193 office (520) 879-8010 fax C:/225 E VALENCIA RD CDRC |