Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: RESTAMP - COMMERCIAL v.3
Permit Number - TC-COM-0923-02246
Review Name: RESTAMP - COMMERCIAL v.3
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/14/2024 | Site Engineering | APPROVED | ADDRESS CHANGE | ||
| 03/14/2024 | Site Zoning | APPROVED | ADDRESS CHANGE | ||
| 03/19/2024 | Water - PDSD | APPROVED | ADDRESS CHANGE | ||
| 03/19/2024 | Bldg Permits - Post Review | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | ADDRESS CHANGE | ||
| 03/19/2024 | External Reviewers - SAFEBuilt | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Structural(S) Reviewer Andrew Bevis abevis@safebuilt.com Approved Reason: Date Completed : 9/28/2023 3:28:33 PM Building(B) Reviewer Andrew Bevis abevis@safebuilt.com Approved Reason: Date Completed : 9/28/2023 3:27:38 PM Mechanical(M) Reviewer Jorge Valido jvalido@safebuilt.com Approved Reason: Date Completed : 9/28/2023 2:00:47 PM Electrical(E) Reviewer Ron Ross rross@safebuilt.com Approved with Comments Reason: Date Completed : 10/5/2023 1:11:53 PM Electrical Review By: Ron Ross PE 1 E0.0 GENERAL NOTES: Sheet index missing sheet E4.1 Equipment Schedule. 3 E1.0 SITE PLAN: Missing Keynote 10. 7 E3.0 SINGLE LINE: Could not locate Keynote 2. 9 E4.1 EQUIPMENT SCHEDULE: Keynote 2 is in error for F2 as it needs a 3 pole disconnect per Volts and Wire Callout. 10 E5.0 SITE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN: Tucson City has a maximum lumens per Acre and lamp lighting cutoff requirement for exterior lighting vs the provided IECC exterior lighting comcheck which is accepted for this review. However, the web URL to reference the proper calculations and table are in Chapter 4: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/cityservices/planning-development-services/documents/2012_outdoor_lighting_code_.pdf Plumbing(P) Reviewer Perry Hendershott phendershott@safebuilt.com Denied Reason: Date Completed : 3/16/2024 10:33:07 AM Fourth Plumbing Review: Comment #5 remains Resolved-1). Water piping & water piping fittings on plan page P1.3 are not compatible. & doesn't correlate with water piping materials on plan page P1.2 -IPC 605 Resolved-2). Carwash water connection on plan page P1..2 needs RPZ Backflow preventer. -IPC 608 ** the RPZ needs to be located on branch supplying car wash** Resolved-3). Storm drain calculation table on P1.1 is using the incorrect rainfall rate -Tucson Plumbing Code Amendments. Resolved-4). Horizontal portion of 3" roof drain conductors on P1.1 will need 1/4" slope -IPC 1106.2 Unresolved-5)., HOT piping still not shown to washer on plan page P1.2 only cold is show. Illustrate the required hot water piping & its source on plan page P1.2 according to -2018 IPC 607.1 Resolved-6). Plan set missing Pages C4.1, 4.2, 4.3 for continuation of water service & sewer as stated throughout plumbing pages. -IPC 106.3.1 |
||
| 03/14/2024 | Fire New Construction | REVIEW COMPLETED |