Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: TD-DEV-0923-00385
Parcel: 10709008A

Address:
2621 N ORACLE RD

Review Status: Requires Resubmit

Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1

Permit Number - TD-DEV-0923-00385
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
10/10/2023 NPPO APPROVED
10/19/2023 CDRC Post Review PENDING ASSIGNMENT
10/16/2023 Commercial Plumbing REQUIRES RESUBMIT 1. Provide a cleanout at the junction of the building drain and the building sewer (i.e. within 30” in developed length beyond the exterior walls of the building). Reference: Sections 202 and 708.1.3, IPC 2018.
2. Provide a vent downstream of the gravity grease separator to protect the seal for the grease separator. Reference: Section 1003.9, IPC 2018.
10/17/2023 External Reviewers - Pima County Addressing REQUIRES RESUBMIT Good afternoon,
Pima County Addressing is returning TD-DEV-0923-00385 New buildings for Teen Challenge for corrections. Please see the attached plan for comments.
Thank you
Nicholas Jordan
Site Review Project Manager – Addressing Official
Pima County Development Services Department
201 N Stone AV – 1st Floor
Tucson, AZ 85701
(520) 724-9623
10/10/2023 ROW Engineering Review REQUIRES RESUBMIT TD-DEV-0923-00385 (2637 N ORACLE RD TUCSON, AZ 85705)

Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter which states how all comments were addressed.

Comments:

1. Please add the Existing ROW and Future Row dimensions to the site plan. Paving plan i-88-042_060 indicates the current ½ ROW from Center Line of Oracle is 65’. Future ROW should be 75’ from the Oracle Rd Center Line (100’ from the Section Line).
2. The existing Oracle Rd ROW is around 135’ but the Future ROW is 150’, so existing and future should not the be same, as described on pages 11-15.
3. A Private Improvement Agreement (PIA) is required for this project because the required curb and sidewalk will be over 300’ long and along an MS&R ROW. For details about PIAs, visit https://www.tucsonaz.gov/Departments/Transportation-Mobility/Private-Improvement-Agreement Email PIASubmittals@tucsonaz.gov to begin the process.
4. AM 2-06.4.8.C – Please dimension the width of existing and proposed curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks and provide offset dimensions between these elements and the ROW.
5. TSM 10-01.3.3.D.1.d - Lateral transitions in sidewalk shall be 3:1, longitudinal to lateral. Please label these ratios on the site plan.
6. Add note “Join new to existing per P.A.G. SD 203” where new sidewalk meets existing.
7. Due to adverse impacts, the proposed stormwater discharge flow into Oracle Rd cannot be accepted. Kreuger Wash Critical Basin management area requirements including that this watershed does not allow for any flow to enter Oracle Rd. Show for other proposed outflow concentration points that critical basin management requirements of 15% or more reduction have been achieved for the 2 and 10 year events.
8. Does the 1P discharge flow east or west along Kelso? East on Keslo and then onto Oracle cannot be accepted for the same reason sited above.

Faffs Riederer
Faffs.Riederer@tucsonaz.gov

Abbreviations: City of Tucson Code (COTC), Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM), Technical Standards Manual (TSM), Street Design Guide (SDG), Pima Association of Governments Standard Details (P. A. G. SD), Access Management Guidelines (AMG), Major Streets and Routes Plan (MS&R).
10/19/2023 Site Engineering REQUIRES RESUBMIT 1. Trash enclosures are required and need to match the figures found in the TSM section 8-01.
2. Show the full maneuverability of the trash collection vehicle to service the site and turn around.
3. Show the future right-of-way on the plans for N Oracle Rd.
4. Show the required 60' throat length for the southern entrance off of Oracle. Should be measured from the edge of travel lane to the first parking spot.

Stephen Blood
(520) 837-4958
Stephen.blood@tucsonaz.gov
10/10/2023 Site Landscape REQUIRES RESUBMIT This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants, and water harvesting.
Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Landscape/NPPO Review Section comments are addressed.

COMMENTS:
1. Ensure that Zoning, Engineering comments, and concerns are addressed before landscape section approval.
2. Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-0923-00385, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2-06.4.3
3. Show spot grades in WHIAs PER tsm 4-01.4.3.2C 3a-iii
4. Label all downspouts/splash pads on the commercial rainwater harvesting plan.

If you have any questions about these comments, I can be reached at Matthew.Carlton@tucsonaz.gov or 520-837-4988
10/06/2023 Site Zoning REQUIRES RESUBMIT PDSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: PDSD Zoning Review

PROJECT: Teen Challenge Men’s Center
Development Package (1st Review)
TD-DEV-0923-00385

TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 5, 2023

DUE DATE: October 13, 2023

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM).

Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is September 12, 2024.

CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-0923-00385, adjacent to the title block on all sheets.

2-06.4.7 - General Notes
The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable.

