Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE REVIEW v.2
Permit Number - TD-DEV-0223-00144
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE REVIEW v.2
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/19/2023 | Commercial Plumbing | APPROVED | |||
| 04/19/2023 | CDRC Post Review | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 04/05/2023 | NPPO | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | See comments on Landscape | ||
| 04/19/2023 | ROW Engineering Review | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | TD-DEV-0223-00144 (5951 S 12TH AV TUCSON, AZ 85706) Please provide a narrative describing how each comment was addressed in the revised plan. Comments: 1. Any existing driveway aprons, curb, or sidewalks that are not compliant with current standards will be modified or replaced to meet current standards. 2. Where adjoining sidewalk from the property ties to sidewalk along the ROW frontage, a 60” X 60” ADA landing is required. Landings shall be 60” X 60” and not to exceed a 2% cross slope in all directions. 3. Protect in place existing streetlights, power poles, and guy wires. 4. Protect in place or relocate accordingly, existing regulatory or warning signs. 5. New 5’ wide concrete sidewalk, per P.A.G. standard 200, is required along the entire property frontage of W Calle Alvord. 6. 3’ minimum buffer between curb and sidewalk, unless ROW is limited. 7. Contact City of Tucson Landscape Architect David Marhefka regarding native trees in the right of way along W Calle Alvord. David.Marhefka@tucsonaz.gov 8. The existing ramp on the northwest corner of S 12th Ave. and W Calle Alvord will be replaced with a P.A.G. 207 type 1 ramp. 9. At least one sidewalk is required to connect the onsite circulation path to sidewalk on both S 12th Ave and W Calle Alvord. 10. Provide site visibility triangles at entrances along S 12th Ave on the site plan. Faffs Riederer Faffs.Riederer@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 04/11/2023 | Site Engineering | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | (Please note, I am reviewing the drainage report for all phases as that is how the drainage report is laid out, but other site comments should be provided on the phase 1 plan. All phase 1 compliancy requirements outlined below must be provided during construction of phase 1.) 1. Show how roof drainage up to the 10-yr storm will be directed away from/under adjacent sidewalks through the use of gutters/scuppers 2. Drainage Report: Label Basin top elevation and side slope, ensure 6" freeboard from 100-yr WSEL (12" with embankment). Ensure slope stabilization compliance with retention/detention manual 3. Drainage Report: Water Harvesting Basin labelled as "1-ft deep," ensure 9" maximum of retention depth is provided, unless a perc test showing adequate infiltration at higher depths is provided 4. Drainage Report: Show attenuation of 2-yr developed discharge due to the water harvesting basin. This should mostly attenuate the pre vs post difference in 2-yr discharge along 12th, any leftover we will waive. (Note: the PC-LID software can show detention attenuation through water harvesting without the need for basin routing/design information) 5. Drainage Report: Each phase must have its water harvesting and retention/detention broken down and accounted for per each phase. The entire site can be calculated as done currently, but the improvements must then be built in the first phase to attenuate its requirements. We will waive this requirement for Phase 1 as very little development is occurring 6. A SWPPP and ADEQ dust permit will be required for all phasing. See ADEQ website for details https://azdeq.gov/AZPDES/SWPPP 7. Dumpster enclosure not to COT standard, ensure all design standards found in TSM 8-01 are followed. See figure 3 in that section 8. Clearly delineate proposed parking lot and parking spaces as planned for phase 1. Show proper waste vehicle maneuverability and access to and from waste enclosure (TSM 7-01). Ensure parking lot meets PAAL dimensions and requirements of UDC 7.4.6, 9. Show a pedestrian circulation path to both Calle Alvord and S 12th Ave, and to the planned waste enclosure, from all buildings (TSM 7-01) 10. Show vertically separated sidewalk between existing structure and any adjacent PAALs or parking spaces (TSM 7-01) 11. Include a note that any sidewalks should have 2% max cross slope, 5% max running slope, and that any ramps should have 8.3% max slope 12. From recent clarification from Environmental Services, per TSM section 8, although recycling service isn’t required the site needs to provide at minimum the enclosure space for both solid waste and recycling. So a single enclosure won’t be sufficient and a double enclosure or an additional single enclosure will be needed to meet this requirement. It is also important to point out per TSM section 8-01.4.I - required parking may be reduced for existing development when solid waste and recycle enclosures are provided. Scott Haseman scott.haseman@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 04/05/2023 | Site Landscape | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department, Plans Coordination FROM: Anne Warner, RLA PDSD Landscape/Native Plant Preservation Section PROJECT: PRCA – South Campus Phase I ACTIVITY NO: TD-DEV-0223-00144 Address: 5951 S 12TH AV Proposed Use: Phased development of a school TRANSMITTAL DATE: April 5, 2023 DUE DATE: 11 days from the above date COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Landscape Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants and water harvesting. General Note - UDC 2-10.4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data - All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. 1. The Unified Development Code (UDC) requires all new development or an expansion of an existing development submit a landscape plan, UDC 7.6.2. Preparation of the landscape plan shall adhere to UDC 7.6.4. and Administrative Manual 2-10, which states any change in design or land use requires a new review and approval process for the landscape plan. Please provide a landscape plan for this phase of development. 2. A Commercial Rainwater Harvesting plan is required for future phases. UDC Technical Standards Manual – Section 4-01.0.0. and Section 5-01.0.0 Landscaping and Screening. Demonstrate how water harvesting is being maximized. 