Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW REVISION v.2
Permit Number - TD-DEV-0525-00143
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW REVISION v.2
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/12/2026 | Site Zoning Standard | APPROVED | |||
| 03/11/2026 | Site Engineering Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Permit Activity Number: TD-DEV-0525-00143 (REV 1 Review) Project: development consists of hybrid self-storage facility Location: 6444 S FONTANA AV Review Date: 3/11/2026 Reviewer: Marco Contreras – Engineering Associate - Site Engineering Related Cases: *This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-6 and Technical Standards Manual (TSM) Section for waste management, Pedestrian Access, Hydrology -Retention/Detention Requirements, and all site standard code. * City of Tucson Code: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/Departments/Planning-Development-Services/Codes Floodplain Code: https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/tucson/latest/tucson_az/0-0-0-19333 Drainage Manual Link: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/engineering-code/cot-drainage-manual-searchable.pdf Design standards for Stormwater Detention and Retention Link: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/engineering-code/updated-retention-detention-manual.pdf Site Engineering Review Comments: 1. The proposed revised pavement section does not meet the minimum design standards established under the Pima County Regional Flood Control District Design Standards for Stormwater Detention and Retention (DSSDR), Section 5.9.5 – General Standards for Pervious Pavements and is therefore not approvable as submitted. a. Filter Layer Deficiency – DSSDR §5.9.5.6 The proposed 4-inch filter layer does not comply with DSSDR §5.9.5.6, which requires a minimum 6-inch-thick filter layer conforming to the material graduation requirements of Table 5.1. The proposed reduction of 2 inches constitutes a 33% deficiency from the established minimum and cannot be approved without a formal alternative design request submitted to and approved by the Floodplain Administrator per DSSDR §1.4. b. Open-Graded Aggregate Base Deficiency – DSSDR §5.9.5 The proposed reduction of the open-graded aggregate base from 4 inches to 2 inches is insufficient for a vehicle use area and is not supported by the standard cross-sections provided under DSSDR §5.9.2 through §5.9.4. As this installation is subject to vehicular loading, a geotechnical report prepared by a geotechnical engineer must be submitted demonstrating that the proposed section provides equivalent structural capacity. 2. The R-3 (3-6) Riprap proposed for the Swale will be allowed as it stands as the more conservative approach as the swale calculations show a flow of 1.71 fps, please revise plan set accordingly to demonstrate this approval by removing the or factor. If you have any questions or concerns, please contact Marco Contreras at Marco.contreras@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 03/05/2026 | CDRC Application Completeness Express | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 03/10/2026 | CDRC Review Coordinator Express | REVIEW COMPLETED | External Reviewers not required. No further action is required from the customer at this time. | ||
| 03/05/2026 | OK to Submit - Engineering Fast | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 03/10/2026 | OK to Submit - Zoning Fast | REVIEW COMPLETED |