Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Approved
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW REVISION v.1
Permit Number - TD-DEV-1024-00280
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW REVISION v.1
Review Status: Approved
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/27/2026 | Site Zoning Standard | APPROVED | |||
| 01/15/2026 | CDRC Application Completeness Express | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 01/27/2026 | CDRC Review Coordinator Express | REVIEW COMPLETED | External reviewer design professional approved | ||
| 01/27/2026 | External Reviewers - Design Professional Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | Rick Gonzalez, Architect 214 E Suffolk Drive, Tucson, Az. 85704 (520) 850-7401 gonzalezrick34@gmail.com DATE: January 26, 2026 TO: Ginger Neely, City of Tucson FROM: Rick Gonzalez, Architect (#26992) COT On-Call Design Professional RE: DP Review, Enclaves at Tumamoc AVP, TD-DEV-1024-00228 I have reviewed the Architectural Variation Plan for AVP (TD-DEV-1024- 00280) submitted January 2026 for the purpose of determining conformance with the Design Requirements of the AVP. I have checked the submittal against the Architectural Variation Plan (AVP) Development Requirements relative to Section 8.7.3., Design Standards under procedure described in Section M4a. Submittal Requirements Status Design Criteria Architectural Variation Purpose Applicability (1) Projects with 20 or more single-family detached residential units except when residential units are on lots larger than 10,000 square feet or, where dwelling units are separated by 30 feet or more; or, (2) Elevations of single-family detached units abutting a public street designated as a collector or arterial street in the Major Streets and Routes Plan; or, a private or public street designed and/or designated as a residential collector street. Requirements (1) The same architectural elevation The applicant has stated in the cover shall not be repeated more often than every fourth lot. letter of the summittal that the same architectural elevation shall not be repeated more often than every fourth lot and therfore would comply. (2) Architectural variation may be accomplished by The applicant has provided five incorporating a minimum of two of the following building elevation options and design features into the affected elevations: different several styles building footprint orientation, building elevation, and, therefore, complies. garage placement, roof type, ornamentation, or architectural style. (3) Garage Placement. For FLD projects with over All models have been presented as 20 or more single-family detached residential units, rear load (alley-load) with garages at no more than 50% of detached residential units backs of the properties and therefore throughout the FLD shall be designed with garages comply. that protrude from or are flush with the front wall of the living area or front porch of the house. Architectural Variation Plan Required The AVP shall be included with the subdivision plat, Complies site plan, or building permit submittal. Transition Edge Treatment and Mitigation for Adjacent Properties Transition Edge Treatment Where a single-family attached or multi-family FLD N/A for detached project is adjacent to existing single-family residential development, the FLD shall provide buffering in order to preserve the privacy of the existing residential development. Examples of buffering include, but are not limited to, landscaping, a fence, or a wall. The proposed buffering shall be included as conditions on the approved subdivision plat or site plan. Privacy Mitigation Applicability Privacy mitigation is required when multistory A PMP is N/A to this project. residences are proposed adjacent to existing no proposed two story units single story residences and the existing residences will face R-2 or more are zoned R-2 or more restrictive. restrictive properties Prohibited Improvements Balconies, windows (except for clerestory and There are no balconies on the translucent windows), or any other feature on an proposed models. upper floor that overlook the rear and side yards of an adjacent residence are prohibited. Privacy Mitigation Plan (a) PMPs shall demonstrate that adequate N/A to this project measures, such as screening, setbacks, building mass, solar access, air circulation, and light access are incorporated into the design of the project to preserve the existing residents’ privacy. (b) PMPs shall be included with submittal of the tentative plat or site plan, whichever is applicable. 19. Solar Access and Passive Solar Solar Access Dwelling units should be configured to allow Optional solar access to adjacent structures. Passive Solar FLD projects should incorporate passive solar Optional design when practicable. 20. Alternative Compliance. Optional Alternative Compliance requests may be considered. General Comments: Based on review of the AVA submittal for Enclaves at Tumamoc, I recommend approval of the AVA as submitted. Sincerely, Rick Gonzalez, Architect RGA |
||
| 01/20/2026 | OK to Submit - Zoning Fast | REVIEW COMPLETED | Review of the Architectural Variation Plan (AVP) by a Design Professional is required. |