Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D04-0007
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/18/2004 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 06/23/2004 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | Submit any revised plans for review. |
| 06/23/2004 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approved | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D04-007 SANTA RITA CO. WAREHOUSE ADDN./REVISED DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: June 21, 2004 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. 1. Submit a 24 x 36 Reverse Reading Double Matte Photo Mylar of approved Development Plan to City Planning. Signed and dated Mylar will be forwarded to Pima County Addressing prior to assignment of addresses. 2. All addresses will need to be displayed per Pima County Address Standards at the time of final inspection. |
| 06/25/2004 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approv-Cond | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING AND DESIGN COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D04-0007 Santa Rita Co. Warehouse Addn. 06/24/04 () Tentative Plat ( X ) Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: SE-03-27 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: N/A GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: N/A COMMENTS DUE BY: 07/01/04 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies (x) See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: ( x ) Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat ( x ) Development Plan ( x ) Landscape Plan ( x ) Other (Elevations) REVIEWER: E. Anderson 791-4505 DATE: 06/23/04 Department of Urban Planning and Design Comments Santa Rita Co. Warehouse Addition, D04-0007 – Second Submittal Condition four states that building facades shall be designed with attention to architectural detail compatible to the front façade. Staff still needs to see the proposed color building elevations and how the new construction is compatible with the existing building and front façade. Condition six states that all masonry walls shall be constructed of, or painted with, graffiti-resistant materials and that they shall be constructed with stated decorative materials. Staff has to review per the approved conditions. Please show a detail of the proposed masonry walls on the appropriate sheet and indicate that they will be graffiti-resistant and what material they will be constructed with. Condition seven states that any continuous wall greater than 75 feet in length and three feet in height visible from the public right-of-way shall have a varied wall alignment. Staff has to review per the approved conditions. Please show the varied wall alignments. The General Plan and the Design Guidelines Manual promote safe by design concepts. Lots abutting common areas should not utilize high walls that isolate the common areas that could promote criminal activities. Placing the “eyes of the community” into these areas creates a safe environment for residents. Where perimeter walls are provided along lot lines that abut designated open areas, common areas, the masonry portion of the wall should not exceed three (3’) feet in height, except for pillars, with wrought iron or other similar open fencing materials on top. A detail of this wall needs to be provided on the development plan. |
| 06/25/2004 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approv-Cond | This morning I met with Scott Adams about this development plan. He showed me how they have met three of our four comments. It was agreed upon that the fourth comment, graffiti-resistent screen walls, can be addressed with a note stating that the property owner will take care of all graffiti in a timely manor. I talked with Roger and he was fine with the comment being located under General Notes. It is my understanding that other departments had additional comments and therefore another review will take place. As long as the new note is on the development plan, we will have no further comments. If you have any questions, please let me know. Thanks. Erik Anderson |
| 06/29/2004 | MATT FLICK | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | 1. The plan was reviewed for development plan purposes only. It was not reviewed as a site/grading plan. The previously-approved plans were not provided as requested in the previous reviewer's Comment #1 dated 23MAR04 and the current plan could not be reviewed for conformance to the current grading plan (T03BU00898). There is no current grading plan application shown for this parcel (3131 E Transcon Way). The plan was not reviewed, in detail, for grading. 2. A right-of-way permit is required from TDOT for any work performed within City of Tucson right-of-way. |
| 07/01/2004 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | ZONING | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Center Plans Coordination Office FROM: Peter McLaughlin Senior Planner FOR: Patricia Gehlen Principal Planner PROJECT: D04-007 Santa Rita/Pepsi Cola Bottling Co. Warehouse Addition Site Plan Review (2nd review) Development Plan TRANSMITTAL: 7-1-04 DUE DATE: 7-1-04 The Zoning Review Section approves the development plan for this project, subject to the following changes on the sign-off copies. However, should there be any changes requested by other CDRC members, the Zoning Review Section approval is void, and we request copies of the revised development plan to verify that those changes do not affect any zoning requirements. 1. According to Assessor records this site is made up of seven parcels. It is acknowledged that a lot combination is being processed as required prior to the approval of this development plan. Please provide documentation of lot combination including approved assessor's tax combo forms and notarized and recorded covenant. 2. Once recorded, add the docket & page of recordation for the recreation easement to the plan DS 2-05.2.4.U If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Peter McLaughlin, (520) 791-5608. |
| 07/13/2004 | MARILYN KALTHOFF | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Approv-Cond | July 13, 2004 TO: Peggy Rau, EEC THRU: FROM: ____________________________________ representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environmental Quality SUBJECT: Santa Rita Bottling Company Warehouse Addition - Submittal D04-0007 The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. As previously requested, separate the last sentence of General Note 10 into a different General Note. Subject to the above, the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality and Wastewater Management Department hereby approve the above referenced submittal of the development plan. The required revision(s) may be shown on the Mylars. Please note the following: Approval of the above referenced submittal does not authorize the construction of public or private sewer collection lines, or water distribution lines. Prior to the construction of such features, a Construction Authorization (Approval To Construct) may need to be obtained from the Pima County Environmental Quality. Also, air quality activity permits must be secured by the developer or prime contractor from the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality before constructing, operating or engaging in an activity which may cause or contribute to air pollution. If you wish to discuss the above comments, please contact me at the phone number provided above, under my signature. Copy: Project |
| 07/13/2004 | CRAIG GROSS | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Completed |