Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1
Permit Number - TD-DEV-1224-00324
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12/27/2024 | External Reviewers - Tucson Airport Authority | APPROVED | December 26, 2024 Planning and Development Services City of Tucson 201 North Stone Avenue Tucson, AZ. 85701 RE: TD-DEV-1224-00324 – Development package for multi-family residential / 1767 E Benson Hy, Tucson, AZ. 85714, Received December 16, 2024 To whom this may concern, Thank you for the opportunity to comment on TD-DEV-1224-00324, the development plan for a multifamily residential use at 1767 East Benson Highway. This development is located in the S.E. quarter of the N.E. quarter of Section 31, Township 14S, Range 14E, of the Gila and Salt River Meridian. The development site occupies parcel numbers 132-16-012P, 132-16-012Q, 132-16-057A, 132-16-057B, 132-16-0580, 132-16-0590, and 132-16-060A, covers approximately 12.21 ± acres, and is zoned as Commercial Zone 3 (C-3). The nearest major roadway intersection is East Benson Highway and South Campbell Avenue, approximately 725 feet to the southeast of the subject development. This site does lie within the Tucson International Airport avigation easement requirements and public disclosure area, FAA traffic pattern airspace, and FAA Part 77 airspace. The Tucson Airport Authority approves the first submittal of this project and is not requiring a resubmittal. Although this project does not propose a change in plan designation or zoning the Tucson Airport Authority highly recommends the applicant add the following notes into the general notes of the revised development plan. This project is located approximately 2.5 miles north of Tucson International Airport and is within FAA traffic pattern airspace, an area which would be subject to aircraft overflight and noise due to being in close proximity to Tucson International Airport. The proposed notes would provide a means of assuring that future owners and tenants of the property are aware they are in proximity an airport and further assures the continued right of the City of Tucson, Tucson Airport Authority, and all persons lawfully utilizing the Tucson International Airport the right to utilize the airspace above or near the property. This would be accomplished through the property owner recording the Avigation Easement and providing the Airport Disclosure Statement to the new residents of all residential uses. The Tucson Airport Authority believes the proposed note helps to support the City of Tucson Airport Environs Overlay Zone and supports Plan Tucson – Regional and Global Positioning policy 4 (RG-4). 1."That prior to the City's approval of the proposed development, the property owner must record the Avigation Easement that discloses the existence and operational characteristics of the Tucson International Airport to future owners or tenants of the property and further conveys the right to the public to lawfully use the airspace above the property. The Avigation Easement shall be recorded in a manner with the Pima County recorder which shall document it as having title liability. The content of such documents shall be according to the form and instructions provided.” The current property owner or person authorized to sign on behalf of the current property owner must complete, sign, and record the Avigation Easement. Please record the Avigation Easement with the Pima County Recorder’s Office. Then send a complete copy of the recorded easement document to Tucson Airport Authority by either email (send to srobidoux@flytucson.com) or to the mailing address provided below. Scott Robidoux Manager of Planning Tucson Airport Authority 7250 South Tucson Blvd, Suite 300 Tucson, AZ 85756” 2. Applicable to residential uses only “The property owner/developer/applicant must provide the Airport Disclosure Statement form, at time of sale, to the new property owners with all new unit purchases. In the event the development of any residential uses does not involve the sale of new units but is instead offering rental residential units to the public, the new tenant of the rental unit must be provided a copy of the Airport Disclosure Statement form. The intent of the Airport Disclosure Statement form is to educate and notify the new residents that they are living near an airport. The content of such documents shall be according to the form and instructions provided.” The property owner (for itself or its tenants) shall forward a signed copy of the Airport Disclosure Statement form to the Tucson Airport Authority within ten (10) days of signature, using the Scott Robidoux mailing address provided above. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or concerns regarding this comment letter. I may be reached by email at srobidoux@flytucson.com or by telephone at 520- 573-4811. Respectfully, Scott Robidoux, C.M. Manager of Planning |
||
| 01/14/2025 | NPPO | APPROVED | |||
