Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE REVIEW v.1
Permit Number - TD-DEV-0223-00147
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE REVIEW v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/12/2023 | Commercial Plumbing | APPROVED | |||
| 03/03/2023 | NPPO | APPROVED | |||
| 04/14/2023 | CDRC Post Review Express | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 03/15/2023 | External Reviewers - Pima Association of Governments | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | Sent FYI emails per SOP | ||
| 03/15/2023 | External Reviewers - Southwest Gas | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | Sent FYI emails per SOP | ||
| 03/15/2023 | External Reviewers - Tucson Electric Power (TEP) | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | Sent FYI emails per SOP | ||
| 03/15/2023 | External Reviewers - United States Postal Service (USPS) | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | Sent FYI emails per SOP | ||
| 04/03/2023 | Site Engineering | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | 1. Grading plan shows Qout100 of northern basin as 39 CFS, but drainage report shows 32 CFS. please clarify 2. Clarify if a lot split is being proposed. If so, the subject parcel already exceeds its maximum number of spits that deviate from the established subdivision plat. A minor subdivision/plat will be required in this case. 3. Please note: For first flush retention calculation purposes, gravel is considered 50% impervious. You are definitely meeting first flush as you are considering it 100% impervious, just for future reference. Scott Haseman scott.haseman@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 04/05/2023 | Site Landscape | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | ACTIVITY NO. TD-DEV-0223-00147 ADDRESS/PARCEL: 3101 S COUNTRY CLUB RD/ 132-05-015R ZONING: I-2 This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants and water harvesting. COMMENTS: 1. Ensure all Zoning and Engineering comments are addressed prior to the Landscape/NPPO comments. 2. Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-0323-00147, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2-06.4.3 3. Please label all existing and future rights of way for S Country Club Rd on all sheets. 7.6.4.C.2.a. 4. Show all site visibility triangles on plan set sheets. 5. Include a construction detail showing planting for water harvesting basins. See example: https://beta.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/government/departments/department-of-transportation-and-mobility/documents/407_plan_section_of_swale_basin_1_of_2.pdf Or similar. 6. Include a construction detail showing planting with root barriers for areas near concrete or sidewalks. See example: https://beta.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/government/departments/department-of-transportation-and-mobility/documents/402_tree_planting_near_pavement_in_plaza_conditions.pdf 7. Please label the separate irrigation meter ‘irrigation only’. TSM 4-01.6.1.A.1. 8. The Grading Plan and Commercial Rainwater Harvesting plan must match. Identify curb inlets on WHIA 2 to landscape areas on grading and water harvesting plans. If you have any questions about these comments, I can be reached at Matthew.Carlton@tucsonaz.gov or 520-837-4988 |
||
| 03/27/2023 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: Fedex Relay Yard Development Package (1st Review) TD-DEV-0223-00147 TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 27, 2023 DUE DATE: April 06, 2023 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is March 06, 2024. 2-06.2.0 APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS 1. COMMENT: 2-06.2.4 – The development package is designed to allow for concurrent review of any site related reviews. Remove sheets 15-21 as they will not be reviewed for building code compliance and will require a separate building permit. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-0223-00147, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – As vehicle storage is not a use defined in the UDC clarify what the proposed use is. Based on a “FEDEX RELAY YARD” this appears to be either commercial storage or transportation service, land carrier, use. If the use is commercial storage Use Specific Standards 4.9.10.A and 4.9.13.Q apply. See Zoning determination T13SA00272 to determine how the requirement of Use Specific Standard 4.9.10.A.2 apply. If the use is transportation service, land carrier Use Specific Standard 4.9.13.Q apply. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.E - It appears that some type of land split, lease agreement, etc. is proposed. As the original parcel was created via a plat and the proposed land split, lease agreement exceeds the number of allowed splits for a property whose boundaries are fixed by a recorded plat which is divided into two or more parts, see UDC Article 11.4.20 definition of a Subdivision, C. A minor/block plat meeting AM 2-07 is required to be submitted and approved. 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – As it appears that access to this site is proposed across the parcel to the south some type of easement/agreement will need to be recorded. Provide a copy of the recorded easement/agreement with the next submittal. Once comment 3 is addressed additional comments may be forth coming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Nicholas Martell at Nicholas.Martell@tucsonaz.gov. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
||
| 02/28/2023 | CDRC Application Completeness Express | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 03/15/2023 | CDRC Review Coordinator Express | REVIEW COMPLETED | Added external reviewers, sent emails and sent FYI emails per SOP. | ||
| 03/22/2023 | External Reviewers - COT Parks & Recreation | REVIEW COMPLETED | Hello CDRC team, On behalf of the City of Tucson Parks and Recreation Department, I have no comments on the above development plan. Tom Fisher Project Manager City of Tucson Parks and Recreation Department 900 S. Randolph Way Tucson, Arizona 85716 (520) 837-8037 |
||
| 03/29/2023 | Fire New Construction | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 03/07/2023 | OK to Submit - Engineering Fast | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 03/03/2023 | OK to Submit - Landscape Fast | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 03/07/2023 | OK to Submit - Zoning Fast | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 04/14/2023 | ROW Engineering Review | REVIEW COMPLETED | No Comments David Stiffey David.Stiffey@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 04/14/2023 | Traffic Engineering Review | REVIEW COMPLETED | No Comments David Stiffey David.Stiffey@tucsonaz.gov |