Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1
Permit Number - TD-DEV-0724-00196
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/14/2024 | Commercial Plumbing | APPROVED | |||
| 07/26/2024 | ROW Engineering Review | APPROVED | DTM has no comments | ||
| 08/26/2024 | CDRC Post Review Express | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 08/26/2024 | External Reviewers - Tucson Electric Power (TEP) | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | WO#T123403 City of Tucson Planning and Development Services Attn: CDRC Admin Team Dear CDRC Admin Team Subject: Remodel of existing Chick-fil-a site TD-DEV-0123-00102 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed and cannot approve the development plan submitted 7/25/2024. There are existing facilities within the development which are not depicted upon the plan; TEP equipment is not specified or shown. Further, please include existing TEP facilities with recorded instrument Docket 13546 Page 3995. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. To apply for electric service, please call the New Construction department at (520) 918- 8300. Please submit a final set of plans including approved site, electric load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans. If available, include a PDF version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Should you have any easement questions, please contact our Land Resources Department, LandReviews@tep.com. Should you have any technical questions, please contact the area designer, Martin Salazar (520) 305-6713 msalazar@tep.com Sincerely, Design Admins Design Admins Tucson Electric Power |
||
| 08/16/2024 | NPPO | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Please see Site Landscape comments. Thank you. Chad Keller, PLA chad.keller@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 08/14/2024 | Site Engineering | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | 1. Waste enclosure aprons are required to have a minimum 2% slope. It does not appear that the proposed apron slope meets this requirement. Please revise the grading for the waste enclosure and clearly state the apron slope. 2. Detail B on sheet 5 shows a waste enclosure that does not meet the minimum requirements for clear space and opening width per TSM 8-01 Fig. 3A. Please revise. 3. Please provide calculations to show the attenuated post-development peak flow rate for the 100-year storm using the water harvesting basin. 4. Per UDC 7.4.6.F.2.b Access lanes and PAALs must be setback at least 2 feet from a wall, screen, or other obstruction over six inches. The additional area is necessary to provide clearance for fire, sanitation, and delivery vehicles. Please revise the plans to accommodate this requirement along the SW side of the proposed building and the NE side of the proposed waste enclosure. Mike Ortiz michael.ortiz@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 08/16/2024 | Site Landscape | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | CDRC TRANSMITTAL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT REVIEWER: CHAD KELLER, RLA PDSD SITE LANDSCAPE/NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION SECTION PROJECT: NEW BUILDING WITH PARKING AND LANDSCAPING IMPROVEMENTS ACTIVITY NO: TD-DEV-0724-00196 ADDRESS/PARCEL: 8284 S CAMINO DE CAFE /141113890 ZONING: I-1 LIGHT INDUSTRIAL ZONE This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants, and water harvesting. Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Landscape/NPPO Review Section comments are addressed. SITE LANDSCAPE/NPPO SECTION COMMENTS: 1. Ensure that Zoning and Engineering comments are addressed prior to landscape section approval. 2. Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-0724-00196, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2-06.4.3 3. NPPO AND PLANTING PLAN COORDINATION: Please add a breakdown below the Native Plant Preservation Worksheet for simple reference between the NPPO and the planting plan. It is difficult to tell if the Blue Palo Verde are PIP or from nursery. The planting legend on sheet 7 of 10 indicates that the Blue Palo Verde are from nursery stock, yet line 16 of the worksheet indicates that the Palo Verde are to remain on site (PIP or TOS)? Please make sure the landscape planting plan matches what is on the NPPO. 4. Add the PIP Ocotillo to the shrub/accent planting legend for consistency. 5. Some landscape contractors have been overlooking the intent of the tree locations within the WHIA (basins). I have also been recommending the addition of a rainwater harvesting basin schematic detail to the CRWHP for redundant clarity, not required. There have been several cases on projects in the field where the trees are not located at the bottom of the basin. If you would like to add the detail and need an example, please reach out and I will email a couple versions of the schematic for your reference/use. If you have any questions about these comments, I can be reached at chad.keller@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 08/12/2024 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Wyatt Berger Lead Planner PROJECT: Brown/Rita Ranch Lot 26 Development Package (1st Review) TD-DEV-0724-00196 TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 12, 2024 DUE DATE: August 12, 2024 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC), Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06, and the Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Per UDC Section 3.3.3.G.5.c, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. The one-year expiration date is August 12, 2025. 1. COMMENT: 2-06.3.12 – Ten sheets were submitted with the development package drawings; however, the sheet index only lists eight sheets. Clarify the discrepancy in the number of sheets. 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.2.D – The title block on the first five sheets indicate eight sheets were submitted; however, ten sheets were submitted. Clarify the discrepancy in the number of sheets. 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-0724-00196, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Clarify why development package case number TD-DEV-0423-00204 is provided in the title block on the first five sheets. 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.2 – The gross area of the site by square footage is listed incorrectly on the cover sheet (23,3522 square feet). 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.A – Ensure the site boundary perimeter information is labeled for all property lines, including bearing in degrees, minutes, and seconds, with basis for bearing noted, together with distances in feet, to hundredths of a foot, or other functional reference system. 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.4 – The right-of-way dimensions and street section provided in Detail A of Sheet 5 is incorrectly depicted. Refer to sheet one of paving plan of I-2001-051 for specifics: https://maps-and-records.tucsonaz.gov/construction-plans/details/I-2001-051. 8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Ensure the widths of the two-way access lane as well as two-way parking area access lane (PAAL) providing access to the proposed parking spaces are dimensioned. The minimum width of a two-way access lane is 20 feet, and the minimum width of a two-way PAAL is 24 feet (UDC Table 7.4.6-2). 9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Per UDC 7.4.6.F.2.b, access lanes and PAALs must be set back at least two feet from a wall, screen, or other obstruction over six inches. If a two-way access lane is proposed between the building wall and the waste enclosure, the above standard applies. 10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Per the 2010 ADA Standards for Accessible Design Advisory Section 502.3.4, wheelchair lifts typically are installed on the passenger side of vans. Where a van and cars share an access aisle, consider locating the van space so that the access aisle is on the passenger side of the van space. Zoning requests that the proposed van accessible parking space comply with the above advisory comment. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Wyatt.Berger@tucsonaz.gov or at (520) 837-4951. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: A revised development package as well as a comment response letter. To resubmit, visit the Tucson Development Center Online at https://tdc-online.tucsonaz.gov/#/home. The instructions for resubmittal can be found at https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/tdc-faq/new-pdfs/revisions-and-resubmittals.pdf. |
||
| 07/11/2024 | CDRC Application Completeness Express | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 07/22/2024 | CDRC Review Coordinator Express | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC added TEP to the workflow. Review request email sent to TEP. FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. | ||
| 07/22/2024 | External Reviewers - Pima Association of Governments | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required. | ||
| 07/22/2024 | External Reviewers - Southwest Gas | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required. | ||
| 07/22/2024 | External Reviewers - United States Postal Service (USPS) | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required. | ||
| 08/08/2024 | Fire New Construction | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 07/22/2024 | OK to Submit - Engineering Fast | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 07/18/2024 | OK to Submit - Zoning Fast | REVIEW COMPLETED |