Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1
Permit Number - TD-DEV-0225-00052
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/28/2025 | NPPO Standard | APPROVED | COMMENTS FOR SALVAGE AND PRESERVATION AND PROTECTED FENCING WILL BE TIED TO THE SITE LANDSCAPE PLAN APPROVAL. Thank you. Chad Keller, RLA chad.keller@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 04/07/2025 | CDRC Post Review Express | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 04/03/2025 | Site Engineering Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | 1. See that zoning and landscaping comments are addressed. Stephen Blood (520) 837-4958 Stephen.blood@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 03/28/2025 | Site Landscape Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | CDRC TRANSMITTAL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT REVIEWER: CHAD KELLER, RLA SITE LANDSCAPE/NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION SECTION PROJECT: NEW LANDSCAPE FOR EXISTING SAN MIGUEL CAMPUS ACTIVITY NO: TD-DEV-0225-00052 ADDRESS: 212 W MEDINA RD ZONING: R-1 RESIDENCE ZONE This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants, and water harvesting. Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all of the Site Landscape/NPPO Section review comments have been addressed. SITE LANDSCAPE/NPPO SECTION COMMENTS: 1. Some sheet and detail references are not coordinated within the plan set. Example: (refer to dtl. - ??). Update this information for the next submittal. 2. The color hatch does make the plan easy to read digitally. If the plans are printed black and white, the hatch that represents the ¾” desert brown screened rock may be hard to read. 3. A few irrigation sleeves are missing on the irrigation plan. 4. The relationship between the proposed trees and the underground infiltrator system chambers is shown on the cover sheet at a small scale. If the position of the tree is important over the top of the chambers, then can the tree placement be shown on the water harvesting plan in (light gray) for simple reference during construction? 5. The water harvesting plan appears to be capturing well over the 50% needed for the plant material. Can the calculation that shows that the 50% plant water needs are met be added to the water harvesting summary? 6. There are a few existing trees to remain in place that are very close to concrete additions, concrete scheduled for removal and other construction activity areas. As a precaution can preservation fencing line work be added to the landscape salvage plan and include a detail and notes that explain the fences placement at the dripline of the tree that is being preserved in place. 7. Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-0225-00052, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2-06.4.3 8. Prior to Site Landscape Development Package approval, please make sure Site Zoning and Site Engineering comments are fully addressed. Thank you. Chad Keller, RLA Landscape Architect chad.keller@tucsonaz.gov 520.837.4923 |
||
| 03/27/2025 | Site Zoning Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: San Miguel High School Courtyard Development Package (1st Review) TD-DEV-0225-00052 TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 27, 2025 DUE DATE: March 28, 2025 COMMENTS: Resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is March 05, 2026. 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS 1. COMMENT: 2-06.3.12 – Provide an index of sheets in the development package shall be provided on the first sheet. 2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.2.D – The page number and total number of pages is not correct. Sheet 1 starts as sheet 2 and the total number of pages shows 23 but only 17 sheet were submitted. 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-1222-00, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – Provide a general note identifying the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses. 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6.a - As this site is located within the Tucson International Airport AEZ provide a general note on the cover sheet stating “THIS PROJECT IS DESIGNED TO MEET THE OVERLAY ZONE(S) CRITERIA, UDC ARTICLE 5.6 AIRPORT ENVIRONS ZONE (AEZ)”. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Clarify if you are proposing new short- or long-term bicycle parking or if it is just relocated. If you are proposing new provide a short- & long-term bicycle parking calculation that provides the number of required and provided short- & long-term bicycle parking spaces. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Zone1.desk@tucsonaz.gov. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: A revised development package as well as a comment response letter. To resubmit, visit the Tucson Development Center Online at https://tdc-online.tucsonaz.gov/#/home. The instructions for resubmittal can be found at https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/tdc-faq/new-pdfs/revisions-and-resubmittals.pdf. |
||
| 02/20/2025 | CDRC Application Completeness Express | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 03/07/2025 | CDRC Review Coordinator Express | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC added TAA, ADOT, and TEP PAG, USPS, SWG to the workflow. Review request email sent to TAA, ADOT, and TEP. FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. | ||
| 03/27/2025 | Commercial Plumbing Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 04/07/2025 | External Reviewers - Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | Good Morning, Thank you for your patience. ADOT has no comments on this DEV. |
||
| 03/07/2025 | External Reviewers - Pima Association of Governments Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required. | ||
| 03/07/2025 | External Reviewers - Southwest Gas Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required. | ||
| 03/19/2025 | External Reviewers - Tucson Airport Authority Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | March 19, 2025 Planning and Development Services City of Tucson 201 North Stone Avenue Tucson, AZ. 85701 RE: TD-DEV-0225-00052, 1 st Submittal, New landscape for existing San Miguel campus (site electrical by separate permit), 6601 S San Fernando Rd, Tucson, AZ. 85756, Received March 7, 2025 To whom this may concern, Thank you for the opportunity to comment on TD-DEV-0225-00052, 1 st Submittal, a development plan for new landscaping at 6601 South San Fernando Road. This development is located in the N.E. quarter of the N.W. quarter of Section 13, Township 15S, Range 13E, of the Gila and Salt River Meridian. The development site occupies parcel number 138-19-045B, covers approximately 8.54 ± acres, and is zoned as Residential 1 Zone (R-1). The nearest major roadway intersection is West Medina Road and South Fernando Road, approximately 50 feet to the northwest of the subject development. This site does lie within the Tucson International Airport avigation easement requirements and public disclosure area, FAA traffic pattern airspace, and FAA Part 77 airspace. The Tucson Airport Authority approves the 1st submittal and is not requiring a resubmittal of this project. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or concerns regarding this comment letter. I can be reached by email at srobidoux@flytucson.com or by telephone at 520- 573-4811. Respectfully, Scott Robidoux, C.M. Manager of Planning |
||
| 03/24/2025 | External Reviewers - Tucson Electric Power (TEP) Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | March 24, 2025 WO#T144688 City of Tucson Planning and Development Services Attn: CDRC Admin Team Dear CDRC Admin Team Subject: San Miguel Highschool Courtyard TD-DEV-0225-00052 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted 3/7/2025. There are existing facilities within the development which are depicted upon the plan; specifically, there is a TEP transformer within the site boundaries which does not appear to be in conflict with the new development. The TEP transformer shall be protected in place. Any grade changes at or in proximity to the transformer may require transformer relocation. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. To apply for electric service, please call the New Construction department at (520) 918- 8300. Please submit a final set of plans including approved site, electric load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans. If available, include a PDF version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Should you have any easement questions, please contact our Land Resources Department, LandReviews@tep.com. Should you have any technical questions, please contact the area designer, Cruz Vega (520) 349-9850 cruzvega@tep.com Sincerely, Design Admins Design Admins Tucson Electric Power |
||
| 03/07/2025 | External Reviewers - United States Postal Service (USPS) Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required. | ||
| 03/07/2025 | Fire New Construction Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | Canopy submittal required Flame Spread certifications per the 2018 IFC. | ||
| 03/06/2025 | OK to Submit - Engineering Fast | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 03/04/2025 | OK to Submit - Zoning Fast | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 03/12/2025 | ROW Engineering Review Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED |