Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Number: TD-DEV-0724-00202
Parcel: 11506107B

Address:
1910 N STONE AV

Review Status: Requires Resubmit

Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.2

Permit Number - TD-DEV-0724-00202
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.2
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
09/09/2024 External Reviewers - COT Environmental Services APPROVED In the future please depict the 14 ft. x 40 ft. clear approach in front of the enclosure, within the site plan. TSM 8-01.5.3.B. The preliminary drawing did include it.

Andy Vera
(520) 837-3798
Andy.Vera@tucsonaz.gov
09/11/2024 NPPO APPROVED
09/16/2024 CDRC Post Review PENDING ASSIGNMENT
09/10/2024 Commercial Plumbing REQUIRES RESUBMIT 1. Provide a cleanout in the building sewer prior to entering the right-of-way. Reference: Pima County Standard Detail RWRD 401, 2021.
2. Verify that no fixtures located more than 12” above the rim elevation of the next upstream manhole (i.e., fixtures located above the first floor) discharge through the backwater valve. Reference: Section 714.1, IPC 2018.
08/30/2024 Design Review REQUIRES RESUBMIT IID Design Package needs to go through the IID review process and approved by the PDSD Director prior to review and approval of Development Package. Please let me know if there are any questions: maria.gayosso@tucsonaz.gov. Thank you.
09/10/2024 Fire New Construction REQUIRES RESUBMIT -Make notes that FD knox box will be provided on both side of vehicle gate. If vehicle gate is electric, knox key switches are required.
-Make note, FD knox box for ped gate.
-Call out the aerial access location on the site plan or include a separate sheet. Needs to comply with IFC D105. Minimum width of 26', 15-30' from the building. One entire side of the building. Unobstructed.
-Remove the trees from the south side of the building if this is going to be your aerial access location. If you cannot remove all the trees, remove necessary trees or relocate. Provide max height of trees listed. Choose shortest/smallest trees possible.
john.vincent@tucsonaz.gov
5203495581
09/03/2024 ROW Engineering Review REQUIRES RESUBMIT TD-DEV-0724-00202 • 1910 N STONE AV

1. Provide a note indicating that any section of sidewalk along 7th Av that is cracked, broken or the cross slope exceeds 2% will be replaced.

If you have any questions, please contact Richard Leigh at 520-403-0970 or email arnold.leigh@tucsonaz.gov.
09/10/2024 Site Engineering REQUIRES RESUBMIT 1. There is a discrepancy with the design flow rate for the wall opening. The calculations use the flow rate of 3.48cfs, but the drainage report also states that the incoming flow rate is 4.4cfs. Please clarify.
2. The SWPPP does not show the fiber roll or other erosion control around the entire perimeter of the site. Please ensure the entire site perimeter will have erosion control in the SWPPP.

Mike Ortiz
michael.ortiz@tucsonaz.gov
09/11/2024 Site Landscape REQUIRES RESUBMIT CDRC TRANSMITTAL
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
REVIEWER: CHAD KELLER, RLA
PDSD SITE LANDSCAPE/NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION SECTION

PROJECT: HCD AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROJECT CONSISTING OF 66 TOTAL UNITS WITH A MIX OF ONE, TWO- AND THREE-BEDROOM UNITS. SITE INCLUDES A PARKING SHADE ON THE SOUTH SIDE, PERIMETER FENCING, PLAYGROUND AND SECURE BIKE PARKING
ACTIVITY NO: TD-DEV-0724-00202
ADDRESS: 1910 N STONE AV
ZONING: I-1 LIGHT INDUSTRIAL ZONE

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants, and water harvesting.

Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Landscape/NPPO Review Section comments are addressed.

SITE LANDSCAPE/NPPO SECTION COMMENTS:
1. Ensure that Zoning and Engineering comments are addressed prior to landscape section approval.

2. The CRWH budget table shows 44%. It appears to me that if you consider the roof top drainage square footage and add some of that drainage area to your sub-watershed area (red dashed line on the plans), then your numbers will work out to well over 50%.

3. General Note number 3 on the CRWH plan explains that all landscape areas are depressed to maximize surface rainwater collection. Can a typical leader call out be added to the CRWH plan and to the planting plan for contractor clarity.

