Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1
Permit Number - TD-DEV-0923-00398
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/30/2023 | Traffic Engineering Review | NOT REQUIRED | |||
| 11/01/2023 | CDRC Post Review Express | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 10/26/2023 | Commercial Plumbing | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Building sewers smaller than 8-inches shall have cleanouts located at intervals of not more than 100-feet of developed pipe length. Reference: Section 708.1.2, IPC 2018. | ||
| 10/27/2023 | External Reviewers - Tucson Airport Authority | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | October 25, 2023 Planning and Development Services City of Tucson 201 North Stone Avenue Tucson, AZ. 85701 RE: TD-DEV-0923-00398, Phase 1 of new Industrial site / 901 W 34th St, Tucson, AZ. 85713, Received September 29, 2023 To whom this may concern, Thank you for the opportunity to comment on TD-DEV-0923-00398, a development plan for a new phase 1 of a new industrial site at 901 West 34th Street. This development is located in the S.W. quarter of the S.E. quarter of Section 23, Township 14S, Range 13E, of the Gila and Salt River Meridian. The development site occupies parcel number 118-11-049J, covers approximately 26.23 ± acres, and is zoned as Park Industrial Zone (P-I) and Light Industrial Zone (I-1). The nearest major roadway intersection is West 34th Street and South Santa Cruz Lane, approximately 50 feet to the northwest of the subject development. This site does lie within the Tucson International Airport avigation easement requirements and public disclosure area, FAA traffic pattern airspace, and FAA Part 77 airspace. The Tucson Airport Authority is requiring a resubmit of this project. These conditions must be included in the plan documents and shall be identified in the general notes section of all future plans submitted to the City of Tucson for review. Conditions of approval: 1. “According to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Notice Criteria Tool, no Notice Criteria are exceeded. Applicants are therefore not required to file FAA Form 7460. However, if the use of cranes is anticipated during development and construction activities, the applicant must file FAA Form 7460 at least 45 days in advance of such use, to provide the applicant with sufficient time to respond to any concerns identified by the FAA. Please file Form 7460 at https://oeaaa.faa.gov/oeaaa/external/portal.jsp.” Although this project does not propose a change in plan designation or zoning the Tucson Airport Authority highly recommends the applicant add the following notes into the general notes of the revised development plan. This project is located approximately 4.5 miles northwest of Tucson International Airport and is within FAA traffic pattern airspace, an area which would be subject to aircraft overflight and noise due to being in close proximity to Tucson International Airport. The proposed notes would provide a means of assuring that future owners and tenants of the property are aware they are in proximity an airport and further assures the continued right of the City of Tucson, Tucson Airport Authority, and all persons lawfully utilizing the Tucson International Airport the right to utilize the airspace above or near the property. This would be accomplished through the property owner recording the Avigation Easement and providing the Airport Disclosure Statement to the new residents of all residential uses. The Tucson Airport Authority believes the proposed note helps to support the City of Tucson Airport Environs Overlay Zone and supports Plan Tucson – Regional and Global Positioning policy 4 (RG-4). 1. "That prior to the City's approval of the proposed development, the property owner must record the Avigation Easement that discloses the existence and operational characteristics of the Tucson International Airport to future owners or tenants of the property and further conveys the right to the public to lawfully use the airspace above the property. The Avigation Easement shall be recorded in a manner with the Pima County recorder which shall document it as having title liability. The content of such documents shall be according to the form and instructions provided.” The current property owner or person authorized to sign on behalf of the current property owner must complete, sign, and record the Avigation Easement. Please record the Avigation Easement with the Pima County Recorder’s Office. Then send a complete copy of the recorded easement document to Tucson Airport Authority by either email (send to srobidoux@flytucson.com) or to the mailing address provided below. Scott Robidoux Manager of Planning Tucson Airport Authority 7250 South Tucson Blvd, Suite 300 Tucson, AZ 85756” 2. Applicable to residential uses only “The property owner/developer/applicant must provide the Airport Disclosure Statement form, at time of sale, to the new property owners with all new unit purchases. In the event the development of any residential uses does not involve the sale of new units but is instead offering rental residential units to the public, the new tenant of the rental unit must be provided a copy of the Airport Disclosure Statement form. The intent of the Airport Disclosure Statement form is to educate and notify the new residents that they are living near an airport. The content of such documents shall be according to the form and instructions provided.” The property owner (for itself or its tenants) shall forward a signed copy of the Airport Disclosure Statement form to the Tucson Airport Authority within ten (10) days of signature, using the Scott Robidoux mailing address provided above. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or concerns regarding this comment letter. I can be reached by email at srobidoux@flytucson.com or by telephone at 520- 573-4811. Respectfully, Scott Robidoux, C.M. Manager of Planning |
||
| 10/24/2023 | Fire New Construction | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | -Will building F and G have fire sprinklers? I do not see fire service lines to these buildings. -Include all hydrants and distances from hydrants to the furthest portions of each building. As the hose lays along the road/street. -Include construction type of buildings to determine fire flow per IFC Table B105.1(2) john.vincent@tucsonaz.gov 5203495581 |
||
| 10/25/2023 | NPPO | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | See Landscape Notes | ||
| 10/26/2023 | ROW Engineering Review | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | TD-DEV-0923-00398 (901 W 34TH ST TUCSON, AZ 85713) Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter which states how all comments were addressed. Comments: Zoning Conditions Update Compliance Statement 1. #2 requires a redesign of the intersection of Fiandaca Boulevard and 34th Street “excluding access (emergency access) onto 34th street.” Please explain how this condition has been met. 2. #16 – Please show the proposed signage on the plan or reference separate plan by plan number. 3. #20 – Contact City of Tucson Landscape Architect David Marhefka regarding the requirement to establish native trees in the right of way that will shade 50% of the proposed sidewalk. David.Marhefka@tucsonaz.gov 4. #24 implies this requirement has been met, but the sidewalk along 34th St has not been constructed yet. Please revise this comment and resubmit this statement. 5. #32 “The property owners along the north side of 34th Street asked that the curb and sidewalk 6. only be placed on the south side of the road.” Please provide documentation of this request. 7. Because of the requirement to construct curb and sidewalk and dedication of land to the city as ROW, a Private Improvement Agreement (PIA) is required for this project. For details about PIAs, visit https://www.tucsonaz.gov/Departments/Transportation-Mobility/Private-Improvement-Agreement Email PIASubmittals@tucsonaz.gov or call Jesus Villezcas at 520-791-5100 for more information. Development Package 8. Page 12, Illustration J shows public street improvement by separate plan. Please list plan number. Drainage Report 9. Please include a discussion of how development and curb along only the south side of 34th St will affect discharges onto neighboring properties. Include a consideration of offsite flows from S Fiandaca Blvd. 10. Should W 34th St be shown as a separate watershed in both existing (DA-C) and proposed condition (DA-K) watershed maps (page 11, 12) considering the existing berm and proposed curb, gutter and wall? Faffs Riederer Faffs.Riederer@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 10/26/2023 | Site Engineering | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | 1. Show on the plans the barrier required for the unfinished phase 2 drive connection in the northeast of the site. The barrier is needed to ensure vehicles don’t drive onto that unimproved area. 2. Clarify whether the temporary cul-de-sac is to be used in phase 1 or is for use in a future phase. If to be used in a future phase a barrier will need to be installed to prohibit vehicles from driving onto it and if it is to be used in phase 1 a border will need to be shown that keeps vehicles in the vehicle use are and a suitable paving surface will need to be proposed. 3. Show how all required onsite sidewalks maintain a 4’ min width next to parking areas where vehicles are allowed to overhang into the sidewalk. 4. Due to proximity to Pima County Regional Flood Control property and maintenance responsibility, please reach out to them for review and/or comment for the proposed work. Include their response documented in next submittal. 5. Show the required first flush calculations along with calculations for both the required and achieved volume to satisfy the first flush requirements for the site. 6. According to recent clarification from Environmental Services, per TSM section 8-01, although recycling service isn’t required the site does need to provide at minimum the enclosure space for both solid waste and recycling. So, a single enclosure won’t be sufficient and a double enclosure or an additional single enclosure will be needed to meet this requirement. Stephen Blood (520) 837-4958 Stephen.blood@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 10/25/2023 | Site Landscape | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | PROJECT: INDUSTRIAL SITE ACTIVITY NO. TD-DEV-0923-00398 ADDRESS/PARCEL: 901 W 34TH ST/ 118-11-049J ZONINGi-1, P-1 This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants, and water harvesting. Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Landscape/NPPO Review Section comments are addressed. COMMENTS: 1. Ensure that Zoning, Engineering comments, and concerns are addressed before landscape section approval. 2. Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-0923-00398, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2-06.4.3 3. Include Rezoning Case # C9-09-03 on all sheets adjacent to the title block. 4. Include a narrative outlining how the rezoning conditions are being met for Landscape/NPPO. 5. Include an NPPO waiver form. An NPPO is required per UDC 7.7.3-B. A Native Plant Preservation Plan, Section 7.7.4, is required to be submitted or approved or a request for an exception from the Native Plant Preservation requirements approved in accordance with Sections 7.7.3.D.3 & .4 of the UDC and Admin. Manual Section 2-11.0.0 prior to Grading Plan approval. A site visit was performed on 10.21.2023 by Landscape/NPPO and no protected plants were located on-site, but please submit the form anyway. 6. Label all site visibility triangles & ROWs (existing & future) on all sheets. 7. DTM approval is required for any planting or irrigation in the ROW before the approval of the development package. Reach out to David Marhefka (David.marhefka@tucsonaz.gov) , if necessary for this project 8. Add root barrier detail for planting next to pavement/asphalt. 9. Add a construction detail showing planting in the WHIAs. 10. Show all directional arrows on the rooftops on the CRWH Plan. 11. Show all curb cuts, splashpads, and downspouts on the CRWH Plan. 12. Show spot elevations on the CRWH Plan to match the grading plan. 13. The Grading Plan & the CRFWH Plan must match. 14. The CRWH Plan doesn’t meet the 50% required by the CRWH Ordinance. See Below. 15. Add all parking lot planting islands as a WHIA, there are six missing from the CRWH Plan, and indicate where the curb cuts will be. 16. If necessary, make WHIA-1 & WHIA-2 deeper to meet the requirements of the CRWH Ordinance. 17. Revise Site Water Budget to show comment #14 . If you have any questions about these comments, I can be reached at Matthew.Carlton@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 10/19/2023 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: Santa Cruz Lane Development Package (1st Review) TD-DEV-0923-00398 TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 19, 2023 DUE DATE: October 27, 2023 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is September 25, 2024. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-0923-00398, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.3 – Provide the rezoning case number to all sheets and provide all rezoning conditions on the plan. 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – Provide a general note that identifies the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses. 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – Clarify what the use “MAJOR TRADE” is that is listed in the Vehicle Parking Requirement. Zoning could not find a use of Major Trade classified in the UDC. 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – Clarify what the areas that have, Keynote 3 - compacted base surface with asphalt millings and Keynote 6 – new gravel surface of compacted millings, will be used for. 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – Clarify what the storage sheds called out under keynote 19 will be use for. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.F - All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. 8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Sheet 5 northeast corner of the site there are improvements shown that appear to be off site within ADOT right-of-way. ADOT will need to review and approve. 9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Sheet 5 northeast corner some type of barrier is required where the future loop road meets the proposed street, UDC Article 7.4.6.H.1. 10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Until comment 5 is addressed Zoning cannot determine if UDC Article 7.4.6.I applies for the areas called out under Keynotes 3 & 6. City Engineer approval may be required. 11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Some type of barrier is required around the temporary cul-de-sac shown in the southwest corner of the site, UDC Article 7.4.6.H.1. 12. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – As the proposed surface for the temporary cul-de-sac shown in the southwest corner of the site does not meet the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.6.I City Engineer approval is required, UDC Article 7.4.6.I.1.d. 13. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Until comments 4 & 5 are addressed Zoning cannot verify vehicle parking requirements. 14. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – On the vehicle parking requirement table revise the PARKING REQUIRED & TOTAL SPACE REQURIED numbers to reflect the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.3.G. 15. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – The parking ratio listed for “COMMERCIAL STORAGE”, 1/500, is not correct. Review UDC Table 7.4.4-4 and provide the correct ratio. 16. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.b - 17. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.c – Review UDC Table 7.5.5-A and provide a loading space calculation that provided the number of required and provided and the type required and provided. 18. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Until comments 4 & 5 are addressed Zoning cannot verify the short- & long-term bicycle parking requirements. 19. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - The short-term bicycle parking ratio listed for the office use, 1/2000, is not correct. Review UDC Table 7.4.8-1and provide the correct ratio. 20. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - On the bicycle parking requirement table revise the BICYCLE PARKING REQUIREMENT & TOTAL SPACE REQURIED numbers to reflect the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.3.G. 21. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Detail G sheet 13 remove the reference to “CLASS 1 & CLASS 2” and “C.O.T. DEV. STD. 2-09.0” as those references are no longer correct. 22. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Detail G sheet 13 short-term rack detail, the distance between racks is not correct. Review UDC Article 7.4.9.B.2.f and Figure 7.4.9-C and provide the correct distance. 23. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Detail G sheet 13 short-term rack detail clearly demonstrate how the requirements of UDC Articles 7.4.6.B.1.d , .e, 7.4.6.B.2.a, .d .f & 7.4.6.C.2.a .d are met. 24. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Detail G sheet 13 long-term locker detail clearly demonstrate how the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.6.D.5 are met. 25. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.L – All proposed easements will need to be recorder prior to approval of this DP. 26. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – Until comment 27 is addressed Zoning cannot verify perimeter yard setback requirements. 27. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.Q – Provide the square footage, height and use of buildings on site within the footprint. 28. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – As parking vehicles are allowed to overhang adjacent sidewalks along the east side of Bldg A and the sidewalk north of the proposed picnic table clearly demonstrate that a parking vehicle will not reduce the sidewalk width to less than 4’-0”. 29. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Detail C sheet 12 shows a 6’-0” wide sidewalk but the sidewalk is required to be 6’-6” when parking vehicles are allowed to overhang the sidewalk, 2’-6” overhand (UDC Article 7.4.6.H.3) and 4’-0” clear sidewalk width (TSM Section 7-01.4.3.A). 30. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Clearly demonstrate how the requirements of TSM Section 7-01.4.3.3.B are met. 31. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.U – As the proposed plan does not match the C9-09-03 Preliminary Development Plan (PDP) contact the PDSD Entitlements Section for PDP revision requirements. https://www.tucsonaz.gov/Departments/Planning-Development-Services/Planning-Zoning-Applications/Entitlements. 32. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.W - Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Also provide a general note stating all signs require separate permits. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Nicholas Martell at Nicholas.Martell@tucsonaz.gov. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package & detailed response letter. |
||
| 10/26/2023 | Transportation Landscape Review | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | see comments on plans and conditions letter | ||
| 09/20/2023 | CDRC Application Completeness Express | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 09/29/2023 | CDRC Review Coordinator Express | REVIEW COMPLETED | Review request email sent per ADOT and TAA; FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG & TEP. | ||
| 11/01/2023 | External Reviewers - Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) | REVIEW COMPLETED | Good Morning, ADOT has no comments on this DEV. Thank you for the opportunity to review. | ||
| 09/29/2023 | External Reviewers - Pima Association of Governments | REVIEW COMPLETED | FYI email sent per PAG, USPS, SWG & TEP | ||
| 09/29/2023 | External Reviewers - Southwest Gas | REVIEW COMPLETED | FYI email sent per PAG, USPS, SWG & TEP | ||
| 09/29/2023 | External Reviewers - Tucson Electric Power (TEP) | REVIEW COMPLETED | FYI email sent per PAG, USPS, SWG & TEP | ||
| 09/29/2023 | External Reviewers - United States Postal Service (USPS) | REVIEW COMPLETED | FYI email sent per PAG, USPS, SWG & TEP | ||
| 09/21/2023 | OK to Submit - Engineering Fast | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 09/21/2023 | OK to Submit - Landscape Fast | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 09/26/2023 | OK to Submit - Zoning Fast | REVIEW COMPLETED |