Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1
Permit Number - TD-DEV-0625-00157
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/23/2025 | Commercial Plumbing Standard | APPROVED | |||
| 06/27/2025 | NPPO Standard | APPROVED | |||
| 06/25/2025 | Zoning Administration Standard | APPROVED | Parking statement is approved by PDSD and ADOT (in-lieu of DTM as Miracle Mile is a state route) in accordance with UDC 5.11.6.G.1. | ||
| 06/13/2025 | External Reviewers - Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Good Afternoon, ADOT has reviewed this DEV and has the following comments; The location is along Miracle Mile, aka State Route 77. The Developer/Owner will need to fill out and submit an ADOT Encroachment Permit Application to southcentralpermit@azdot.gov The ADOT Encroachment Permit information is location online, ADOT Encroachment Permit [azdot.gov] The Parking Statement is acceptable and needs to be submitted with the Permit Application. The Plans will need to be submitted with the Permit Application for review and approval. Let me know if you have any questions, comments, or concerns regarding this item. Respectfully, James Gomes, Jr., PE SOUTHERN REGION TRAFFIC ENGINEER ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1221 S. 2nd Ave. Tucson, Az, 85713 520.388.4231 azdot.gov [azdot.gov] |
||
| 06/25/2025 | External Reviewers - Pima County Addressing Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Reviewer Name Reviewer Email Reviewer Phone Nicholas Jordan Nicholas.Jordan@pima.gov 5207249623 Report Date: 06/24/2025 Description : Addresing review of TD-DEV-0625-00157 DP for Amazon Flats Address : , , , Record Type : Addressing Document Filename : SUB1-DP Reviewer Contact Information: Corrections in the following table need to be applied before a plan is approved Review Report - Resubmittal Requested Application Number: P25AD00442 Comment ID Comment Date Corrections Needed Page Ref Reviewer : Department Review Comments DSD Addressing 1 06/25/252025 Yes 1 Nicholas Jordan : DSD Addressing Site address will be 1143 W Miracle Mile 2 06/25/252025 Yes 3 Nicholas Jordan : DSD Addressing Provide floor plans if you wish to have units issued as part of this review. General Comments Pima County Public Works 201 N. Stone Ave. Tucson, AZ 85701 If you have any questions please call 520- 724-6490 for an appointment to discuss this notice. If following discussions with staff you still disagree with the below listed deficiencies, you may appeal to the Building Official in accordance with Pima County Code 15.04.060 by submitting the form posted on our web site with payment of appeal fee prior to permit application expiration. Disputes about the interpretation of the Zoning Code may be appealed to a Pima County Board of Adjustment under A.R.S. § 11 -816 and P.C.C. § 18.93.060. Please submit all plans, calculations and specifications to us electronically via the Digital Projects page in the online portal. Re-Submittal Procedures Please submit all documents using Citizen Access at permits.pima.gov (i.e. plans, drawings, calculations, quantities, exhibits, photographs, letters, etc.). 1. Please go to permits.pima.gov and login to your account to access review comments and resubmit. 2. If you have questions or need clarification regarding comments, please contact the reviewer. 3. Provide a response to each correction comment. 4. To resubmit, upload revised full plan set. |
||
| 06/26/2025 | Site Engineering Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | 1. Please provide a dimension of the wall off the property line along the western border of the site to ensure there is adequate space and no grading/footer installation will occur on the neighboring parcel. Stephen Blood (520) 837-4958 Stephen.blood@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 06/27/2025 | Site Landscape Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | CDRC TRANSMITTAL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT REVIEWER: CHAD KELLER, RLA SITE LANDSCAPE/NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION SECTION PROJECT: PHASE 2; NEW 4-STORY, 58-UNIT MULTI-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT ON WESTERN HALF OF PARCEL (COMMUNITY CORRIDORS TOOL) ACTIVITY NO: TD-DEV-0625-00157 ADDRESS: 1135 W MIRACLE MILE ZONING: C-2 COMMERCIAL ZONE; COMMUNITY CORRIDORS TOOL LAND USE: MULTIFAMILY This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants, and water harvesting. Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all of the Site Landscape and NPPO Section review comments have been addressed. SITE LANDSCAPE/NPPO SECTION COMMENTS: 1. The shade study detail is great. Include a Community Corridors Tool chart or outline or checklist on the planting plan sheet that indicates how the standards for site landscape are being met per the pre-application CCT comments (TP-PRE-0525-00091). Please be specific in detailing how the plans meet the CCT standards for all applicable site landscape requirements for simplified review. 