Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.2
Permit Number - TD-DEV-0923-00396
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.2
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/15/2024 | Site Landscape | APPROVED | |||
| 02/27/2024 | CDRC Post Review | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 02/27/2024 | Design Review | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Please address comments issued by the Design Professional on 2/23/2024. The PDF file of his review is available in TDC online and PRO. Any questions, please contact me at maria.gayosso@tucsonaz.gov. Thanks. | ||
| 02/09/2024 | Historic | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | (1) Please include elevations in the the construction documents. (2) The elevations should note the brand name for the product being applied to the exposed brick. Questions? Jodie.Brown@tucsonaz.gov | ||
| 02/16/2024 | ROW Engineering Review | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | TD-DEV-0923-00396 2/16/2024 847 N. Stone Ave. Comments: 1. Please show on the plan that the 2nd Street roadway width between the new 90-degree parking at 847 N. Stone and the “parallel Parking” across the street is maintained at 24 Ft. wide. (Comment Response stated this was labeled on the plan, but it is not. Please verify this roadway width and label it on the plan.) David Stiffey DTM Project Coordinator David.Stiffey@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 02/15/2024 | Site Engineering | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | 1. The waste stream calculations were not provided with this submittal. Please provide waste stream calculations compliant with TSM 8-01.8. 2. Provide the correspondence with Andy Vera approving the use of APCs. Lianne Evans lianne.evans@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 02/06/2024 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: Crystal Café & Gallery Development Package (2nd Review) TD-DEV-0923-00396 TRANSMITTAL DATE: February 6, 2024 DUE DATE: February 22, 2024 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is September 21, 2024. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 1. This comment was not addressed. Provide the required information for the owner on the right half of the cover sheet. COMMENT: 2-06.4.1 - The name, mailing and email addresses, and phone number of the primary property owner of the site, the developer of the project, registrant(s), and other person(s), firm(s), or organization(s) that prepared the development package documents shall be provided on the right half of the cover sheet. 2. This comment was not addressed. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-0923-00396, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 3. This comment was not addressed. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.2 - List the gross area of the site by square footage and acreage. 4. This comment was not addressed. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – The proposed use(s) listed are not correct. Retail is a Use Group not a use and café is not a use classified in the UDC. Also the application lists the use as “Development Plan for an existing building being converted to Gem Show wholesale.” Clarify what the use(s) might be and list them and any applicable Use Specific Standards as classified in the UDC. 5. This comment was not addressed. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6.a – As Stone Ave. is designated as an Arterial on the COT MS&R Map provide a general note on the cover sheet stating “THIS PROJECT IS DESIGNED TO MEET THE OVERLAY ZONE(S) CRITERIA, UDC ARTICLE 5.4 MAJOR STREETS AND ROUTES SETBACK ZONE (MS&R)”. 6. This comment was not addressed. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6.a – The IID review shall be approved prior to Zoning approval of this DP. IID requirements can be found at: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/Departments/Planning-Development-Services/Planning-Zoning-Applications/Special-Districts. 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 7. This comment was not addressed. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.b – Remove the reference to lot coverage from the plan as it is not applicable in the C-3 zone (UDC Table 6.3-4.A). 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 8. This comment was not addressed. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Until comment 4 is addressed Zoning cannot verify the short- & long-term bicycle parking requirements. 9. This comment was not addressed. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Provide a short- & long-term bicycle parking space detail. The short-term detail shall clearly demonstrate how the requirements of UDC Articles 7.4.9.B.1.d, .e, 7.4.9.B.2.a, .b, .c, .d, .f & .g are met. The long-term detail shall clearly demonstrate how the requirements of UDC Articles 7.4.9.D are met. 10. This comment was not addressed. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.Q – Provide the square footage height and specific use proposed within the footprint of the building. 11. This comment was not addressed. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.W - Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Also provide a general note stating all signs require separate permits. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Nicholas Martell at Nicholas.Martell@tucsonaz.gov. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package & detailed response letter. |
||
| 02/06/2024 | CDRC Application Completeness | REVIEW COMPLETED |