Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1
Permit Number - TD-DEV-1223-00493
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/22/2024 | NPPO | APPROVED | |||
| 10/22/2024 | ROW Engineering Review | APPROVED | |||
| 12/09/2024 | CDRC Post Review | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 11/18/2024 | Commercial Plumbing | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | With the new manhole rim and finish floor elevations, Lots 8 and 9 will not require the addition of backwater valves but lot 13 will require the addition of a backwater valve. [Initial comment: Based on an assumed FFE 8 inches above the proposed pad elevation, the following additional lots will require backwater valves because the rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole is less than 12” below the FFE: 2, 5, 6, 16, 25, 30, 31, 33, 38, and 43. Reference: Section 714.1, IPC 2018, as amended by the City of Tucson.] | ||
| 12/02/2024 | External Reviewers - Pima County Addressing | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Report Date: 12/02/2024 Description : Addressing review of TD-DEV-1223-00493 TP for Valencia and Nexus Lots 1-48 Address : , , , Record Type : Addressing Document Filename : 2_5430_Valencia & Nexus DP_LP_v2.pdf Reviewer Contact Information: Corrections in the following table need to be applied before a plan is approved Review Report - Resubmittal Requested Application Number: P24AD00067 Comment ID Comment Date Corrections Needed Page Ref Reviewer : Department Review Comments DSD Addressing 6 12/02/242024 Yes 1 Nicholas Jordan : DSD Addressing Street (ST) is not an appropriate suffix. Avenue (AV) is acceptable along with Lane, Way, and Drive. General Comments Pima County Public Works 201 N. Stone Ave. Tucson, AZ 85701 If you have any questions please call 520- 724-6490 for an appointment to discuss this notice. If following discussions with staff you still disagree with the below listed deficiencies, you may appeal to the Building Official in accordance with Pima County Code 15.04.060 by submitting the form posted on our web site with payment of appeal fee prior to permit application expiration. Disputes about the interpretation of the Zoning Code may be appealed to a Pima County Board of Adjustment under A.R.S. § 11 -816 and P.C.C. § 18.93.060. Please submit all plans, calculations and specifications to us electronically via the Digital Projects page in the online portal. Re-Submittal Procedures Please submit all documents using Citizen Access at permits.pima.gov (i.e. plans, drawings, calculations, quantities, exhibits, photographs, letters, etc.). 1. Please go to permits.pima.gov and login to your account to access review comments and resubmit. 2. If you have questions or need clarification regarding comments, please contact the reviewer. 3. Provide a response to each correction comment. 4. To resubmit, upload revised full plan set. Should the resubmittal not completely address this request for corrections, the application maybe denied requiring a new application and payment all applicable review fees in accordance withA.R.S. § 11-1605. |
||
| 12/09/2024 | Site Engineering | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | 1. There is currently no continuous pedestrian circulation connecting all blocks. Please revise SFR locations to provide safe continuous accessible pedestrian circulation from all SFR's to adjacent pedestrian circulation, and all common areas including mailbox. This circulation should include direct routes with marked crosswalks perpendicular to vehicle use areas and not require use of roadways. | ||
| 11/22/2024 | Site Landscape | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | CDRC TRANSMITTAL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT REVIEWER: CHAD KELLER, RLA PDSD SITE LANDSCAPE/NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION SECTION PROJECT: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE FOR AN FLD SUBDIVISION ACTIVITY NO: TD-DEV-1223-00493 ADDRESS: 9190 E VALENCIA RD ZONING: C-2 COMMERCIAL ZONE LAND USE: FLD This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants, and water harvesting. Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Landscape/NPPO Review Section comments are addressed. SITE LANDSCAPE/NPPO SECTION COMMENTS: 1. Sheet 28 - Erosion Control Plan is missing from the development package. Add the plan to complete the set for approval. 2. Are sight visibility triangles required at the intersections within the development, or are they only required at the major street entry and exit points of the development? 3. All other comments provided by the previous site landscape reviewer have been satisfied. Once the full plan set is compiled with the Erosion Control Plan, then site landscape will approve the landscape plans. If you have any questions about these comments, I can be reached at chad.keller@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 11/29/2024 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Fernando Garcia PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: FLD (Flexible Lot Development) TD-DEV-1223-00493 910 E Valencia Rd, Tucson, AZ 85747 Development Package (2nd Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: November 26, 2024 DUE DATE: November 19, 2024 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is October 22, 2025. SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS) 2-06.4.2.B - A brief legal description and a statement as to whether the project is a re-subdivision are to be provided. On re-subdivisions, provide the recording information of the existing subdivision plat; 1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.2.B – A separate land division permit for these parcels – TD-DIV-0124-00001 – was separately submitted for a block plat. What is the intent, or phasing, for this block plat permit in relation to the current tentative/final plat submittal? 2-06.4.9.R - Show on-site pedestrian circulation and refuge utilizing location and the design criteria in Section 7-01.0.0, Pedestrian Access, of the Technical Standards Manual. 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Connectivity between pedestrian circulation paths is inconsistent. For example, pedestrian circulation along both side of Bergman St. abruptly end at Astaire St and do not connect to pedestrian circulation in Common Area B-3. No connectivity exists between the pedestrian circulation at south of Pad 46 (and north of Pad 3) across Bergman St to the nearest sidewalk. In addition, paths perpendicular to Newman Ln on its north and south sides end at the street and no connectivity is provided to each other; this pattern is repeated across the development. No pedestrian circulation is provided to the parking area on the south end of Common Area B-3 or to the gang mailbox on Lombard Ln. If none is proposed, incorporate the request for additional relief from TSM Section 7-01.3.3 in a revised TSMR. ***For additional information on the any standard presented in this memo, please refer to the City of Tucson “Unified Development Code” – Administrative Manual Section 2-06 or Technical Standards noted in the comments. https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/all-codes-plans-determinations If you have any questions about this transmittal, contact Fernando Garcia by email at fernando.garcia2@tucsonaz.gov. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package and comment response letter. To resubmit visit Tucson Development Center at https://tdc-online.tucsonaz.gov/#/home. Instructions for resubmittal - https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/website/Resubmittals.pdf. |
||
| 12/05/2024 | TSMR/PDMR - Engineering | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | 1. The pedestrian circulation path doesn't seem to be complete throughout the development. 2. After discussions with zoning we feel a meeting would be appropriate between city staff and the developers to discuss the proposed street widths and overall subdivision design. Stephen Blood (520) 837-4958 Stephen.blood@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 12/06/2024 | TSMR/PDMR - Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | See Engineering comments |