Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: BUILDING DEFERRED SUBMITTAL REVIEW v.1
Permit Number - TC-COM-1023-02486
Review Name: BUILDING DEFERRED SUBMITTAL REVIEW v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/24/2025 | Bldg Permits - Post Review Express | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 03/24/2025 | External Reviewers - Stantec Express | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | March 24, 2025 1st Review Light+Path Architects, LLC. Attn: Brian G. Hagedon 475 S. Gollob Road Tucson, Arizona 85710 Re: TEEN CHALLENGE – STUDENT SERVICES FOUNDATION AND SUPER STRUCTURE (DEFERRED SUBMITTAL: STAIRS) City of Tucson Permit Number: TC-COM-1023-02486 Stantec Project Number: 185215066 Stantec File Number: TUC-25-037 Plan review for the above referenced project has been completed. This letter reflects comments to be addressed. PLEASE send all response to comments back to the City through the permit portal! Responses sent directly to Stantec will be ignored. Also, please submit complete copies of all permit documents (i.e. plans, calculations, reports, etc.) even if they have not been changed. Please cloud and delta all changes and provide a letter with a written response to each of the comments indicating the action taken. The scope of this review covers the architectural and structural designs as they relate to the codes adopted by the jurisdiction. All features were checked only to the extent allowed by the submittals provided. All portions of this project are assumed to meet or will meet other departmental requirements, conditions, and concerns before permit approval. Occupancy Group Construction Type Area (Square feet) Occupant Load Automatic Fire Sprinklers Fire Alarms B V-B 29,312 278 Yes Yes R-2 Separate Permits: Automatic fire sprinklers and fire alarm. Deferred Submittals: Wood ‘I’ Joists and steel stairs. Special Inspections: Earthwork, concrete, epoxy and expansion anchors, structural steel, high-strength bolts, field welding and cold-formed steel deck. ARCHITECTURAL COMMENTS Sheet GR111 1. Guardrail GR111 does not appear to meet the minimum required height of 42”. The plan indicates a height of 3’ 3” from the base of the guard post to the center of the top rail. The guard is attached to the stringer which indicates a 2” clearance height above the finished floor which only makes the guard 41”. Please revise. [Ref. IBC 2018 Sec. 1015.3] Sheet GR110 1. Guardrail GR110 does not appear to meet the minimum required height of 42”. The plan indicates a height of 3’ 3” from the base of the guard post to the center of the top rail. The guard is attached to the stringer which indicates a 2” clearance height above the finished floor which only makes the guard 41”. Please revise. [Ref. IBC 2018 Sec. 1015.3] STRUCTURAL COMMENTS There are no comments. MECHANICAL COMMENTS There are no comments. PLUMBING COMMENTS There are no comments. ELECTRICAL COMMENTS There are no comments. Should you have any questions regarding the plan review comments, please contact the plan reviewer listed for the appropriate discipline. Plans reviewed by: Trevor Bies, Senior Plan Reviewer 602-338-9922 trevor.bies@stantec.com |
||
| 03/19/2025 | PDSD Application Completeness Express | REVIEW COMPLETED |