Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: COMMERCIAL REVIEW - FULL v.1
Permit Number - TC-COM-1222-00270
Review Name: COMMERCIAL REVIEW - FULL v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/19/2023 | Bldg Permits - Post Review Express | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 01/19/2023 | External Reviewers - SAFEBuilt | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Activity Number: TC-COM-1122-00108 BLDG A TC-COM-1222-00268 BLDG C TC-COM-1222-00269 BLDG D, TC-COM-1222-00270 BLDG B GENERAL: Provide written responses to all review comments. Provide a complete plan set. Provide additional documents as requested by review staff. STRUCTURAL REVIEW COMMENTS: CONDITIONALLY APPROVED NOTE: Every effort has been made to identify the code violations. Any oversight by the review team shall not be considered an authority to violate, set aside, cancel or alter applicable codes or ordinances. The plan review and permit issuance shall not be considered a warranty or guarantee. The Structural Engineer is responsible for following ALL applicable Federal, State and local Municipal Codes and Ordinances. BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS: DENIED 1. General: This is a change of occupancy. It is recommended to use the IEBC for this project. One is free to use either the IBC and IEBC but not both, unless specifically referenced by the IEBC. If the IEBC is the desired approach, one must choose 1 of 4 compliance paths. These compliance paths cannot be used in combination with each other in accordance Section 301.3 of the IEBC. It is important to note that the Chapter 3 requirements apply to all compliance methods. i. Prescriptive compliance method: Chapter 5: The prescriptive approach is the simplest method to follow in terms of code requirements but is also the most conservative approach. ii. Work area compliance method: Chapters 6-12: The work area compliance method provides the greatest number of benefits to the building owner and design professional. This is the easiest route to take. It is much more conservative. iii. Performance compliance method: Chapter 13: This method focuses on what the building is required to do, rather than prescribing how it is to be constructed. This method requires the design profession to work more closely with the owner of the building, as well as the code official, to ensure that design meets specific requirements for the occupants and not simply the prescriptive requirements. iv. Previously adopted code: Section 301.3 Exception 1. This method utilizes a previously adopted code under which the area in question was most recently built or modified; this requires the code official’s approval. Please clearly indicate which compliance method will be chosen and provide a narrative outlining the applicable code requirements. 1. Sheet C0.01: The occupant load calculation is incorrect. Provide a corrected occupant load calculation in accordance with Table 1004.5. 2. Sheet AS1.01: The individual buildings are buildings on the same lot and appear to require exterior wall ratings. Provide properly rated exterior walls in accordance with Section 705.3 and Table 602. MECHANICAL REVIEW COMMENTS: CONDITIONALLY APPROVED Approved/subject to field approval ELECTRICAL REVIEW COMMENTS APPROVED PLUMBING REVIEW COMMENTS: DENIED 1). Stiebel Eltron water heater model number 224198 on plan page P3.00 doesn't correlate with that manufacturer's water heater model numbers? -IPC 303 2). Add note to plan page P3.00 fixture schedule that the selected fixtures will comply with -IPC section 303 3). Add note to plan page P3.00 fixture schedule that the selected Shower/tub valve will comply with-IPC 412.3 4). Provide Civil site plan for continuation of water & sewer as stated on plan pages - P1.00, P1.01 -IPC 106.3.1 If you require additional clarification regarding these comments, please contact Doris Benoit at doris.benoit@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 01/03/2023 | Site Engineering | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | 1. See zoning comment for need of a development package. Stephen Blood (520) 837-4958 Stephen.blood@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 12/28/2022 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | ZONING REVIEW TRANSMITTAL FROM: Wyatt Berger Planner PROJECT: TC-COM-1222-00270 5639 E 5th St – R-3 Multifamily development (2nd Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: December 28, 2022 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. 1. As you are proposing a change of use from an outpatient Medical Service use to a Multifamily Development use, a development package is required. The development package shall be submitted, reviewed, and approved prior to approval of this permit. The development package is a separate submittal and shall be submitted through the Tucson Development Center Online. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Wyatt.Berger@tucsonaz.gov or at 520-837-4951. |
||
| 01/05/2023 | Fire New Construction | REVIEW COMPLETED | Fire sprinkler underground plans shall be submitted to and a permit obtained from TFD Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to and a permit obtained from TFD Fire alarm plans shall be submitted to and a permit obtained from TFD Fire alarm panel shall be powered from "Owner" electrical panel and not a tenant panel. Fire alarm can be located outside in a listed NEMA enclosure with heating and cooling. |
||
| 12/09/2022 | PDSD Application Completeness Express | REVIEW COMPLETED |