Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Approved
Review Details: PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE REVIEW v.1
Plan Number - TP-PRE-0525-00092
Review Name: PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE REVIEW v.1
Review Status: Approved
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entitlements | REVIEW COMPLETED | PREFACE: This application is identical to a previous resubmittal for this site, TP-PRE-0525-00131. From an entitlements perspective, the same comments apply. PROJECT DESCRIPTION & LOCATION: The applicant is requesting a rezoning from SR to RX-1 to subdivide parcel 114-51-228C into a total of 12 parcels. The minimum parcel size of an SR lot is 180,000 square feet, rezoning allows the parcel to be split into 12 lots 36,000 to 38,600 square feet each. APPLICANT NAME: Jeffrey Stanley, Jas Engineering E-MAIL: Stanley19263@msn.com PLAN DIRECTION ADOPTED PLAN (S): PLAN TUCSON AND BEAR CANYON NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN PLAN AMENDMENT REQUIRED BASED ON CONCEPT PRESENTED (SEE NOTES BELOW) 0 YES 1 NO 0 TO BE CONFIRMED LATER PLAN SUPPORT BASED ON CONCEPT PRESENTED (SEE NOTES BELOW): 0 YES 0 NO 1 WILL DEPEND ON DESIGN Plan Tucson The parcel is within the Mixed-Use Centers building block, which encourages more density around mixed-use activity hubs. The proposed rezoning is aligned with Plan policy – although the requested zoning does not support the levels of density typical of a mixed-use center, the density is consistent with the surrounding neighborhood. Bear Canyon Neighborhood Plan Land use direction at the proposed site is governed by the Bear Canyon Neighborhood Plan. The Plan designates the subject parcel as appropriate for suburban residential development of no more than 1 Residence-per-Acre. It promotes high-quality infill where adequate streets and utilities are made available and encourages compatibility of new development with existing land uses. It encourages an emphasis on single-family, owner-occupied dwellings. Analysis: The applicant is proposing rezoning the subject parcel from SR to RX-1 to split the lot into 12 individual residential lots. The concept development plan also shows some road and sewer improvements. The rezoning to RX-1 is consistent with the surrounding zoning district, and the density of one residence per acre is consistent with the existing density. The proposal is in conformance with the policy goals and guidelines of Plan Tucson and the Bear Canyon Neighborhood Plan. There may be requirements from other review teams that will impact the design. If the refined preliminary development plan is substantially similar to the concept presented (12 lots, over 36,000 square feet each) and other comments are addressed, then Entitlements staff will be supportive of the rezoning. A plan amendment is not required at this time. ADDITIONAL NOTES: None. |
|||
| Fire New Construction | REVIEW COMPLETED | TP-PRE-0525-00092 • Pre-Application Conference Review v1 • 8800 E JACARANDA WY TUCSON, AZ 85749: 1. Verify dead ends in excess of 150’ are provided with turnarounds. IFC, 2024, D103.4 Questions: patricia.shelton@tucsonaz.gov / 520.837.7082 |
|||
| Floodplain Administration Review | REVIEW COMPLETED | DTM Floodplain Review - Proposed Rezoning Conditions: 1) Retention is waived due to Fahringer Wash Watershed critical basin management area and hydrologic soil types in the area, However, 20% detention reduction from predeveloped conditions is required. 2) Hydrologic study is required for the Fahringer Wash to show current regulatory floodplain limits, flowrate, velocity, interval WSEL cross sections, and Erosion Hazard Setback. 3) All Weather Access (AWA) design is required. 4) Fahringer Wash is a W.A.S.H. Ordinance watercourse so a clear span bridge will be required from Little Bear Pl to development site due to non-AWA flow conditions in Fahringer Wash. 5) Feasibility study under a separate floodplain use permit application is required for any proposed Fahringer Wash crossing prior to Tentative Plat submittal. 6) Tentative Plat is required. 7) To provide continuity of surrounding neighbourhood pavement, a minimum pavement structure shall be two inches of asphaltic concrete over four inches of aggregate base course, supported by subgrade compacted to 95% relative density in accordance with the Pima County and City of Tucson Standard Specifications for Public Improvements. Pavement width shall be 24-ft minimum with header curb. 8) Development shall show N.U.O.S. designated areas for erosion hazard and floodprone areas for areas not disturbed due to AWA improvements. 9) Provide Private Drainage Maintenance Access Easements or Common Area connectivity for detention basin areas. 10) Development shall provide setbacks for all outfall spillways from basins. Elizabeth Leibold P.E., CPM. CFM Civil Engineer City of Tucson 520-429-4905 elizabeth.leibold@tucsonaz.gov |
|||
| Site Engineering | REVIEW COMPLETED | 1. See that Floodplain Administration Comments and Zoning Comments are addressed. Stephen Blood (520) 837-4958 Stephen.blood@tucsonaz.gov |
|||
| Site Landscape | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC TRANSMITTAL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT REVIEWER: CHAD KELLER, RLA SITE LANDSCAPE/NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION SECTION PROJECT: REZONING FROM SR TO RX-1 ACTIVITY NO: TP-PRE-0525-00092 ADDRESS: 8800 E JACARANDA WY ZONING: SR – SUBURBAN RANCH RESIDENCE ZONE This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants, and water harvesting. The comments provided are preliminary and are not to be assumed as a complete review of the proposal. During the Development Package review process, a full review will be made by the Site Landscape and NPPO section to ensure compliance with the applicable UDC development criteria and Technical Standards. SITE LANDSCAPE/NPPO COMMENTS: 1. Prior to any development in this subdivision a NPPO or a NPPO Waiver is required per UDC 7.7. SEE UDC 7.7.3. APPLICABILITY; UDC 7.7.4 NPPO GENERAL PROVISIONS AND STANDARDS; UDC 7.7.4.C. PLAN APPROVAL PRIOR TO PERMITTING; UDC 7.7.4.D. PROFESSIONAL EXPERTISE 7.7.5.C.5; ALSO SEE AM 2-11.3.0 PERMITTED EXCEPTIONS. PDSD will provide the applicant with the NPPO Waiver form upon request. 2. A portion of the southeast property line is along a minor local road. Per UDC 7.6.4.C.2.b, RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISIONS STREET LANDSCAPE BORDERS FOR RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISIONS OF EIGHT OR MORE LOTS SHALL CONFORM TO THE FOLLOWING STANDARDS: (1) Street landscape borders are only required along the exterior boundaries of subdivisions. Landscape borders are not required along front yard street frontages. (2) Walls, fences, or other screening must be placed behind the landscape border. (3) The landscape border must be recorded as common area and maintained by the homeowner’s association (HOA) for the subdivision. The subdivision CC&Rs shall reference and require compliance with the maintenance standards in Section 7.6.8, Maintenance. The PDSD Director may allow the recording of a public use easement with the subdivision plat in cases where the standards of this section are the only reason for the creation of an HOA. The public use easement shall require the abutting property owner to install and maintain a landscape border in accordance with the standards in this section. (4) STREET LANDSCAPE BORDERS FRONTING ON LOCAL STREETS MAY BE REDUCED TO A MINIMUM OF FIVE FEET. 3. A landscape plan is required per UDC 7.6.2.B.1-b. The Unified Development Code requires all new development, per the above-mentioned code for subdivisions of 8 or more lots. 4. A drip irrigation plan and details are required for all proposed landscape planting areas. 5. DTM review is required for all planting and irrigation in the ROW prior to the approval of the development package. Reach out to David Marhefka (david.marhefka@tucsonaz.gov) if necessary for this project. Thank you. Chad Keller, RLA Landscape Architect chad.keller@tucsonaz.gov 520.837.4923 |
|||
| Site Zoning | REVIEW COMPLETED | FROM: Ramiro Olivarez PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: Pre-submittal meeting TP-PRE-0525-00092 Address: 8800 E JACARANDA WY Current Zoning: SR Proposed Zoning: RX-1 Proposed Use: Subdivision TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 04, 2025 COMMENTS: 1. Comment: The Preliminary Development Package (DP) reference must significantly correspond with the DP when you are formally ready to submit with Administrative Manual 2-03.3.0. 2. Comment: Upon formal submittal the proposed development must comply with the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual Chapter 2-06 – Development Package and Tentative Plat, and 2-07, Final Plat. Building permits can be submitted and reviewed concurrently with the development package but the building plans cannot be approved until the development package is approved and the building plans are reviewed for consistency. 3. Comment: In the RX-1 zone the minimum lot size is 36,000 SF. UDC TABLE 6.3-4.A. 4. Comment: Proposed use and use-specific standards: Single Family Detached, and the following use-specific standards apply: 4.9.7.B.6, .8, & .9 5. Comment: For Residential use maximum lot coverage is not applicable UDC TABLE 6.3-4.A. 6. Comment: The height maximum is 30 feet for multifamily residential use. UDC TABLE 6.3-4.A. 7. Comment: Density is 1/36,000 sf. 8. Comment: Setbacks for a nonresidential use adjacent to a residential zone is 10 feet or ¾(H) to the south property line. UDC TABLE 6.3-4.A. Setbacks for a residential use adjacent to a residential zone (West, East, South) is 20 feet UDC TABLE 6.3-4.A. Setbacks for the north parcel line adjacent to a residential use adjacent to a residential zone is 20 feet UDC TABLE 6.3-4.A. Setbacks for the north parcel line adjacent to a residential use adjacent to a nonresidential zone is Height of the proposed exterior building wall. UDC TABLE 6.3-4.A. 9. Comment: Per UDC 6.4.5.C.1.a., For single-family and duplex development , the minimum required front street perimeter yard is 20 feet measured from the street property line. 10. Comment: Ensure compliance with Table 7.4.4-1: Single-Family and Mobile Home Dwellings 2 spaces per dwelling unit plus visitor parking required at a ratio of 0.25 space per unit. Exception. Residential development in the R-1 zone must comply with Section 4.9.7.B.7 11. Comment: Note that portions of Lots 1, 2, 3, and 4 (based off the preliminary site plan) are located in flood zones and flood hazard zone. 12. Comment: If access is provided by an easement and the easement serves more than two single-family homes the City may require the easement to be developed as a street or as a parking area access lane (PAAL). The determination as to whether a developed street or PAAL is required will be made at the time of review of the proposed land division or development of the property based on the need for public services, such as utilities, refuse collection, and fire suppression, and on the projected average daily traffic (ADT) of the access easement. UDC 7.8.4.C. *The submitted proposal does not meet this requirement. Lots 2, 3, and 6 are accessed by easements that serve more than two single-family homes. An easement may not serve more than two SFR’s and will be required to be developed as a private street. 13. Comment: The annexation conditions must be adhered to from activity number C9-84-32. *For conditions, please see the documents in the following link: https://pro.tucsonaz.gov/plandetails/C9-84-32/ 14. Comment: The comments provided are preliminary and are not to be assumed as a complete review of the proposal. During the review process, a full review will be made by Zoning to assure compliance with the applicable UDC development criteria and Technical Standards. If you have any questions, please contact me at Ramiro.Olivarez@tucsonaz.gov |
|||
| Traffic Engineering Review | REVIEW COMPLETED | Anticipated trip generation from 12 lot parcel is very low, with a negligible impact on surrounding roadway network. No comments or concerns from DTM Traffic Engineering Division. |