Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: SITE FROM MODEL TEMPLATE - INFILL BUILDERS v.1
Permit Number - TC-MDP-0425-00254
Review Name: SITE FROM MODEL TEMPLATE - INFILL BUILDERS v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/06/2025 | Fire New Construction | NOT REQUIRED | |||
| 06/13/2025 | Bldg Permits - Post Review Express | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 05/28/2025 | Addressing Validation | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | The model permit shows to be for a duplex, the location and site plan do not have units attached to the address. Please contact Pima County Addressing at addressing@pima.gov or 520-724-9512 to verify and add the units. Once addressing has been resolved a resubmittal all permit documents listing units 1 & 2 along with an address change request to add the units to this permit. For questions: Building_Official@tucsonaz.gov | ||
| 06/11/2025 | Residential Building | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | ACTIVITY NO. TC-MDP-0425-00254 ADDRESS/PARCEL: (1008 E 27TH ST TUCSON, AZ 85713) Submit your revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Building Review Section comments were addressed. The submitted documents were incomplete and a thorough plan review could not be performed. Please be aware, new comments may arise with the next review. Review will not proceed without the response letter. COMMENTS: 1. Please show the FFE, finished floor elevation, and the RIM elevation of the nearest upstream manhole on the site plan. a. Will be used to confirm whether a backwater valve is required |
||
| 06/05/2025 | ROW Engineering Review | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Site plan: Show existing and proposed Right-of-Way features. Provide distances and dimensions for the following: 1. Driveway (PAG SD 206) Max. width for residential driveway is 20’ 2.Sidewalk (PAG SD 200) 5’ for Local roadways. Sidewalk Damage and non compliant section bordering property to be repair or brought to standard. Unused existing curb cuts shall be closed. For collector/arterial roadways, show onsite vehicle maneuverability |
||
| 06/13/2025 | Site Engineering | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | TC-MDP-0425-00254 1008 E 27th ST Comments: - Show Physical separation in the form of a fence, wall, curbing, etc. which prevents the parking area of this site and the parcel to the west from being shared marco.contreras@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 06/13/2025 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: TC-MDP-0425-00254 1008 E 27TH ST. – C-2 Duplex (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 13, 2025 Provide a detailed response letter with your next submittal that clearly shows how you have addressed all Zoning comments. This site is located in the C-2 zone (UDC 4.7.21). A duplex is a permitted use in this zone (Table 4.8-4). 1. Zoning acknowledges that a Pima County Assessor’s Consolidation Request Form has been submitted but this form has not been approved by the Assessor’s Office on received. Until an approved Consolidation Request Form is submitted or a letter from the Assessor’s Office stating the combination is in process Zoning cannot approve this permit. 2. This site and the one immediately to the west appear to function as one unified site where access and/or parking could potentially be shared between the two lots. If so, this would classify the two lots as a single commercial multifamily development and require it to meet the full development standards indicated in UDC Article 7. If these two sites are meant to function independently of each other, show on the plans how each site will have its own parking and access without the possibility of cross-access. This can be accomplished through a perimeter wall or barrier between the two lots. The Unified Development Code (UDC) can be found at: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/Departments/Planning-Development-Services/Codes/Zoning-Code. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Zone1.desk@tucsonaz.gov. |
||
| 05/28/2025 | PDSD Application Completeness Express | REVIEW COMPLETED |