Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE REVIEW v.2
Permit Number - TD-DEV-1222-00079
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE REVIEW v.2
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/08/2023 | Commercial Plumbing | APPROVED | |||
| 01/19/2023 | OK to Submit - Engineering Fast | APPROVED | |||
| 02/13/2023 | Site Engineering | APPROVED | |||
| 02/15/2023 | CDRC Post Review Express | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 02/13/2023 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: St. Philips Corner Apartments – Covered Parking w/Solar Development Package (2nd Review) TD-DEV-1122-00079 TRANSMITTAL DATE: February 13, 2023 DUE DATE: February 17, 2022 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is December 14, 2023. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 1. This comment was not addressed. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.J - As Campbell is designated as Arterial Gateway and Roger designated as Collector on the COT MS&R Map clearly show the future right-of-way line and future curb location on the plan. 2. This comment was not addressed. Until the future curb location is provided and the correct street perimeter yard setback dimensions are provided Zoning cannot determine if the setbacks are met. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – The street perimeter yard setbacks are not shown correctly. Per UDC Article 11.4.6 definition of Established Area Setback any site that has street frontage on a street designated on the COT MS&R map does not qualify for established area setbacks. That said the street perimeter yard setbacks for this site are based on UDC Article 6.4.5.C.2 and Table 6.4.5.C-1, Average Daily Traffic (ADT) of 1,000 or greater or 21’ or the H = The height of the proposed exterior building wall, greater of the two, as measured from the back of future curb. 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – The setback waiver provided for the south property is the same one provided for the west property. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Nicholas Martell at Nicholas.Martell@tucsonaz.gov. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
||
| 01/18/2023 | CDRC Application Completeness Express | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 02/08/2023 | CDRC Review Coordinator Express | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 02/15/2023 | Fire New Construction | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 01/19/2023 | NPPO | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 01/19/2023 | OK to Submit - Landscape Fast | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 01/25/2023 | OK to Submit - Zoning Fast | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 02/15/2023 | ROW Engineering Review | REVIEW COMPLETED | No Comments | ||
| 01/19/2023 | Site Landscape | REVIEW COMPLETED |