Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: PRIVATE IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT REVIEW v.2
Permit Number - TR-PIA-0624-00008
Review Name: PRIVATE IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT REVIEW v.2
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/08/2024 | Floodplain Administration Review | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | PIA/DP Plans: 1) There is no indication of detention system however detention is labeled on DP for underground pipe that connects to drywell (retention system). Remove details D, M, & L from sheet 13 of DP. Revise drainage design so that the runoff from the is project does not increase flowrates for 2-, 10, 100-year conditions. As stated in verbal review comments to consultant, City will accept any form of surface detention or cisterns or combination that bleed-off to surface flow or existing alley stormdrain system that does not cause adverse impacts to downstream right-of-way or adjacent properties. 2) For stormwater quality, show location of solid waste pick-up areas with proposed dumpsters located near sanitary waste clean-out so that surface where dumpsters are stored can be washed down to sanitary clean-out, not to public right-of-way which is considered part of stormdrain system. Geotechnical Report: 3) No percolation test was provided, however, infiltration rate likely will not meet the 24-hour drain-down time requirement due to Hydrologic Soil Group D soils at this site. Provide revised geotechnical report that includes: 3a) Collapsible soils boring assessment with setback recommendations from drainage features. 3b) Setbacks from geotechnical engineer for detention features from edge of right-of-way line to accommodate maintenance and construction to be located fully within property boundary. 3c) Setback recommendations for existing building from drainage features. Drainage Report: 4) Drywell cannot be approved as it will not meet all 17 criteria for subsurface retention requirements. Provide detention system so that the post condition runoff from this project does not increase flowrates for existing 2-, 10-, 100-year conditions. 5) Provide detail in drainage report and plans for detention system(s) for project. [References: TS Secs.4-04.14.2, 14.5, TC Sec. 26-11.2(b)] |
||
| 10/09/2024 | PIA Engineering Review | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | See DTM Comments (Redlines) on attached plans. On next submittal submit comments response letter addressing DTM's comments. Utility clearance letters will need to be submitted prior to plan approval. |
||
| 08/16/2024 | Transportation Landscape Review | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | |||
| 09/11/2024 | Transportation Maps and Records Review | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Please see comments on plans | ||
| 08/20/2024 | Traffic Engineering Review | REVIEW COMPLETED | Previous Traffic Engineering Division comments have been addressed appropriately in this PIA plan resubmittal. No further comments. Thank you! |