Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE REVIEW v.2
Permit Number - TD-DEV-0423-00197
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE REVIEW v.2
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/12/2023 | TSMR/PDMR - Traffic Engineering | APPROVED | |||
| 06/12/2023 | CDRC Post Review Express | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 04/27/2023 | Commercial Plumbing | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Provide the rim elevations for the new private manholes. Determine the need for backwater valves per Section 714.1, IPC 2018, as amended by the City of Tucson | ||
| 05/11/2023 | External Reviewers - Pima County Addressing | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Good morning, Pima County Addressing is returning TD-DEV-0423-00197 TP for Rodeo Addition No. 4, Lots 1-18 for corrections. Please see the attached plan for comments. Nicholas Jordan Site Review Project Manager - Addressing Official Pima County Development Services Department 201 N Stone AV – 1st Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 724-9623 |
||
| 05/01/2023 | Fire New Construction | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | -Will need to install fire hydrant so it is located on the west side of Nogales hwy and within 600' (as the hose lays) to the furthest portions of all buildings. IFC 507.5 john.vincent@tucsonaz.gov 5203495581 |
||
| 04/21/2023 | NPPO | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | See landscape comments. | ||
| 05/09/2023 | ROW Engineering Review | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | TD-DEV-0423-00197 (5386 S NOGALES HY TUCSON, AZ 85706) Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter which states how all comments were addressed. Comments: 1. S. Ida Ave and W Rosetta Ct do not meet our standards to be dedicated as a public right of way. (TSM 10-01.9.0) a. Sidewalk cannot be directly adjoin the back of wedge curb. If sidewalk is at the back of curb use vertical curb. (TSM 10-01.3.2) (PAG SD 209) The Street Design Guide recommends 4’-8’ between curb and sidewalk for a planting zone. 3’ minimum buffer between curb and sidewalk. b. Sidewalks are a minimum of 5’ wide on local streets (Some in this plan are 3’). 2. W Gallo St could be accepted as public. Would it be possible to move the sidewalk north to create a Planting Amenity Zone between the street and sidewalk? City code requires 2’ and recommends 4’-8’. 3. Standard street design cross sections can be found in the Tucson Street Design Guide 2021. Consider the Shared Street (pg 2-14, 2-40) to provide greater pedestrian ease and increased potential for water harvesting and landscaping. Feel free to reach out if you would like to discuss further. 4. Please use 20ft radiuses for the curb returns at the corners of S Nogales Hy and W Gallo St and 15ft radiuses within the development (2021 Tucson Street Design Guide 5-10). 5. Add Type 3 midblock crossing ramps to the sidewalk along the west side of S Ida Av access from the Type 1 ramps on the corner of S Ida Av and W Gallo St. (PAG SD 207) 6. Please provide a depth dimension for the backup spurs on the plans. 7. Please add spot grades to detail H and spot grades to the grading plan showing the ADA landings where ramps meet sidewalk. 8. A PIA is going to be required for this project. https://www.tucsonaz.gov/tdot/private-improvement-agreement Contact TDOT Engineering for information. DOT-Engineering-Review-Section@tucsonaz.gov Or call Jesus Villezcas at 520-791-5100 9. The PIA number is required on these plans prior to approval. 10. 2. Add a Type- 2 Sidewalk Scupper where trench box (note No. 8,) crosses Gallo Street. Reference: 1. Concrete curb per P.A.G. standard 209. 2. Concrete sidewalk per P.A.G. standard 200. 3. Concrete curb access ramp per P.A.G. standard 207. Faffs Riederer Faffs.Riederer@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 05/02/2023 | Site Engineering | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Tucson codes and ordinances can be found online at https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/tucson/latest/overview The Stormwater Detention-Retention Manual can be found online at https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/updated-retention-detention-manual/updated-retention-detention-manual.pdf TD-DEV-0423-00197 1. It is unclear what the devices at the bottom of the basins are, please label them. There is a detail for a sediment marker, but please clarify whether that detail is in reference to the devices at the bottom of the basin and label them in the drawings. 2. Provide a measurement from the bottom of the footer to the top of the fill on the retaining wall detail in the alley cross section detail. If the measurement is more than 4 feet from the bottom of the footer to the top of the fill, the retaining walls will require structural analysis and a separate building permit. Lianne Evans lianne.evans@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 04/21/2023 | Site Landscape | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | PROJECT: RODEO ADDITION NO. 4 ACTIVITY NO. TD-DEV-0423-00197 ADDRESS/PARCEL: 5386 S NOGALES HY/LOTS 1-18 ZONING: R-2 This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants and water harvesting. Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Landscape/NPPO Review Section comments are addressed. COMMENTS: 1. Ensure that Zoning, Engineering comments and concerns are addressed prior to landscape section approval. 2. Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-0423-00197, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2-06.4.3 3. Correct #24 under ‘General Notes’ to read Functional Open Space Calculation. 4. Label sight visibility triangles and ROWs (existing and future) to all landscape plans. 5. A separate irrigation water meter is required. Please label the new irrigation meter as “irrigation only”. UDC Technical Standards 4-01.-.2. A.1. 6. If using d.g at a 2” depth, ensure the rainwater harvesting basins are 8” in depth to account for the d.g. 7. You must have a permit from Department of Transit and Mobility for any planting or irrigation being done in the right of way. Please reach out to David Marhefka (david.marhefka@tucsonaz.gov) if this is the case. If you have any questions about these comments, I can be reached at Matthew.Carlton@tucsonaz.gov or 520-837-4988 |
||
| 04/28/2023 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: Development Package (1st Review) TD-DIV-0423-00197 TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 11, 2023 DUE DATE: May 11, 2023 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is April 03, 2024. 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS 1. COMMENT: 2-06.3.9 - The plan drawing shall be oriented with north toward the top of the sheet. If it is not practical to orient north to the top of the sheet, the plan drawing shall be oriented with north to the left side of the sheet. That said sheets 11, 14 & 17 do not meet this requirement. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, TD-DIV-0423-00197, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – Remove the reference to “DUPLEX” from General Note 2 as by definition a duplex is a building containing two dwelling units on a single lot or parcel.. 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6.a - As Nogales Hw. is designated as an Arterial on the COT MS&R Map provide a general note on the cover sheet stating “THIS PROJECT IS DESIGNED TO MEET THE OVERLAY ZONE(S) CRITERIA, UDC ARTICLE 5.4 MAJOR STREETS AND ROUTES SETBACK ZONE (MS&R)”. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.4 – As the proposed public streets allowing vehicles to directly access required vehicle parking spaces and wedge curbs do not match any street cross sections of TSM Section 10 a TSMR will need to be submitted and approved. 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – The vehicle parking spaces calculation is not correct. Per TSM Section 10, Figure 1 when vehicle parking is not provided on the street the required guest parking is based on a ratio of 1 space per dwelling unit. 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – For your information long-term bicycle parking is not required for this type of development. 8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – Based on UDC Code Amendments adopted April 21, 2023 the exteriror street perimeter yard setbacks listed under General Note 12 and shown on the plan are not correct and should be 20’-0”. 9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – As the proposed interior street perimeter yard setbacks do not meet the required 20’, UDC Code Amendments adopted April 21, 2023, PDSD Director approval is required, UDC Article 8.7.3.L.2. Contact Nicholas Ross, Site Section Manager for this approval. 10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – The 3’ wide sidewalks shown west of the proposed landscape planters shown in the northern vehicle parking areas does not meet the minimum sidewalk width per TSM Section 7-01.4.3.A. A TSMR will be required to reduce the sidewalk width. 2-06.5.0 FLEXIBLE LOT DEVELOPMENT (FLD - ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS) 2-06.5.3 Additional Information The following are required in addition to the requirements of the tentative plat or site plan, whichever is applicable: 11. COMMENT: 2-06.5.3.A – Street perimeter yards along interior street rights-of-way and perimeter yards between interior lots may be modified in accordance with Section 8.7.3.L, Perimeter Yards on Interior Lots, of the UDC. Applicants requesting a perimeter yard reduction must indicate what the required and reduced perimeter yards are and their locations. Applicants requesting a reduced street perimeter yard must provide a written description of how the reduced yard will enhance the architectural design or the vehicular circulation in the FLD and submit a transportation statement, or if required by the Department of Transportation, a traffic impact analysis; 12. COMMENT: 2-06.5.3.C – Sheet 3 Keynote 12 states “SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR ADDITIONAL DETALS ON AMENITY SPACE” but Zoning was not able to any details on the landscape plans. 13. COMMENT: 2-06.5.3.G.2 - Provide two copies of the protective covenants or common use agreements for any shared areas being established by easements over individually-owned property. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Nicholas Martell at Nicholas.Martell@tucsonaz.gov. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
