Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE REVIEW v.2
Permit Number - TD-DEV-0423-00209
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE REVIEW v.2
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/10/2023 | Design Review | NOT REQUIRED | |||
| 05/24/2023 | CDRC Post Review | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 05/09/2023 | Commercial Plumbing | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | 1. Revise the first cleanout located downstream of the sand interceptor to orient the cleanout in the direction of flow. Reference: Sections 706.3 and 708.1.8, IPC 2018. 2. The rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole, MH #4 (2622.6’) is higher than the first floor elevation of the car wash (2619.70’). Provide a backwater valve per Section 714.1, IPC 2018, as amended by the City of Tucson. 3. Revise the Private Sewer Construction Notes using Pima County Wastewater Reclamation standards rather than Phoenix and Maricopa County standards. 4. Verify that Pima County Wastewater Reclamation will allow a 6” BCS to connect to an existing 12” PVC sewer with a wye fitting instead of constructing a new manhole. |
||
| 05/15/2023 | External Reviewers - COT Environmental Services | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Hello, ES comments are as follows: 1. No enclosure detail provided. Include detail drawings of enclosure/s with dimensions. TSM 8-01.4.A & 8-01.5.2 2. Depict the 14ft x 40ft clear approach in front of both enclosures. Refer to TSM 8-01.5.3.B 3. Proposed access and maneuvering works. Let me know if you have any questions. Thanks, Andy Vera City of Tucson -Environmental Services Accounts Representative Supervisor (520) 837-3798 |
||
| 05/24/2023 | NPPO | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | See zoning and engineering comments. | ||
| 05/19/2023 | ROW Engineering Review | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | TD-DEV-0323-00194 (7889 E 22ND ST TUCSON, AZ 85710) Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter which states how all comments were addressed. Comments: 1. Please include an area expansion calculation. A 25% Floor Area Expansion triggers full site code compliance. 48,110 SF / 36,367 SF* (*approx. based on satellite images) = 132% or 32% floor area expansion. 2. Any existing curb, sidewalk, curb access ramps which are not compliant with current standards will be modified or replaced to meet current standards. 3. Existing curb may remain if it is compliant with current standards. 4. At least one sidewalk is required to connect the onsite circulation path to sidewalk along each adjacent street. ( TMS 7-01.3.0) 5. Where adjoining sidewalk from the property ties to sidewalk along the ROW frontage, a 60” X 60” ADA landing is required. Landings shall be 60” X 60” and not to exceed a 2% cross slope in all directions. 6. Curb ramps shall be code compliant with detectable warning strips. 7. Protect in place or relocate accordingly, existing regulatory or warning signs. 8. Curb return radius off of S Pantano (Suburban Connector) should be 15’. Curb return radius off of E 22nd St (Suburban Thoroughfare) should be 20’. Curb return radius off of S Eastside Loop (Neighborhood Street) should be 10’. (Tucson Street Design Guide page 5-10, Table 5.2) 9. Please include sight triangles at all driveway intersections on the site plan. 10. Note 9 on Sheet C10, add “Per P.A.G. SD 203”. 11. Please include a Traffic Impact Analysis in the next submittal. Faffs Riederer Faffs.Riederer@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 05/23/2023 | Site Engineering | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | 1. Lot combination should be performed to combine parcels 13507440D & 13507440C. 2. Per 3.3 of the geotechnical report, the entire area of the proposed building should be over-excavated a minimum of 3 feet. Based on the building footprint, this appears to exceed the 5,000 CY limit requiring Engineered Grading. Please provide a grading plan meeting the requirements of TSM 2-01.4.1.C. 3. Entrance throat depth must be indicated. 4. Include drainage arrows on revised sheets. 5. ROW permit required for all work in right of way. 6. Include note to protect-in-place transverse catch basin in Eastside Loop 7. Show wheel stops or other mechanism to prevent vehicle encroachment into property to Southeast, parcel 135-07-441A 8. Show sidewalk dimensions on East side of building, wheel stops required if vehicle encroachment occurs or leaves the sidewalk less than 4’ 9. Sidewalk on West side of building less than 4’, reconfigure to meet 5’ minimum dimensions. 10. Show pedestrian access to the proposed car wash. 11. Building exit #6 exits into a parking space. Provide pedestrian separation from parking areas. 12. 4’ Drainage Channel – Keynote 33 on sheet C10 should be a scupper or provide reasoning for open channel in pedestrian area. Show/call out Curb Cut at outlet. 13. Per UDC 7.4.6.F.4, A Back-Up Spur should be located at the end of the 22nd St. frontage parking on the Northwest space. 14. Per UDC 7.4.6.F.3 – Sight visibility triangles shall be provided. 15. Waste enclosure details must be provided as part of the Development Package. 16. Exit #5 appears to be missing from Development Package drawings. 17. 6’ height of handicap sign is incorrect. Revise to 7’ 18. Please provide detail numbers for details on sheet C13, and refer to those detail numbers in plan sheets. 19. Where is the Curb Opening W/ Rip Rap spillway shown on C13? 20. Protect in place existing RCBC. 21. Identify parking area uses (customer, vehicle display, vehicle storage, company vehicle parking, employee parking) Joshua Garcia joshua.garcia@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 05/01/2023 | Site Landscape | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | PROJECT: JEEP DEALERSHIP ACTIVITY NO. TD-DEV-0423-00209 ADDRESS/PARCEL: 7800 E 22ND STREET/ 135-07-440D ZONING: C-2 This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants and water harvesting. COMMENTS: 1. Ensure all Zoning and Engineering comments are addressed prior to the Landscape/NPPO comments. 2. Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-0423-00209, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2-06.4.3 3. Label all site visibility triangles across the landscape plan set. 4. If using d.g at a 2” depth, ensure the rainwater harvesting basins are 8” in depth to account for the d.g. 5. Include a construction detail showing root barriers for plants located near sidewalks and parking lots. (see Detail 402 located here: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/tdot/landscape-architects) 6. Include a construction detail showing the depressed landscaping for the rainwater harvesting basins. 7. You must have a permit from Department of Transit and Mobility for any planting being done in the right of way. Please reach out to David Marhefka (david.marhefka@tucsonaz.gov) if this is the case. 8. A separate irrigation water meter is required. Please label the new irrigation meter as “irrigation only”. UDC Technical Standards 4-01.-.2. A.1. 9. Show all curb cuts/downspouts/splashpads on the landscape and the commercial rainwater harvesting plan. 10. Show roof directional arrows on Commercial Rainwater Harvesting Plan. 11. If at all possible add curb cuts to the landscaping located outside of the service drive as well as to the parking locations to the south west where the directional arrows on the Commercial rainwater Harvesting plan indicate water flow in those areas. Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Landscape Review Section comments are addressed. If you have any questions about these comments, I can be reached at Matthew.Carlton@tucsonaz.gov or 520-837-4988 |
||
| 05/04/2023 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: Larry H. Miller Jeep Development Package (1st Review) TD-DIV-0423-00209 TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 04, 2023 DUE DATE: May 11, 2023 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is April 17, 2024. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, TD-DIV-0423-00209, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4 - The project-location map shall be drawn at a minimum scale of three inch equals one mile, provide the scale of the location map. 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4.B – Label all streets that abut the subject property on the location map. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.2 - List the gross area of the site by square footage and acreage. 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – The existing use, “AUTO DEALERSHIP, VEHICLE SERVICE CENTER” and proposed use, “AUTO DEALERSHIP, CAR WASH” listed on sheet 1, and the proposed use “AUTO DEALERSHIP, CAR WASH, VEHICLE SERVICE CENTER, SHOW ROOM”, are not uses as classified per the UDC. Review UDC TABLE 4.8-4: PERMITTED USES - COMMERCIAL AND MIXED USE ZONE, C-2 Zone and provide a use as classified in the UDC. Also provide the Use Specific Standards associated with the use in the zone. 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6.a - As 22nd St. & Pantano Rd. are designated as an Arterial on the COT MS&R Map provide a general note on the cover sheet stating “THIS PROJECT IS DESIGNED TO MEET THE OVERLAY ZONE(S) CRITERIA, UDC ARTICLE 5.4 MAJOR STREETS AND ROUTES SETBACK ZONE (MS&R)”. 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.d – Clarify why you have the same calculations, i.e. parking, setbacks etc on different sheets. For review purposes please combine all required calculation to a single calculation on a single sheet. 2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided. 8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.C – Provide the following information regarding existing public right-of-way adjacent to this site, dimensioned width of paving, curbs, and sidewalks. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.E – Based on MapTucson appears that this site is made up of parcels 135-07-440D, 135-07-440C and the northwest portion of parcel 135-07-441A. Provide approved documentation that shows the proposed parcel in the configuration shown on the plan. Either a lot line reconfiguration or combination maybe required. 10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – The vehicle parking space calculation is not correct. Review UDC Article 7.4.3.G and revise the calculation. Also, you list “FULL – SERVICE AUTOMOTIVE WASS” under “PARKING REQUIREMENTS” sheet 4, clarify if this is a full service auto was for the public of is this just for customers of the dealer. If only for the dealer the automotive wash is considered an accessory use to the vehicle sales and rental and is not required to be parked. 