Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.2
Permit Number - TD-DEV-1124-00319
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.2
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/09/2025 | Commercial Plumbing | APPROVED | |||
| 01/16/2025 | NPPO | APPROVED | |||
| 01/30/2025 | External Reviewers - Pima County Addressing | NOT REQUIRED | Good afternoon, TD-DEV-1124-00319 does not require review by Pima County Addressing. The applicant need to apply for new address 5205 E Valencia RD. |
||
| 02/06/2025 | CDRC Post Review Express | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 12/27/2024 | External Reviewers - Tucson Airport Authority | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | December 27, 2024 Planning and Development Services City of Tucson 201 North Stone Avenue Tucson, AZ. 85701 RE: TD-DEV-1124-000319, McDonald's - Valencia Crossings, Received December 18, 2024 To whom this may concern, Thank you for the opportunity to comment on TD-DEV-1124-00319, the development plan for a new McDonalds restaurant. This development is located in the S.W. quarter of the S.E. quarter of Section 11, Township 15S, Range 14E, of the Gila and Salt River Meridian. The development site occupies parcel numbers 140-36-3550, covers approximately 1.37 ± acres, and is zoned as Planned Area Development 21 Zone (PAD-21). The nearest major roadway intersection is East Littletown Road and East Valencia Road, approximately 200 feet to the south of the subject development. This site does lie within the City of Tucson Airport Environs Overlay Zone – AEZ Height Zones, City of Tucson Airport Environs Overlay Zone – Airport Hazard District, Tucson International Airport avigation easement requirements and public disclosure area, FAA traffic pattern airspace, and FAA Part 77 airspace. The Tucson Airport Authority is requiring a resubmittal of this project. Conditions of approval: 1. “The applicant shall file FAA Form 7460 with the FAA at least 45 days before construction activities begin unless FAA staff, with the Obstruction Evaluation / Airport Airspace Analysis (OE/AAA), provides the project applicant with written communication that filing FAA Form 7460 is not required. It is highly recommended that the applicant file earlier than 45 days to provide the applicant with sufficient time to respond to any concerns which are identified by the FAA. Any cranes which are used must also be identified with Form 7460. Please file Form 7460 at https://oeaaa.faa.gov/oeaaa/external/portal.jsp” Although this project does not propose a change in plan designation or zoning the Tucson Airport Authority highly recommends the applicant add the following notes into the general notes of the revised development plan. This project is located approximately 2 miles northeast of Tucson International Airport and is within FAA traffic pattern airspace, an area which would be subject to aircraft overflight and noise due to being in close proximity to Tucson International Airport. The proposed notes would provide a means of assuring that future owners and tenants of the property are aware they are in proximity an airport and further assures the continued right of the City of Tucson, Tucson Airport Authority, and all persons lawfully utilizing the Tucson International Airport the right to utilize the airspace above or near the property. This would be accomplished through the property owner recording the Avigation Easement and providing the Airport Disclosure Statement to the new residents of all residential uses. The Tucson Airport Authority believes the proposed note helps to support the City of Tucson Airport Environs Overlay Zone and supports Plan Tucson – Regional and Global Positioning policy 4 (RG-4). 1."That prior to the City's approval of the proposed development, the property owner must record the Avigation Easement that discloses the existence and operational characteristics of the Tucson International Airport to future owners or tenants of the property and further conveys the right to the public to lawfully use the airspace above the property. The Avigation Easement shall be recorded in a manner with the Pima County recorder which shall document it as having title liability. The content of such documents shall be according to the form and instructions provided.” The current property owner or person authorized to sign on behalf of the current property owner must complete, sign, and record the Avigation Easement. Please record the Avigation Easement with the Pima County Recorder’s Office. Then send a complete copy of the recorded easement document to Tucson Airport Authority by either email (send to srobidoux@flytucson.com) or to the mailing address provided below. Scott Robidoux Manager of Planning Tucson Airport Authority 7250 South Tucson Blvd, Suite 300 Tucson, AZ 85756” 2. Applicable to residential uses only “The property owner/developer/applicant must provide the Airport Disclosure Statement form, at time of sale, to the new property owners with all new unit purchases. In the event the development of any residential uses does not involve the sale of new units but is instead offering rental residential units to the public, the new tenant of the rental unit must be provided a copy of the Airport Disclosure Statement form. The intent of the Airport Disclosure Statement form is to educate and notify the new residents that they are living near an airport. The content of such documents shall be according to the form and instructions provided.” The property owner (for itself or its tenants) shall forward a signed copy of the Airport Disclosure Statement form to the Tucson Airport Authority within ten (10) days of signature, using the Scott Robidoux mailing address provided above. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or concerns regarding this comment letter. I can be reached by email at srobidoux@flytucson.com or by telephone at 520- 573-4811. Respectfully, Scott Robidoux, C.M. Manager of Planning |
||
| 02/06/2025 | External Reviewers - Tucson Electric Power (TEP) | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Due to no response from TEP and customer having other reviews requiring comment response, will update the TEP review status as "Requires Resubmit", until PDSD receives an approval from TEP, via TEP response or customer providing TEP approval letter. | ||
| 12/20/2024 | ROW Engineering Review | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | TD-DEV-1124-00319 1. Per Sec 10-01.4.1.A.1.a, the minimum width of a sidewalk along an arterial street is 6ft. Section 2 on sheet C801 indicates a 5’ wide sidewalk. 2. Label the driveway curb returns with the proposed radii. If you have any questions, please contact Richard Leigh at richard.leigh@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 01/14/2025 | Site Engineering | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | 1. On the cover sheet please include the contact information for the firm that prepared the geotechnical report per Admin Manual section 2-06.4.1 including name, address, email address, and phone number. 2. Include the waste stream calculations on the cover sheet. 3. Per TSM section 8-01 the concrete slab for the trash enclosure shall slope at 1% to the gate opening and the concrete ramp shall slope 2% away from the enclosure. Revise detail as necessary. 4. Any alteration to the trash enclosure detail found in TSM section 8-01 requires Environment Services approval through a TSMR. Revise the trash enclosure to match TSM Section 8-01 or apply for a TSMR with the next submittal. 5. On the grading sheets show the location of the roof downspouts to verify drainage patterns and ensure that no downspouts are discharging directly onto the sidewalk per TSM section 7.01.4.1.E. 6. On the grading sheet C300 check all slope arrows and spot elevations for accuracy, there appears to be one off showing 7.27% cross slope on the sidewalk adjacent to the handicap parking spaces. 7. The use of underground storage will be acceptable for this project on the condition that the Underground Storage Standards are met from section 4.13 of the Design Standards for Stormwater Detention and Retention Manual. Please include a letter in the next submittal addressing each standard found in section 4.13 and how it is being met. 8. Per section 4.13.2.2 of the Design Standards for Stormwater Detention and Retention Manual infiltration as a means of disposal is prohibited, without prior approval of the Floodplain Administrator as well as 4.13.2.3 – Providing first flush retention underground is prohibited, without prior approval of the Floodplain Administrator. Infiltration testing will be required at the location and depth of the bottom of each underground retention basin to ensure the drain down times found in section 4.5 of the same manual are met. 9. The storm drain system has a discharge flow of 17.7 cfs, explain how this increased discharge is meeting balanced basin requirements. Stephen Blood (520) 837-4958 Stephen.blood@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 01/16/2025 | Site Landscape | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | CDRC TRANSMITTAL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT REVIEWER: CHAD KELLER, RLA SITE LANDSCAPE/NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION SECTION PROJECT: MCDONALD'S - VALENCIA CROSSINGS ACTIVITY NO: TD-DEV-1124-00319 PARCEL: 140363550 ZONING: PAD-21 (VALENCIA CROSSINGS PAD) LAND USE: COMMERCIAL RESTAURANT This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants, and water harvesting. Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all of the Site Landscape/NPPO Section review comments have been addressed. PAD-21 SPECIFIC SITE LANDSCAPE COMMENTS: 1. Parking lot tree requirements: Where a single parking row occurs, one tree per every four parking spaces will be provided. 41 parking spaces are provided on the plan, requiring 11 trees. Trees within the landscape border can count at a two to one or at 50% if the trees are located within 10-feet of the paved parking area, see UDC 7.6.4.B.1.a.(2). With the 2 for 1/50% standard, the current calculation for trees is at 7 total. Provide the required shade trees and include a calculation similar to the street landscape border calcs. shown on the planting plan. 2. A masonry screen wall is shown on the planting plan. The civil plans reference the landscape plans for wall details. Call out the proposed screen wall on the planting plan and provide a detail for the wall. 3. In general, with PAD 21 landscape requirements, provide descriptions on the planting plan or on the landscape cover sheet of how the standards are being met/or how the plans meet the intent of the PAD requirements, per the pre-application comments. GENERAL SITE LANDSCAPE/NPPO SECTION COMMENTS: 4. On the planting plan, add a key/legend that shows the transplant with the gray symbol for coordination clarity. 5. Landscape General Note #15 with regard to tree staking is great. Can a detail for a multi-trunk tree planting with no stakes be added to the plans and add a note to remove the nursery stake? Or should a time period advisement for removal of tree stakes be added to your current multi-trunk tree planting detail and general landscape notes for clarity? This is an issue I’ve been seeing out on finished project sites. The staking cinch-ties have been constricting and damaging newly planted trees. Below are some example notes that could be added to the detail and/or in the general notes if you wish to incorporate this additional detail with regard to tree staking: TREE STAKING GENERAL NOTES: - Tree stakes are not required for 5 gal. trees - Tree stakes may be omitted if tree is able to support itself upright without leaning or bending - When stakes are installed, ties should be placed as low as possible while still providing necessary support. Cut stake approx. 6" above tie to avoid branches rubbing on stake - All nursery stakes are to be removed regardless of plant size 6. WHIA/SWA-4 extends into the ROW. Provide approval documentation from DTM/David Marhefka for all work being proposed in the ROW. David.Marhefka@tucsonaz.gov 7. The civil grading plan does not include contouring for the WHIA basins. Coordinate with the civil engineer to make sure the grading plan and the CRWHP reference each other and all proposed line work matches. Similar contouring line work to what is shown on civil sheet C301 for the detention/retention basin on the west portion of the site should be included for all depressed water harvesting areas on site. 8. As a standard practice, a few spot elevations on the CRWHP at the bottom of basin, basin curb cut inlets and outlets (if applicable), and at the top of the basin slope should be included. Match the elevations located on the civil grading plan for coordination between the plans. Just a few spot elevations in key locations on the CRWHP as a quick reference for the contractor and inspectors. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS SHOULD BE CONSIDERED AS ADDITIONAL CLARIFICATION FOR THE CONTRACTORS. STATING INTENT AND THE IMPORTANCE OF THE COMMERCIAL RAINWATER HARVESTING PLAN AND ITS REQUIRED IMPLEMENTATION PRECISION ON SITE: 9. On the rainwater harvesting plan add these general notes for construction clarity. Wording similar to the following will provide clear direction/coordination and intent for the contractor’s reference: a. See Civil Grading Plan for additional information on basin side slopes, spot elevations, shape, contouring, flow lines, curb cuts, downspouts, splash pads, etc. b. This Rainwater Harvesting Plan is designed to work in conjunction with the civil grading and drainage plans. The specific intent of the Rainwater Harvesting Plan is to demonstrate that the site grading and drainage facilitates direct flow of impervious-surface runoff in sufficient quantities to the depressed planting areas to comply with the Commercial Rainwater Harvesting Ordinance. It is the Contractors responsibility to meet the requirements of Site Grading and Drainage plans and the Rainwater Harvesting Plan and to notify the engineer and landscape architect if there are any discrepancies between the two plans. 10. Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-1124-00319, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2-06.4.3 11. Prior to Site Landscape Development Package approval, please make sure Site Zoning and Site Engineering comments are addressed. Thank you. Chad Keller, RLA If you have any questions about these comments, I can be reached at chad.keller@tucsonaz.gov or at 520.837.4923 |