||
| 05/16/2023 | Traffic Engineering Review | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | TD-DEV-0423-00197 (5386 S NOGALES HY TUCSON, AZ 85706) Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter which states how all comments were addressed. Comments: 1. S. Ida Ave and W Rosetta Ct do not meet our standards to be dedicated as a public right of way. (TSM 10-01.9.0) a. Sidewalk cannot be directly adjoin the back of wedge curb. If sidewalk is at the back of curb use vertical curb. (TSM 10-01.3.2) (PAG SD 209) The Street Design Guide recommends 4’-8’ between curb and sidewalk for a planting zone. 3’ minimum buffer between curb and sidewalk. b. Sidewalks are a minimum of 5’ wide on local streets (Some in this plan are 3’). 2. W Gallo St could be accepted as public. Would it be possible to move the sidewalk north to create a Planting Amenity Zone between the street and sidewalk? City code requires 2’ and recommends 4’-8’. 3. Standard street design cross sections can be found in the Tucson Street Design Guide 2021. Consider the Shared Street (pg 2-14, 2-40) to provide greater pedestrian ease and increased potential for water harvesting and landscaping. Feel free to reach out if you would like to discuss further. 4. Please use 20ft radiuses for the curb returns at the corners of S Nogales Hy and W Gallo St and 15ft radiuses within the development (2021 Tucson Street Design Guide 5-10). 5. Add Type 3 midblock crossing ramps to the sidewalk along the west side of S Ida Av access from the Type 1 ramps on the corner of S Ida Av and W Gallo St. (PAG SD 207) 6. Please provide a depth dimension for the backup spurs on the plans. 7. Please add spot grades to detail H and spot grades to the grading plan showing the ADA landings where ramps meet sidewalk. 8. A PIA is going to be required for this project. https://www.tucsonaz.gov/tdot/private-improvement-agreement Contact TDOT Engineering for information. DOT-Engineering-Review-Section@tucsonaz.gov Or call Jesus Villezcas at 520-791-5100 9. The PIA number is required on these plans prior to approval. 10. 2. Add a Type- 2 Sidewalk Scupper where trench box (note No. 8,) crosses Gallo Street. Reference: 1. Concrete curb per P.A.G. standard 209. 2. Concrete sidewalk per P.A.G. standard 200. 3. Concrete curb access ramp per P.A.G. standard 207. Faffs Riederer Faffs.Riederer@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 04/04/2023 | CDRC Review Coordinator Express | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 05/23/2023 | External Reviewers - COT Parks & Recreation | REVIEW COMPLETED | Hello CDRC team, On behalf of the City of Tucson Parks and Recreation Department, I have no comments on the above development plan. Tom Fisher Project Manager City of Tucson Parks and Recreation Department 900 S. Randolph Way Tucson, Arizona 85716 (520) 837-8037 |
||
| 04/04/2023 | External Reviewers - Pima Association of Governments | REVIEW COMPLETED | SENT FYI EMAIL PER SOP. | ||
| 04/04/2023 | External Reviewers - Southwest Gas | REVIEW COMPLETED | SENT FYI EMAIL PER SOP. | ||
| 05/09/2023 | External Reviewers - Tucson Airport Authority | REVIEW COMPLETED | May 2, 2023 CDRC Admin Team Planning and Development Services, 2nd Floor 201 N. Stone Ave. Tucson, AZ. 85701 RE: TD-DEV-0423-00197, Rodeo Addition No. 4, Lots 1-18, An FLD Subdivision – 5386 S Nogales Highway, Received April 7, 2023 To whom this may concern, Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the planned development of a new residential development at 5386 S. Nogales Highway located approximately 2000 feet northwest of the intersection between East Drexel Road and South Nogales Highway. The subject parcels are #137-04-1100, 137-04-1110, 137-04-1120, 137-04-1130, 137-04-1140, 137-04-1150, and 137- 04-1160 is zoned for R-2 (Residence Zone 2) and covers 1.93 acres ±. The parcel is situated in the N.W. quarter of the S.E. quarter of Section 1, Township 15S, Range 13E, of the Gila and Salt River Meridian. This project site lies 1.5 miles ± from an active runway at Tucson International Airport, which also places the project site within the Avigation Easement boundary. This site also lies within Federal Aviation Administration traffic pattern airspace. According to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Notice Criteria Tool, the proposed structure height does not exceed Notice Criteria. The Tucson Airport Authority conditionally approves the subject development plan request contingent upon the conditions of approval noted below. These conditions must be included in the development plans. Conditions of approval: 1.