Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: COMMERCIAL REVIEW - FULL v.1
Permit Number - TC-COM-0824-01642
Review Name: COMMERCIAL REVIEW - FULL v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/26/2024 | Site Engineering | APPROVED | MASTER SET OF CONSTRUCTION PLANS ARE LOCATED AT TC-COM-0724-01340/BLDG A WITH PERMIT with reviews to be performed for permit TC-COM-0824-01642/BLDG B AND TC-COM-0824-01643/BLDG C | ||
| 09/24/2024 | Water - PDSD | APPROVED | MASTER SET OF CONSTRUCTION PLANS ARE LOCATED AT TC-COM-0724-01340/BLDG A WITH PERMIT with reviews to be performed for permit TC-COM-0824-01642/BLDG B AND TC-COM-0824-01643/BLDG C | ||
| 09/26/2024 | Bldg Permits - Post Review | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | MASTER SET OF CONSTRUCTION PLANS ARE LOCATED AT TC-COM-0724-01340/BLDG A WITH PERMIT with reviews to be performed for permit TC-COM-0824-01642/BLDG B AND TC-COM-0824-01643/BLDG C | ||
| 08/30/2024 | External Reviewers - SAFEBuilt | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | MASTER SET OF CONSTRUCTION PLANS ARE LOCATED AT TC-COM-0724-01340/BLDG A WITH PERMIT with reviews to be performed for permit TC-COM-0824-01642/BLDG B AND TC-COM-0824-01643/BLDG C Structural(S) Reviewer Kimiyoshi Shimabukuro kshimabukuro@safebuilt.com Denied Reason: Date Completed : 8/30/2024 8:50:07 AM 1. Cross reference structural details in site plan. Such as detail 17/S1.1 masonry site and 14/S1.1 stepped footing. 2. Structural calculations references “CBC 2019” for City of Tucson, AZ project. 3. Sheet S3.0 steel stair footing detail shows steel stair tread per architectural but missing. 4. Sheet S1.3 wood stud shear wall schedule note 1 refers to see details 109 and 206 but they are missing. Building(B) Reviewer Kimiyoshi Shimabukuro kshimabukuro@safebuilt.com Denied Reason: Date Completed : 8/30/2024 8:48:28 AM 1. Structural calculation design parameter states wind speed of 101 mph for risk category ll but City of Tucson Amendments to the 2018 International Building Code section 1609.1.1 Determination of wind loads revise as “105 mph” for risk category ll. Calculations should use City of Tucson amendment. Coordinate with wind loads shown in sheet S0.0. 2. Sheet A.1 – Project information doesn’t contain fire sprinkler and fire alarm scope of work. 2018 IBC section 907.2.9 fire alarm systems and smoke alarms shall be installed in Group R-2 occupancies when applicable. 3. Sheet A.1 - Provide building code analysis of allowed and provided building height and area accordance with 2018 IBC section 503, section 504.4 number of stories, and section 506 building area. 4. Sheet A.1 – Show the occupancy classification designation per 2018 IBC section 302. Section 310.3 residential group R-2 includes apartment houses and section 310.4 include all detached one and two family dwellings. Clarify if it’s townhouse or an apartment as both stated in this sheet code information and project information. 5. Missing means of egress code analysis document per Chapter 10. 6. Sheet A.1 – Missing accessibility code compliance and details. City of Tucson adopts ICC A117.1 – 2009 Accessible and usable buildings and facilities. 7. Existing and demolition scope of work and plans are missing. 8. Missing dwelling units and sleeping units information and details per ICC A117.1 – 2009 accessible and usable buildings and facilities chapter 10. 9. Sheet A.1 – Show how total number of required accessible units and parking spaces were determined. For example, 2018 IBC table 1107.6.1.1 if applicable. 10. Sheet A.1 – Show fair housing act assessment. U.S. Department of Justice states “The Act requires all newly constructed multi-family dwellings of four or more units intended for first occupancy after March 13, 1991, to have certain features: an accessible entrance on an accessible route, accessible common and public use areas, doors sufficiently wide to accommodate wheelchairs, accessible routes into and through each dwelling, light switches, electrical outlets, and thermostats in accessible location, reinforcements in bathroom walls to accommodate grab bar installations, and usable kitchens and bathrooms configured so that a wheelchair can maneuver about the space.” Project information states “new 12-unit multi-family residences.” 11. Sheet A.2 – Wall type 3 shows interior party wall between units however without any fire rating. Provide building code analysis of the fire protection system including party wall type. When fire rated assemblies such as party wall are applied, then provide the UL assembly number and specification. 2018 IBC table 706.4 fire wall fire resistance ratings if applicable. Reiterating that the occupancy group classification is not clearly defined. 12. Sheet A.3 – Provide building code analysis of exterior walls fire protection capabilities and conditions per 2018 IBC section 705. Show the fire separation distance between building A and building B and building B and C. Show also the projection distance and compliance with 2018 IBC table 705.2. Opening protection should show compliance with such table as 2018 IBC section 705.8. Show opening percentage calculation required and provided area. Exterior walls assembly requirement is also in 2018 IBC table 716.1(2). Fire Separation Distance and projection distance can be shown in sheet A.5 elevations for clarity. 13. Sheet A.1 – Accessible route of travel from parking spaces are not defined into the units. 14. Sheet A.1 - Show accessible dwelling units and sleeping units scope analysis that how many units are required and provided in the project. 