Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1
Permit Number - TD-DEV-0724-00202
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/19/2024 | CDRC Post Review | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 07/19/2024 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Loran Shamis PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: Sugar Hill on Stone 1910 N STONE AV Development Package (1st Review) TD-DEV-0724-00202 TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 19, 2024 DUE DATE: July 19, 2024 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is July 11, 2025. The following comments are for the purpose of initiating the Infill Incentive District process and should not be construed as a full development package review. The following are items that will need to be modified using the IID or some other modification process. 1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 - Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-0724-00202, adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – the site is within the optional Infill Incentive District overlay which may be used to modify underlying zoning requirements which the proposal is not meeting. To apply for the IID, compliance with UDC 5.12.6 is required and approval obtained through the Special Districts division is required. 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 –The site’s underlying zoning is I-1 and the proposed use is Residential – Multifamily Development which is not a permitted use in the I-1 zone. The site is within the optional Infill Incentive District (IID) and approval through the optional overlay would allow Residential – Multifamily Development at this site (UDC Table 5.12-IID-1). 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.5 – As the site is zoned I-1 which does not permit Residential – Multifamily Development, there is no maximum residential density permitted. Approval through the IID as an Affordable Housing project would exempt the proposal from maximum residential density restrictions (UDC 5.12.8.H.2). The proposed development includes 66 dwelling units. 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6 – If the IID is pursued using the Affordable Housing project residential density exemption, include a note stating compliance with UDC 5.12.8.H by providing the number of units that will be dedicated to households earning 80% AMI or less for a term of 50 years from the Certificate of Occupancy. The project developer or manager shall provide an annual report to the HCD Director verifying the units qualify as Affordable Housing Units. 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6.a – If applicable, include the Special Districts case number in the lower right corner of each sheet. 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6.a – If applicable, include a general note stating the project meets the criteria/conditions of the additional application or overlay, the case number, date of approval, what was approved, and the conditions of approval, if any. 8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Per UDC Table 7.4.4-1, Multifamily Residential Development with 1-bedroom units require 1.5 parking spaces per unit, 2-bedroom units require 2 parking spaces per unit, 3-bedroom units require 2.25 parking spaces per unit. The proposed development would require a total of 120 parking spaces. Of the 120 required parking spaces, 1 of which is required to be an ADA-van accessible parking space and 2 ADA-standard parking spaces. By utilizing the IID, the required parking may be reduced by 25% which results in 90 required parking spaces. A Parking Design Modification Request may reduce the number of parking spaces by 20% but no more than 5 spaces (UDC 7.4.10.D.8) which results in 85 required parking spaces. The proposed development provides 66 on-site parking spaces and 19 on-street parking spaces. Reduction of parking spaces beyond the required 85 parking spaces may be accomplished through an Individual Parking Plan (IPP) or through a City Manager Waiver in accordance with Section V of the Administrative Directive 1.07-6. (UDC 5.12.6.M). Per UDC 5.12.9.C.2.b the number and location of accessible parking spaces required by the City’s adopted Building Code shall not be reduced or eliminated and shall be based on the number of motor vehicle parking spaces required prior to any modification. 9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Per UDC Table 7.4.11 -1, 10% of the required parking shall be EV Ready and 20% of the required parking shall be EV Capable. The proposed development requires 120 parking spaces prior to any reduction which would require 12 parking spaces to be EV Ready and 24 parking spaces to be EV Capable. Four percent but no less than one of electric vehicle (EV) charging spaces must be accessible compliant, these spaces are separate from the ADA parking spaces. The proposal requires a total of 36 EVSE parking spaces, one of which is required to be accessible. The proposed development provides 7 parking spaces to be EV Ready and 14 parking spaces to be EV Capable. The EVSE required parking may be reduced through a City Manager Waiver in accordance with Section V of the Administrative Directive 1.07-6. (UDC 5.12.6.M). ***For additional information on the any standard presented in this memo, please refer to the City of Tucson “Unified Development Code” – Administrative Manual Section 2-06 or Technical Standards noted in the comments. https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/all-codes-plans-determinations If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact Loran Shamis by email Loran.Shamis@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package and comment response letter. To resubmit visit Tucson Development Center at https://tdc-online.tucsonaz.gov/#/home. Instructions for resubmittal - https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/website/Resubmittals.pdf. |
||
| 07/12/2024 | CDRC Application Completeness | REVIEW COMPLETED |