Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: In Review
Review Details: ENTITLEMENT REVIEW v.1
Plan Number - TP-ENT-1025-00021
Review Name: ENTITLEMENT REVIEW v.1
Review Status: In Review
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Transportation Landscape Review | APPROVED | Approval is conditional on: Applicant shall implement all requests from the Design Review Board | |||
| Entitlements | IN REVIEW | ||||
| External Reviewers - Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) | IN REVIEW | ||||
| External Reviewers - AZ State Land | IN REVIEW | ||||
| External Reviewers - COT Environmental Services | IN REVIEW | ||||
| External Reviewers - COT Parks & Recreation | IN REVIEW | ||||
| External Reviewers - Davis Monthan AFB | IN REVIEW | ||||
| External Reviewers - PC RFCD | IN REVIEW | ||||
| External Reviewers - Pima Association of Governments | IN REVIEW | ||||
| External Reviewers - Pima County Addressing | IN REVIEW | ||||
| External Reviewers - Pima County Assessor | IN REVIEW | ||||
| External Reviewers - Pima County Development Services | IN REVIEW | ||||
| External Reviewers - Pima County Natural Resources | IN REVIEW | ||||
| External Reviewers - Pima County Transportation | IN REVIEW | ||||
| External Reviewers - Pima County Wastewater (RWRD) | IN REVIEW | ||||
| External Reviewers - Tohono Oodham | IN REVIEW | ||||
| External Reviewers - Tucson Airport Authority | IN REVIEW | ||||
| External Reviewers - Tucson Electric Power (TEP) | IN REVIEW | ||||
| External Reviewers - Tucson Unified School District (TUSD) | IN REVIEW | ||||
| Historic | IN REVIEW | ||||
| Real Estate | IN REVIEW | ||||
| ROW Engineering Review | IN REVIEW | ||||
| Signs | IN REVIEW | ||||
| Site Engineering | IN REVIEW | ||||
| Site Landscape | IN REVIEW | ||||
| Site Zoning | IN REVIEW | ||||
| Streetcar Track Access Review | IN REVIEW | ||||
| Sun Tran Review | IN REVIEW | ||||
| Transportation - Bike/Ped | IN REVIEW | ||||
| Entitlement Review Coordinator Express | REVIEW COMPLETED | ||||
| Fire New Construction | REVIEW COMPLETED | ||||
| IPC - Entitlements | REVIEW COMPLETED | ||||
| IPC - Fire New Construction | REVIEW COMPLETED | ||||
| IPC - Site Engineering | REVIEW COMPLETED | No site engineering comments | |||
| IPC - Site Zoning | REVIEW COMPLETED | FROM: Fernando Garcia PDSD Site Zoning Review PROJECT: TP-ENT-1025-00021 Address: 1602 N Vine Av, Tucson, AZ Existing Use: Utilities – Distribution System TRANSMITTAL DATE: November 6, 2025 COMMENTS: 1. Development must comply with the Administrative Manual Section 2-06 - Development Package, and 2-03 -PDP. Please ensure the next submittal has all the standards addressed here: https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/tucson/latest/tucson_az_udc/0-0-0-8416 2. A “Utilities Land Use Group – Distribution System” is a permitted use in R-2 zoning subject to a Zoning Examiner Special Exception Procedure and use-specific standards 4.9.11.A.1, .2, .5, .8, .9, .11, .12. 3. Per UDC 6.4.5.C.2.a and use-specific standard 4.9.11.A.1, and A.2, a minimum setback of 20’ is required from the screen/wall to the street property line along N Vine Av, a local street. Per use-specific standards 4.9.11.A.1 and A.2, from the northern and southern property lines, the portion of the eastern property line not adjacent to PAD-28, adjacent to residential zones, the minimum required setback from the screen/wall to the property line is 20’. This is not clearly apparent on the submitted drawings. 4. Per use-specific standard 4.9.11.A.9, the site must be enclosed on all sides with a masonry wall or compact evergreen hedge, not less than six feet, nor more than ten feet, in height. The submitted plans indicate a wall height of 13.5’. Any modifications to the use specific standards will require a modification of standards from the Zoning Examiner or Board of Adjustment variance. Reach out to Mark Castro for more information at mark.castro@tucsonaz.gov regarding a variance. Reach out to the Entitlements Team at jay.olivas@tucsonaz.gov to discuss which option may be warranted or required. 5. The comments provided are preliminary and are not to be assumed as a complete review of the proposal. During the Development Package review process, a full review will be made by Zoning to assure compliance with the applicable UDC development criteria and Technical Standards, as well as being in substantial compliance with the approved pre-development plan. If you have any questions, please contact me at fernando.garcia8@tucsonaz.gov. |
|||
| IPC - Traffic Engineering | REVIEW COMPLETED | No traffic comments | |||
| Tucson Water New Area Development | REVIEW COMPLETED | Based on the information provided, Tucson Water has no objections to, or comments on the proposed development. The building currently has three (3) existing domestic water meters of varying sizes, as well as a 4-inch fire service line. These services are connected to the 6-inch cast iron water main (B Zone) located within the east side of the parcel right-of-way of Vine Ave. If these services will be abandoned due to the building being demolished, and new service connections will be required, please contact Tucson Water’s New Services Section by calling 520-791-5164 or by sending an email to TW_Common@tucsonaz.gov. The above comments are based on the limited preliminary information provided by the applicant and should not be construed as a complete review of the proposal. Any questions, comments or concerns about these comments may be directed to: Abdullah Salman | Project Manager Tucson Water - New Area Development Abdullah.Salman@tucsonaz.gov |