Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.3
Permit Number - TD-DEV-0925-00234
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.3
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/04/2025 | Site Engineering Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Permit: TD-DEV-0925-00234 Location: 2884 E GANLEY RD Review Date: 11/4/2025 Site Engineering Comments: 1. Previous comment #1 appears to not be addressed, the plans still show TD-DEV-1-----00--- for JB Steel, revise accordingly 2. Due to the proposal of a basin, this development will require a grading sheet/plan to be added to this development package. Ensure to include total cut/fill quantities as well as limits of grading, and all required basin information to be provided. 3. Provide a descriptor box adjacent to each basin on the site plan(Includes Stormwater Harvesting basins/landscaping). Include a leader arrow to the basin or provide a label for the basin and reference the label on the top of the descriptor box. Include the following applicable information in the descriptor box: a. Total volume, cubic feet or acre feet; b. If applicable, detention volume, cubic feet or acre feet; c. If applicable, retention volume, cubic feet; d. If applicable, first-flush retention volume, cubic feet; e. If applicable, Q100 in, cubic feet per second; f. If applicable, Q100 out, cubic feet per second; g. Basin top elevation, feet; h. 100-year water surface elevation, feet; and i. 100-year ponding depth, (measured from the lowest elevation of the basin), feet. DSSDR 11.1.3 4. There appears to be no drainage statement document provided, please provide an official drainage statement document following format/content requirements found in the drainage manual section 2.3.2 Ensure to show full compliance with first flush retention and balanced basin detention requirements associated with this development. https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/engineering-code/cot-drainage-manual-searchable.pdf 5. It is required that a licensed civil engineer or architect stamp the submitted development package, and a civil engineer or hydrologist must stamp the drainage statement document as well. 6. Clearly show downspouts and sidewalk scuppers for all structures to ensure that stormwater from roof drains, up to and including flow from the ten-year storm event, does not pass over sidewalks per Technical Standards Manual 7-01.4.3E. If you have any questions or concerns, please contact Marco Contreras Marco.contreras@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 11/13/2025 | Site Zoning Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Krista Hansen – Lead Planner PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: Building Addition Development Package (2nd Review) TD-DEV-025-00234 (2884 E Ganley Rd) TRANSMITTAL DATE: 11/13/2025 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is September 17, 2026. SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS) 1-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 1. PREVIOUS COMMENT 1: 2-06.4.3 - Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-025-00234, adjacent to the title block on each sheet. **Follow-Up: This comment still stands. 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Provide, as a note, calculations for bicycle parking spaces required and provided for the expansion. Per UDC Table 7.4.8-1, the Industrial Use Group (Manufacturing) requires a minimum of two long-term spaces. Show the location of bicycle parking facilities on the site plan. 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R - Per TSM 7-01.4.1.B, a sidewalk is required adjacent and parallel to any access lane or PAAL on the side where buildings are located. Show pedestrian circulation adjacent to the addition on the west side of the building, connecting to the existing sidewalk. Ensure compliance with design criteria in Section 7-01.0.0, Pedestrian Access, of the Technical Standards Manual (TSM). 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - As a note, provide calculations on the number of ADA spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided (www.ada.gov/topics/parking). Dimension the accessible parking spaces and indicate the locations on the site plan. If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact Krista Hansen by email Krista.hansen@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Corrected development package and comment response letter. To resubmit visit Tucson Development Center at https://tdc-online.tucsonaz.gov/#/home. Instructions for resubmittal - www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/tdc-faq/new-pdfs/revisions-and-resubmittals.pdf. |