4. It appears that there are some plantings and irrigation are shown in the ROW. The plans do have the appropriate City of Tucson ROW Notes, but DTM review is required for all planting and irrigation in the ROW prior to the approval of the development package. Reach out to David Marhefka (david.marhefka@tucsonaz.gov) if necessary for this project. David Marhefka, PLA will provide a letter acknowledging the use of ROW for landscape. Please include this letter as part of your next submittal.

5. Some landscape contractors have been overlooking the intent of the tree locations within the WHIA’s. I have been recommending the addition of a rainwater harvesting basin schematic detail to the CRWHP for redundant clarity. Not required. There have been several cases on projects where the trees are not located within the basin. If you would like to add the detail and need an example, please reach out and I will send you a copy for reference.

If you have any questions about these comments, I can be reached at chad.keller@tucsonaz.gov, or at 520.837.4923
09/10/2024 Site Zoning REQUIRES RESUBMIT CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Loran Shamis
PDSD Zoning Review Section

PROJECT: Sugar Hill on Stone
Development Package (1st Review)
TD-DEV-0724-00202

TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 9, 2024

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is September 11, 2024.

SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS)


1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.2.B – Please include a brief legal description of the property in the title block. The legal description is as follows: BRONX PARK LOTS 9, 10, 11, 12, AND 13 & ALL THAT PT ALLEY W & ADJ TO LOT 13 &LOTS 14, 15, 16 EXC W 10.4 BLK 26.

2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – the site is within the optional Infill Incentive District overlay which may be used to modify underlying zoning requirements which the proposal is not meeting. To apply for the IID, compliance with UDC 5.12.6 is required and approval obtained through the Special Districts division is required. Zoning cannot approve until the Special Districts application has been approved.

3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – The site’s underlying zoning is I-1 and the proposed use is Residential – Multifamily Development which is not a permitted use in the I-1 zone. The site is within the optional Infill Incentive District (IID) and approval through the optional overlay would allow Residential – Multifamily Development at this site (UDC Table 5.12-IID-1). Zoning acknowledges the proposed development is seeking approval through the IID but cannot approve the use until the IID application has been approved

4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.5 - There is no maximum residential density permitted as the site is zoned I-1 which does not permit Residential – Multifamily Development. Approval through the IID as an Affordable Housing project would exempt the proposal from maximum residential density restrictions (UDC 5.12.8.H.2). The proposed development includes 66 dwelling units. Zoning acknowledges the proposed development is seeking approval through the IID but cannot approve the use until the IID application has been approved.

5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6 –Include a note stating the project is in compliance with UDC 5.12.8.H Affordable Housing by providing the number of units that will be dedicated to households earning 80% AMI or less for a term of 50 years from the Certificate of Occupancy. The project developer or manager shall provide an annual report to the HCD Director verifying the units qualify as Affordable Housing Units.

6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6.a – Include the Special Districts application number in the lower right hand corner – SD-0824-00083. In a general note provide the case number, date of approval, what was approved, and, if applicable, any conditions of approval.


7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Per UDC Table 7.4.4-1, Multifamily Residential Development with 1-bedroom units require 1.5 parking spaces per unit, 2-bedroom units require 2 parking spaces per unit, 3-bedroom units require 2.25 parking spaces per unit. The proposed development would require a total of 119 parking spaces. Of the 119 required parking spaces, 1 of which is required to be an ADA-van accessible parking space and 3 ADA-standard parking spaces.

By utilizing the IID, the required parking may be reduced by 25% which results in 89 required parking spaces (UDC 5.12.9.a). The proposed development provides 66 on-site parking spaces. A reduction of parking spaces beyond the required 89 parking spaces may be accomplished through an Individual Parking Plan (IPP) or through a City Manager Waiver in accordance with Section V of the Administrative Directive 1.07-6. (UDC 5.12.6.M). Zoning cannot approve until documentation of an approved modification is provided.

8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Per UDC 5.12.8.F parking must be in a parking structure with the ground floor of the parking structure screened from view. Per UDC 5.12.8.F.4.a parking may be located on a surface parking lot if it is recommended by the Design Professional and determined by the PDSD Director to be impracticable to be located elsewhere and other options are not available. The Design Professional and the PDSD Director will look more favorably on surface parking in the Greater IID.

