Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D04-0007
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/04/2004 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 03/04/2004 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | The Development Plan is approved 03/04/04. |
| 03/05/2004 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D04-0007 SANTA RITA CO. WAREHOUSE ADDN. / DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: March 5, 2004 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: 1: Delete direction from all street names (Location Map and all sheets). 2: Number all buildings numerically. |
| 03/09/2004 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING TASK FORCE COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D04-0007 Santa Rita Co. Warehouse Addn. 03/08/04 () Tentative Plat (x) Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: SE-03-27 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: N/A GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: N/A COMMENTS DUE BY: 03/30/04 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies (x) See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: (x) Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat (x) Development Plan (x) Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: E. Anderson 791-4505 DATE: 03/08/04 Comprehensive Planning Task Force Comments Santa Rita Co. Warehouse Addition, D04-0007 Condition four states that the applicant shall provide building elevations and a color palette demonstrating compatibility with existing onsite buildings and the overall neighborhood construction. In addition, building facades shall be designed with attention to architectural detail compatible to the front façade. Please show all four building elevations, the color palette, and how the new construction is compatible with the existing building and overall neighborhood construction. Condition six states that all masonry walls shall be constructed of, or painted with, graffiti-resistant materials and that they shall be constructed with stated decorative materials. Please show a detail of the proposed masonry walls and indicate that they will be graffiti-resistant and what material they will be constructed with. Condition seven states that any continuous wall greater than 75 feet in length and three feet in height visible from the public right-of-way shall have a varied wall alignment and include trees or shrubs in the voids created. Please show the varied wall alignments and trees or shrubs on the appropriate development plan and landscape plan. |
| 03/23/2004 | ELIZABETH EBERBACH | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | SUBJECT: Santa Rita Co. Warehouse addition REVIEWER: Doug Williams DATE: 23 March 2004 CDRC Case Number: D04-0007 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Revised Development Plan, Trail Easement recording documents, and copies of the most recent stamped/approved site and grading plans. SUMMARY: Engineering Division has reviewed the subject plan. Approval is not recommended. Please address the following comments prior to resubmittal: 1. Provide a copy of the recorded Rodeo Wash 15-foot trail easement document or documents and provide recording information on the plan (Type V Exception Case - condition # 5 and Development Standard 2-05.2.3 B). 2. Please provide a complete set of the stamped/approved Site and Grading Plans for reference (DSD activity #'s T03OT00511 and T03BU00898). Please note that if significant changes are proposed on the Development Plan, with respect to the approved plans referenced, additional comments may be necessary. Please address the above comments in their entirety. Resubmittal shall include a revised Development Plan, copies of the most recent stamped/approved site and grading plans, and recorded trail easement documents. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550, extension 1189 or Dwillia1@ci.tucson.az.us. Douglas Williams Sr. Engineering Associate Engineering Division Development Services Department |
| 03/25/2004 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | SUBJECT: Santa Rita Co. Warehouse Addition D04-007 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan dated February 26, 2004. It appears that there are no existing facilities or conflicts within the boundaries of this proposed development. Liza Castillo Land Management Tucson Electric Power Company lcastillo@tep.com Office: (520) 917-8479 Pager: (520) 218-6565 Fax: (520) 917-8400 |
| 03/29/2004 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | PIMA COUNTY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION 201 N. Stone Avenue, 2nd Floor Tucson, Arizona 85701-1207 CARMINE DEBONIS, JR. Phone: (520) 740-6586 Director FAX: (520) 740-6380 March 24, 2004 TO: Ryan Bale, Engineering and Environmental Consultants, Inc. THRU: Craig Gross, City of Tucson Development Services FROM: Tim Rowe, P.E., Development Review Engineer (representing Pima County Wastewater Management and Environmental Quality) Pima County Development Review Division SUBJECT: Santa Rita Company Warehouse Addition Development Plan - 1st Submittal D04-007 The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management (PCWWM) Department. This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. Separate review letters from PDEQ and PCWWM representatives will not be prepared for this project. The following comments are offered for your use: 1. This project will be tributary to the Southeast Interceptor and the Roger Road Wastewater Treatment Facility. Per PCWWM Planning Services, there is currently treatment and conveyance system capacity in the existing downstream sewerage system for this development. Flow from this proposed project would not cause an flow of effluent quality limits to be exceeded. This response is not to be construed as a commitment for treatment or conveyance capacity allocation, but rather an analysis of the existing sewerage system as of this date. If conditions change between now and the time a formal Sewer Service Agreement is established between the owner of record and Pima County, the property owner may be required to augment the existing public sewerage system in order to provide adequate treatment and conveyance capacity for this project. 2. Based on the Sewer Service Agreement for the Santa Rita Bottling Company under case no. CO12-87-05, this project would qualify for Participating sewer connection fee rates. 3. All Sheets: Add the development plan case number, D04-0007, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than the cross reference numbers. No wastewater review fees will be charged for sheets where this is the only required revision. 4. Sheet 1: Will the warehouse addition have any plumbing that will discharge into the public sewer system? If so, show the number of proposed wastewater fixture unit equivalents in a General Note. This value must be calculated using Table 13.20.040(F)(1) in Pima County Code 13.20.040(F). If not, add a General Note that states: THIS PROJECT WILL HAVE ZERO WASTEWATER FIXTURE UNIT EQUIVALENTS. 5. Sheet 1: If the warehouse addition will have any plumbing that will discharge to the public sewer system, add a General Note that states: 6. Sheet 1: Make the last sentence of General Note 10 (regarding industrial wastewater) into a separate General Note and change DISCHARGE to DISCHARGED in this sentence. 7. Sheet 1 or Sheets 4 & 5: Are any new sewer lines being proposed? If so, show them on Sheets 4 & 5 along with the design data. If not, add a General Note that states: THIS PROJECT WILL BE SERVED BY EXISTING PRIVATE SEWER LINES. NO NEW SEWERS WILL BE BUILT. 8. We will require a complete set of the revised bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. If the warehouse addition doesn’t have any plumbing that will discharge into the public sewer system, this project is exempt from the wastewater review fees identified in Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.B. If the warehouse addition will be sewered, these wastewater review fees do apply, and these fees for the 1st and 2nd submittal should be submitted to this office with the second submittal. If you wish to discuss the above comments, please contact me at 740-6563. Tim Rowe, P.E., Development Review Engineer (Wastewater) Pima County Development Review Division TR/tr Copy: Project |
| 03/29/2004 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | DATE: March 24, 2004 TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services FROM: Glenn Hicks, Parks and Recreation SUBJECT: CDRC Transmittal, Project D04 – 0007 Santa Rita Bottling: DP CC: Craig Gross, Development Services Staff has reviewed the development plan and has no comments. Please feel free to call me at 791-4873 x 215 if you have any questions. |
| 03/30/2004 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Center Plans Coordination Office FROM: Peter McLaughlin Senior Planner FOR: Patricia Gehlen Principal Planner PROJECT: D04-007 Santa Rita Bottling Co. Warehouse Addition Site Plan Review (1st review) Development Plan TRANSMITTAL: 3-30-04 DUE DATE: 3-30-04 1. LUC Section 5.3.8.2 permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for full CDRC review. The one year expiration date for this development plan is March 2, 2005. 2. Place the development plan number (D04-007) on each sheet of the d.p., landscape plan and NPPO plan in the lower right hand corner near the title block. . In addition to the Special Exception case number, add the date of approval to the notes. DS 2-05.2.2.B.2 DS 2-05.2.2.B.6 3. For microfilming/archiving purposes, all text must be a minimum of 12 (0.12") point in size. Please revise the lettering in the location map to meet this minimum standard. DS 2-05.2.1.D.2 DS 2-05.2.1.C 4. According to Assessor records this site is made up of seven parcels. Lot lines may not run through buildings. A lot combination is required prior to the approval of this development plan. Please provide documentation of lot combination including approved assessor's tax combo forms and notarized and recorded covenant. 5. The width of the existing backup spur located to the east of the office building is required to be 24 feet. Please revise or approval of a DSMR (Development Standard Modification Request is required. If a DSMR is approved, add the case number, date of approval and any conditions imposed as a note to the plan. DS 3-05.2.2.D 6. 6. Add a general note listing the conditions of annexation for annexation case number C15-88-1. DS 2-05.2.2.B.7 7. Some of the text and line work is difficult to read on the plans with the aerial photo background. It will be more difficult to read on microfilm. In addition to the aerial photo based plan, for clarity please submit a line drawing drafted on plain white background for the southern portion of the property as was done for the northern portion. 8. Demonstrate compliance with special exception condition 5 regarding trail easement by providing documentation from City Parks and Recreation that the proposed location has been approved. Add the docket & page of recordation for the recreation easement to the plan. DS 2-05.2.4.U 9. The proposed use is not clear. General note 1 on sheet C1 reads: "Existing and proposed use is distribution and storage of products" and the plan title reads: "Warehouse Addition". However, special exception conditions and parking calcs indicate manufacturing is a new proposed use. Please clarify and revise to be consistent. Add the development designators for the existing/proposed uses and detail the subject to restrictions from the I-1 chapter of the LUC. DS 2-05.2.2.B.3 LUC 2.7.2.2 10. Demonstrate compliance with special exception condition 4 by submitting elevation drawings and color palette information DS 2-05.2.4.U 11. Detail any existing or proposed freestanding lighting and signage on the plan. Also, indicate if any billboards exist on the site. DS 2-05.2.4.W 12. Continuous pedestrian circulation must provide a connection between the proposed building and the right-of-way along Country Club Road. Please revise to show pedestrian connection. DS 2-08.4.1.A DS 2-05.2.4.K 13. Between any building and PAAL a minimum 5-foot pedestrian refuge, including a 4-foot sidewalk is required. Revise plan to show a 5-foot pedestrian refuge along the west side of the proposed building. DS 3-05.2.2.B.1 14. Dimension from street monument lines the distance to existing and future curbs. Show future MS&R sidewalk location along Country Club Road. Label the street centerlines for adjacent right-of-way. It is not clear where the 51' dimension in Country Club Road is taken from DS 2-05.2.4.D.2 15. Label the height of proposed building on the drawing, as was done for the existing building, and add dimensions of the building to the drawings. DS 2-05.2.4.N 16. Add SVT's to the intersection of Country Club Road and Transcon Way. DS 2-05.2.4.R 17. All requested changes must be made to the Development Plan and Landscape Plan. DS 2-07.2.1.A If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Peter McLaughlin, (520) 791-5608. |
| 03/31/2004 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | Submit landscape and native plant preservation plans. LUC 3.7, 3.8 & DS 2-06, 2-07, 2-15. |
| 04/01/2004 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | Traffic Engineering recommends APPROVAL of this DP D. Dale Kelch, EIT Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov |