Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1
Permit Number - TD-DEV-0824-00238
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/19/2024 | Commercial Plumbing | APPROVED | |||
| 09/26/2024 | NPPO | APPROVED | |||
| 09/27/2024 | CDRC Post Review | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 09/23/2024 | Site Engineering | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | 1. Show a washout area on the erosion control plan sheet C6.0. 2. Clearly show the waste enclosure on the plans. Show that the slab and apron have a slope of at least 1% and 2%, respectively. Show a 14-foot by 40-foot clear space in front of the dumpster enclosure to comply with waste access and maneuverability requirements in TSM 8. Mike Ortiz michael.ortiz@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 09/26/2024 | Site Landscape | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | CDRC TRANSMITTAL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT REVIEWER: CHAD KELLER, RLA PDSD SITE LANDSCAPE/NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION SECTION PROJECT: TI PACKAGE ON BEHALF OF EL RIO HEALTH FOR MERIDIAN PROPERTY COMPANY, FOR THE RENOVATION OF THE EXISTING 2-STORY, 91,578SF BUILDING FOR AN EL RIO HEALTH CLINIC. IT INCLUDES ADDITIONAL PARKING AND LANDSCAPING AND SITE UTILITY COORDINATION, AS WELL AS A NEW PHARMACY DRIVE-THRU. REFER TO PLANNING CASE #TC PRE-0424-00096 ACTIVITY NO: TD-DEV-0824-00238 ADDRESS: 4888 N STONE AV ZONING: C-2 COMMERCIAL ZONE This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants, and water harvesting. Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Landscape/NPPO Review Section comments are addressed. SITE LANDSCAPE/NPPO SECTION COMMENTS: 1. Ensure that Zoning and Engineering comments are addressed prior to landscape section approval. 2. Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-0824-00238, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2-06.4.3 3. In a few locations on sheet LS2.1, LS2.2 and LS2.3, proposed trees/accent conflicts with the existing trees shown in red. There are a couple of notes with reference to infestation, or dead trees to be removed. Add a note to remove the existing tree if that is the intention for these other tree planting conflicts. 4. Irrigation note number 3 on sheet LS3.0 is good. Add the general note that irrigation equipment and lines are shown schematically for graphic clarity only. All irrigation equipment and lines are within the landscape planter areas, unless otherwise noted. Or something along these lines on the irrigation sheets. 5. Include a construction detail showing root barriers for trees located near hardscape areas. See Detail 402 located here: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/Departments/Transportation-Mobility/Landscape/Landscape-Architects 6. Add Ocotillo planting detail to the plan set. COT standard Ocotillo planting detail can be found here: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/government/departments/department-of-transportation-and-mobility/documents/404_ocotillo_planting.pdf for your use. 7. The sub-watershed area should include the WHIA area. The way that it is drawn, the blue sub-watershed is not encapsulating the red correlating WHIA. Is it drawn this way for graphic clarity, and you have added the WHIA square footage to the overall correlated sub-watershed? 8. Some landscape contractors have been overlooking the intent of the tree locations within the water harvest infiltration areas. I have been recommending the addition of a rainwater harvesting basin schematic detail to the CRWHP for redundant clarity. Not required. There have been several cases where the trees are not located within the basin. If you would like to add the detail and need an example, please reach out and I will send you a copy for reference. If you have any questions about these comments, I can be reached at chad.keller@tucsonaz.gov, or at 520.837.4923 |
||
| 09/19/2024 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: El Rio Health Rillito Clinic Development Package (1st Review) TD-DEV-0824-00238 TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 19, 2024 DUE DATE: September 22, 2024 COMMENTS: Resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is , 2025. 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS 1. COMMENT: 2-06.3.12 – Provide a sheet index that includes all sheets submitted. 2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.1 – Provide an email address for all of the professionals listed on the cover sheet. 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.2.D - The page number and the total number of pages in the package (i.e., sheet xx of xx) on all sheets submitted. The total number of pages shall include all sheets submitted. 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-0824-00238, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4 - The project-location map shall cover approximately one square mile, be drawn at a minimum scale of three inch equals one mile. 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4.C – Label section, township, and range; section corners on the location map. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – As a general note identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses. 8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6.a - As River Rd is designated as an Arterial Scenic and Stone Ave. designated as an Arterial on the COT MS&R Map provide a general note on the cover sheet stating “THIS PROJECT IS DESIGNED TO MEET THE OVERLAY ZONE(S) CRITERIA, UDC ARTICLE 5.4 MAJOR STREETS AND ROUTES SETBACK ZONE (MS&R) & UDC ARTICLE 5.3 SCENIC CORRIDOR ZONE (SCZ). 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.a – Clarify if the proposed golf cart storage structure will have a roof. 10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.c – Provide a vehicle use area expansion calculation on the plan. Additional comments maybe forth coming once this comment is addressed. 2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided. 11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.C – Provide dimensioned width curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks for both River Rd and Stone Ave. 2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided. 12. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.B - As this site is made up of four (4) parcels, 105-09-5520, 10509553A, 10509553B & 105-09-554A and under two (2) different ownerships some type of cross access agreement or easement is required. Provide a copy of the recorded agreement or easement with the next submittal. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 13. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.A – As this site is made up of four (4) parcels, 105-09-5520, 10509553A, 10509553B & 105-09-554A and under two (2) different ownerships a Covenant Regarding Development and Use of Real Property will need to be recorded. This covenant can be found at: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/submission-documents/covenant-regarding-development-and-use-of-real-property-udc-with-release.pdf. 14. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.F - All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. 15. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Provide PAAL width dimensions for all PAAL associated with new vehicle parking. 16. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Until comment 7 is addressed Zoning cannot determine if the vehicle parking space requirements are met. 17. OMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Compact vehicle parking spaces are not allowed, and a Parking Design Modification Request (PDMR), UDC Article 7.4.10, will need to be submitted and approve for the reduced width of the proposed vehicle parking spaces. Also, per UDC Article 7.4.10.D.9 The number of parking spaces with decreased dimensions may not exceed 10% of the total number of parking spaces provided. Based on 563 provided vehicle parking spaces you are only allowed 56 compact spaces on this site. A Board of Adjustment for Variance will need to be submitted and approved to all 58 compact spaces. 18. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – The total parking required is not correct. Review UDC Article 7.4.3.G and provide the correct number of required spaces. 19. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – The wheel stop location dimensions shown on detail 1 sheet C7.0 and details 3 & 4 sheet C7.1 are not correct. Review UDC Article 7.4.6.H.3 and Figure 7.4.6-C and provide the correct dimension. 20. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.c – Provide a loading space calculation the provides the number required and provided. 21. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Until comment 7 is addressed Zoning cannot determine if the short- & long-term bicycle parking space requirements are met. 22. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - The bicycle required numbers are not correct. Review UDC Article 7.4.3.G and provide the correct number of required spaces. 23. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Detail 15, sheet C7.0 Clearly demonstrate how the requirement of UDC Articles 7.4.9.D.5 is met. 24. Detail 12, sheet C7.0 Clearly demonstrate how the requirements of UDC Articles 7.4.9.B.1.e & 7.4.9.B.2.a are met. 25. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – The “20.00’ SCENIC ROUTE SETBACK” shown on the plans for River Rd is not correct. Review UDC Article 5.3.5 and provide the correct perimeter yard setback. 26. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – The “15’ FRONTYARD BUILDING SETBACK” shown on the plans for Stone Ave. is not correct. Review UDC Article 6.4.5.C.2.a and provide the correct perimeter yard setback. 27. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.Q – Provide the square footage, height and the specific use within the footprint of the building(s). 28. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Demonstrate that the requirements of TSM Section 7-01.4.1.B are met along the south side of 4888 N. Stone Ave. building and the proposed access lane. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Nicholas Martell at Nicholas.Martell@tucsonaz.gov. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: A revised development package as well as a comment response letter. To resubmit, visit the Tucson Development Center Online at https://tdc-online.tucsonaz.gov/#/home. The instructions for resubmittal can be found at https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/tdc-faq/new-pdfs/revisions-and-resubmittals.pdf. |
||
| 08/22/2024 | CDRC Application Completeness | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 08/30/2024 | CDRC Review Coordinator | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC added ADOT, TEP, PAG, USPS, SWG to the workflow. Review request email sent to ADOT and TEP. FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. | ||
| 09/27/2024 | External Reviewers - Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) | REVIEW COMPLETED | Good Afternoon, ADOT has no comments on this DEV. Thank you for the opportunity to review. |
||
| 08/30/2024 | External Reviewers - Pima Association of Governments | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required. | ||
| 08/30/2024 | External Reviewers - Southwest Gas | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required. | ||
| 09/23/2024 | External Reviewers - Tucson Electric Power (TEP) | REVIEW COMPLETED | September 23, 2024 WO#T127497 City of Tucson Planning And Development Services Attn: CDRC Admin Team Dear CDRC Admin Team Subject: N Stone Avenue Meridian Property Ventures LLC TD-DEV-0824-00238 4888 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted 8/30/2024. There are existing facilities within the development which are depicted upon the plan. The customer must follow all safe working distances and clearances from overhead lines as well as follow all blue stake laws when digging or planting trees near existing underground electric lines and pad mounted equipment. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. To apply for electric service, please call the New Construction department at (520) 918- 8300. Please submit a final set of plans including approved site, electric load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans. If available, include a PDF version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Should you have any easement questions, please contact our Land Resources Department, LandReviews@tep.com. Should you have any technical questions, please contact the area designer, Chuck Leon (520) 400-6133 cleon@tep.com Sincerely, Design Admins Design Admins Tucson Electric Power |
||
| 08/30/2024 | External Reviewers - United States Postal Service (USPS) | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required. | ||
| 09/23/2024 | Fire New Construction | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 08/29/2024 | OK to Submit - Engineering | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 08/27/2024 | OK to Submit - Zoning | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 09/03/2024 | ROW Engineering Review | REVIEW COMPLETED | DTM has no comments. |