Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1
Permit Number - TD-DEV-0924-00259
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/04/2024 | CDRC Post Review | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 10/28/2024 | NPPO | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | See Site Landscape comments. Thank you. Chad Keller, RLA chad.keller@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 10/17/2024 | ROW Engineering Review | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | TD-DEV-0924-00259 See redlined drawings for comments. If you have any questions, please contact Richard Leigh at 520-403-0970 or email richard.leigh@tucsonaz.gov. |
||
| 10/22/2024 | Site Engineering | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | 1. Please extend the fiber roll around the entire perimeter of the site for the SWPPP. 2. Table 7 of the drainage report shows proposed peak flow rates with unknown calculations. Section 3.2 Detention Basin 1 states the basin was analyzed for only onsite flows. The report only provides routing for this basin with offsite flows (O2) included. Table 6 shows Qout values that include the offsite flows for Basin 1. The value for Q100 proposed would be 34.2cfs based on the values shown in this table. Table 7 says the Q100 proposed is 19.4cfs. Additionally, the majority of the flow to this basin is coming from the onsite (D2) flows. No routing calculations have been provided for the onsite condition only. It is not clear how the proposed peak flow rates in Table 7 were calculated, but the values appear to be lower than they should be. Please explain the calculation, and show all modeling outputs described in the report. Mike Ortiz michael.ortiz@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 10/28/2024 | Site Landscape | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | CDRC TRANSMITTAL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT REVIEWER: CHAD KELLER, RLA PDSD SITE LANDSCAPE/NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION SECTION PROJECT: NEW CONTRACTOR STORAGE YARD ACTIVITY NO: TD-DEV-0924-00259 ADDRESS/PARCEL: 6970 E VALENCIA RD/14103038B ZONING: I-1 LIGHT INDUSTRIAL ZONE LAND USE: EQUIPMENT STORAGE YARD This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants, and water harvesting. Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Landscape/NPPO Review Section comments are addressed. SITE LANDSCAPE/NPPO SECTION COMMENTS: 1. Ensure that Zoning and Engineering comments are addressed prior to landscape section approval. 2. Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-0924-00259, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2-06.4.3 3. Show the 25 Barrel Cactus transplant inventory and symbols on the NPPO and show their approximate final placement on the planting plan. I have reviewed the “salvaged barrel cactus to be field located into the landscape border areas.” Add a note to make sure that the barrel cactus are not placed near the bottom of the basins. 4. The southeast corner landscape linework does not match the civil line work. Adjust the fence line to match and revise the planting, irrigation and rainwater harvesting plans to match. 5. Match all line work on the landscape plans to the civil plans. On the landscape plans, the basin outlines and rip rap locations are not matching the civil plans. 6. Landscape border calculation for Valencia has a typo of 3001 linear feet. Update to read 301 linear feet if that is the total linear feet for that border. Should the required 9.12 trees be rounded up to 10 required trees for both the north and south street landscape borders? 7. Revise Hesperaloe parviflora common name to Red Yucca. 8. Indicate with an additional leader for the Old Vail Road street landscape border that it is one single landscape border like it was done at the Valencia Road border to the north. The border is bisected by a driveway. I am fine with calling it one border as long as it has a leader callout saying so. 9. Is the west property line meant to be hydroseed. If so, update the hatch to match the desert seeding hatch in the legend. Also, the hydroseed plant list is missing from the plans. Add the approved list found in the Technical Standards 5-02.6.0 Exhibit 1: NATIVE SEED LIST. 10. A rainwater harvesting basin schematic detail is not a requirement but adding it to CRWHP or to the detail sheet would be a nice addition for construction clarity. 11. There are a few plants located in the ROW along Valencia and along Old Vail. Please reach out to David Marhefka with DTM for approval or move the plants out of the ROW and back within the property limits. david.marhefka@tucsonaz.gov 12. Label the property line on all plans in the landscape plan set. 13. Label the ROW along Valencia Road and along Old Vail Road on all plans in the landscape plan set. 14. The schedule 40 mainline is conflicting graphically with what I believe is the property line and other line work on the irrigation plan sheet 10 of 12. If possible, adjust the line work to be clearer for the contractor. If you have any questions about these comments, I can be reached at chad.keller@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 10/29/2024 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Loran Shamis PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: Contractor’s Storage Yard – Commercial Storage Development Package (1st Review) TD-DEV-0924-00259 TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 29, 2024 DUE DATE: October 20, 2024 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is September 18, 2025. SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS) 1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.2.B – Include a brief legal description in the title block on each sheet. Pima County Assessors states the legal description as “PTN W330' E660' S2 NE4 SE4 4.30 AC SEC 7-15-15” 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 - Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-0924-00259, adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6.a - Include a note stating “this project is designed to meet the overlay zone(s) criteria. UDC Article 5.4 Major Streets and Routes Setback Zone (MS&R) and 5.5 Gateway Corridor Zone (GCZ). 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.F – Please label the subject parcel’s zone on the site plan on the Cover Sheet and on Sheet 3. 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – In the parking area, ensure parking area access lanes (PAALs) are designed in accordance with Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design. 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Zoning acknowledges the note stating “parking shall be accommodated within the open specified storage area”, however, required parking shall comply with UDC 7.4 which has specific design standards to be reviewed for compliance. The applicant must demonstrate compliance with those standards listed under UDC 7.4. Further comments may be forthcoming. 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Show on-site pedestrian circulation and refuge utilizing location and design criteria in Section 7-01.0.0, specifically in the parking area. ***For additional information on the any standard presented in this memo, please refer to the City of Tucson “Unified Development Code” – Administrative Manual Section 2-06 or Technical Standards noted in the comments. https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/all-codes-plans-determinations If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact Loran Shamis by email Loran.Shamis@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package and comment response letter. To resubmit visit Tucson Development Center at https://tdc-online.tucsonaz.gov/#/home. Instructions for resubmittal - https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/website/Resubmittals.pdf. |
||
| 09/20/2024 | CDRC Application Completeness | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 09/30/2024 | CDRC Review Coordinator | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC added TAA, Addressing and TEP PAG, USPS, SWG to the workflow. Review request email sent to TAA, Addressing and TEP. FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. | ||
| 10/15/2024 | Commercial Plumbing | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 09/30/2024 | External Reviewers - Pima Association of Governments | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required. | ||
| 11/04/2024 | External Reviewers - Pima County Addressing | REVIEW COMPLETED | Good afternoon, Pima County Addressing approves TD-DEV-0924-00259. We issued address 7025 E Old Vail RD for the subject parcel and project. The address should be available to TDC in three days. |
||
| 09/30/2024 | External Reviewers - Southwest Gas | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required. | ||
| 10/03/2024 | External Reviewers - Tucson Airport Authority | REVIEW COMPLETED | October 2, 2024 Planning and Development Services City of Tucson 201 North Stone Avenue Tucson, AZ. 85701 RE: TD-DEV-0924-00259, DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE for 6970 EAST VALENCIA ROAD / 6970 E Valencia Rd, Tucson, AZ 85706, Received September 30, 2024 To whom this may concern, Thank you for the opportunity to comment on TD-DEV-0924-00259, the development plan for a new contractor storage yard use 6970 East Valencia Rd. This development is located in the N.E. quarter of the S.E. quarter of Section 7, Township 15S, Range 15E, of the Gila and Salt River Meridian. The development site occupies parcel number 141-03-038B, covers approximately 4.4 ± acres, and is zoned as Light Industrial Zone (I-1). The nearest major roadway intersection is East Valencia Road and South Kolb Road, approximately 400 feet to the northeast of the subject development. This site does lie within FAA Part 77 airspace. The Tucson Airport Authority approves the proposed project and is not requiring a resubmittal. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or concerns regarding this comment letter. I can be reached by email at srobidoux@flytucson.com or by telephone at 520- 573-4811. Respectfully, Scott Robidoux, C.M. Manager of Planning |
||
| 10/30/2024 | External Reviewers - Tucson Electric Power (TEP) | REVIEW COMPLETED | October 29, 2024 WO#T129503 City of Tucson Planning and Development Services Attn: CDRC Admin Team Dear CDRC Admin Team Subject: 6970 E Valencia Road TD-DEV-0924-000259 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted 9/30/2024. There are no TEP facilities within the boundaries of the property and thus are no apparent conflicts at this time. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. To apply for electric service, please call the New Construction department at (520) 918- 8300. Please submit a final set of plans including approved site, electric load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans. If available, include a PDF version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Should you have any easement questions, please contact our Land Resources Department, LandReviews@tep.com. Should you have any technical questions, please contact the area designer, Cruz Vega (520) 349-9850 cruzvega@tep.com Sincerely, Design Admins Design Admins Tucson Electric Power |
||
| 09/30/2024 | External Reviewers - United States Postal Service (USPS) | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required. | ||
| 10/15/2024 | Fire New Construction | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 09/27/2024 | OK to Submit - Engineering | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 09/30/2024 | OK to Submit - Zoning | REVIEW COMPLETED |