| 03/26/2025 | CDRC Post Review Express | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 01/08/2025 | Commercial Plumbing | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | 1. Provide the size of the proposed water meters and the expected water demand each meter will serve. 2. Where the finish floor elevation is less than 12 inches above the elevation of the next upstream manhole in the public sewer or private sewer collection system, a backwater valve shall be installed in the building drain or branch of the building drain serving that floor (e.g., buildings 2, 5, 6, and 7). Floors discharging from above that reference point shall not discharge through the backwater valve. Reference: Section 714.1, IPC 2018, as amended by the City of Tucson. 3. Building 1 does not appear to have either water service or a connection to the private sewer collection system. Is sheet 19 of 22 complete? |
||
| 01/03/2025 | External Reviewers - Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Good Afternoon, ADOT has reviewed this DEV, and has the following comments; ADOT is currently in the design phase of the I-10 - Kino to Country Club widening project, which will impact this location, and coordination is required. This size of development will typically require a Traffic Impact Analysis, unless agreements have already been made between the City and the Developer.. Also, a development of this size would typically warrant Off-Site improvements, and in this case a SB Kino right turn deceleration lane to enter the Development, upto/or including a traffic signal. Previous discussions with projects in the area indicate that this access location would be signalized by a Project on the east side of Kino Parkway. This needs to be confirmed, and the Project identified on this Plan Set. ADOT looks forward to meeting with the COT and the Developer to better understand the Project's timeline, and associated requirements. Let us know if you have any questions, concerns, or comments regarding this item. -- Respectfully, James Gomes, Jr., PE SOUTHERN REGION TRAFFIC ENGINEERING MANAGER ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1221 S. 2nd Ave. Tucson, Az, 85713 520.388.4231 azdot.gov [azdot.gov] |
||
| 01/29/2025 | External Reviewers - Pima County Addressing | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Pima County Public Works 201 N. Stone Ave. Tucson, AZ 85701 If you have any questions please call 520- 724-6490 for an appointment to discuss this notice. If following discussions with staff you still disagree with the below listed deficiencies, you may appeal to the Building Official in accordance with Pima County Code 15.04.060 by submitting the form posted on our web site with payment of appeal fee prior to permit application expiration. Disputes about the interpretation of the Zoning Code may be appealed to a Pima County Board of Adjustment under A.R.S. § 11 -816 and P.C.C. § 18.93.060. Please submit all plans, calculations and specifications to us electronically via the Digital Projects page in the online portal. Re-Submittal Procedures Please submit all documents using Citizen Access at permits.pima.gov (i.e. plans, drawings, calculations, quantities, exhibits, photographs, letters, etc.). 1. Please go to permits.pima.gov and login to your account to access review comments and resubmit. 2. If you have questions or need clarification regarding comments, please contact the reviewer. 3. Provide a response to each correction comment. 4. To resubmit, upload revised full plan set. Should the resubmittal not completely address this request for corrections, the application maybe denied requiring a new application and payment all applicable review fees in accordance withA.R.S. § 11-1605. |
||
| 01/02/2025 | Fire New Construction | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | -Include a sheet showing all the aerial access requirements for each building per IFC D105. Also include a note, on same sheet, that solar parking structures are prohibited in these areas of aerial access. Covered parking will also be prohibited in these areas. Once submitted we will review the landscape plans to verify trees will not obstruct the aerial apparatus once deployed. -IFC 503.2.1 requires 20' unobstructed access for fire apparatus access roads. The road at the SE, next to building #1, is only 16' wide. -Verify buildings will be over 35'. Any buildings over 35' require testing by PCWIN for emergency radio coverage. Installation of emergency responder communication enhancement systems may be required depending on test results. john.vincent@tucsonaz.gov 5203495581 |
||
| 03/26/2025 | Floodplain Administration Review | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | 1) Underground retention will not be allowed for this project. Full retention requirements will be waived, with additional cisterns provided, besides the proposed shallow waterharvesting features. 2) The proposed underground detention is allowed however there shall be no disturbance of Tucson Diversion Channel (TDC). Disturbance in proximity to the TDC may be limited and subject to ACOE & PCRFCD review if activity is too close. Resubmittal plans will be provided to PCRFCD for assessment. 3) One 30-ft boring is required per Tech Stnds sec.4-04.14.2.6 to determine if building setback is needed from water harvesting or other basin features. 