||
| 01/03/2025 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Ramiro Olivarez – Planner PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: McDonald’s – Parcel # 140363550 Development Package (1st Review) TD-DEV-1124-00319 TRANSMITTAL DATE: 1/3/2025 DUE DATE: 01/10/2025 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is December 11, 2025. SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS) Section 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.3.4 - A title block shall be provided in the lower right quadrant of each sheet. 1. COMMENT: Remove the architectural description from the title block on all sheets and revise as follows: The title block should include a brief legal description of this site and the section, township, and range. (VALENCIA CROSSING COMMERCIAL SQ20222970255 LOT 7) 2. COMMENT: The title section of the title block should include the name of the sheet, i.e. cover sheet “McDonald’s Littletown”. 2-06.3.12 - An index of sheets in the development package shall be provided on the first sheet. 3. COMMENT: All Sheets shall include page numbers, i.e. sheet 3 of 25, 4 of 25, etcetera. (The site plan sheet and the few following sheets do not provide the exact sheet numbers.) CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.4.1 - The name, mailing and email addresses, and phone number of the primary property owner of the site, the developer of the project, registrant(s), and other person(s), firm(s), or organization(s) that prepared the development package documents shall be provided on the right half of the cover sheet. The applicable registration or license number shall be provided if prepared by or with the assistance of a registered professional, such as a surveyor, architect, landscape architect, or engineer. All sealing shall be consistent with Arizona Board of Technical Registration guidelines. 4. COMMENT: In the Project Team section on the cover sheet, include the stamped landscape registrant’s information (Mary L. Estes), as noted by the Standard above. 2-06.4.2 - The title block shall include the following information and be provided on each sheet: 2-06.4.2.B - A brief legal description and a statement as to whether the project is a re-subdivision are to be provided. On re-subdivisions, provide the recording information of the existing subdivision plat; 5. COMMENT: See related comments 1 and 2 above. 2-06.4.2.D - The page number and the total number of pages in the package (i.e., sheet xx of xx). 6. COMMENT: See related comment 3 above. 2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 7. COMMENT: Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-1124-00319, adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 2-06.4.2.B - Identify major streets and regional watercourses within the square mile area and all streets that abut the subject property; and, 8. COMMENT: Identify and label the major highway (Interstate-10), the wash (Julian Wash), and the SPRR (railroad to the north) on the map. As noted by the Standard above. 2-06.4.6 - If the project is located within the boundaries of a Planned Area Development (PAD) zone, include a reduced-scale map of the PAD on the first sheet, indicating the location of the portion being developed. 9. COMMENT: Provide the PAD-21 information as noted by the Standard above. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 2-06.4.7.A.3 - If the plan/plat has been prepared in conjunction with a rezoning application, add the following note next to the existing zoning note: "Proposed zoning is ____." List the applicable rezoning file number and conditions of approval. Also place the C9-__-__ (if applicable) and the plan/plat file numbers in the lower right corner of each sheet. 10. COMMENT: List the rezoning case number in the lower right corner of the title block as noted by the Standard above. (C9-12-03). 2-06.4.7.A.6 - If a plan or plat is prepared in conjunction with other applications or overlays or the parcel being developed is subject to conditions of an application processed previously, additional information must be added to the plan. Such applications and overlays include, but are not limited to: annexations; rezonings; special exceptions; Board of Adjustment variances; Design Development Options; Technical Standard Modification Request; overlays (Airport Environs Zone, Environmental Resource Zone, Gateway Corridor Zone, Hillside Development Zone, Historic Preservation Zone, Major Streets and Routes, Rio Nuevo District, Scenic Corridor Zone, WASH); Modification of Development Regulations through the Downtown Area Infill Incentive District or Rio Nuevo District; Downtown Heritage Incentive Zone; or, Design Review Board. Provide the following information on the plan. 11. COMMENT: On the cover sheet, remove all Pima County references from general note 11. Add a general note stating this project is designed to meet the standards in UDC 5.6 Airport Environs Zone (AEZ). 