2. PRE-APPLICATION COMMENT RELATED TO THE PREVIOUS COMMENT: g. Interior landscape borders required per Section 7.6.4. may be satisfied by providing public spaces in accordance with this section, except for landscape borders required adjacent to residential zones on the site boundary. The south property line is adjacent to a residence zone (MH-1). Shade trees have not been provided due to the parking area shade canopy location and the width restrictions along the property line. UDC 7.6.4 interior landscape border requirement cannot be met. A Board of Adjustments Variance may be required for relief from this standard. Please contact Mark Castro for more information on the Variance process. Mark.Castro@tucsonaz.gov 3. If basic spot elevations are not going to be included on the CRWHP for contractor and inspector reference, then update the general water harvesting notes number 3 “refer to the grading plans and drainage report for all spot grades and site drainage scheme” to be presented in bold, distinct lettering that makes it clear what plan dictates the construction of all basins. 4. Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-0625-00157, adjacent to the title block on all site landscape sheets, per Administrative Manual 2-06.4.3 5. Prior to Site Landscape Development Package approval, please make sure Site Zoning and Site Engineering comments are addressed. Thank you. Chad Keller, RLA Landscape Architect chad.keller@tucsonaz.gov 520.837.4923 |
||
| 06/26/2025 | Site Zoning Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Ramiro Olivarez –Planner PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: Amazon Flats - 1135 W MIRACLE MILE Development Package (1st Review) TD-DEV-0625-00157 TRANSMITTAL DATE: 06/26/2025 DUE DATE: 06/24/2025 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is June 11, 2025. SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS) Section CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.4.1 - The name, mailing and email addresses, and phone number of the primary property owner of the site, the developer of the project, registrant(s), and other person(s), firm(s), or organization(s) that prepared the development package documents shall be provided on the right half of the cover sheet. The applicable registration or license number shall be provided if prepared by or with the assistance of a registered professional, such as a surveyor, architect, landscape architect, or engineer. All sealing shall be consistent with Arizona Board of Technical Registration guidelines. 1. COMMENT: In addition to listed contact information, provide the applicable contact information for the Civil Engineer registrant (Blake Junak), as noted by the Standard above. 2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 2. COMMENT: Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-0625-00157, adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 3. COMMENT: If applicable add any additional case numbers as noted by the Standard above. 2-06.4.2.B - Identify major streets and regional watercourses within the square mile area and all streets that abut the subject property; and, 4. COMMENT: Annotate N Flowing Wells Rd as noted by the Standard above. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 2-06.4.7.A.3 - If the plan/plat has been prepared in conjunction with a rezoning application, add the following note next to the existing zoning note: "Proposed zoning is ____." List the applicable rezoning file number and conditions of approval. Also place the C9-__-__ (if applicable) and the plan/plat file numbers in the lower right corner of each sheet. 5. COMMENT: List the C9-59-19 activity number as noted by the Standard above. 2-06.4.7.A.5 - On residential projects, list the total number of units/lots proposed. 6. COMMENT: List the total number of units as noted by the Standard above. 2-06.4.7.A.6 - If a plan or plat is prepared in conjunction with other applications or overlays or the parcel being developed is subject to conditions of an application processed previously, additional information must be added to the plan. Such applications and overlays include, but are not limited to: annexations; rezonings; special exceptions; Board of Adjustment variances; Design Development Options; Technical Standard Modification Request; overlays (Airport Environs Zone, Environmental Resource Zone, Gateway Corridor Zone, Hillside Development Zone, Historic Preservation Zone, Major Streets and Routes, Rio Nuevo District, Scenic Corridor Zone, WASH); Modification of Development Regulations through the Downtown Area Infill Incentive District or Rio Nuevo District; Downtown Heritage Incentive Zone; or, Design Review Board. Provide the following information on the plan. Community Corridors Tool (CCT) - Comments 5.11.6. Development Standards 7. COMMENT: Clarify, in the general notes the max building height listed is 300’. In the CCT in the C-2 Zone the max building height is 60’. Correct the max building height listed. 8. COMMENT: 5.11.6.B.f., Privacy mitigation is required when buildings over two stories are proposed within 50 feet of adjacent single-story residences which are zoned R-2 or more restrictive. Balconies, windows (except for clerestory and translucent windows), or any other features that overlook the rear and side yards of adjacent residences are discouraged. Privacy mitigation measures, such as the incorporation of vegetation, screening elements, walls, building placement and orientation, balcony and window placement and orientation, or other design strategies shall be incorporated. * Ground Floors 9. COMMENT: 5.11.6.B.2.b., If a residential façade is less than five feet from a property line, then it shall be elevated one to five feet above finish floor of the adjacent sidewalk to provide privacy for the individual residential unit. Draw, label, and dimension the setback from the north property line to the building. 