Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: COMMERCIAL REVIEW - FULL v.4
Permit Number - TC-COM-0624-01172
Review Name: COMMERCIAL REVIEW - FULL v.4
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/28/2025 | Bldg Permits - Post Review Express | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 04/21/2025 | External Reviewers - Stantec | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | April 21, 2025 3rd Review Ankrom Moisan Architects Attn: Jason Jones 38 NW Davis Street Portland, Oregon 97209 Re: CAPSTONE SPEEDWAY STUDENT HOUSING SUPER, SHELL, CORE & FITOUT City of Tucson Permit Number: TC-COM-0624-01172 Stantec Project Number: 185215066 Stantec File Number: TUC-24-128 Plan review for the above referenced project has been completed. This letter reflects comments to be addressed. PLEASE send all response to comments back to the City through the permit portal! Responses sent directly to Stantec will be ignored. Also, please submit complete copies of all permit documents (i.e. plans, calculations, reports, etc.) even if they have not been changed. Please cloud and delta all changes and provide a letter with a written response to each of the comments indicating the action taken. The scope of this review covers the architectural, structural, plumbing, mechanical, and electrical designs as they relate to the codes adopted by the jurisdiction. All features were checked only to the extent allowed by the submittals provided. All portions of this project are assumed to meet or will meet other departmental requirements, conditions, and concerns before permit approval. Occupancy Group Construction Type Area (Square feet) Occupant Load Automatic Fire Sprinklers Fire Alarms A-3 I-A 7,600 278 Yes Yes B 2,288 16 R-2 44,340 227 S-2 54,885 250 R-2 III-A 165,181 946 Separate Permits: Automatic fire sprinklers, fire alarm, smoke control, swimming pool, site utilities. Deferred Submittals: Pre-engineered wood trusses, exterior cladding and steel stud framing, steel stairs, glass guardrail, roof tie backs and anchorages, post-tension shop drawings, non-bearing interior stud partition walls, elevator shop drawings, storefront shop drawings. Special Inspections: Earthwork, concrete, caissons, post-tension, epoxy and expansion anchors, structural steel, high-strength bolts, field welding, masonry, wood construction, and outdoor lighting. ARCHITECTURAL COMMENTS General 1. Addressed. 1. New Comment: The revised plan includes an updated outdoor lighting calculation that requires special inspection. Please note on the cover of the drawings that special inspection is required for outdoor lighting. Also, provide City of Tucson special inspection certificate(s) with Parts A and B completed. Make sure that the owner or their legal representative signs the form. Sheet CS 1. Addressed. Sheet G0.01 1. Addressed. Sheet G2.01 2. Addressed. 3. Addressed. 4. Addressed. 5. Addressed. 6. Addressed. Sheet G2.21 1. Addressed. Sheet G2.21 1. Addressed. 2. Addressed. Sheets G2.22 thru G2.27 1. Addressed. Sheet G2.28 1. Addressed. Sheet A0.11 1. Addressed. Sheet A0.22 1. Addressed. Sheet A2.01a 1. Addressed. 2. Addressed. Sheet A2.01b 1. Addressed. 2. Addressed. Sheet A2.02 1. Addressed. Sheet A2.02a 1. Addressed. Sheet A2.02c 1. Addressed. 2. Addressed. Sheet A2.03a 1. Addressed. Sheet A2.03c 1. Addressed. Sheet A2.08 1. Addressed. 2. Previous Comment: The response letter for the mechanical comment number 7 indicates that rated shafts were added to the mechanical drawings for the refrigerant piping. The architectural plan-set does not include additional shafts from the first submittal. Please coordinate and clarify. Still Required: The plan was revised to show the locations of the new shafts for the refrigerant piping, but the callouts indicated on these new shaft locations do not correlate with the correct sheets and details in the plan-set. The callouts indicate details on sheets A2.07 and A2.08 which do not contain details in reference to the shafts. It appears these callouts should reference details on sheets A6.32 & A6.33. Please revise. Sheet A11.80 1. Addressed. STRUCTURAL COMMENTS General 1. Addressed. MECHANICAL COMMENTS General 1. Addressed. 2. Addressed. 3. Addressed. 4. Addressed. 5. Addressed. 6. Addressed. 7. Addressed. 8. Addressed. 9. Addressed. 10. Addressed. Sheet M0.02 1. Addressed. Sheet M2.P1 1. Addressed. Sheet M2.01 1. Addressed. Sheet M2.01a 1. Addressed. Sheet M2.02a 1. Addressed. 2. Addressed. Sheet M2.02c 1. Addressed. Sheet M3.01 1. Addressed. Sheet M4.01 1. Addressed. 2. Addressed. 3. Addressed. 4. Addressed. 5. Addressed. 6. Addressed. 7. Addressed. PLUMBING COMMENTS General 1. Addressed. 2. Addressed. 3. Addressed. 4. Addressed. 5. Addressed. 6. Addressed. 7. Addressed. 8. Addressed. 9. Addressed. 10. Addressed. 11. Addressed. Sheet P0.02 1. Addressed. Sheet P2.01 1. Addressed. Sheet P2.01a 1. Addressed. 2. Addressed. Sheet P2.01b 1. Addressed. 2. Addressed. Sheet P2.01c 1. Addressed. Sheet P2.07c 1. Addressed. Sheet P3.11 1. Addressed. Sheet P4.01 1. Addressed. 2. Addressed. 3. Addressed. 4. Addressed. ELECTRICAL COMMENTS General 1. Addressed. General Comments 1. Addressed. Sheets E2 Lighting Sheets 1. Addressed. 2. Addressed. 3. Addressed. 4. Addressed. Sheets E3 Power Sheets 1. Addressed. 2. Addressed. 3. Addressed. 4. Addressed. 5. Addressed. 6. Addressed. Sheets E4 Unit Sheets 1. Addressed. Sheet E5 One-Line 1. Addressed. 2. Addressed. 3. Addressed. Sheets E6 Panel Schedules 1. Addressed. 2. Addressed. 3. Addressed. Sheet E7.1 1. Addressed. 2. Addressed. 3. Addressed. 4. Addressed. 5. Addressed. Should you have any questions regarding the plan review comments, please contact the plan reviewer listed for the appropriate discipline. Architectural reviewed by: Trevor Bies Senior Plan Reviewer 602-338-9922 trevor.bies@stantec.com Mechanical & Plumbing reviewed by: Kristine Molina Plans Examiner 480-687-6077 kristine.molina@stantec.com Structural reviewed by: Kenton Steiner, P.E., S. E. Structural Plans Examiner 480-518-7252 notnek@cox.net Electrical reviewed by: Russ Cox Electrical Plan Reviewer 480-687-6049 russell.cox@stantec.com |
||
| 04/25/2025 | Fire New Construction | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | -See previous comments. Could not locate a response to the fire comments. john.vincent@tucsonaz.gov 5203495581 |
||
| 04/28/2025 | Site Engineering | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | |||
| 04/23/2025 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | The development package sheets provided in the building plan set either need to be the stamped approved development package sheets, marked for reference only, or removed from the building set. If you elect to mark for reference only do not mark the utility plans and if you elect to remove the plans leave the utility plans in the so Plumbing can review. | ||
| 04/23/2025 | Water - PDSD | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | The water demand calculations show a total demand of 380 GPM. The development package drawings call for the installation of a 3” water meter and a 4” reduced pressure backflow preventer. Tucson Water limits a 3” meter to a maximum demand of 350 GPM. Provide a letter from Tucson Water confirming that the use of a 3” water meter will be allowed for this project. [Second comment: Comment not addressed. Provide the total water demand for the building and the size of the proposed water meter.] [Initial comment: Provide the water demand that will be served by the proposed 3” water meter.] | ||
| 04/09/2025 | PDSD Application Completeness Express | REVIEW COMPLETED |