Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE REVIEW v.1
Permit Number - TD-DEV-1222-00061
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE REVIEW v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12/29/2022 | NPPO | NOT REQUIRED | |||
| 01/20/2023 | CDRC Post Review | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 01/18/2023 | Commercial Plumbing | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | 1. The maximum distance between cleanouts shall be 100-feet, measured along the developed pipe length from the upstream entrance of the cleanout (i.e. add the distance between the rim of the upstream cleanout and the invert of the building sewer to the horizontal length of the building sewer). Reference: Section 708.1.1, IPC 2018 2. The rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole (2459.88’) is less than 12” below the first floor elevation (2460.50’). Provide a note on the plans requiring the installation of a backwater valve when future plumbing activities take place. Reference: Section 714.1, IPC 2018, as amended by the City of Tucson. |
||
| 01/20/2023 | Site Engineering | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | 1. Please provide the hydraulic calculations showing the culverts provide sufficient capacity. We acknowledge that we have given approval for the change from the channel to culverts, but the calculation must be memorialized in a sealed report. If the conversion to culverts is part of another Development Package, provide a reference on the plan to the other plan. 2. We are accepting the retention and detention conclusions of the drainage report for this project. We would like to discuss the retention/detention descriptions in the master report with the development drainage reports to ensure consistency with the development of the rest of Area B-IV. Stephen Blood (520) 837-4958 Stephen.blood@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 12/29/2022 | Site Landscape | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Landscape and irrigation plans are required with this submittal | ||
| 01/03/2023 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: JED at The Bridges – Phase II Development Package (1st Review) TD-DEV-1122-00055 TRANSMITTAL DATE: January 3, 2023 DUE DATE: January 13, 2023 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is December 04, 2023. 2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-1222-00061, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.d – Ensure that the Bridges Tracking table is fully updated. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Nicholas Martell at Nicholas.Martell@tucsonaz.gov. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
||
| 12/15/2022 | CDRC Application Completeness | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 12/28/2022 | CDRC Review Coordinator | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 01/10/2023 | Fire New Construction | REVIEW COMPLETED | Section 503.2.5 Dead ends. Dead-end fire apparatus access roads in excess of 150 feet (45 720 mm) in length shall be provided with an approved area for turning around fire apparatus. Section D104.3 Remoteness. Where two fire apparatus access roads are required, they shall be placed a distance apart equal to not less than one half of the length of the maximum overall diagonal dimension of the lot or area to be served, measured in a straight line between accesses. Section D105.1 Where required. Where the vertical distance between the grade plane and the highest roof surface exceeds 30 feet (9144 mm), approved aerial fire apparatus access roads shall be provided. For purposes of this section, the highest roof surface shall be determined by measurement to the eave of a pitched roof, the intersection of the roof to the exterior wall, or the top of parapet walls, whichever is greater. Section D105.2 Width. Aerial fire apparatus access roads shall have a minimum unobstructed width of 26 feet (7925 mm), exclusive of shoulders, in the immediate vicinity of the building or portion thereof. Section D105.3 Proximity to building. One or more of required access routes meeting this condition shall be located not less than 15 feet (4572 mm) and not greater than 30 feet (9144 mm) from the building and shall be positioned parallel to one entire side of the building. The side of the building on which the aerial fire apparatus access road is positioned shall be approve by the fire code official. Section D105.4 Obstructions. Overhead utility and power lines shall not be located over the aerial fire apparatus access road or between the aerial fire apparatus road and the building. Other obstructions shall be permitted to be placed with the approval of the fire code official. Fire sprinkler underground plans shall be submitted to and a permit obtained from SFM Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to and a permit obtained from SFM Fire alarm plans shall be submitted to and a permit obtained from SFM Building shall be tested for ERRC by PCWIN and the report provided to TFD prior to the TCO Please contact me for further discussions. Questions: Jennifer Peel-Davis Tucson Fire Department Fire Plans Examiner Fire Inspector I, II and Fire Alarm Plans Examiner Jennifer.Peel-Davis@Tucsonaz.gov Desk: 520-837-7033 |
||
| 12/16/2022 | OK to Submit - Engineering | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 12/23/2022 | OK to Submit - Landscape | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 12/21/2022 | OK to Submit - Zoning | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 01/05/2023 | ROW Engineering Review | REVIEW COMPLETED | TP-PRE-1122-00061 751 E. Tucson Mkt Pl. Blvd. NO TRAFFIC ENG COMMENTS. NO DTM COMMENTS. David Stiffey DTM Project Coordinator David.Stiffey@tucsonaz.gov |