15. In contrary to sheet A.1 describing the project as multi-family residences, 2018 International Residential Code sections are referenced like for smoke and carbon monoxide detections in sheet A.7. 2018 IRC applies to one and two family dwellings and townhouses per section R101.2. 16. Sheet A.9 – section A-02 missing guard rail and handrail protections. 17. Sheet 13 of 18 and 18 of 18 development package shows 3 accessible parking spaces which contradicts with 2 spaces on sheet A.1 and A.3. Missing details of stairs, guardrail and handrail. 18. Sheet A.4 – Show the fire apparatus access roads per 2018 International Fire Code section 503.1.1. 19. Sheet A.4 – Show the locations of fire hydrants per 2018 International Fire Code appendix C fire hydrant locations and distribution. 20. Missing geotechnical investigations accordance with 2018 IBC section 1803 geotechnical investigations. Sheet S0.0 – 2. Foundations & slabs of grade recommending that the project owner retain the design services of a geotechnical engineer in an effort to better understand the soil properties present at this site. Explain. 21. Provide design professional comment response, explanation and identify correction/modifications made in sheets and calculations for each item. Mechanical(M) Reviewer Kimiyoshi Shimabukuro kshimabukuro@safebuilt.com Denied Reason: Date Completed : 8/30/2024 8:49:15 AM 1. Mechanical sheet notes reference City of Phoenix inspector not Tucson. 2. Sheet M.2 pipe penetration detail shows through 1 hour wall/floor/ceiling. Where are they? Cross reference detail in architectural plans. Note 9 appears to indicate the common wall. 3. Mechanical scope at roof plan missing. Electrical(E) Reviewer Kimiyoshi Shimabukuro kshimabukuro@safebuilt.com Denied Reason: Date Completed : 8/30/2024 8:48:51 AM 1. Sheet E.0 submittals 5.2 directs to submit fire alarm shop drawings to the local authority for review. 2. 16 of 18 detail A irrigation controller note 1 describes solar panel per irrigation legend. Solar panel design information is missing. 3. Sheet E7 shows fire penetration detail. Cross reference to identify location. 4. ES.0 site electrical plan locates exterior lightings but missing lumens calculation on plans per section 104.2.1 in 2012 City of Tucson/Pima County Outdoor lighting Code. Demonstrate compliance with the lumen cap per Table 401.1. Plumbing(P) Reviewer Kimiyoshi Shimabukuro kshimabukuro@safebuilt.com Denied Reason: Date Completed : 8/30/2024 8:49:48 AM 1. Plumbing sheets show rated walls and ceilings but not in architectural plans. Submit coordinated design documents. 2. Sheet P.8 Plumbing fixtures note states refer to architectural sheets for ADA accessible locations and requirements, but these are missing. 3. Plumbing scope at roof plan missing. |
||
| 08/29/2024 | Fire New Construction | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | -Determine if you are using the IRC or IBC. It appears you are using the IBC and this will have an occupancy classification of R2 (apartments). Please list the occupancy classification in the code analysis (project information). -R2 apartments per the IBC require fire sprinklers per IFC 903.2.8. Make a note in the project information/code analysis that fire sprinklers will be installed and will be a deferred submittal. The DP shows a fire line which indicates the buildings will have fire sprinklers. -Fire sprinklers for this project will require sprinkler monitoring which requires a fire panel. You do not have a clubhouse so verify where the fire panel will be located. john.vincent@tucsonaz.gov 5203495581 MASTER SET OF CONSTRUCTION PLANS ARE LOCATED AT TC-COM-0724-01340/BLDG A WITH PERMIT with reviews to be performed for permit TC-COM-0824-01642/BLDG B AND TC-COM-0824-01643/BLDG C |
||
| 09/24/2024 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | MASTER SET OF CONSTRUCTION PLANS ARE LOCATED AT TC-COM-0724-01340/BLDG A WITH PERMIT with reviews to be performed for permit TC-COM-0824-01642/BLDG B AND TC-COM-0824-01643/BLDG C ZONING REVIEW TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: TC-COM-0724-01340 Bldg A, TC-COM-0824-01642 Bldg B & TC-COM-0824-01643/Bjdg C - TD-DEV-0324-00073 630 N ALVERNON WY. – R-2 Multifamily (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL: September 24, 2024 This site is located in the R-2 zone (UDC 4.7.9). Multifamily is a permitted use in this zone (Table 4.8-2). See Use-Specific Standards 4.9.7.B.6, .9, & .10. 1. Zoning has reviewed the building plans for compliance with Development Package (DP) TD-DEV-0324-00073, and or the most part the building plans appear to match the DP. But until the comments below are addressed Zoning cannot approve this plan. 2. Perimeter yard setbacks are based on a wall height measurement from design grade to the highest point of the exterior wall UDC Article 6.4.5.B & Figure 6.4.5-A. Provide height dimension from design grade to the highest point of the wall on all elevations so that perimeter yard setback requirements can be determined. 3. The DP sheets provided in the building plan set either need to be the stamped approved plans, marked for reference only, or removed from the building set. If you elect to mark for reference only do not mark the utility plans and if you elect to remove the plans leave the utility plans in the so Plumbing can review. 4. Provide a break down of each unit type and square footage so that impact fee requirements can be determined. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Zone1.desk@tucsonaz.gov. |
||
| 08/27/2024 | PDSD Application Completeness | REVIEW COMPLETED |