Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1
Permit Number - TD-DEV-1224-00346
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/07/2025 | CDRC Post Review Express | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 03/07/2025 | External Reviewers - Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Good Afternoon, ADOT has reviewed this DEV and has the following comments; Has a traffic study been prepared for this DEV? This DEV will add traffic to the transportation system due to being two commercial buildings on a parcel where there was previously one. Consideration by the COT DTM should be exercised in determining if Off-Site improvements would be required. Internal circulation appears to be restrictive as well. Thank you for the opportunity to review. | ||
| 03/07/2025 | NPPO Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | See Site Landscape comments for NPPO Waiver requirement for the project. Thank you. Chad Keller, RLA chad.keller@tucsonaz.gov | ||
| 03/07/2025 | ROW Engineering Review Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | TD-DEV-1224-00346 • 1070 E AJO WY 1. Per Sec 10-01.3.3 of the Technical Standards Manual, a pedestrian circulation path will have to be provided along the development's street frontage as specified in Sec. 10-01.4.0, this includes bringing the curb access ramps at the SE corner of Ajo Way and Park Ave and at the west side of the eastern driveway into compliance. 2. Revise keynote 34 to indicate that the concrete bus bay will be repaired per PAG SD 216, Type 3. If you have any questions, please contact Richard Leigh at richard.leigh@tucsonaz.gov. | ||
| 03/07/2025 | Site Engineering Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | 1. There are several parking areas proposed with no pedestrian circulation nearby. Per TSM 7-01.4.1.D sidewalks must connect all areas of the development. Please add sidewalks, pedestrian crossings, and/or pedestrian refuge areas to provide safe access from all parking areas to the buildings. 2. On the utilities plan sheet please add "new utility service connections by separate permit" where applicable. 3. Please provide the slope for the proposed areas of grouted riprap slope stabilization. Please explain or provide more information as to why certain areas along this southern property line are proposed to have slope stabilization and others are not. Please explain why no slope stabilization is provided adjacent to the retention basin south of the proposed grouted riprap and waste enclosure. Infiltration in close proximity to a steep slope may cause erosion problems. Mike Ortiz michael.ortiz@tucsonaz.gov | ||
| 03/07/2025 | Site Landscape Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | CDRC TRANSMITTAL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT REVIEWER: CHAD KELLER, RLA SITE LANDSCAPE/NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION SECTION PROJECT: TWO NEW FOOD SERVICE BUILDINGS ACTIVITY NO: TD-DEV-1224-00346 ADDRESS: 1070 E AJO WY ZONING: I-1 LIGHT INDUSTRIAL ZONE LAND USE: COMMERCIAL This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants, and water harvesting. Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all of the Site Landscape/NPPO Section review comments have been addressed. SITE LANDSCAPE/NPPO SECTION COMMENTS: 1. Even though the plans indicate that existing natives and other plants will be utilized within the design, we would still like to see a NPPO Waiver for our records with this project. 2. As a standard practice, a few spot elevations on the CRWHP at the bottom of basin and basin curb cut inlets and outlets that match the civil grading plan for coordination between the plans should be included. It is noted to see the civil grading plan for grading information, which is good. For redundant clarity adding a few spot elevations in key locations as a quick reference for the contractor and inspectors will be helpful. 3. The basin in the southeast corner has Ocotillo and Barrel Cacti at the bottom. Will the Barrel and Ocotillo survive if they sit in too much standing water during Monsoon? If you think that these plants shown in the depressed area will be okay, then can the other areas (2C, 1H, 1I and 1J) be depressed and coordinated between the CRWHP and the Civil Grading Plan? Or should the Barrels and Ocotillo be moved toward the top edge of the basin? 4. Make sure all trees are placed so that they don’t have a conflict with any utility lines. The street landscape border trees along Ajo may be a little close to some utility lines (middle Texas Ebony). If you feel that Texas Ebony stay small enough in stature and won’t affect the new water line, then I am okay with its proximity. 5. Can a leader callout be added to the planting plan to see detail G – Depressed Landscape Area for contractor reference. 6. Can the note be added to the tree planting detail about multi-trunk trees not needing to be staked if it is standing upright once the nursery stake is removed? 7. Can all reference to screened rock also indicate that the rock will be washed. The wording “washed screened rock” will help with any miscommunication between what is approved on the plans and what is implemented on site. There have been instances out on completed project sites where the quantity of fines in the rock mulch have been very high and not meeting the intent of how the rock mulch should function and appear aesthetically. This is a general recommendation. If this is something that you’re not comfortable specifying, it is okay to spec the screen rock as you have it currently. 8. Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-1224-00346, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2-06.4.3 9. Prior to Site Landscape Development Package approval, please make sure Site Zoning and Site Engineering comments are addressed. If you have any questions about these comments, I can be reached at chad.keller@tucsonaz.gov or at 520.837.4923 | ||
| 03/07/2025 | Site Zoning Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: SEC Park Av. and Ajo Wy. Development Package (1st Review) TD-DEV-1224-00346 TRANSMITTAL DATE: January 21, 2025 DUE DATE: January 23, 2025 COMMENTS: Resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is December 30, 2025. 2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-1224-00346, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – Based on current aerial photos this site is currently vacant. The Existing use should be vacant and proposed use should be food service, General Note 3. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – For the angled parking detail provide a C- Space Depth & E – Curb Length dimension, see UDC Figure 7.4.6-A. 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – The short-term bicycle parking detail does not address the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.9.B.2.g. 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Clearly demonstrate that the requirements of TSM Section 701.3.3.A & 7-01.4.1.A are met out to Park Ave. 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Clearly demonstrate how the requirements of TSM Section 7-01.3.3.B are met between the two buildings. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Zone1.desk@tucsonaz.gov. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: A revised development package as well as a comment response letter. To resubmit, visit the Tucson Development Center Online at https://tdc-online.tucsonaz.gov/#/home. The instructions for resubmittal can be found at https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/tdc-faq/new-pdfs/revisions-and-resubmittals.pdf. | ||
| 03/07/2025 | CDRC Application Completeness Express | REVIEW COMPLETED |