Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: TD-DEV-0723-00304
Parcel: 11702294A

Review Status: Requires Resubmit

Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.3

Permit Number - TD-DEV-0723-00304
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.3
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
11/29/2023 NPPO APPROVED
12/18/2023 CDRC Post Review PENDING ASSIGNMENT
11/07/2023 Commercial Plumbing REQUIRES RESUBMIT 1. The rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole (2413.50’) is less than 12” below the first floor elevation of building 814 (2414.4’). Provide a backwater valve per Section 714.1, IPC 2018, as amended by the City of Tucson.
2. Connecting the building sewer for the existing building 939 to the new manhole will require the installation of a backwater valve because the rim elevation of the new manhole is less than 12” below the first floor elevation of building 939. Reference: Section 714.1, IPC 2018, as amended by the City of Tucson.
12/07/2023 Historic REQUIRES RESUBMIT Previous comments were not addressed. As noted, provide additional information on the proposed relocation and rehabilitation of the homes. Information noted under the Full Historic review in the Historic & Special District informational handout (https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/pdsd/documents/submission-documents/special_districts_application_instructions_7.18.23.pdf). Once the submittal is complete, please resubmit it under the Historic sub folder.
12/18/2023 Site Engineering REQUIRES RESUBMIT 1. Provide a grading plan that satisfies the conditions of the geotechnical report. Show pre-developed conditions, areas of over-excavation, and compaction plan. Please provide a relocation sequence and moving plan, will grading occur in phases?
2. Provide elevation sheets detailing the area between the pad elevations and FFE.
3. TSMR approval from Environmental Services required for APC pickup in alley.
4. Recycling and refuse collection required – should APC’s be allowed, they will need to be screened.
5. Provide outlet details demonstrating how positive drainage will be maintained should the water harvesting basins be at or above capacity.
6. Please provide a site plan with additional dimensioning of sidewalks including landing dimensions. – Explain offset sidewalk at entrance of Unit 812.
7. Keynote 4 on sheet 5 references horizontal control plans – Please provide.
8. Please clarify keynote 12 on sheet 5, appears to refer to a water harvesting basin.
9. Separate utility permits required for underground utilities.
10. Separate building permits required for any retaining walls.
11. Lot Combination Required.
12. Contact Building review. - New developments require underground electrical service unless a waiver is granted.
Joshua Garcia
joshua.garcia@tucsonaz.gov
11/29/2023 Site Landscape REQUIRES RESUBMIT ACTIVITY NO. TD-DEV-0723-00304
PROJECT: MULTI-FAMILY
ADDRESS/PARCEL: 926 N 2ND AV/117-02-2970
ZONING: HR-2

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants and water harvesting.

COMMENTS:
1. Ensure all Zoning and Engineering comments are addressed prior to the Landscape/NPPO comments.
2. Please include the correct Development Package number, TD-DEV-0723-00304 on all landscape & NPPO sheets.
3. Reorder sheet set so that the actual landscape plans begin at L2 rather than lead with irrigation sheets.
4. Please label all existing and future rights of way for n 2nd Av on all sheets
5. Show all site visibility triangles on plan set sheets.
6. On Sheet L01 under City of Tucson General Notes, remove #8 as an NPPO waiver was used.
7. Please label the separate irrigation meter ‘irrigation only’. TSM 4-01.6.1.A.1.
8. If using d.g at a 2” depth, ensure the rainwater harvesting basins are 8” in depth to account for the d.g. Then revise the Site Water Budget table to reflect these changes.
Once the above change takes place, ensure the Grading Plan matches the Commercial Rainwater Harvesting Plan & the Landscape Plan.
9. Identify curb inlets/splash pads to landscape areas on grading and water harvesting plans.
10. Include spot grade on the CRWH Plan.

If you have any questions about these comments, I can be reached at Matthew.Carlton@tucsonaz.gov
12/12/2023 Site Zoning REQUIRES RESUBMIT CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Loran Shamis
PDSD Zoning Review Section

PROJECT: 926 N 2nd Av – multifamily development
Development Package (1st Review)
TD-DEV-0723-00304

TRANSMITTAL DATE: December 12, 2023
DUE DATE: December 8, 2023

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is July 7, 2024.

SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS)

1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.1 – On the right half of the cover sheet, include the name, mailing address and email addresses, and phone numbers of the primary property owner of the site, the developer of the project, registrant(s), and other person(s), or organization(s) that prepared the development package documents. The applicable registration or license number shall be provided if prepared by or with the assistance of a registered professional, such as a surveyor, architect, landscape architect, or engineer. All sealing shall be consistent with Arizona Board of Technical Registration guidelines.

2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 - Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-0723-00304, adjacent to the title block on each sheet.

3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4.C – Include a north arrow and scale for the project location map.

4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6 – The site is within the West University Historic Preservation Zone (HPZ) and the HPZ designation is an overlay zone superimposed over underlying zoning. Zoning cannot approve until Historic and SD-0723-00076 are approved.

5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6.a - Include the related case number as well C9-83-49 and SD-0723-00076 in thew lower right corner of each sheet. In general note #5 provide the Historic application case number, SD-0723-00076, and the date of approval.

6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.C – Provide the dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks of Second Avenue
7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.A – An approve lot combination processed through Pima County Assessor is required. Access the lot combination form here - https://www.asr.pima.gov/Downloads/Forms/ComboRequest.pdf

8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Per UDC 7.4.6.K.A, an alley cannot be used for maneuvering directly into or from any sparking space located wholly or partially outside the public right-of-way.

9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Per UDC 7.4.6.D.2.c, a parallel parking space must be eight feet wide and 23 feet in length. The length of the proposed parallel parking spaces is 22’.

10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Clarify the number of bedrooms within Unit 818 (the house on the southeast corner of the property) to verify the parking calculation per UDC 7.4.4, Table 7.4.4-1.

11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Correct the parking calculation. Per UDC table 7.4.4-1 the minimum parking requirement for dwelling units with two bedrooms is 2 parking spaces per dwelling unit, and for dwelling units less than 400 square feet the parking requirement is 1 space per dwelling unit.

12. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Include a note stating the required number of Electric Vehicle Supply Equipment per UDC 7.4.11. Multifamily requires 10% of the required parking to be EV ready and 20% EV capable. Refer to UDC 7.4.12 Electric Vehicle Parking Design Criteria.

13. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Update the bicycle parking calculation to demonstrate the required number of short term and long term bicycle parking spaces. per UDC table 7.4.8-1 the minimum required short-term bicycle parking space is 0.10 spaces per bedroom, with a minimum requirement of two spaces. The minimum required long-term bicycle parking spaces is 0.5 spaces per bedroom with a minimum of 2 spaces. Clarify the number of bedrooms in unit 818, the dwelling unit on the southeast corner of the site, to verify the required number of short-term bicycle parking spaces. Ensure the design complies with UDC 7.4.9 Bicycle Parking Design Criteria.

14. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.L – Provide the recordation information for the proposed new public manhole.

15. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – Correct the perimeter yard setbacks for side and rear yard in the notes as well as demonstrated on the site plan on sheet 2. For nonresidential developments adjacent to residential zones, the minimum required setback is the greater of 10’ and ¾ the height of the proposed structure wall. The setback along N Jacobus Avenue is 20’ from the property line. Provide the height of the proposed structure wall to verify the setback requirements.

16. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.Q – Correct the unit labels in the building footprints on Sheet 2, as the unit labels are not consistent with the other site plans in the plan set.

17. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.T – Per Technical Standards Manual 8-01.5.3 refuse collection service access is required to be from within the development. Properties without sufficient space for on-site collection of solid waste and recycle containers will be evaluated for service on a case-by-case basis.

18. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.V – Clarify if the development will provide gang mailboxes and demonstrate the location to ensure there are no conflicts with other requirements such as pedestrian accessibility, utilities, and landscaping.

***For additional information on the any standard presented in this memo, please refer to the City of Tucson “Unified Development Code” – Administrative Manual Section 2-06 or Technical Standards noted in the comments. https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/all-codes-plans-determinations


If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact Loran Shamis by email Loran.Shamis@tucsonaz.gov

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package and comment response letter. To resubmit visit Tucson Development Center at https://tdc-online.tucsonaz.gov/#/home.
Instructions for resubmittal - https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/website/Resubmittals.pdf.
11/06/2023 CDRC Application Completeness REVIEW COMPLETED
11/07/2023 Fire New Construction REVIEW COMPLETED
11/20/2023 Traffic Engineering Review REVIEW COMPLETED No Comments

David Stiffey

David.Stiffey@tucsonaz.gov