Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: TD-DEV-0226-00034
Parcel: 14118659A

Review Status: In Review

Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1

Permit Number - TD-DEV-0226-00034
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1
Review Status: In Review
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
02/12/2026 Design Review Standard NOT REQUIRED Property not located in a Special District.
N/A Commercial Plumbing Standard PENDING ASSIGNMENT
N/A Entitlements Standard PENDING ASSIGNMENT
N/A External Reviewers - COT Parks & Recreation Standard PENDING ASSIGNMENT
N/A External Reviewers - Southwest Gas Standard PENDING ASSIGNMENT CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required.
N/A External Reviewers - Tucson Electric Power (TEP) Standard PENDING ASSIGNMENT
N/A Fire New Construction Standard PENDING ASSIGNMENT
02/10/2026 Historic PENDING ASSIGNMENT Not in HPZ/HL, is privately funded, and no demo over 50 years
N/A NPPO Standard PENDING ASSIGNMENT
N/A ROW Engineering Review Standard PENDING ASSIGNMENT
N/A Site Landscape Standard PENDING ASSIGNMENT
N/A Site Zoning Standard PENDING ASSIGNMENT
02/17/2026 Site Engineering Standard REQUIRES RESUBMIT Permit Activity Number: TD-DEV-0226-00034 (1st Review)
Project: New commercial fitness center
Location: 10084 E OLD VAIL RD
Review Date: 2/17/2026
Reviewer: Marco Contreras – Engineering Associate - Site Engineering
Related cases: TP-PRE-1125-00237

Site Engineering Review Comments:
1. Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-0226-00034, adjacent to the title block on all sheets.
2. Show the 2ft minimum grading setback from the property line on the grading plan TSM 2-01.9.0. Demonstrate this along the northern property line of the site. A reduced setback will require geotechnical justification that no adverse impacts will be caused by the proximity of grading and drainage infrastructure within the minimum 2-foot setback.
3. It should be noted that after email correspondence, a Geotech report submission is required for review for the 2nd cycle.
4. Provide a cross-section detail showing the property line area to the southeast where the swale is proposed.
5. An inspection and maintenance protocol including frequency of inspection, a checklist of items to be inspected and recommended maintenance when an inspection identifies a maintenance requirement shall be prepared by an Arizona registrant should be included at the end of the provided drainage report. DSSDR 4.1.1
6. Provide all City of Tucson Hydrologic Data sheets used for computing the 2-, 10-, & 100-year peak discharges. Pima County Data sheets will not be accepted.

FOR PERMIT RESUBMISSION, IT IS REQUIRED THAT: Corrected/Revised Plan set and a detailed response letter document that clearly shows how you addressed all of Site Engineering’s and other reviewers’ comments for the completed review cycle.
If you have any questions or concerns, please contact Marco Contreras at Marco.contreras@tucsonaz.gov
02/05/2026 CDRC Application Completeness Express REVIEW COMPLETED
02/10/2026 CDRC Review Coordinator Express REVIEW COMPLETED EXTERNAL REVIEWERS
CDRC added: , TEP, TAA, PARKS, ENT, SWG, USPS, and PAG to the workflow. Review request email sent to, TEP, TAA and FYI email sent to, SWG USPS PAG.
02/10/2026 External Reviewers - Pima Association of Governments Standard REVIEW COMPLETED CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required.
02/10/2026 External Reviewers - United States Postal Service (USPS) Standard REVIEW COMPLETED CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required.
02/13/2026 MITZ District Standard REVIEW COMPLETED
02/09/2026 OK to Submit - Engineering Fast REVIEW COMPLETED
02/10/2026 OK to Submit - Zoning Fast REVIEW COMPLETED
02/13/2026 ROW Review REVIEW COMPLETED