“According to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Notice Criteria Tool, no Notice Criteria are exceeded. Applicants are therefore not required to file FAA Form 7460. However, if the use of cranes is anticipated during development and construction activities, the applicant must file FAA Form 7460 at least 45 days in advance of such use, to provide the applicant with sufficient time to respond to any concerns identified by the FAA. Please file Form 7460 at https://oeaaa.faa.gov/oeaaa/external/portal.jsp.” Although this project does not propose a change in plan designation or zoning the Tucson Airport Authority highly recommends the applicant add the following notes into the general notes of the revised development plan. This project is located approximately 1.5 miles northwest of Tucson International Airport and is within FAA traffic pattern airspace, an area which would be subject to aircraft overflight and noise due to being in close proximity to Tucson International Airport. The proposed notes would provide a means of assuring that future owners and tenants of the property are aware they are in proximity an airport and further assures the continued right of the City of Tucson, Tucson Airport Authority, and all persons lawfully utilizing the Tucson International Airport the right to utilize the airspace above or near the property. This would be accomplished through the property owner recording the Avigation Easement and providing the Airport Disclosure Statement to the new residents of all residential uses. The Tucson Airport Authority believes the proposed note helps to support the City of Tucson Airport Environs Overlay Zone and supports Plan Tucson – Regional and Global Positioning policy 4 (RG-4). 1. “That prior to the City's approval of any construction permit and before any proposed subdivision of the property, but no later than seven (7) business days after the City’s approval of the proposed Rezoning, the property owner/developer/applicant shall record the TAA approved Avigation Easement form which discloses the existence, and operational characteristics of the Tucson International Airport to future owners or tenants of the property and further conveys the right to the public to lawfully use the airspace above the property. The Avigation Easement shall be recorded in a manner with the Pima County recorder which shall document it as having title liability. The content of such documents shall be according to the form and instructions provided. The current property owner/developer/applicant or other person authorized to sign on behalf of the current property owner shall complete, sign, and record the Avigation Easement with the Pima County Recorder’s Office. Once the Avigation Easement is recorded send a complete copy of the recorded easement document, which contains all pages which were recorded, to Tucson Airport Authority by either electronic mail (send to srobidoux@flytucson.com) or to the mailing address provided below. Scott Robidoux Manager of Planning Tucson Airport Authority 7250 S. Tucson Blvd. STE 300 Tucson, AZ 85756” 2. “Applicable to residential uses only The property owner/developer/applicant shall provide the Airport Disclosure Statement form, at time of sale, to the new property owners with all new unit purchases. In the event the development of any residential uses does not involve the sale of new units but is instead offering rental residential units to the public, the new tenant of the rental unit shall be provided a copy of the Airport Disclosure Statement form. The intent of the Airport Disclosure Statement form is to educate and notify the new residents that they are living near an airport. The content of such documents shall be according to the form and instructions provided. The property owner (for itself or its tenants) shall forward a signed copy of the Airport Disclosure Statement form to the Tucson Airport Authority within ten (10) days of signature, using the mailing address provided below. Scott Robidoux Manager of Planning Tucson Airport Authority 7250 S. Tucson Blvd. STE 300 Tucson, AZ 85756” Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have questions or concerns regarding this comment letter. My work telephone is 520-573-4811 and my work email is srobidoux@flytucson.com. Respectfully, Scott Robidoux, Manager of Planning, C.M |
||
| 04/04/2023 | External Reviewers - Tucson Electric Power (TEP) | REVIEW COMPLETED | SENT FYI EMAIL PER SOP. | ||
| 04/04/2023 | External Reviewers - United States Postal Service (USPS) | REVIEW COMPLETED | SENT FYI EMAIL PER SOP. | ||
| 04/04/2023 | OK to Submit - Engineering Fast | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 05/10/2023 | TSMR/PDMR - Engineering | REVIEW COMPLETED | Engineering Approves the Technical Standards Modification Requests and has no comments. Stephen Blood (520) 837-4958 Stephen.blood@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 05/15/2023 | TSMR/PDMR - Zoning | REVIEW COMPLETED | Zoning has no objections with this request |