12. COMMENT: Add a general note stating this project is designed to meet the standards in UDC 5.4 Major Streets and Routes. 2-06.4.7.A.6.a - List additional applications and overlays, by case number (if applicable), in lower right corner of each sheet. As a general note provide the type of application processed or overlays applicable, a statement that the project meets the criteria/conditions of the additional application or overlay, the case number, date of approval, what was approved, and the conditions of approval, if any. 13. COMMENT: List all the related case numbers (S13-026, C9-12-03, C15-12-01, DP21-0281, P22WS00023) and sequence number (20222970255) associated as noted by the Standard above. 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 2-06.4.7.A.8.a - Floor area for each building; 14. COMMENT: The floor area of the building listed on the cover sheet project location map is not consistent with the floor area on the site plan, sheet 3/SP1.0. Clarify the correct building floor area. For consistency, correct all calculations on the cover sheet and site plan sheet 3/SP1.0 to match. 2-06.4.7.D - Utilities Note All development package documents are to include the following note: "Any relocation or modification of existing utilities and/or public improvements necessitated by the proposed development will be at no expense to the public." 15. COMMENT: Add the Utilities Note as noted by the Standard above. 2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided. 16. COMMENT: As this site is on a corner lot adjacent to two streets, provide the information as noted by the Standard above. 2-06.4.8.A - Provide site boundary/subdivision perimeter information, including bearing in degrees, minutes, and seconds, with basis for bearing noted, together with distances in feet, to hundredths of a foot, or other functional reference system. 17. COMMENT: Label the bearings on the site plan, sheet 3, as noted by the Standard above. The 25.00’ radius in the southeast corner is incorrect and should be 50.00’, per the recorded final plat sequence # 20222970255. 2-06.4.8.B - All easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement shall occur prior to approval of plan unless written permission from easement holder(s) is provided. 18. COMMENT: Identify and label the recordation information for the Cross Access Easement, the Private Drainage Easement, and the Private Access Easement to be abandoned. The Private Access Easement to be abandoned must be completed prior to final approval of this Development Package. Include the recorded abandonment documentation information in the next submittal. Revise the note to say Private Access Easement is abandoned per sequence number or docket and page. 2-06.4.8.C - The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. 19. COMMENT: Per PAD-21 document page 48, the total future right-of-way of Valencia Road is 200 feet. The dimensioned half R.O.W. drawn on the site plan is 95 feet. Draw the future right-of-way and dimension the building setbacks from the future right-of-way. (Verify with the Department of Transportation & Mobility if the additional dedication of 5 feet of future right-of-way will be required, in compliance with the PAD-21 document) Label and dimension all the information as noted by the Standard above. (The name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks.) 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 2-06.4.9.B - Identify each block or lot by number within the subdivision boundary and include the approximate square footage of each, or a note may be provided stating that all lots comply with the minimum lot size requirements. 20. COMMENT: Label the lot number and square footage (59,647 SQ FT. as found in Recorded Subdivision Plat Map for Sequence Number 20222970255) as noted by the Standard above. 2-06.4.9.F - All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. If the property is being rezoned, use those boundaries and classifications. The basis for this requirement is that some zoning requirements on a project are based on the zoning classification of adjacent property. Also, in some instances, each zone has to be taken into consideration on property that is split by two or more zoning classifications, as each may have different requirements. 21. COMMENT: Note the zoning for all adjacent properties as PAD-21, as noted by the Standard above. 2-06.4.9.H.2 - Show future and existing sight visibility triangles. On a designated MS&R street, the sight visibility triangles are based on the MS&R cross-section. 22. COMMENT: Draw the sight visibility triangles as noted by the Standard above. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC. 23. COMMENT: The required parking calculation on the cover sheet (based on a building floor area of 3,819 SF) is 38 required vehicle parking spaces, not 39. (Per UDC code, spaces are only rounded up at .5) On the cover sheet and site plan sheet 3, ensure the vehicle parking calculations listed are consistent. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Section 7.4.9, Bicycle Parking Design Criteria, of the UDC. Provide, as a note, calculations for short and long term bicycle spaces required and provided. 24. COMMENT: Draw, label, and dimension the short-term bicycle parking facility specific to the area proposed as noted by the Standard above. 2-06.4.9.O - All applicable building setback lines, such as erosion hazard, floodplain detention/retention basins, and zoning, including sight visibility triangles, will be shown. 25. COMMENT: If applicable, dimension the building setback lines from the future right-of-way line. 2-06.4.9.Q - Provide the square footage and the height of each commercial, industrial, or business structure and the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building(s). 26. COMMENT: The building height listed on the cover sheet is not consistent with the building height on the site plan, sheet 3/SP1.0. Clarify the correct building height. Provide the square footage and building height within the footprint of the building on the cover sheet and site plan, sheet 3/SP1.0 as noted by the Standard above. Clarify under the project data on site plan sheet 3/SP1.0., the “Allowed: 50’-0” building height. This 50’ building height could not be verified in the PAD-21 document. Remove the 50’ allowed building height on the site plan, sheet 3/SP1.0. 2-06.4.9.U - Indicate graphically, where possible, compliance with conditions of rezoning. 28. COMMENT: Per rezoning case # C9-12-03, “Prior to the submittal of any development package or tentative plat, the Master Association Design Review Committee shall review the project and certify the proposed design conforms to the established standards. A copy the certification will be provided to the City at time of development package or subdivision review.” 2-06.4.9.X - Show compliance with landscaping and screening requirements by locations, material descriptions, and dimensions. Specific plant or hardscape material shall be detailed on a landscape plan. A detailed landscape plan is required. In accordance with Section 2-11.0.0, Landscape Plan Requirements. 29. COMMENT: See landscape reviewer comments as it relates to the Standard above. COMMENT: Additional zoning comments may apply on the next submittal based on the corrected resubmittal and response to zoning comments. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Ramiro Olivarez at Ramiro.Olivarez@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Corrected development package. |
||
| 12/12/2024 | CDRC Application Completeness Express | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 12/18/2024 | CDRC Review Coordinator Express | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC added ADOT, TAA, Addressing, and TEP PAG, USPS, SWG to the workflow. Review request email sent to ADOT, TAA, Addressing, and TEP. FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. | ||
| 01/27/2025 | External Reviewers - Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) | REVIEW COMPLETED | The review files that DTM was provided in support of this development included the attached Traffic Impact Analysis. Based on the information cited in the TIA, DTM does not object to the development moving forward. | ||
| 01/08/2025 | External Reviewers - Pima Association of Governments | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required. | ||
| 01/08/2025 | External Reviewers - Southwest Gas | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required. | ||
| 01/08/2025 | External Reviewers - United States Postal Service (USPS) | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required. | ||
| 01/07/2025 | Fire New Construction | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 12/18/2024 | OK to Submit - Engineering Fast | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 12/20/2024 | ROW Review | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 01/07/2025 | Traffic Engineering Review | REVIEW COMPLETED | The TIA written in support of this McDonald's development indicates that the signalized intersection adjacent to the site will continue to operate at an acceptable LOS after the project's opening, so DTM Traffic Engineering does not object to the development. The trip reduction factors based on pass-by rates described in the trip generation section are reasonable. The TIA indicates that an extension of the WB right turn lane is warranted by the site traffic generated. Any right turn lane improvements would be conducted under the Private Improvement Agreement process. Thanks! |