Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.2
Permit Number - TD-DEV-0823-00363
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.2
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/24/2024 | ROW Engineering Review | APPROVED | |||
| 01/31/2024 | CDRC Post Review | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 01/25/2024 | Commercial Plumbing | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Provide the first floor elevations of the existing historical buildings and the proposed buildings. Determine the need for backwater valves per Section 714.1, IPC 2018, as amended by the City of Tucson. Reference: City of Tucson Administrative Manual, Section 2-06.4.8D and Section 107.2.1, IBC 2018. | ||
| 01/31/2024 | External Reviewers - Pima County Addressing | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Good afternoon, Pima County Addressing is returning TD-DEV-0823-00363 for corrections. See the attached plan for comments. Nicholas Jordan Site Review Project Manager – Addressing Official Pima County Development Services Department 201 N Stone AV – 1st Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 724-9623 |
||
| 01/16/2024 | External Reviewers - Tucson Electric Power (TEP) | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Greetings, Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed the development plan submitted on January 3rd, 2024, and cannot approve the plan. Existing electrical facilities/easements within the development must be depicted in the plan [ docket 11110, page 2991 (attached)], omitted from the plan. The developer will be responsible for removing or relocating existing facilities. Respectfully, Tucson Electric Power Co. Land Resources Department | ||
| 01/16/2024 | Fire New Construction | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Provide hydrant spacing in accordance with IFC 2018 C102.1 (500' max spacing between hydrants) Questions: patricia.shelton@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 01/30/2024 | NPPO | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | See Landscape Comments. | ||
| 01/26/2024 | Site Engineering | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Tucson codes and ordinances can be found online at https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/tucson/latest/overview The Design Standards for Stormwater Detention and Retention manual can be found online at https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/pdsd/documents/engineering-code/updated-retention-detention-manual.pdf TD-DEV-0823-00363 1. Label each basin on development package page 3 with their corresponding basin plan names: Basin 1 -> TE-BAS-0124-00005, Basin 2 -> TE-BAS-0124-00006, Basin 3A -> TE-BAS-0124-00007, Basin 3 -> TE-BAS-0124-00008, Basin 4 -> TE-BAS-0124-00009, Basin 5 -> TE-BAS-0124-00010, Basin 6 -> TE-BAS-0124-00011. Lianne Evans lianne.evans@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 01/30/2024 | Site Landscape | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | ACTIVITY#: TD-DEV-0823-00363 PROJECT: BELLO MESQUITE ESTATES ADDRESS/PARCEL: 8800 E JACARANDA WY/114-51-228C ZONING: SR This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants and water harvesting. - COMMENTS: 1. Ensure all Zoning and Engineering comments are addressed prior to the Landscape/NPPO comments. 2. Please include the correct Development Package number, TD-DEV-0823-00363 on all landscape & NPPO sheets. 3. If not using a licensed arborist or landscape architect to perform the NPPO, the applicant must supply the credentials of the person who performed this NPPP. An engineer cannot perform this task. 4. Show on the plans where the mitigation for the NPPO is happening. Or submit the applicable landscape sheets for this set. The landscape plan sheet shows 6 new trees and 2 existing to remain in place. That leaves a total of 273 un accounted for plants on site. There must be a full set of landscape plans designating where every ‘PIP’ tree & cactus is located or being mitigated for. 5. Missing any and all landscape planting details. 6. Missing all irrigation construction details. 7. A separate irrigation water meter is required. Please label the new irrigation meter as “irrigation only”. UDC Technical Standards 4-01.-.2. A.1. 8. Missing all required Fuctional Open Space & corresponding landscape plans for the proposed FLD. A Common Street is not functional open space. 9. There is no open space shown on the plan provided. This is a requirement and not an option. There will need to be 6200 sq ft of open space for this to be considered an FLD. 10. Per 8.7.3.G-1, to the greatest degree practical, detention and retention basins withing an FLD shall be designed as Functional Open Space (See UDC 8.7.3-F) by incorporating Multiple Use Concepts and Aesthetic Design Guidelines described in Chapter 4 of the Stormwater Detention/Retention Manual, the floodplain ordinance, and in Accordance with UDC Section 7.6.6.C, Stormwater Runoff, FOS amenities within detention and retention basin may count toward meeting Functional Open Space requirements; and developed in accordance with Section 7.11, Detention and Retention Basins. – Show this on the correct landscape plans. 11. Per Section 8.7.3.H-2, one canopy tree shall be provided every 40 feet of pedestrian circulation systems, if providing canopy trees every 40 feet is not achievable, the applicant shall provide the equivalent number of trees that would be obtained using the 40-foot measurement and distribute the trees withing the FLD project site along pedestrian circulation systems and within functional open space areas. – Show this on the landscape plans. If you have any questions about these comments, I can be reached at Matthew.Carlton@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 01/10/2024 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: Bello Mesquite Estates, Lots 1-22 Development Package (1st Review) TD-DEV-0823-00363 TRANSMITTAL DATE: January 10, 2024 DUE DATE: January 28, 2024 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is January 02, 2024. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-0823-00363, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.5 – Per UDC Table 8.7.3-1 the allowed FLD density for an SR zoned property is 0.25. 0.25 x 11.26 = 2.825 or 2 lots allowed not 22 as proposed. A rezoning to RX-2 or SH will be required to get the density you are proposing. Once comment 2 is addressed additional comments may be forth coming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Nicholas Martell at Nicholas.Martell@tucsonaz.gov. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
||
| 12/29/2023 | CDRC Application Completeness | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 01/03/2024 | CDRC Review Coordinator | REVIEW COMPLETED | External Reviewers not required. No further action is required from customer at this time. | ||
| 01/03/2024 | External Reviewers - Pima Association of Governments | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI email to PAG, USPS and SWG. No further action is required from customer at this time. | ||
| 01/03/2024 | External Reviewers - Southwest Gas | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI email to PAG, USPS and SWG. No further action is required from customer at this time. | ||
| 01/03/2024 | External Reviewers - United States Postal Service (USPS) | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI email to PAG, USPS and SWG. No further action is required from customer at this time. | ||
| 01/03/2024 | OK to Submit - Zoning | REVIEW COMPLETED |