Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: FIRE CONSTRUCTION REVIEW v.1
Permit Number - TF-FCP-0626-00384
Review Name: FIRE CONSTRUCTION REVIEW v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/25/2026 | Fire New Construction - Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Fire Sprinkler (FS) Reviewer Rob Neale; rneale@safebuilt.com Discipline Status:Denied Date Completed: 6/25/2026 1.Construction Site Safety Plan.The submittal does not appear to include the construction site safety plan required by IFC 3303.1.1. The plan shall be submitted and approved prior to issuing the building permit. Please provide documentation on the plans the construction site safety plan is approved by the local code official. (2024 IFC 3303.1) 2.Fire Protection Impairment Plan.Whenever existing fire protection or life safety systems are out of service, the facility shall activate its Tucson Fire Department-approved fire protection system impairment plan. Please provide documentation that the impairment plan is approved by the local code official. (2024 IFC 901.7) 3.Sheet FP2 / Occupancy Identification.The plans do not appear to identify“all rooms and spaces, regardless of occupancy”as required by NFPA 13-28.1.3(6). Please address this upon resubmittal. (2024 IFC 903.3.1.1) 4.Sheet FP 2 / CMSA Hydraulic Remote Area.The long dimension of the remote area(43’ 11”)does not appear to meet the requirements of NFPA 13-28.2.4.3. Please revise the size of the remote area to comply with NFPA 13-28.2.4.3. (2024 IFC 903.3.1.1) 5.Sheet FP2 / Seismic Protection.According to the ASCE Hazard Tool, this facility falls within Seismic Design Category C and requires seismic protection for the fire sprinkler system. Please provide seismic bracing and calculations on resubmittal or a stamped, signed report from a licensed structural engineer this site is not Seismic Design Category C. (2024 IBC 1613.1 an NFPA 13-18.1.1) 6.Sheet FP2 / Connection from Existing Warehouse/ Flexible Coupling.A flexible coupling shall be provided to allow the new piping to move differentially from the existing piping in the adjacent warehouse. (2024 IFC 903.3.1.1 and NFPA 13-18.2.1) 7.Sheet FP 2 Plan Southeast / Overhead Doors.The plans appear to show overhead doors in the southeast exterior wall. Please confirm on the plans if these are overhead doors and provide protection beneath where required. (2024 IFC 903.3.1.1and NFPA 13-9.5.5.3.1) 8.Sheet FP2 / Air Vent.The plans do not appear to show the required high point air vent. Please show its location on the plans. (2024 IFC 903.3.3.1 and NFPA 13-8.1.5 and NFPA 13-16.7) 9.Hydraulic Calculations.It is not clear from the plans the hydraulic calculations are computed to the test site. The hydraulic calculation shall extend to the effective point of the water supply where the characteristics of the water supply are known. Please address this upon resubmittal. (2024 IFC 903.3.1.1 and NFPA 13-27.2.1.6) RESUBMITTAL DIRECTIONS: · All corrections must be clouded, delta numbered, with a brief explanation within the plan sheet or the title block of the sheet. For corrections or revision to whole plan sheets, you need only cloud the sheet number and provide the delta identification number, with a brief explanation of the change(s). · As part of the resubmittal, please collate all revised sheets into the electronic document (PDF) and submit a complete and full plan set. We cannot accept individual sheets in response to review comments, since the entire plan set is required for approval and permitting. · Please include with the resubmittal a separate response narrative, which is numbered or itemized to correspond to each of the noted plan review comments items. · This response narrative must clearly address how each issue was corrected or resolved and indicate where the information may be found within the construction documents. The response narrative must be typewritten, on letterhead noting the project name, with the Permit Application Number. Failure to provide this response narrative may result in review delays or rejection of the resubmittal. · Once all electronic construction documents (plan sheets, energy compliance certificates, reports, calculations, etc.) have been revised according to the above directions. Please resubmit the complete revised plan set with a separate copy of response narrative PDF through the municipality to complete the review. · Review of revised construction documents in response to this letter may take upwards of 5 (five) business days, depending on the size of the project and the volume of plans in queue at time of resubmittal. |
||
| 06/09/2026 | TFD Application Completeness Check Express | REVIEW COMPLETED |