2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes

2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – The use shown on the plan does not appear to be correct and are not uses as defined in the UDC. Based on discussions with Staff and the architect the proposed uses should be “Religious Use, Group Dwelling & Food Service subject to Use Specific Standards 4.9.4.M.1 and 4.9.13.P.

COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6.a – As Oracle is designated as an Arterial Gateway on the COT MS&R Map revise Zoning and Land Use Note 7 to include “UDC ARTICLE 5.5 GATEWAY CORRIFOR ZONE (GCR)”

2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development
The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes.

3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.E – As this site is made up of two (2) parcels, a lot combination is required. Provide a copy of the approved Pima County Assessor’s Combo Request form or a letter from the Assessor’s Office stating the combo is approved.

4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Fully dimension all back-up spurs shown on the plan, UDC Article 7.4.6.F.4.

5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – The vehicle parking calculation needs to be revised based on discussions with Staff and the architect.

6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Demonstrate how the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.11 & .12 are met.

7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Clearly how the requirements of ICC A117.1-2009 Section 502.4.4 are met for the southern most accessible parking space access aisle.

8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Based on Staff and the architect short- & long-term bicycle will need to be provided for the Religious, Group Dwelling & Food Service uses only.

9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - The short- & long-term bicycle parking calculation needs to be revised based on discussions with Staff and the architect.

10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Keynote 56 sheet 4 references “NUMBER OF SPACES AS NOTED” but Zoning was not able to find any notes on the plan.

11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Detail 5 sheet 8, Note 5 references “LONG TERM BIKE PARKING POSTS SHALL HAVE THE TC-LOGO FACING OUT FROM THE ADJACNET WALL”. If the proposed long-term bike parking post is similar to the post shown on the detail it does not meet the requirements of UDC 7.4.9.D. If you propose to provide all long-term withing the dwelling units, no post or detail is needed.

12. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.L – There is a “NEW 15’ X 15’ ELECTRIC EASEMENT” called out on sheet 6. This easement will need to be recorded. Zoning recommends that you remove the “SEQ#_______” reference from the plan so that if needed the requirement for recordation can be placed on a C of O for one of the main buildings.

13. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – It’s not clear if what appears to be 4 separate buildings shown along the south end of the property is 4 separate buildings or a single building under one roof.

14. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.Q – Provide the height for all existing and proposed walls.

15. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Clearly demonstrate how the requirements of ICC A117.1-2009 Section 505 are met for the handrails shown on detail 9 sheet 8 “RAMP “F” and for the stairs called out under Keynote 60 sheet 4.

16. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Keynote 17 sheet 4 references “WIDTH AS NOTED” but Zoning was not able to find widths for all sidewalks shown on the plan.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Nicholas Martell at Nicholas.Martell@tucsonaz.gov.

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package & detailed response letter.
10/13/2023 Traffic Engineering Review REQUIRES RESUBMIT TD-DEV-0923-00385
2637 N. Oracle Rd.

Comments:
1. On the site plan (Pg. C3.0) a sliding gate is on the plan (Keynote No. 33.) (Building plans were referenced, but Building plans are not a part of this plan.) A gate cannot be installed in a manner that would create “backing movements” out onto an arterial street. You are required to move the gate back onto property and provide an “adequate turn-around area” on site. Technical Standards Manual, (10-01.6.1.E)

David Stiffey
DTM Project Coordinator
David.Stiffey@tucsonaz.gov
09/06/2023 CDRC Application Completeness REVIEW COMPLETED
09/13/2023 CDRC Review Coordinator REVIEW COMPLETED Addressing review required, review request email sent per ADOT, and FYI email sent per SOP.
09/20/2023 External Reviewers - Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) REVIEW COMPLETED [EXTERNAL] Re: DUE OCTOBER 13TH, 2023 / NEW BUILDINGS, PARKING AND LANDSCAPE FOR TEEN CHALLENGE. / TD-DEV-0923-00385

Jay Gomes
CDRC
Good Morning,

ADOT has no comments on this DEV.

Thank you for the opportunity to review.
09/13/2023 External Reviewers - Pima Association of Governments REVIEW COMPLETED FYI email sent per SOP.
09/13/2023 External Reviewers - Southwest Gas REVIEW COMPLETED FYI email sent per SOP.
09/13/2023 External Reviewers - Tucson Electric Power (TEP) REVIEW COMPLETED FYI email sent per SOP.
09/13/2023 External Reviewers - United States Postal Service (USPS) REVIEW COMPLETED FYI email sent per SOP.
09/28/2023 Fire New Construction REVIEW COMPLETED
09/11/2023 OK to Submit - Engineering REVIEW COMPLETED
09/07/2023 OK to Submit - Landscape REVIEW COMPLETED
09/11/2023 OK to Submit - Zoning REVIEW COMPLETED