4) Clarify plans with additional cross sections along north side of project to clarify proposed protected slopes and proposed retaining wall system and to show positive gradient detention system and to comply with geotechnical recommendations for slope stability. Add an additional section for the access to existing TDC access ramp. 5) Explain and show on plans offsite drainage improvements and associated easements (private maintenance?) and how any existing maintenance roads are accounted for in design. Clarify dimensions for easements. Elizabeth Leibold P.E., CPM. CFM Civil Engineer City of Tucson 520-429-4905 elizabeth.leibold@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 01/08/2025 | Site Engineering | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | 1. Include TD-DEV-1224-00324 on all sheets of the plan set. 2. Pedestrian circulation is required to connect all buildings, dumpster areas, and the sidewalk on the street frontage per TSM 7-01.3.3. Show a continuous pedestrian path. 3. Per UDC 7.4.6 a one way access lane serving as a fire lane must be 20 feet wide. The current design has 16ft bottlenecks at both entrances. Please provide the required fire lane width for emergency purposes. 4. Approval from Pima County is required for the proposed outfalls in Julian Wash/Tucson Diversion Channel. Provide documentation of approval. 5. The waste enclosures are required to have a minimum 1% slope for the slab and 2% slope for the apron per TSM 8. Show the slope of the slab and apron on the grading sheets for all of the waste enclosures. Some currently do not meet the requirements based on the information shown. Please also include waste stream calculations per TSM 8 to justify the number of waste enclosures. 6. The following comments apply to the drainage report: a) Per The City of Tucson’s adopted Pima County Regional Flood Control District Design Standards for Stormwater Detention and Retention (DSSDR), as amended, Section 4.13.1 Underground Storage Standards outlines 8 requirements which must be met. Please review these requirements and provide a narrative clearly explaining how all of these requirements will be met by the proposed underground system. b) Provide all of the Hydrologic Data Sheets for all sub-basins mentioned in the report, both offsite and onsite, for both the existing and proposed conditions. Only a few have been provided. Order them alphabetically. The Anytime Storage sub-basins do not require Hydrologic Data Sheets. c) The ADS sheets in the drainage report (and the plan set) say Marana instead of Tucson. The narrative on page 5 in section "Underground Stormwater Storage" says the system will drain in 36 hours. Change the ADS sheets to say Tucson. Tucson requires a drawdown time of 12 or 24 hours depending on the contributing drainage area. 36 hours is not acceptable in the City. Provide infiltration testing results to the proposed depth of the system and drawdown calculations in the drainage report. d) Page 57 - First Flush Requirement - It is not clear why the last table says the total site requires 4.7 cubic feet of first flush and a minimum basin area of 6.24 square feet. Remove this table or correct it. e) Provide hydraulic calculations for all onsite storm drains for the 100-year storm. f) Provide separate calculations that show the volume of retention provided in the water harvesting basins. Mike Ortiz michael.ortiz@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 01/14/2025 | Site Landscape | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | CDRC TRANSMITTAL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT REVIEWER: CHAD KELLER, RLA SITE LANDSCAPE/NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION SECTION PROJECT: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE FOR MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL ACTIVITY NO: TD-DEV-1224-00324 ADDRESS: 1767 E BENSON HY ZONING: C-2 COMMERCIAL ZONE LAND USE: MULTIFAMILY This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants, and water harvesting. Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all of the Site Landscape/NPPO Section review comments have been addressed. SITE LANDSCAPE/NPPO SECTION COMMENTS: 1. Have the engineer update the plan set cover to include the landscape plans as part of the sheet index. Update the sheet numbers on all applicable sheets in the plan set. 2. Update the building numbers so that they match the numbering on the civil plans. 3. Add the Wash PRA Riparian Mitigation Plant Key to the landscape cover sheet L-1. Below the key, list the applicable sheets for reference. 4. Include a construction detail showing root barriers for trees located near hardscape areas. See Detail 402 located here: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/Departments/Transportation-Mobility/Landscape/Landscape-Architects Or modify your current Multi-Trunk Tree Planting Detail so that it shows the root barrier application. 5. Add sleeves for irrigation poly tubing crossing hardscape. 