Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: TD-DEV-0624-00169
Parcel: 127090180

Review Status: Requires Resubmit

Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.2

Permit Number - TD-DEV-0624-00169
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.2
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
08/05/2024 External Reviewers - Tucson Electric Power (TEP) APPROVED July 16, 2024 WO#T119649 City of Tucson Planning and Development Services Attn: CDRC Admin Team Dear CDRC Admin Team Subject: New McDonald's Site and Building TD-DEV-0624-00169 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted 6/21/2024. There are existing facilities within the development which are not depicted upon the plan; however, there do not appear to be any apparent conflicts at this time. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. To apply for electric service, please call the New Construction department at (520) 918- 8300. Please submit a final set of plans including approved site, electric load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans. If available, include a PDF version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Should you have any easement questions, please contact our Land Resources Department, LandReviews@tep.com. Should you have any technical questions, please contact the area designer, Alex Mendez (520) 349-7969 alex.mendez@tep.com Sincerely, Design Admins Design Admins Tucson Electric Power
07/26/2024 NPPO NOT REQUIRED
08/05/2024 CDRC Post Review PENDING ASSIGNMENT
07/18/2024 Commercial Plumbing REQUIRES RESUBMIT The maximum distance between cleanouts shall be 100-feet, measured along the developed pipe length from the upstream entrance of the cleanout. The total developed length of the 97 LF section of the building sewer is greater than 100 feet because the distance from the rim of the cleanout to the invert is greater than 4 feet. Reference: Section 708.1.1, IPC 2018.
07/19/2024 Site Engineering REQUIRES RESUBMIT 1. Provide a SWPPP since disturbance is over an acre.
2. Show on the plans where roof drainage and downspouts are proposed to ensure they are not discharging directly onto the sidewalk.

Stephen Blood
(520) 837-4958
Stephen.blood@tucsonaz.gov
07/26/2024 Site Landscape REQUIRES RESUBMIT CDRC TRANSMITTAL
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
REVIEWER: CHAD KELLER, RLA
PDSD SITE LANDSCAPE/NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION SECTION

PROJECT: NEW MCDONALD'S SITE AND BUILDING
ACTIVITY NO: TD-DEV-0624-00169
ADDRESS/PARCEL: 6105 E BROADWAY BL/127090180
ZONING: C-1 COMMERCIAL ZONE

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants, and water harvesting.

Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Landscape/NPPO Review Section comments are addressed.

SITE LANDSCAPE/NPPO SECTION COMMENTS:
1. Ensure that Zoning and Engineering comments are addressed prior to landscape section approval.

2. Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-0624-00169, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2-06.4.

3. Label ROWs (existing and future) to all landscape plans.

4. According to the site calculation on the cover sheet, the site area is 1.06 acres, and the area of disturbance is 1.06 acres. It appears that there are several areas that can be used toward a Commercial Rainwater Harvesting Plan. There are existing curbs and plants to remain per the civil plans. In the areas of new curbing and plantings, provide rainwater harvesting. If there are additional constraints that prevent the additions of rainwater harvesting basins, please include an explanation in your response letter. At the very least, depress the new landscape areas 6 to 9-inches to maximize the use of rainwater for the new plants and label those areas on the planting plan and refer to the civil plan for construction. Show and label downspouts and splash pads for building roof drainage. The water harvest infiltration areas should match the civil grading plan in shape, depth and curb cut locations. Refer to the civil grading plan for construction of the basins. If a Commercial Rainwater Harvesting Plan becomes part of the plan set, then please label irrigation meter as “irrigation only”. See TSM 4-01.6.0

5. Update the street landscape border along E Broadway Bl in the area to the west of the existing southeast entry. It looks like there is an opportunity to add a shade tree and a few understory plants.

6. Is there an opportunity to add a shade tree in the rock outcropping planter island at the southwest corner of the property parking area?

7. Add a root barrier to detail #1 Multi-Trunk Tree Planting, or include the City of Tucson Standard construction detail showing root barriers for trees located near hardscape areas. See Detail 402 located here: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/Departments/Transportation-Mobility/Landscape/Landscape-Architects

If you have any questions about these comments, I can be reached at chad.keller@tucsonaz.gov
07/10/2024 Site Zoning REQUIRES RESUBMIT PDSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: PDSD Zoning Review

PROJECT: McDonald’s Rebuild - 6105 E. Broadway Blvd.
Development Package (1st Review)
TD-DEV-0624-00169

TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 10, 2024

DUE DATE: July 16, 2024

COMMENTS: Resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM).

Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is June 19, 2025.


2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS

1. COMMENT: 2-06.3.12 – The sheet index is not correct and should include all sheets that are submitted.

2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.2.D – Provide the page number and the total number of pages in the package (i.e., sheet xx of xx) within the title block on all sheets.

3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-0624-00169, adjacent to the title block on all sheets.

2-06.4.7 - General Notes
The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable.

2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes

4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – The Use Specific Standards listed under General Note 4 are not correct. Review UDC Table 4.8-5-4 add provide the correct Use Specific Standards for a Food Service: Excluding Soup Kitchens, use in the C-1 Zone.

5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6.a – As Broadway Blvd. is designated as an Arterial/Gateway on the COT MS&R map revise General Note 11 to include “UDC ARTICLE 5.5 GATEWAY CORRIFOR ZONE (GCR)”.

2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide:

6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.b – It is not clear if there will be an expansion or reduction of building square footage. Either way provide a calculation that demonstrates the percentage of expansion or reduction.

2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions
The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided.

7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.B – Provide the recordation information for all easements shown on the plan

8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.C – Provide the following information for Broadway Blvd., dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks.

2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development
The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes.

9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.F - All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined.

10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Clearly demonstrate that the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.6.F.2.a.(2) are met for the proposed drive-through.

11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – The vehicle parking ratio used in the vehicle parking space calculation is not correct. Review UDC Table 7.4.4-1 and provide the correct parking ratio for a food service use.

12. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Provide a detail for both a standard and angled parking spaces.

13. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Remove the reference to “ALL PARKING SHALL COMPLY WIYH PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA CODE, TITLE 18 ZONE, CHAPTER 18.75 OFF-STREET PARKING REQUIRMENTS” shown under Parking Requirements as this site does not fall under Pima County jurisdiction.

14. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – The accessible parking sign mounting height shown on detail 1 sheet 3 is not correct and should be 60” if wall mounted and 84” if within a pedestrian way.

15. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Provide a short- & long-term bicycle parking space calculation on the plans that provides the number required and provided.

16. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Bicycle rack detail 5 sheet 3 is not correct. Review UDC Article 7.4.9 and figure 7.4.9-C and clearly demonstrate that the requirements of UDC Articles 7.4.9.B.1.e, 7.4.9.B.2.d, .f, .g, .h and 7.4.9.C.2.a, .c are met.

17. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Clearly demonstrate how the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.9.D.5 are met for the long-term bicycle parking.

18. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – The long-term bicycle locker detail 6 sheet 3, reference “CLASS 1”, remove this reference as it is not applicable.

19. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.Q – Provide the square footage, and the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building.

20. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Provide the width for all sidewalks and pedestrian ways on the plan.

21. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.W – Provide a general note stating all signs require separate permits.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Nicholas Martell at Nicholas.Martell@tucsonaz.gov.

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: A revised development package as well as a comment response letter. To resubmit, visit the Tucson Development Center Online at https://tdc-online.tucsonaz.gov/#/home. The instructions for resubmittal can be found at https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/tdc-faq/new-pdfs/revisions-and-resubmittals.pdf.
06/14/2024 CDRC Application Completeness REVIEW COMPLETED
06/21/2024 CDRC Review Coordinator REVIEW COMPLETED Review request email sent per TEP. CDRC sent FYI email to PAG, USPS, SWG.
06/21/2024 External Reviewers - Pima Association of Governments REVIEW COMPLETED CDRC sent FYI email to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required from the customer at this time.
06/21/2024 External Reviewers - Southwest Gas REVIEW COMPLETED CDRC sent FYI email to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required from the customer at this time.
06/21/2024 External Reviewers - United States Postal Service (USPS) REVIEW COMPLETED CDRC sent FYI email to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required from the customer at this time.
07/16/2024 Fire New Construction REVIEW COMPLETED
06/20/2024 OK to Submit - Zoning REVIEW COMPLETED
07/12/2024 ROW Engineering Review REVIEW COMPLETED Verify keynote numbering, numbering on site plan do not match.