10. COMMENT: The setback to the south steel parking canopies (keynote 36) from the southern and western property lines adjacent to the MH-1 zone could not be clearly confirmed. Draw, label, and dimension the west and south property line setback to the south steel parking canopy. Draw, label, and dimension the western property line setback to the north steel parking canopy. The southern property line setback appears to be less than the 10’ required. A Design Development Option (DDO), or signed neighbor waiver, will be required to allow the canopy within the required setback area. *Neighbor waiver The following verbiage can be used for the setback waiver and must be Added to the site plan. The statement may be in English or Spanish. Example of an adjacent owner’s setback waiver for detached accessory structures. The adjacent owner’s waiver statement must be Added to the site plan. The following statement can be used. My Name is __________________ and I am the owner of the property located at ________________________. I have reviewed the site plan and I have no objection to structure being located or constructed ______ feet from the property line as depicted on the site plan. Signature: _____________________________ Date: _________________________________ If you are unable to secure a waiver a Design Development Option (DDO) application must be submitted for review and approval. A Design Development Option (DDO) must be submitted and approved to reduce the required setback. In order to submit a DDO application, apply for a new sub-record under this permit at TDC Online. See the following link for DDO application assistance - https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/2/pdsd/documents/tdc-faq/new-pdfs/sub-records.pdf Please contact Mark at Mark.Castro@tucsonaz.gov for further DDO questions *Pedestrian Amenities 11. COMMENT: Clearly demonstrate compliance with UDC 5.11.6.E.1.a. (Shade shall be provided for at least 50% of all sidewalks and pedestrian access paths and 35% of all public or private open space as measured at 2:00 pm on June 21 when the sun is 82 degrees above the horizon.) 12. COMMENT: 5.11.6.E.3.a., Public spaces shall be provided for all development projects. The minimum amount of public space is based on project type and size; (6)., Type 4 project: 10% of total site area. As this development is considered a Type 4 project, clearly delineate the minimum public space required. 13. COMMENT: Clarify how section 5.11.6.E.c and d. Public Spaces are meeting compliance. 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 2-06.4.7.A.8.a - Floor area for each building; 14. COMMENT: Provide the floor area for all buildings as noted by the Standard above. 2-06.4.7.A.8.c - Percentage of building, lot area, or vehicular use area expansion. If the building(s) or lot area have been previously expanded, those calculations shall be included; and, 15. COMMENT: Provide the information as noted by the Standard above. 2-06.4.7.A.8.d - When the proposed site is part of a larger site, the calculations encompass the entire site, whether existing or proposed. If the project is being phased, calculations must show that, at each phase, requirements are being met. 16. COMMENT: Provide the information as noted by the Standard above. 2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided. 2-06.4.8.A - Provide site boundary/subdivision perimeter information, including bearing in degrees, minutes, and seconds, with basis for bearing noted, together with distances in feet, to hundredths of a foot, or other functional reference system. 17. COMMENT: Provide the information as noted by the Standard above. (indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided.) 2-06.4.8.B - All easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement shall occur prior to approval of plan unless written permission from easement holder(s) is provided. 18. COMMENT: If applicable to this parcel, provide the information as noted by the Standard above. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 2-06.4.9.A - Draw in all proposed lot lines with approximate distances and measurements. 19. COMMENT: Remove the proposed north south lot line to be submitted under separate application notes on the site plan, sheet 3. 2-06.4.9.E - Proposed land splits or existing lot lines shall be drawn on the plan with dimensions and the identification number and approximate square footage of each lot. (Please be aware that, if land division occurs and the number of lots falls within the definition of subdivision, a subdivision plat is required.) Land splits require a separate permit and review. 20. COMMENT: Remove the proposed north south lot line to be submitted under separate application notes on the site plan, sheet 3. 2-06.4.9.G - If the project is to be phased, provide calculations, setbacks, etc., to indicate that each phase complies with all requirements as a separate entity. Show phase lines on the drawing. Show and label any temporary improvements that may be needed to make the site function for each phase as one entity. If such temporary improvements are off the site of the phase under consideration, a temporary easement or other legal documentation to assure legal use of the property is required. Note recording information. 21. COMMENT: Provide the information for as noted by the Standard above. 2-06.4.9.H - Proposed Traffic Circulation 2-06.4.9.H.1 - Proposed traffic circulation will be designed in accordance with Section 10-01.0.0, Street Technical Standards, of the Technical Standards Manual, to include streets, intersections, street names, right-of-way widths, curve radii of centerlines and curb returns, and proposed improvements, such as pavement, curbs, access points (driveways), accessible ramps, and sidewalks. Street improvements, such as sidewalks, curbs, pavement, and accessible ramps, do not need to be drawn on the plan if such information is provided on typical street cross sections. Please be aware that, if a new street is created (for other than for subdivisions) which divides the property into two or more lots, a subdivision plat is required (refer to the definition of subdivision in Section 11.4.20 of the UDC). 22. COMMENT: Provide the information as noted by the Standard above. 2-06.4.9.H.2 - Show future and existing sight visibility triangles. On a designated MS&R street, the sight visibility triangles are based on the MS&R cross-section. 23. COMMENT: Provide the information for as noted by the Standard above. 2-06.4.9.H.3 - Indicate fire circulation, including accessibility and vehicle maneuverability. 24. COMMENT: Provide the information for as noted by the Standard above. 2-06.4.9.H.5 - If utilizing parking area access lanes (PAALs), they shall be designed in accordance with Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC. 25. COMMENT: The typical parking detail dimensions do not meet the Motor Vehicle Use Area Dimensions found in UDC 7.4.6.D.1. 26. COMMENT: Per UDC 7.4.6.4, Figure 7.4.6-B., The back-up spur shall have 3’ radius’s. 27. COMMENT: Wheel stop curbing must be a minimum of two and one-half feet from the front of the parking space. 28. COMMENT: Dimension the distance from the accessible sign and post to wheel stop curbing. 29. COMMENT: Clearly draw, label, and dimension the carport setbacks. Access lanes and PAALs must be setback at least one foot from a carport, per UDC 7.4.6.F.2.a. 30. COMMENT: Motor vehicle use areas must be designed in accordance with UDC 7.4.6, to include required parking area access lane (PAAL) widths for one and/or two-way lanes. The PAAL width for the southern parking area shows two dimensions, 22.85’ and 23’, which is less than the 24’ required for a two-way PAAL per UDC 7.4.6-2. 31. COMMENT: In order to provide a 23’ PAAL and reduced Motor Vehicle Use Area Dimensions (vehicle parking spaces) as proposed, an application for review and approval of a Parking Design Modification Request (PDMR) will be required. For further information on the PDMR application process please contact Nicholas Ross at Nicholas.Ross@tucsonaz.gov. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC. 32. COMMENT: It is acknowledged a parking statement has been applied for. Motor vehicle off-street parking comments will be addressed under the Zoning Administration Standard Review. 2-06.4.9.H.5.b - If any of the required parking is located off-site as permitted by the UDC, a drawing of that parking area is to be provided, together with the city's required parking agreement (include a copy of the lease agreement if applicable) must be provided. Please remember that in these situations, if the off-site parking location is a new parking area, it must comply with all parking area requirements and must be allowed as a principal use by the zoning classification of that property. If the off-site parking area location is an existing parking lot, the parking spaces utilized for the proposed land use must be non-required parking for the existing use for which the parking area was established. 33. COMMENT: It is acknowledged a parking statement has been applied for. Motor vehicle off-street parking comments will be addressed under the Zoning Administration Standard Review. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Section 7.4.9, Bicycle Parking Design Criteria, of the UDC. Provide, as a note, calculations for short and long term bicycle spaces required and provided. 34. COMMENT: Dimension and detail the short-term bicycle parking facility pad area on the site plan, sheet 3. 2-06.4.9.H.6 - If the project is phased, the phase under consideration shall be designed so those later phases are assured legal access. If such access is provided through the phase under consideration, public streets are required, or access easements must be delineated and dedicated for such use. If private easements are utilized, protective covenants establishing the right of access, maintenance and incorporation of future phases into this project are required. 35. COMMENT: Provide the information for as noted by the Standard above. 2-06.4.9.H.7 - If streets are proposed, indicate if they are designed for on-street parking to accommodate visitor parking or if parking is provided in common parking areas. Visitor parking is to be evenly distributed and usable by all residents of the project. Extra parking on individual lots, such as tandem parking in driveways, does not count toward visitor parking, as it is not available to other property owners within the project. Design criteria for streets are located in Technical Standards Manual Section 10-01.0.0. Streets designed at the minimum width, without on-street parking, need clearance for access to all homes by life safety vehicles and, where no alleys are provided, by refuse collection vehicles. If motor vehicles are parked along streets that are not designed to allow for parking, life safety services will be inhibited and, in many situations, blocked. 36. COMMENT: It is acknowledged a parking statement has been applied for. Motor vehicle off-street parking comments will be addressed under the Zoning Administration Standard Review. 