6. All proposed landscape planting areas should be depressed for water harvesting. Add a note or a typical leader callout indicating that all landscape areas shall be depressed, even if only receiving rainfall. Coordinate this information with the civil engineer and the grading plan. Example: Parking area tree planting islands shall be depressed 4-6” from the top back of curb. 7. As a standard practice, a few spot elevations on the CRWHP at the bottom of basin, basin curb cut inlets, outlets (if applicable) or at the top of the slope of the basin, etc., that match the civil grading plan should be included on the CRWHP for coordination. Just a few spot elevations in key locations as a quick reference for the contractors and inspectors during construction. 8. On the rainwater harvesting plan add these general notes for construction clarity. Wording similar to the following will provide clear direction/coordination and intent for the contractors reference: a. See Civil Grading Plan for additional information on basin side slopes, spot elevations, shape, contouring, flow lines, curb cuts, downspouts, splash pads, etc. b. This Rainwater Harvesting Plan is designed to work in conjunction with the civil grading and drainage plans. The specific intent of the Rainwater Harvesting Plan is to demonstrate that the site grading and drainage facilitates direct flow of impervious-surface runoff in sufficient quantities to the depressed planting areas to comply with the Commercial Rainwater Harvesting Ordinance. It is the Contractors responsibility to meet the requirements of Site Grading and Drainage plans and the Rainwater Harvesting Plan and to notify the engineer and the landscape architect of any discrepancies between the two plans. 9. The WHIA’s are currently rainfall only basins and the 50% plant water demand is not being met on the CRWH plans per the ordinance. All of the building rooftop impervious areas are being captured and routed to the underground stormwater chambers. Can a portion of the roof drainage be diverted to the WHIA’s so that the site will be in conformance with the Commercial Rainwater Harvesting Ordinance? 10. Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-1224-00324, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2-06.4.3 11. Prior to Site Landscape Development Package approval, please make sure Site Zoning and Site Engineering comments are addressed. Thank you. Chad If you have any questions about these comments, I can be reached at chad.keller@tucsonaz.gov or at 520.837.4923 |
||
| 01/10/2025 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: Kino & Benson - Multifamily Development Package (1st Review) TD-DEV-1224-00324 TRANSMITTAL DATE: January 10, 2025 DUE DATE: January 7, 2025 COMMENTS: Resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is December 11, 2025. 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS 1. COMMENT: 2-06.3.12 – The drawing index is not correct and should include all sheets submitted with the DP. 2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.1 – Provide all information required by the AM section for the Project team. 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.2.D – The page number and the total number of pages in the package (i.e., sheet xx of xx) shall include all sheets provided in the DP and be provided on all sheets of the DP. 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-1224-00324, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.1 – The existing zoning listed under Site Note 1 is not correct. 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – Provide a general note that identifies the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses. 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6.a - As Kino Pw. is designated as an Arterial/Gateway and Benson Hwy. is designated as an Arterial on the COT MS&R Map provide a general note on the cover sheet stating “THIS PROJECT IS DESIGNED TO MEET THE OVERLAY ZONE(S) CRITERIA, UDC ARTICLE 5.4 MAJOR STREETS AND ROUTES SETBACK ZONE (MS&R) & UDC ARTICLE 5.5 GATEWAY CORRIFOR ZONE (GCR)” 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.a – Provide the floor area for each building. 2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided. 9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.C – Provide the following information for both Kino and Benson Hwy., dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.E – As this site is made up of 8 parcels a lot combination is required. Provide approved documentation that the combination is complete, 11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.F - All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. 12. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Fully dimension the back-up spur shown at the end of the vehicle use area south of Building 7, UDC Article 74.6.H.4. 13. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Clearly demonstrate that the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.6.F.2.a.(1) are met for the covered parking called out under Keynote 13. 14. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Fully dimension what appears to be a round-about on the plan. 15. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – The vehicle parking space calculation shall show the total number of required and provided. 16. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Clearly demonstrate that the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.11. & 7.4.12 are met. 17. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Detail M sheet 21 shows a wheel stop. Zoning was not able to find any wheel stops within the vehicle use area. If you are planning on using wheel stops show them on the plan and the details and provide a wheel stop location dimension, UDC Article 7.4.6.H.3. 18. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Provide a short- and long-term bicycle parking space calculation that provided the number of required and provided along with the ratio used. 19. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Provide a detail for both the short- and long-term bicycle parking that clearly demonstrates that the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.9 are met. Keynote 14 references “SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR DETAILS” but there are not bicycle parking details provided on the landscape plans. 20. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – Provide perimeter yard setbacks from all building to the applicable property lines. 21. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.Q – Provide the specific use of each building within the footprint. 22. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Provide width dimension for all sidewalks shown on the plan. 23. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Clearly demonstrate on the plan how the requirements of Technical Standards Manual Section 7-01.4.1.A are met. 24. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.V – Clarify how mail delivery will be handled on this site. 25. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.W – Site Note 15 reference a monument sign. Indicate the locations of this sign on the plan to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Zone1.desk@tucsonaz.gov. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: A revised development package as well as a comment response letter. To resubmit, visit the Tucson Development Center Online at https://tdc-online.tucsonaz.gov/#/home. The instructions for resubmittal can be found at https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/tdc-faq/new-pdfs/revisions-and-resubmittals.pdf. |
||
| 12/06/2024 | CDRC Application Completeness Express | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 12/16/2024 | CDRC Review Coordinator Express | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC added TAA, Addressing, ADOT, and TEP PAG, USPS, SWG to the workflow. Review request email sent to TAA, Addressing, ADOT, and TEP. FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. | ||
| 12/16/2024 | External Reviewers - Pima Association of Governments | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required. | ||
| 12/16/2024 | External Reviewers - Southwest Gas | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required. | ||
| 02/27/2025 | External Reviewers - Tucson Electric Power (TEP) | REVIEW COMPLETED | February 27, 2025 WO#T138836 City of Tucson Planning and Development Services Attn: CDRC Admin Team Dear CDRC Admin Team Subject: Kino and Benson TD-DEV-1224-00324 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted 1/10/2025. There are conflicts with existing overhead electrical lines present within the development. Relocation of TEP facilities will be required. Contact TEP design (contact information below). Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. To apply for electric service, please call the New Construction department at (520) 918- 8300. Please submit a final set of plans including approved site, electric load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans. If available, include a PDF version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Should you have any easement questions, please contact our Land Resources Department, LandReviews@tep.com. Should you have any technical questions, please contact the area designer, Martin Salazar (520) 305-6713 msalazar@tep.com Sincerely, Design Admins Design Admins Tucson Electric Power |
||
| 12/16/2024 | External Reviewers - United States Postal Service (USPS) | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required. | ||
| 12/13/2024 | OK to Submit - Engineering Fast | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 12/13/2024 | OK to Submit - Zoning Fast | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 01/16/2025 | ROW Engineering Review | REVIEW COMPLETED | TD-DEV-1224-00324 - 1767 E BENSON HY 1. Per Sec. 6.3.2 of the Transportation Access Management Guidelines for the City of Tucson, a Traffic Impact Analysis will be required for this development. Additional comments may be forthcoming based on the report's conclusion. 2. Provide complete details for the proposed drainage channel along Benson Hy, include a cross section of the channel and pipe culverts. 3. Provide complete details of the proposed driveway entrances off of Benson Hy 4. Pima County currently has a traffic signal planned at the location of the proposed entrance off of Kino Pw. The configuration of this driveway should be coordinated with Pima County and shown on the plans. 5. Completely depict the existing roadway infrastructure of the adjacent street frontage. If you have any questions, please contact Richard Leigh at richard.leigh@tucsonaz.gov. |