9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Per UDC Table 7.4.11 -1, 10% of the required parking shall be EV Ready and 20% of the required parking shall be EV Capable. The proposed development requires 119 parking spaces prior to any reduction which would require 12 parking spaces to be EV Ready and 24 parking spaces to be EV Capable. Four percent but no less than one of electric vehicle (EV) charging spaces must be accessible compliant, these spaces are separate from the ADA parking spaces. The proposal requires a total of 36 EVSE parking spaces, one of which is required to be accessible. The proposed development provides 7 parking spaces to be EV Ready and 14 parking spaces to be EV Capable. The EVSE required parking may be reduced through a City Manager Waiver in accordance with Section V of the Administrative Directive 1.07-6. (UDC 5.12.6.M). Zoning cannot approve until documentation of an approved modification is provided.

10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Clarify the striped pavement behind the ADA designated parking spaces on Sheet 3, per Technical Standards Manual 7-01.4.1.F, sidewalks or pedestrian refuge areas cannot be located between any motor vehicle parking spaces and the PAAL providing access to those spaces.

11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.T – It appears the design of the trash enclosure is consistent with the design found acceptable by City of Tucson Environmental Services (ES) documented in the email from Andy Vera dated February 27, 2024, however, Zoning will defer the review of this item to ES and once ES has approved, Zoning can approve.



***For additional information on the any standard presented in this memo, please refer to the City of Tucson “Unified Development Code” – Administrative Manual Section 2-06 or Technical Standards noted in the comments. https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/all-codes-plans-determinations


If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact Loran Shamis by email Loran.Shamis@tucsonaz.gov

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package and comment response letter. To resubmit visit Tucson Development Center at https://tdc-online.tucsonaz.gov/#/home.
Instructions for resubmittal - https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/website/Resubmittals.pdf.
08/27/2024 CDRC Application Completeness REVIEW COMPLETED
08/28/2024 CDRC Review Coordinator REVIEW COMPLETED Addressing, TEP, ADOT PAG, USPS, SWG to the workflow. Review request email sent to Addressing, ADOT and TEP. FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG.
09/09/2024 External Reviewers - Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) REVIEW COMPLETED Good Afternoon,

ADOT has no comments on this DEV.

Thank you for the opportunity to review.
08/30/2024 External Reviewers - Pima Association of Governments REVIEW COMPLETED CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required.
09/16/2024 External Reviewers - Pima County Addressing REVIEW COMPLETED Addressing review of TD-DEV-0724-00202 DP for Sugar Hill on Stone AV has been approved and invoiced.



The applicant has made payment. We will publish the addresses and units once the City of Tucson has approved the project.



Thank you,

Marianna Kuglmeier

PLANNER

Pima County Development Services Department

201 N Stone AV – 1st Floor

Tucson, AZ 85701

(520) 724-6772
08/30/2024 External Reviewers - Southwest Gas REVIEW COMPLETED CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required.
09/13/2024 External Reviewers - Tucson Electric Power (TEP) REVIEW COMPLETED September 13, 2024
WO#T126806
City of Tucson
Planning and Development Services
Attn: CDRC Admin Team
Dear CDRC Admin Team
Subject: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE for SUGAR HILL ON STONE AV
TD-DEV-0724-00202
Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed and approved the development
plan submitted 8/28/2024. There are no existing facilities within the development, there
is a pole located north of the property line; however, the release of easements are to be
addressed separately, please contact Sabrina.Kyles@tep.com.
Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the
existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer.
To apply for electric service, please call the New Construction department at (520) 918-
8300. Please submit a final set of plans including approved site, electric load, paving
off-site improvements and irrigation plans. If available, include a PDF version of the
plans.
If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Should you
have any easement questions, please contact our Land Resources Department,
LandReviews@tep.com.
Should you have any technical questions, please contact the area designer,
Fred Quintero
(520) 235-6329
fquintero@tep.com
Sincerely,
Design Admins
Design Admins
Tucson Electric Power
08/30/2024 External Reviewers - United States Postal Service (USPS) REVIEW COMPLETED CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required.
08/28/2024 OK to Submit - Engineering REVIEW COMPLETED
08/28/2024 OK to Submit - Zoning REVIEW COMPLETED
09/05/2024 Real Estate REVIEW COMPLETED Hello Linda,



City of Tucson DTM Real Estate Division has reviewed the Development Package submittal below for Sugan Hill On Stone Avenue. Based on the plans and specifications provided, City Real Estate has no comments or objections to this development.



Sincerely – Tom



Thomas Kral

Real Estate Division

City of Tucson

P.O. Box 27210

Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210

Main: (520) 791-4181

Direct: (520) 837-6708

Thomas.Kral@tucsonaz.gov