Permit Review Detail
Review Status: In Review
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.3
Permit Number - TD-DEV-0326-00074
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.3
Review Status: In Review
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/23/2026 | Commercial Plumbing Standard | APPROVED | |||
| N/A | External Reviewers - Tucson Electric Power (TEP) Standard | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| N/A | Fire New Construction Standard | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| N/A | NPPO Standard | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| N/A | ROW Engineering Review Standard | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| N/A | Site Landscape Standard | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| N/A | Site Zoning Standard | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| N/A | Traffic Engineering Review Standard | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| N/A | TSMR/PDMR - Engineering | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| N/A | TSMR/PDMR - Zoning | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 04/24/2026 | Site Engineering Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Permit Activity Number: TD-DEV-0326-00074 (1st Review) Project: Costco Wholesale is relocating its fuel facility from the current City Parcel to the adjacent County Parcel. Location: 6255 E GRANT RD Review Date: 4/24/2026 Reviewer: Marco Contreras – Engineering Associate - Site Engineering *This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-6 and Technical Standards Manual (TSM) Section for waste management, Pedestrian Access, Hydrology -Retention/Detention Requirements, and all site standard code. * City of Tucson Code: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/Departments/Planning-Development-Services/Codes Floodplain Code: https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/tucson/latest/tucson_az/0-0-0-19333 Drainage Manual Link: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/engineering-code/cot-drainage-manual-searchable.pdf Design standards for Stormwater Detention and Retention Link: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/engineering-code/updated-retention-detention-manual.pdf Site Engineering Review Comments: 1. Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-0326-00074, adjacent to the title block on all sheets 2. Revise the sheet index to reflect all development package pages/sheets. a. This should be done for the bottom corner sheet xx of xx. This would mean the total page count should be XX of 13 based on what the current DP file shows 3. Provide the Zoning and Land Use General Note: “Drainage will remain in its natural state and will not be altered, disturbed, or obstructed other than as shown on this site plan.” AM 2-06.4.7.B.3 4. Provide the Zoning and Land Use General Note: “Any relocation or modification of existing utilities and/or public improvements necessitated by the proposed development will be at no expense to the public.” AM 2-06.4.7.D 5. Provide the Zoning and Land Use General Note: “No structure or vegetation shall be located or maintained so as to interfere with the sight visibility triangles in accordance with Section 10-01.5.0, Sight Visibility, of the Technical Standards Manual.” AM 2-06.4.7.C.2 6. Revise the site plan sheets provided to provide Sight visibility triangles for site entrance along Grant RD in compliance with TSM 10-01.5.0. NOTE: Grant RD is designated as an Arterial RD. This designation will be used for Table 5.3. Refer to TSM 10-01.9.0 Figures 16-18 for examples of SVTs. 7. Revise the grading/drainage plan (Sheet P4) to show that the water harvesting areas are depressed 6-9 inches. The current spot elevation provided do not showcase this. 8. Include spot elevations at curb cut inlets, bottom of basin and curb cut outlets for quick reference during site inspections. 9. Provide slope % for the concrete swales/valley gutters shown on the grading/drainage plan. If you have any questions or concerns, please contact Marco Contreras at Marco.contreras@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 04/20/2026 | CDRC Review Coordinator Express | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC added TEP, PAG, USPS, and SWG to the workflow. Review request email sent to TEP. FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. | ||
| 04/20/2026 | External Reviewers - Pima Association of Governments Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required. | ||
| 04/20/2026 | External Reviewers - Southwest Gas Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required. | ||
| 04/20/2026 | External Reviewers - United States Postal Service (USPS) Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required. | ||
| 04/15/2026 | OK to Submit - Engineering Fast | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 04/20/2026 | OK to Submit - Zoning Fast | REVIEW COMPLETED |