3. Please provide all landscape calculations on the landscape plan, including required trees for the parking areas, Admin. Manual 2-10-4.2.A.2.c and landscape borders, UDC Technical Standards 2-10.4.2.f & g. 4. Please label the existing and future rights of way for all public streets, UDC 7.6.4.C.2.a. 5. Consider using an organic groundcover such as mulch instead of d.g. 6. Placing trees along the edge of a parking area or at the ends of parking row does not meet the intent of the UDC. All spaces within 40’ of a tree is only one of the requirements, and it is required to meet all. The intent is to provide as much 7. An irrigation plan and specifications are required per UDC Administration Manual 2-10.4.2.C and Technical Standards Manual Section 4-01.4.2, Irrigation Standards. 8. Please label the separate irrigation meter “irrigation only”. UDC Technical Standards 4-01.6.1.A.1. 9. Identify the type of irrigation controller with soil moisture gauge, tensiometer, weather station and/or evaportranspiration data. UDC Tech Standards 4-01.4.A. 10. Provide a maintenance schedule for the landscape and irrigation for this project. UDC 7.6.8, Admin Manual 2-10-4.2.A.4. and Technical Standards 5-01.9., please be specific. 11. Tree viability has nothing to do with salvageability. Only ½ of trees are labeled viable, therefore a site visit will be conducted prior to approval. 12. Demonstrate how PIP plants will be successfully preserved throughout the phased project, otherwise they may not be counted as PIP. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package YOUR NEXT STEPS: Submit documents to the Tucson Development Center https://tdc-online.tucsonaz.gov/#/home 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to the reviewer's “Requires Changes” comments) 2) Plan Set (or individual sheets) 3) Naming Conventions 2nd resubmittal & subsequent reviews (3,4, etc.) should be labeled as: 2_Plan Set 2_Comment Response Narrative 2_Structural Calcs 3) Any other items requested by review staff If you have any questions, please contact me at anne.warner@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 04/18/2023 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: Pusch Ridge Christian Academy – South Campus (Phase 1) Development Package (1st Review) TD-DIV-0223-00144 TRANSMITTAL DATE: April 18, 2023 DUE DATE: April 15, 2023 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is March 26, 2024. 2-06.2.0 APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS 1. COMMENT: 2-06.2.2 – It appears that this site may qualify for the exemption from zoning regulations per ARS 15-189.01. If so, provide an approval letter from the PDSD Zoning Administrator stating that this site qualifies. Contact Elisa Hamblin, Zoning Administrator for requirements at, Elisa.Hamblin@tucsonaz.gov for requirements. Until the letter is provide the following comments apply. 2. COMMENT: 2-06.2.4 – The development package is designed to allow for concurrent review of any site related reviews. That said, sheets E1 & E2 will not be reviewed for electrical code requirements and will require a separate permit. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.1 – Provide a phone number and email address for the Owner Developer listed on sheet 1. 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.2.D – Provide the page number and the total number of pages in the package (i.e., sheet xx of xx). 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, TD-DIV-0223-00144, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4.C – The southeast section corner “8” shown on the location map is not correct and should be 18. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – Provide a general note that identifies the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses. The proposed use should be listed as Elementary & Secondary subject to Use Specific Standards 4.9.3.D.1-7. Cleary demonstrate on the plan that the requirements of all Use Specific Standards 4.9.3.D.1-7 are met. 8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6.a – As 12th Ave. is designated as an Arterial on the COT MS&R Map and the site is located within the TIA Environs zone provide a general note on the cover sheet stating “THIS PROJECT IS DESIGNED TO MEET THE OVERLAY ZONE(S) CRITERIA, UDC ARTICLE 5.4 MAJOR STREETS AND ROUTES SETBACK ZONE (MS&R) & UDC ARTICLE 5.6 AIRPORT ENVIRONS ZONE (AEZ)”. 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.b – Provide a lot coverage calculation that meets the UDC Article 6.4.3, reference UDC Table 6.3-2.B. 10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.b – Provide a building area expansion calculation on the plan. 2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided. 11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.C – For both 12th Ave. & W Calle Alvoid as applicable provide right-of-way width, dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 12. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.G – On the plan you state “PHASE 1” but there are no phases shown on the plan. Typically, a phased plan with show construction for each phase and include applicable phasing calculations, clarify what you are proposing. 13. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – As it appears that the building expansion will exceed 25%, UDC Article 7.4.3.E.2, clearly show that the requirements of this section are met on the plan. 14. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - As it appears that the building expansion will exceed 25%, UDC Article 7.4.3.E.2, clearly show that the requirements of this section are met on the plan. 15. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - As it appears that the building expansion will exceed 25%, UDC Article 7.4.3.E.2, clearly show that the requirements of this section are met on the plan. 16. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R - As it appears that the building expansion will exceed 25%, UDC Article 7.4.3.E.2, clearly show that the requirements of this section are met on the plan. 17. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.W - Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Also provide a general not stating that all signs require separate permits. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Nicholas Martell at Nicholas.Martell@tucsonaz.gov. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
||
| 03/30/2023 | CDRC Review Coordinator | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 04/18/2023 | External Reviewers - Pima County Addressing | REVIEW COMPLETED | Good afternoon, This project does not require review by Pima County Addressing. The project will require building numbers. Warm Regards, Nicholas Jordan Site Review Project Manager - Addressing Official Pima County Development Services Department 201 N Stone AV – 1st Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 724-9623 |
||
| 04/12/2023 | Fire New Construction | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 03/22/2023 | OK to Submit - Engineering | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 03/27/2023 | OK to Submit - Zoning | REVIEW COMPLETED |