2-06.4.9.I - Show all right-of-way dedications on or abutting the site and label. If the development package documents have been prepared in conjunction with a subdivision plat or is required as a condition of approval of a review process, such as a rezoning, street dedications in accordance with the Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan may be required by these processes. Projects bounded by streets having only a portion of the right-of-way width dedicated will be required to dedicate right-of-way, up to one-half, to complete the street width. Should there be any proposed street or alley vacation, provide this information. If vacation has occurred, include the recording information. 37. COMMENT: If applicable, provide the information as noted by the Standard above. 2-06.4.9.J - If street dedication is not required or proposed and the project site is adjacent to a Major Street or Route, draw the Major Street right-of-way lines for those streets. (Add the MS&R future sidewalk, right-of-way lines, sight visibility triangles, etc.) 38. COMMENT: Provide the information as noted by the Standard above. 2-06.4.9.L - All proposed easements (utility, sewer, drainage, access, etc.) are to be dimensioned and labeled as to their purposes and whether they will be public or private. The easements may have to be recorded and the recordation information added to the development package prior to approval. 39. COMMENT: Provide the information as noted by the Standard above. 2-06.4.9.M - Grading Plan 2-06.4.9.O - All applicable building setback lines, such as erosion hazard, floodplain detention/retention basins, and zoning, including sight visibility triangles, will be shown. 40. COMMENT: Provide the information as noted by the Standard above. 2-06.4.9.Q - Provide the square footage and the height of each commercial, industrial, or business structure and the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building(s). 41. COMMENT: Provide the square footage and the height of all structures as noted by the Standard above. Include the height for the steel parking canopy structures. (The minimum height clearance along access lanes and PAALs is 15 feet) 2-06.4.9.R - Show on-site pedestrian circulation and refuge utilizing location and the design criteria in Section 7-01.0.0, Pedestrian Access, of the Technical Standards Manual. 42. COMMENT: Demonstrate pedestrian circulation connectivity to the entire site development as noted by the Standard above. 2-06.4.9.X - Show compliance with landscaping and screening requirements by locations, material descriptions, and dimensions. Specific plant or hardscape material shall be detailed on a landscape plan. A detailed landscape plan is required. In accordance with Section 2-11.0.0, Landscape Plan Requirements. 43. COMMENT: See landscape reviewer comments as it relates to the Standard above. 44. COMMENT: Additional comments may be forthcoming on the next review based on the proposed use. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Ramiro Olivarez, Ramiro.Olivarez@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Corrected development package. |
||
| 06/09/2025 | CDRC Application Completeness Express | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 06/11/2025 | CDRC Review Coordinator Express | REVIEW COMPLETED | EXTERNAL REVIEWERS CDRC added TEP, ADOT, AND ADDRESSING. PAG, USPS, SWG to the workflow. Review request email sent to TEP, and ADOT AND ADDRESSING. FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. | ||
| 06/11/2025 | External Reviewers - Pima Association of Governments Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | FYI CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required. |
||
| 06/11/2025 | External Reviewers - Southwest Gas Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | FYI CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required. |
||
| 07/08/2025 | External Reviewers - Tucson Electric Power (TEP) Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | July 8, 2025 WO#T151570 City of Tucson Planning and Development Services Attn: CDRC Admin Team Dear CDRC Admin Team Subject: Enterprise - Craycroft TD-DEV-1123-00448 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted 5/20/2025. There are existing facilities within the development which are depicted upon the plan. No apparent conlicts. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. To apply for electric service, please call the New Construction department at (520) 918- 8300. Please submit a final set of plans including approved site, electric load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans. If available, include a PDF version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Should you have any easement questions, please contact our Land Resources Department, LandReviews@tep.com. Should you have any technical questions, please contact the area designer, Martin Salazar (520) 305-6713 msalazar@tep.com Sincerely, Design Admins Design Admins Tucson Electric Power |
||
| 06/11/2025 | External Reviewers - United States Postal Service (USPS) Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | FYI CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required. |
||
| 06/25/2025 | Fire New Construction Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 06/11/2025 | OK to Submit - Engineering Fast | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 06/10/2025 | OK to Submit - Zoning Fast | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 06/24/2025 | ROW Engineering Review Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED |