Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1
Permit Number - TD-DEV-1223-00493
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/06/2024 | External Reviewers - Tucson Electric Power (TEP) | APPROVED | Greetings, Tucson Electric Power Co., (TEP) has reviewed and has no objection to plat submitted January 4, 2024. There are existing TEP facilities within the boundaries of the plat. Costs for removing or relocating existing TEP facilities will be billable to the developer. Please call the New Construction Department at 520-918-8300 to apply for service for new development. Submit a final set of approved plans, including electrical load and offsite improvement plans to determine how TEP will serve this development. If easements are required for new TEP facilities, they will be obtained by separate instrument. Respectfully, Tucson Electric Power Co. Land Resources Department |
||
| 01/08/2024 | External Reviewers - Pima County Assessor | NOT REQUIRED | Good morning, We Do Not Review Development Packages. We will we review this after the final plat is issued. Please do not use our review of TD-DEV-1223-00493 this at this time. Please contact me if you have any questions. Thank you, Judy Hertel Cartographer Pima County Assessor’s Office (520)724-4395 Judy.hertel@pima.gov |
||
| 02/29/2024 | CDRC Post Review | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 02/02/2024 | Commercial Plumbing | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Based on an assumed FFE 8 inches above the proposed pad elevation, the following additional lots will require backwater valves because the rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole is less than 12” below the FFE: 2, 5, 6, 16, 25, 30, 31, 33, 38, and 43. Reference: Section 714.1, IPC 2018, as amended by the City of Tucson. | ||
| 02/06/2024 | External Reviewers - Pima County Addressing | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Good afternoon, Pima County Addressing is returning TD-DEV-1223-00493 TP for Valencia and Nexus Lots 1-48 for corrections. See the attached document for comments. Nicholas Jordan Site Review Project Manager – Addressing Official Pima County Development Services Department 201 N Stone AV – 1st Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 724-9623 | ||
| 02/26/2024 | NPPO | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | See Landscape comments. If you have any questions about these comments, I can be reached at Matthew.Carlton@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 01/25/2024 | ROW Engineering Review | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | TD-DEV-1223-00493 9190 E. Valencia Rd. Comments: 1. Any existing curb, sidewalk, curb access ramps which are not compliant with current standards will be modified or replaced to meet current standards. 2. The 6’ wide median on Street A off of Nexus must extend through the pedestrian path across the street. A “Pedestrian Refuge” must be provided for driveway widths over 35’. Pedestrian Refuge per P.A.G. standard 207, type 1. David Stiffey DTM Project Coordinator David.Stiffey@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 02/28/2024 | Site Engineering | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | 1. Truncated Domes should be installed at all ramps and areas with flush pedestrian circulation/vehicle areas. Please provide detail of ramp with detectable warnings. 2. There does not appear to be pedestrian circulation to the parking area SE of the Street B & C Intersection. 3. Parking Detail F on sheet 9 needs to show the vehicle wheel stop. 4. Please provide a security barrier between sidewalk and channel shown in detail L/9, and all locations where pedestrian circulation is within 5 feet of the top of any basin with a depth greater than 2’ per 4.11.4 of the Retention/Detention manual 5. Provide a filter fabric weave detail per 4.7.2.C. 6. Please provide basin details per 11.1.3, and 11.3 of the retention/detention manual. 7. Please provide a separate basins sheet showing dimensions, and centerline cross sections of basins. 8. As-built certification required per 12. Of the Retention/detention manual 9. Provide details and locations of sediment level measurement devices in basins per 4.4.1.4 of the Retention/Detention manual 10. Please provide invert elevation monument and weir elevation monuments in all basins. 11. Material specification sheets required during construction – i.e. mirafi or equivalent documentation. 12. Please call out all sidewalk scuppers – drainage not allowed to cross over pedestrian circulation paths. 13. Please provide TSMR referred to in general note 28 14. The resubdivision description does not appear to match the final plat currently in review. Please coordinate subdivision plans. 15. Separate utility permits required for all underground utilities. 16. Provide a note related to areas near boring 7 which may require overex per geotechnical report. 17. Final as built certification from geotechnical engineer required prior to acceptance of grading ensuring that site grading complies with Geotechnical evaluation requirements. Compaction reports and elevation will also need to be provided at grading inspections. 18. Please provide copy of all easements, CC&R’s and related documents with subsequent submission 19. All easements to be vacated prior to issuance of permits Joshua Garcia joshua.garcia@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 02/26/2024 | Site Landscape | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | ACTIVITY NO. TD-DEV-1223-00493 ADDRESS/PARCEL: 9190 E VALENCIA RD/SEVERAL ZONING: C-2 This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants and water harvesting. COMMENTS: 1. Ensure all Zoning and Engineering comments are addressed prior to the Landscape/NPPO comments. 2. Include an NPPO Waiver. There was a previously approved grading DP for the site (DP19-0156). Landscape/NPPO cannot hold the applicant to the previously approved NPPO, but please submit an NPPO waiver to verify that there are no longer any existing or viable plants on-site. 3. Please label all existing and future rights of way for all streets. 7.6.4.C.2.a. on all sheets 4. Show all site visibility triangles on plan set sheets. 5. Add spot elevations to all basins on the landscape sheets. 6. Include a root barrier detail for trees located near asphalt or sidewalk. If you have any questions about these comments, I can be reached at Matthew.Carlton@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 01/16/2024 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: Valencia & Nexus – FLD Subdivision Development Package (1st Review) TD-DEV-1223-00493 TRANSMITTAL DATE: January 16, 2024 DUE DATE: February 4, 2024 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is December 28, 2024. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-1223-00493, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6 – As a TSMR is required, General Not 28, until the TSMR is approved Zoning cannot approve the DP. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – As you are proposing accessible parking spaces provide the number of required and provided. Also demonstrate that the requirements of 2018 IBC Section 1106.5 are met. 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – As you are proposing accessible parking spaces provide a detail for the accessible spaces and required signage. 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – As you are showing wheel stop curbing provide a location dimension on the parking spaces detail(s) that demonstrate that UDC Article 7.4.6.H.3 is met. Detail F sheet 9 appears to show the dimension but no wheel stop is shown. 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – Under Tabulations, Perimeter Yards provide a note stating “Interior Lots - the perimeter yard requirements of Section 6.3.4, Dimensional Standards and Exceptions Tables, may be reduced for setbacks along interior lot lines to the extent permitted by the City’s adopted Building Codes. 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – As you are proposing reduced street perimeter yard setbacks provide written approval from the PDSD Director, UDC Article 8.7.3.L.2. Contact Nicholas Martell for requirements. 8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – It does not appear that the requirements of UDC Article 8.7.3.J.2 & .5 are met. 2-06.5.0 FLEXIBLE LOT DEVELOPMENT (FLD - ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS) 2-06.5.3 Additional Information The following are required in addition to the requirements of the tentative plat or site plan, whichever is applicable: 9. COMMENT: 2-06.5.3.A – Street perimeter yards along interior street rights-of-way and perimeter yards between interior lots may be modified in accordance with Section 8.7.3.L, Perimeter Yards on Interior Lots, of the UDC. Applicants requesting a perimeter yard reduction must indicate what the required and reduced perimeter yards are and their locations. Applicants requesting a reduced street perimeter yard must provide a written description of how the reduced yard will enhance the architectural design or the vehicular circulation in the FLD and submit a transportation statement, or if required by the Department of Transportation, a traffic impact analysis; 10. COMMENT: 2-06.5.3.G.2 - Provide two copies of the protective covenants or common use agreements for any shared areas being established by easements over individually-owned property. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Nicholas Martell at Nicholas.Martell@tucsonaz.gov. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
||
| 12/29/2023 | CDRC Application Completeness | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 01/04/2024 | CDRC Review Coordinator | REVIEW COMPLETED | Addressing review required per SOP. Review request email sent per TEP. CDRC sent FYI email to PAG, USPS, SWG. | ||
| 01/04/2024 | External Reviewers - Pima Association of Governments | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI email to PAG, USPS and SWG. No further action is required from customer at this time. | ||
| 01/04/2024 | External Reviewers - Southwest Gas | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI email to PAG, USPS and SWG. No further action is required from customer at this time. | ||
| 01/04/2024 | External Reviewers - United States Postal Service (USPS) | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI email to PAG, USPS and SWG. No further action is required from customer at this time. | ||
| 01/25/2024 | Fire New Construction | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 01/04/2024 | OK to Submit - Engineering | REVIEW COMPLETED | Tucson codes and ordinances can be found online at https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/tucson/latest/overview 1. The project includes grading greater than 2 feet of fill within 100 feet of residential areas. This triggers the differential grading process. This requires that there is engineering justification provided for the 2 feet of fill as well as the written permission of the director of PDSD and approval of property owners within 100 feet of the fill site (TSM 2-01.8.1.A). Lianne Evans lianne.evans@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 12/29/2023 | OK to Submit - Landscape | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 01/02/2024 | OK to Submit - Zoning | REVIEW COMPLETED |