11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – The accessible parking calculation is not correct. Per 2018 IBC Chapter 11, Table 1106.1 the number of required accessible spaces is based on the number of “TOTAL NUMBER OF SPACES PROVIDED”. Based on the 302 spaces provided number of required accessible spaces is 8 to of which must be van accessible, 2018 IBC Chapter 11 Section 1106.5. The vehicle parking space calculation shall include the number of accessible spaces required and provided for a standard and van accessible spaces. 12. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Provide a detail for both a standard and accessible vehicle parking spaces. 13. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Cleary delineated the required/proposed vehicle parking spaces from the vehicle display spaces on the plan and if applicable revise the number of provided vehicle parking spaces to not include the display spaces. 14. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – The mounting height shown for the accessible sign is not correct and as this sign is located within pedestrian circulation it must be 7’-0”. 15. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Review UDC Table and provide a short- & long-term bicycle parking space calculation on the plan that provides the ratio used and the number required and provided. 16. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Provide a detail for both the required short- & long-term bicycle parking tht demonstrates how the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.9.B, .C & .D are met. 17. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – The perimeter yard setbacks listed on sheets 1 & 4 are not correct. Based on final plat Eastside Research/Commerce Center, Bk 37 Pg 19(2), there is a platted 30’-0” setback along 22nd street that takes precedence over UDC requirements. Clarify why there are “REQUIRED” & “FUTURE” perimeter yard requirements shown for 22nd & Pantano. Based on current code, amended on April 21, 2023, the required perimeter yard setback for Pantano is 10’ from existing of future property line, more restrictive of the two, and for Eastside Lp the minimum setback is 20’. The “PROVIDED” setbacks list are not correct as the propose setbacks appear to exceed the listed provided setbacks. 18. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Demonstrate that the requirements of TSM Section 7-01.4.1.A are met for this site. 19. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Demonstrate that the requirements of TSM Section 7-01.4.1.H are met for the are within the proposed fenced area along the east, west and south side of the building. 20. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Provide a sidewalk width dimension from the northeast corner of the building to the vehicle parking spaces to the northeast. Based on a 2’-6” vehicle overhang, UDC Article 7.4.6.H.3, this sidewalk is required to be 6’-6” wide, TSM Section 7-01.4.3.A. 21. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.W - Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Also provide a general note on the plan stating all signs require separate permits. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Nicholas Martell at Nicholas.Martell@tucsonaz.gov. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
||
| 04/11/2023 | CDRC Application Completeness | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 04/19/2023 | CDRC Review Coordinator | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 05/23/2023 | External Reviewers - COT Parks & Recreation | REVIEW COMPLETED | Hello CDRC team, On behalf of the City of Tucson Parks and Recreation Department, I have no comments on the above development plan. Tom Fisher Project Manager City of Tucson Parks and Recreation Department 900 S. Randolph Way Tucson, Arizona 85716 (520) 837-8037 |
||
| 05/12/2023 | External Reviewers - PC RFCD | REVIEW COMPLETED | No comments from the Pima County Regional Flood Control District. Regards, JJ Jim “JJ” Janecek, P.E., CFM Development Review Civil Engineer Floodplain Management Division Pima County Regional Flood Control District 201 N. Stone Avenue, 9th Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 520-724-4661 |
||
| 04/19/2023 | External Reviewers - Pima Association of Governments | REVIEW COMPLETED | SENT FYI EMAIL PER SOP. | ||
| 04/19/2023 | External Reviewers - Southwest Gas | REVIEW COMPLETED | SENT FYI EMAIL PER SOP. | ||
| 04/19/2023 | External Reviewers - Tucson Electric Power (TEP) | REVIEW COMPLETED | SENT FYI EMAIL PER SOP. | ||
| 04/19/2023 | External Reviewers - United States Postal Service (USPS) | REVIEW COMPLETED | SENT FYI EMAIL PER SOP. | ||
| 05/01/2023 | Fire New Construction | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 04/13/2023 | OK to Submit - Engineering | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 04/12/2023 | OK to Submit - Landscape | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 04/18/2023 | OK to Submit - Zoning | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 04/24/2023 | Real Estate | REVIEW COMPLETED | Real Estate has No Comment. Thank you, Phil Paige Senior Property Agent Real Estate Division Dept. Transportation and Mobility City of Tucson 520-342-4024 cell philip.paige@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 05/22/2023 | Traffic Engineering Review | REVIEW COMPLETED | No Comments David Stiffey David.Stiffey@tucsonaz.gov |