Permit Review Detail
Review Status: In Review
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1
Permit Number - TD-DEV-0526-00128
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1
Review Status: In Review
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Commercial Plumbing Standard | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| N/A | External Reviewers - Pima County Addressing Standard | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| N/A | External Reviewers - Tucson Airport Authority Standard | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| N/A | Fire New Construction Standard | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| N/A | NPPO Standard | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| N/A | ROW Engineering Review Standard | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| N/A | ROW Review | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| N/A | Site Landscape Standard | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| N/A | Site Zoning Standard | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 06/01/2026 | Site Engineering Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Permit Activity Number: TD-DEV-0526-00128 (1st Review) Project: Proposed site improvements include relocating site elements and adding additional parking. Improvements also include opening access to the east and constructing a new trash enclosure per TAA comments. Additionally, the existing pork chop access will be removed and restriped in accordance with TAA requirements. Location: 1840 E VALENCIA RD Unit: BLDG 8 Review Date: 6/1/2026 Reviewer: Marco Contreras – Engineering Associate Reviewer Contact Information: marco.contreras@tucsonaz.gov Related cases: Plan review for the above-referenced development package has been completed. This review was conducted for compliance with applicable development criteria including the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC), Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-6, and Technical Standards Manual (TSM) sections governing waste management, pedestrian access, hydrology – retention/detention requirements, and all applicable site standards. The following comments must be addressed prior to approval. To help facilitate a timely resubmittal, please provide updated plans and calculations along with a written response to each comment, indicating what action was taken and where the change can be found on the plans. Do not use revision clouds on resubmittal drawings — clouds are reserved for post-permit revisions only. Submit your response letter and updated plan set & reports as separate files. Applicable Code Links for quick/direct reference: City of Tucson Code: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/Departments/Planning-Development-Services/Codes Floodplain Code: https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/tucson/latest/tucson_az/0-0-0-19333 Drainage Manual Link: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/engineering-code/cot-drainage-manual-searchable.pdf Design standards for Stormwater Detention and Retention Link: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/engineering-code/updated-retention-detention-manual.pdf Site Engineering Review Comments: 1. Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-0526-00128, adjacent to the title block on all sheets 2. Revise the general note #16 to be updated to current adopted codes : Accessible standards must be met per 2024 IBC, chapter 11, and 2017 ICC A117.1 as these standards were adopted by the COT and established beginning at the start of this year (2026). 3. There looks to be a numbering error on sheet 2 – general notes. You can see 1-15# on the left, but the next set started at #17 – revise accordingly. 4. Revise the site plan sheet 3 provided to provide Sight visibility triangles for the site entrances for Valencia RD in compliance with TSM 10-01.5.0. NOTE: Valencia RD is designated as an Arterial Road. This designation will be used for Table 5.3. Refer to TSM 10-01.9.0 Figures 16-18 for examples of SVTs. 5. Ensure to delineate the required clearance is 14x40 feet with a required height clearance of 25ft. TSM 8-01.0.0. Please show this required space delineated for the trash enclosure. 6. Revise trash enclosure on the grading plan sheets to show all the trash enclosures ramps slopes being 2% away from enclosure as well as the enclosure slabs sloping 1% to the gate. TSM 8-1.0.0. 7. With reviewing the grading elevations, it appears that the patio area is proposed as the same elevations as the pavement. Demonstrate how the vehicle use area is contained in regard to the patio area per UDC 7.4.6.H.1. 8. It will be required that the parking space directly south of the new patio be made 10 feet wide in compliance with UDC 7.4.6.D.2.b. 9. Revise keynote #17 to include that the new fence is to be “built under separate permit.” a. If it is decided that this development package is the method for construction, please provide associated construction details for the fence. |
||
| 05/20/2026 | CDRC Application Completeness Express | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 05/28/2026 | CDRC Review Coordinator Express | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC added TAA, TEP, PAG, USPS, and SWG to the workflow. Review request email sent to TAA, and TEP. FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. | ||
| 05/28/2026 | External Reviewers - Pima Association of Governments Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required. | ||
| 05/28/2026 | External Reviewers - Southwest Gas Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required. | ||
| 05/28/2026 | External Reviewers - United States Postal Service (USPS) Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required. | ||
| 05/21/2026 | OK to Submit - Engineering Fast | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 05/22/2026 | OK to Submit - Zoning Fast | REVIEW COMPLETED |